WHICH Bible "version" Is Authorized By God?

Then stop doing the same thing and there is a slight possibility of your abounding confusion clearing up

They contend that the translators of 1611 were perfect in what they did. Arrogance and hypocrisy at its finest.

Cultish behavior.

And you are one of the chosen, right? Very few. So like what? 144,000?

Special revelation. The mirror bears you own likeness and not the Holy Spirit (other than the fact He is invisible)

Except when the KJV misses it. One that comes to mind is translating Passover as 'Easter.'

Have you ever read a modern English version of the bible? Even the KJV has a NKJV version available.

Holy Ghost and Holy Spirit would be the simplest example I could give. Do you know why the KJV uses Holy Ghost instead of Holy Spirit?

For the cause of Christ
Roger

You realize Isaiah wrote that in Hebrew. You are reading a revised version of a translation released in 1611 in English. It's a translation of the words Isaiah wrote.

yea Im not sure about the easter thing
Its obviously passover time, but the NT was in greek and written for to communicate with gentiles living in a pagan world, so they would have celebrated easter at that time... or the ENglish translators just never called it Passover?
I mean even today, christians in english say we celebrate Easter when actually we dont. I see childrens books about the crucifixtion and resurrection and they still call it 'The EASTER story' in the title.

They never title their books 'Jesus came back to life!' or 'He rose again! ' or 'The passover story version 2.0' or anything like that.

The fallacy invalidates your argument. When you point at the error of another person, and do not deal with your own, you are not making a sound argument for your actions, but rather only diverting attention. It's what politicians and celebrities do, and people tolerate it. I won't from you or from any other person on a theological issue.

It's not likely to happen. I have better things to do than run a study to test a KJV-only theory.

Psst… seventy years of captivity, not 400.

Come on ,this is like when Atheists always use the ' slavery ' argument.

We just started a bible study . Not for anything other than to go through the bible. Small group of 5 . It just so happened that we were all reading from different translations . I started with Nkjv, two had the kjv , one niv and another Nasb . I just assumed that the Nkjv was just a 'up dated 'version of the kjv ..The differences are crazy . In context the kjv completely overshadowed the rest .

Apples to oranges, and also a tu quoque fallacy. Deal with the criticism of your argument instead of trying to divert attention elsewhere.

And your conclusion is entirely subjective.

A two year side by side study going through each verse of the new testament? I think not . That was educational.

Id just stick with KJV for english.
I dont want to be carting round 20 different bibles personally.

My Bible reading group worked cos we all read from the same Bible, or we shared one Bible.
When Ive had Bible study groups from everyone with a different version it just took forever. And most of the time was wasted looking up different versions and asking what does yours say?
what does your version say? x10

Surely we can do better than the ' Easter ' fiasco?

King James Bible Translators

Unsaved Adulterers Kurt and Barbara Aland, and Homosexual Union Supporter (Carlo Maria Martini) who created the (Novum Testamentum Graece) That's Supports Modern Translations NIV, NASB, ESV, Etc

They Don't Amount To A Speck Of Sand On The Beach, As Compared To The Confessing "Christian Scholars" On The King James Translation, As Shown In The Link Above

King James Bible Translators

I Dont Use A Translation From The Corrupt (Novum Testamentum Graece)

Created By The Adulterers Kurt and Barbara Aland, and Homosexual Union Supporter (Carlo Maria Martini) known as the (Novum Testamentum Graece) (Alexandrian Text Type) That's Supports Modern Translations NIV, NASB, ESV, Etc

They Don't Amount To A Speck Of Sand On The Beach, As Compared To The Confessing "Christian Scholars" On The King James Translation, As Shown In The Link Above, Who Used The Greek Text, Used And Received By The Historical Church

Your claim is false

A few honorable mentions on the (Evil) changes, I could post hundreds!

Below in Daniel 11:37KJV the Antichrist is identified as being in the lineage of the true Hebrew (God Of His Fathers)

The NIV has (gods of his ancestors) showing a polytheistic lineage

The KJV shows a human man not desiring women, while the NIV has a man being desired by women (A Complete Change In Eschatology in Theology), hiding the true identity of the future Antichrist in the NIV (Fact)

Daniel 11:37KJV
37 Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers, nor the desire of women, nor regard any god: for he shall magnify himself above all.

Daniel 11:37NIV
37 He will show no regard for the gods of his ancestors or for the one desired by women, nor will he regard any god, but will exalt himself above them all.

As seen below, the NIV hides the identity of Satan/Lucifer, and turns him into Jesus Christ, the morning star, (Evil)!

Isaiah 14:12KJV
12 How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!

Isaiah 14:12NIV
12 How you have fallen from heaven,
morning star, son of the dawn!
You have been cast down to the earth,
you who once laid low the nations!

Revelation 22:16KJV
16 I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star.

Revelation 22:16NIV
16 “I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you[a] this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”