No major doctrines changed?
- Thread starter John146
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
What‘s the reconciliation of 2 Samuel 21:19 in the modern versions? And as always, thank you for the kind words.
I have always read the KJV, but I am well read on all the English classics and the amazing English poets so to me other versions sound flat.
I like the exalted language and if someone wants to put in the effort it is still very understandable/readable.
But I also do appreciate the fidelity to the correct pronouns, this is far more important over and above the archaic words found in post #74
Someday I may research all this further, I think it is good to be informed of all sides.
-
1
- Show all
It's you who refuses to see truth! Get some integrity and there will be far less disagreement!
The root of the problem is not that there are issues with the text. The problem is that your criticism of other translations is hypocritical. You employ double standards, as most (if not all) KJV-only advocates do, because your position cannot be maintained without double standards.
Your vaunted KJV has a clear, blatant contradiction (several, actually, but only one is needed); no amount of "reconciliation" will change that. You harp on similar or identical issues in other translations and won't even begin to consider that there are comparable reconciliations that are equally satisfying to those who use those translations. You do this repeatedly, pretending that the reconciliation you provide for Ahaziah's age at the beginning of his reign should be accepted by others as valid, while rejecting every attempt to explain issues in other translations.
Frankly, it borders on a sickness.
The root of the problem is not that there are issues with the text. The problem is that your criticism of other translations is hypocritical. You employ double standards, as most (if not all) KJV-only advocates do, because your position cannot be maintained without double standards.
Your vaunted KJV has a clear, blatant contradiction (several, actually, but only one is needed); no amount of "reconciliation" will change that. You harp on similar or identical issues in other translations and won't even begin to consider that there are comparable reconciliations that are equally satisfying to those who use those translations. You do this repeatedly, pretending that the reconciliation you provide for Ahaziah's age at the beginning of his reign should be accepted by others as valid, while rejecting every attempt to explain issues in other translations.
Frankly, it borders on a sickness.
-
1
- Show all
Mark 15:25 "And it was the third hour, and they crucified him." (KJV)
John 19:14-16 "And it was the preparation of the passover, and about the sixth hour: and he saith unto the Jews, Behold your King! But they cried out, Away with him, away with him, crucify him. Pilate saith unto them, Shall I crucify your King? The chief priests answered, We have no king but Caesar. Then delivered he him therefore unto them to be crucified. And they took Jesus, and led him away." (KJV)
Case closed.
John 19:14-16 "And it was the preparation of the passover, and about the sixth hour: and he saith unto the Jews, Behold your King! But they cried out, Away with him, away with him, crucify him. Pilate saith unto them, Shall I crucify your King? The chief priests answered, We have no king but Caesar. Then delivered he him therefore unto them to be crucified. And they took Jesus, and led him away." (KJV)
Case closed.
-
2
- Show all
Psalm 19:14
Scripture Memory Songs - Let The Words (Original Version)
(Written by Don Moen; Sung by Rita Baloche)
Keep back Your servant from presumptuous sins
Let them not have dominion over me
Then shall I be upright and innocent
From great transgression
Let the words
Of my mouth
And the meditation
Of my heart
Be acceptable
In Your sight, O Lord
My strength
My redeemer
(Written by Don Moen; Sung by Rita Baloche)
Keep back Your servant from presumptuous sins
Let them not have dominion over me
Then shall I be upright and innocent
From great transgression
Let the words
Of my mouth
And the meditation
Of my heart
Be acceptable
In Your sight, O Lord
My strength
My redeemer
❧
-
1
- Show all
I really respect your self-restraint.
I have always read the KJV, but I am well read on all the English classics and the amazing English poets so to me other versions sound flat.
I like the exalted language and if someone wants to put in the effort it is still very understandable/readable.
But I also do appreciate the fidelity to the correct pronouns, this is far more important over and above the archaic words found in post #74
Someday I may research all this further, I think it is good to be informed of all sides.
I have always read the KJV, but I am well read on all the English classics and the amazing English poets so to me other versions sound flat.
I like the exalted language and if someone wants to put in the effort it is still very understandable/readable.
But I also do appreciate the fidelity to the correct pronouns, this is far more important over and above the archaic words found in post #74
Someday I may research all this further, I think it is good to be informed of all sides.
I don't expect everyone to share it.
The works of Shakespeare and the collection of books we call The Bible don't serve the same purpose.
Shakespeare is not needed to support doctrine or explain the method of eternal salvation.
The Biblical record is better served when translated directly from the original languages to the target language we use now.
I don't see why the entire English-speaking world should do specialist studies of archaic forms of English in order to read what is
readily available in clear language. People aren't lacking comprehension or reading skills because they don't know how differently
"bowels" was used 400 years ago.
-
2
-
2
- Show all
If a translation was not "entirely accurate" would it have had the place of preeminence for over 400 years? Examine the commentaries of conservative Christian theologians and you will note that not one of them questioned the accuracy or the reliability of the King James Bible. God had His hand over this Bible as the Gospel went out into all the world. And had it not been for two deceivers (primarily) i.e. Westcott and Hort, the English-speaking world would have continued with an updated KJV from the 19th century.
But in spite of all the efforts of modern "critics" to undermine the traditional texts and to promote the CORRUPT critical texts, the King James Bible continues to hold a high place of esteem among discerning Christians. What is extremely sad and disturbing is that so many preachers failed to do their due diligence and began promoting the modern versions without taking the time to carefully check them out. What is even more disturbing is that fundamentalist seminaries, Bible schools and colleges all jumped on the Wescott-Hort bandwagon instead of totally rejecting their false theory and their corrupt critical texts. THIS SHOWS THE POWER OF THE BIG LIE. If you repeat a lie long enough and without let up, it suddenly becomes the truth. And who is the Father of all lies?
But in spite of all the efforts of modern "critics" to undermine the traditional texts and to promote the CORRUPT critical texts, the King James Bible continues to hold a high place of esteem among discerning Christians. What is extremely sad and disturbing is that so many preachers failed to do their due diligence and began promoting the modern versions without taking the time to carefully check them out. What is even more disturbing is that fundamentalist seminaries, Bible schools and colleges all jumped on the Wescott-Hort bandwagon instead of totally rejecting their false theory and their corrupt critical texts. THIS SHOWS THE POWER OF THE BIG LIE. If you repeat a lie long enough and without let up, it suddenly becomes the truth. And who is the Father of all lies?
-
2
-
1
- Show all
I've been a fan of English Literature since I was 16. It doesn't present any problems. That's just a personal interest though.
I don't expect everyone to share it.
The works of Shakespeare and the collection of books we call The Bible don't serve the same purpose.
Shakespeare is not needed to support doctrine or explain the method of eternal salvation.
The Biblical record is better served when translated directly from the original languages to the target language we use now.
I don't see why the entire English-speaking world should do specialist studies of archaic forms of English in order to read what is
readily available in clear language. People aren't lacking comprehension or reading skills because they don't know how differently
"bowels" was used 400 years ago.
I don't expect everyone to share it.
The works of Shakespeare and the collection of books we call The Bible don't serve the same purpose.
Shakespeare is not needed to support doctrine or explain the method of eternal salvation.
The Biblical record is better served when translated directly from the original languages to the target language we use now.
I don't see why the entire English-speaking world should do specialist studies of archaic forms of English in order to read what is
readily available in clear language. People aren't lacking comprehension or reading skills because they don't know how differently
"bowels" was used 400 years ago.
However, more modern translations are better suited to current cultural/language usages, and modern language translations like the NKJV, NIV, and RSV have translation integrity while expressing the literary modern expressions of the texts.
One of the more marginal modern translations that gets overlooked is the Moffatt. He is a highly credentialed scholar/translator, and his version has the best flow for reading smoothness and depth. I highly recommend this translation as a worthy addition to our personal Christian libraries!
-
2
-
1
- Show all
As a lit. major, I just love the KJV because it brings me back to classical poetry from Donne and Shakespeare. King James English is so poetic and lyrical.
However, more modern translations are better suited to current cultural/language usages, and modern language translations like the NKJV, NIV, and RSV have translation integrity while expressing the literary modern expressions of the texts.
One of the more marginal modern translations that gets overlooked is the Moffatt. He is a highly credentialed scholar/translator, and his version has the best flow for reading smoothness and depth. I highly recommend this translation as a worthy addition to our personal Christian libraries!
However, more modern translations are better suited to current cultural/language usages, and modern language translations like the NKJV, NIV, and RSV have translation integrity while expressing the literary modern expressions of the texts.
One of the more marginal modern translations that gets overlooked is the Moffatt. He is a highly credentialed scholar/translator, and his version has the best flow for reading smoothness and depth. I highly recommend this translation as a worthy addition to our personal Christian libraries!
Okay! Found it at Archive.org!
The Old Testament: a new translation by James Moffatt
The New Testament: a new translation by James Moffatt
They're both downloadable in different formats!
❧
The Old Testament: a new translation by James Moffatt
The New Testament: a new translation by James Moffatt
They're both downloadable in different formats!
❧
-
1
-
1
- Show all
The main issue I have with Moffatt's translation is he moved some chapters and sections around in certain books to try and synchronize the flow of the ideas/storyline. He captures some great literary expressions from the original Hebrew and Greek languages. I feel like I'm reading great poetry/prose from highly skilled classical writers!
-
1
- Show all