Search results

Of course David and Paul harmonize one another. How could they not? We don't have any man of God teaching against any other man of God in the Bible. If "we" see a "contradiction" then that problem is only with "us" - NOT the men of God in the Bible. We read and understand the Bible until it...

Forget a serious discussion with that tone, dear. Pie-trowing is not edifying anyone.

*sighs* As already indicated, you mix oranges and apples by equaling ethnicity with gender and make an argumentum ex silentio. Again, I have by no means claimed that Paul even suggested that NON-proselyte gentiles (your wording, as you wrote in your first response to me) would be to be ordained...

Excellent post and I wholeheartedly agree. For me also the witness of the Church Fathers is very important. As well what the apostolic succession teaches. There is a very clear statue about this issue. I see no need for revising these historical facts.

To contend for the truth is one thing, to be contentious by the root of pride is another thing. These boards reflect this difference in attitude.

The silence about this of many churches is a problem. If it's not preached against and education and information is given, it leaves that little loophole into the cesspool. We're living in a modern era which is very sexist and which sees sex as just about any little pleasure or escape from the...

I don't know why you change tracks. I have not contended that any non-proselyte gentile was ordained during biblical times. So it's argumentum ex silentio, an argument you make in the absence of me stating anything of which you argue. That itself makes a poor ground for discussion. And I wonder...

I am not an american, but I would advise gun owners in the US NOT to surrender your weapons to the government. We were too many people in other countries who did so (or "respected" repressive laws of gun control) and ended up rounded up and massacred with zero possibility of self-defense. You...

Luk 10:31: Perspective is God's or man's?

SDA people must answer for themselves. As for me, non-SDA, I've long ago dropped this "Saturday vs Sunday" or vice versa debate. The focus is the fourth commandment, which, yes, we are to mind. Arthur W. Pink wrote an excellent treatise on "The Holy Sabbath".

Yes. Context. Isn't that something? It's really something to consider when there are selected verses thrown at ya.

Beloved, you may read my posting history here where I in many posts expound on the will of man. Neither time nor circumstances allow me to recap same here and now. Me gotta goes.

You're unto something here. Expect the free-will crowd to have objections.

I'm all fine with that spiritual gifts still are available and working. I believe it. Not sure I'm so fine with most of the pentecostal or charismatic denominations though.

Yup. It's called the Nazarenes, or notzarim (or notzrim) as they say in Israel.

Don't miss out on the jewish influence as well. Jesuits and KoC I'd guess have been infiltrated by masonic-like entities long ago.

Oh, but since Muhammed is (by most) viewed as a non-white man he will get away with it. It's only white people who can be bad.

They don't like whitey but they like to live like whitey and live off whitey. When no more whitey is around life is not so fun anymore.

Exactly. And that's all one needs to know. Those who oppose this are in their PRIDE.

None. These parties are infiltrated by freemasons and other anti-christian forces. Democrats are worse though, of course.