Search results

With respect, don't waste your time with him. He will throw one bad argument after another, and when refuted, he will sidestep instead of admitting that he's wrong... like every other KJV-onlyist I have ever encountered. Then in a few months, he'll throw the same refuted argument again...

Your quotation is irrelevant, and your assertion is wrong. Here's the only one I need to refute you: Ephesians 4:11-13 "So Christ himself gave the apostles, the prophets, the evangelists, the pastors and teachers, to equip his people for works of service, so that the body of Christ may be built...

So, given your position (bolded), do you believe that all male Christians must be physically circumcised in order to be saved?

It's only "slander" if it's not true. He prefaced his thought with "I sincerely think" which makes it an opinion, not a statement of fact. No judge worth his or her salt will agree that's slander.

You didn't read my post very carefully. I'm not interested in blather about "Modern Bibles", and I'm not interested in a list of various issues in various translations. If you have evidence of "errors" (clear, blatant, and multiple) in ONE SPECIFIC TRANSLATION, then please share. Otherwise, I'll...

Please go and learn the meaning of “concise” and what a run-on sentence is. Apply the former and avoid the latter.

What is the difference between tarring all KJV-only proponents with the same brush, and tarring all users of other translations with the same brush? Nothing whatsoever. It’s not sound criticism in either case, but that won’t stop you from doing it.

You keep bleating about the dangers of “the modern Bible movement” and the “false doctrines” that these Bibles teach, but you don’t provide evidence. Step up! Provide evidence from ONE modern translation that supports your assertion. Not one bit from one translation, another bit from another...

This has nothing whatsoever with “living in the past” and everything to do with your choice of words. You said, “I was able to get the results I desired”. You looked for ‘X’, and AI provided you ‘X’. If you look for information to confirm your hypothesis, and mention that AI provided that...

You’re so far off in left field, you’re in a different county. You refuse to learn but are convinced that you understand. You are unteachable.

So you got the answer you wanted from AI. And people wonder why there is so much bad “theology”. …smh

And just like Trudeau, you respond without actually answering the question I asked. Therefore my opinion of you diminishes further.

Do you honestly think that's all there is to it? Just "walk in obedience to God's law" and you'll be saved? Saved from what? Saved for what? What is the benefit of being saved in your world, such that you would "walk in obedience to God's law" to obtain it? Why did Jesus have to die on the...

Answer the freaking question, Trudeau!

So you focus on hypotheticals instead of reality... not a wise move. Again, what God "can" do is irrelevant in light of what He HAS done.

You don't understand Scripture because you don't believe that salvation is only through the shed blood of Jesus Christ and not through your adherence to the law. Sadly, you are not a Christian, but there is hope for you. Ephesians 4:18 They are darkened in their understanding and separated from...

No, that is not a "commandment". Why do you cite Luke but quote John? And why do you bring Luke 14:26 up again? It's a figure of speech. Are you so hardhearted that you cannot learn when you are taught the truth?

Why do you do this ^^^ ? Please don't. There's no need for it. No, they aren't. They weren't even in the Tabernacle. They were in a valley East of the Jordan River, prior to their entry into Canaan. I think I know what you're saying, despite your awkward statement, but you're wrong. The...

What God "can" do is irrelevant. What He actually did was inspire the Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek texts. I don't believe He directly inspired the English wording of the KJV. I'll ask you again, since you didn't answer: Do you believe that God inspired the English words of the KJV? If so, on...

Again, yes, in SOME places, but not in Deuteronomy 14, and not in most of Scripture. It’s not a “commandment”. Do you understand what a “figure of speech” is?