Doesn't the book of Galatians explain this already?
Can you share your understanding of the explanation of Galatians? I wasn’t able to read it, maybe I missed it.
Doesn't the book of Galatians explain this already?
“The one who eats everything must not treat with contempt the one who does not, and the one who does not eat everything must not judge the one who does, for God has accepted them.”
Romans 14:3 NIV
![]()
Romans 14:3 (NIV) - The one who eats everything must no - Bible App
The one who eats everything must not treat with contempt the one who does not, and the one who does not eat everything must not judge the one who does, for God has accepted them.bible.com
Neither, necessarily.Then in your belief, which of them is telling the truth? The one enforcing the law that forbids eating pork, or the one teaching that there is nothing wrong with eating any kind of food, including pork?
The physical realm is a shadow of the spiritual realm: the dynamics that occur in the physical reflect the dynamics that occur in the spiritual realm. To understand the spiritual truth that is being pointed to by something reported as physical, we need to explore what happens in the physical, and then to transfer those processes into the spiritual.DEUTORONOMY 14:6-8
6 And every beast that parteth the hoof, and cleaveth the cleft into two claws, and cheweth the cud among the beasts, that ye shall eat.
7 Nevertheless these ye shall not eat of them that chew the cud, or of them that divide the cloven hoof; as the camel, and the hare, and the coney: for they chew the cud, but divide not the hoof; therefore they are unclean unto you.
8 And the swine, because it divideth the hoof, yet cheweth not the cud, it is unclean unto you: ye shall not eat of their flesh, nor touch their dead carcase.
The one teaching that there is nothing wrong with eating any kind of food, including pork - as long as doing so is not going to hinder the advance of the gospel among the people observing me eat. We forwent beef while in India so as not to unnecessarily offend the Hindus with whom we were trying to build friendships. But we eat beef here in New Zealand.Then in your belief, which of them is telling the truth? The one enforcing the law that forbids eating pork, or the one teaching that there is nothing wrong with eating any kind of food, including pork?
Neither, necessarily.
The one teaching that there is nothing wrong with eating any kind of food, including pork - as long as doing so is not going to hinder the advance of the gospel among the people observing me eat. We forwent beef while in India so as not to unnecessarily offend the Hindus with whom we were trying to build friendships. But we eat beef here in New Zealand.
Doesn't the book of Galatians explain this already?
It does, but there are several members here who insist on holding Christians to the old covenant.
Your concept of necessity does not necessitate my distinction.It is necessary because the two commandments contradict each other. Otherwise, why would the Lord God command Deut 14:6-8 & Romans 14:3.
Truth is exclusive.You really like looking at other people’s specks.
"I am not come to destroy the [Mosaic] law or the prophets, but to fulfil them,” does not mean the same thing as "I have not come to release you from the Mosaic Law."It is not right to disregard the command of the Lord God in Book of Deuteronomy 14:6–8, because even the Lord Jesus, in His role as the Son of the Living God, fulfilled this commandment in the Old Testament
MATTHEW 5:17
17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Each belief was based on a certain level of understanding. The law forbidding the eating of pork is inferior to the scripture in the NT that states that what God has made let no one call unclean. This would be the superior understanding.Then in your belief, which of them is telling the truth? The one enforcing the law that forbids eating pork, or the one teaching that there is nothing wrong with eating any kind of food, including pork?
Lot there to chewCook your meal with human dung
Truth is exclusive.
Each belief was based on a certain level of understanding. The law forbidding the eating of pork is inferior to the scripture in the NT that states that what God has made let no one call unclean. This would be the superior understanding.
"I am not come to destroy the [Mosaic] law or the prophets, but to fulfil them,” does not mean the same thing as "I have not come to release you from the Mosaic Law."
Jesus came to keep all the Mosaic Law perfectly during that coming, therefore He did not come to destroy it and cast it aside during that coming. Clearly, a righteousness that keeps the Mosaic Law is possible, because Jesus achieved it and was accepted into the Holy of Holies for doing so. So, that path is still available to mankind to try. It is not destroyed. We still have it with us.
But Jesus has provided a new way to achieve righteousness before God and have access into the Holy of Holies, one that by-passes keeping the Letter of Mosaic Law , while keeping to the spirit of that Mosaic Law. That way into God’s presence is to believe into Christ and enter into the Holy of Holies in Him. We can choose that easier new and living way of the Spirit or we can choose the hard way of keeping perfectly the letter of the Mosaic Law. Personally, I choose the new and living way.
Acts 20:23DEUTORONOMY 14:6-8
6 And every beast that parteth the hoof, and cleaveth the cleft into two claws, and cheweth the cud among the beasts, that ye shall eat.
7 Nevertheless these ye shall not eat of them that chew the cud, or of them that divide the cloven hoof; as the camel, and the hare, and the coney: for they chew the cud, but divide not the hoof; therefore they are unclean unto you.
8 And the swine, because it divideth the hoof, yet cheweth not the cud, it is unclean unto you: ye shall not eat of their flesh, nor touch their dead carcase.
I am confident that God did not reveal anything to you regarding what I said about exclusive truth, because that has nothing to do with what I meant by it.I do not know to what extent or in what sense you mean that truth is exclusive. The truth that is exclusive is proclaimed by the Lord Jesus only to His chosen ones(Mark 4:34), for they are the ones who have come to know the one true God. Therefore, they alone receive the truth. To those who do not know the one true God, everything is spoken in parables
...
Therefore, anyone who claims to be a follower of the Lord Jesus, even if they have read the Holy Scriptures in full and studied them for five to ten years, will not possess or see the truth as long as they do not know the one true God. That is what God revealed to me regarding what you said about exclusive truth.
I am confident that God did not reveal anything to you regarding what I said about exclusive truth, because that has nothing to do with what I meant by it.
You should examine yourself carefully to determine what "spirit" you are hearing.