So what human devised software would be needed to translate God given spiritual languages?
Might be a bit beyond your Webster's.
Did you mean the foundation of the tongues doctrine? That has to do with God mocking those in unbelief and yet for all that they still refuse to believe. Its not in Webster's but is in the bible. Isiah 28 confirms it as a sign against those who refuse to hear prophecy after the manner of tongues as a fact of not believing God after any manner of prophecy . It is why the sign confirm them in unbelief... yet they still see no evil in creating their own: But we will certainly do whatsoever thing comes out of our own mouth as oral traditions of the fathers .
As for the word that thou hast spoken unto us in the name of the Lord, we will not hearken unto thee. But we will certainly do whatsoever thing goeth forth out of our own mouth, to burn incense unto the queen of heaven, and to pour out drink offerings unto her, as we have done, we, and our fathers, our kings, and our princes, in the cities of Judah, and in the streets of Jerusalem: for then had we plenty of victuals, and were well, and saw no evil.Jerimiah 44:16 17
Stammering lips..
1) mocking, derision, stammering
1a) mocking, derision
1b) stammerings
For with stammering lips and another tongue will he speak to this people. To whom he said, This is the rest wherewith ye may cause the weary to rest; and this is the refreshing: yet they "would not hear".Isaiah 28:11-12
1 Corinthians 14:21-22 King James Version (KJV) In the law (isaiah 28) it is written, With men of other tongues and other lips will I speak unto this people; and yet for all that will they not hear me, saith the Lord. Wherefore tongues are for a sign, not to them that believe, but to them that believe not: but prophesying serveth not for them that believe not, but for them which believe.
Find the meaning as to what the sign confirms and who it speaks to? Then the rest of the doctrines falls in to place. Or you could say ignore it fall back hoping someone is there to catch. Wouldn't want to be slain in the spirit. .
Hebrew NASB Number: 3934
Hebrew Word: לָעֵג
Transliterated Word: laeg (541d)
Root: from 3932;
Definition: mocking:--
List of English Words and Number of Times Used
jesters (1),
stammering (1).
New American Standard Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible.
.
Isaiah 28:11 (GWT)
11 The LORD will speak to these people. He will mock them by speaking in a foreign language.
trying to use gibberish to mock gibberish while trying to convey a message knowing that they will never get a message, and this is clearly done with righteous anger. If man try to do that I can imagine seizures or possibly stroke, but God is God, wow,
I'm trying to imagine God's anger on those people
trying to use gibberish to mock gibberish while trying to convey a message knowing that they will never get a message, and this is clearly done with righteous anger. If man try to do that I can imagine seizures or possibly stroke, but God is God, wow,
I'm trying to imagine God's anger on those people
As I have explained many times, this interpretation does not mesh with Acts 10, for in that case there were no unbelieving Jews present. Therefore it cannot be the only valid interpretation.Isaiah 28:11 (YLT)
11 For by scorned lip, and by another tongue, Doth He speak unto this people.
... NOTICE: That is what Happen on the Day of Pentecost.
And NOTICE it was in other Languages.
And NOTICE it was ALWAYS TO UNBELIEVING JEWS.
Isaiah 28:11
11 For with stammering lips and another tongue will he speak to this people.
bə·la·‘ă·ḡê
בְּלַעֲגֵ֣י
with stammering
śā·p̄āh,
שָׂפָ֔ה
lips
ū·ḇə·lā·šō·wn
וּבְלָשׁ֖וֹן
and tongue
’a·ḥe·reṯ;
אַחֶ֑רֶת
another
yə·ḏab·bêr
יְדַבֵּ֖ר
He will speak
’el-
אֶל־
to
hā·‘ām
הָעָ֥ם
people
Really? I had given you the benefit of better reading comprehension.As I have explained many times, this interpretation does not mesh with Acts 10, for in that case there were no unbelieving Jews present. Therefore it cannot be the only valid interpretation.
And NOTICE it was in other Languages.
And NOTICE it was ALWAYS TO UNBELIEVING JEWS.
NOTICE the word Stammering is not use in many translation, and it does not mean what you think.
Notice it implies that they would HEAR IT.
these were believing jews not unbelieving jews. dino's point still standsReally? I had given you the benefit of better reading comprehension.
Acts 10: 44 ¶ While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Ghost fell on all them which heard the word.
45 And they of the circumcision which believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that on the Gentiles also was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost.
46 For they heard them speak with tongues, and magnify God. Then answered Peter,
47 Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?
They of the circumcision are Jews who did not believe that Gentiles could be saved.
For the cause of Christ
Roger
They like Peter did not want to believe that Gentiles could be saved. There were in their number some who did not believe and were there to spy out the activities of the apostles for the purpose of reporting back to the authorities in Jerusalem.these were believing jews not unbelieving jews. dino's point still stands
Reading comprehension? Seriously, man, you know better than to make silly and irrelevant ad hominem comments like that.Really? I had given you the benefit of better reading comprehension.
Acts 10: 44 ¶ While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Ghost fell on all them which heard the word.
45 And they of the circumcision which believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that on the Gentiles also was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost.
46 For they heard them speak with tongues, and magnify God. Then answered Peter,
47 Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?
They of the circumcision are Jews who did not believe that Gentiles could be saved.
What is Acts 10 to do with Isaiah 28? It is clear from the text in Acts 10 that the Jews did not want to believe that God would save Gentiles. Isaiah is clearly a pronouncement of captivity on Israel by the Assyrians. Common point would be that the Jews hated the Assyrians for their brutal treatment of Israel when they were captives.Reading comprehension? Seriously, man, you know better than to make silly and irrelevant ad hominem comments like that.
As for your theory, somehow it morphed from "Jews who do not believe in Jesus for salvation" to "Jews who do not believe Gentiles can be saved."
That is a MASSIVE difference and is not supported by Isaiah 28.. at all.
An excellent example of irrelevance. Go back to VCO's post that I quoted, which referenced Isaiah 28. If you have a problem with his post, take it up with him.What is Acts 10 to do with Isaiah 28? It is clear from the text in Acts 10 that the Jews did not want to believe that God would save Gentiles. Isaiah is clearly a pronouncement of captivity on Israel by the Assyrians. Common point would be that the Jews hated the Assyrians for their brutal treatment of Israel when they were captives.
Prejudice in biblical times? Christians do not hate Israel but much of the rest of the world has a deep hatred for Israel.
For the cause of Christ
Roger
Not at all since you conveniently ignore that there were indeed unbelieving Jews present in Acts 10. They contended with Peter in Acts 11. I'm certain that you understand the continuation of the narrative from Acts 10 to Acts 11.An excellent example of irrelevance. Go back to VCO's post that I quoted, which referenced Isaiah 28. If you have a problem with his post, take it up with him.