Well firstly I do not profess to be a teacher of the word, but you continually asked me to write an exposition of chs 6, 7&8 and when I did not immediately do so suggested with sarcasm that I could not do so.
I will just be honest now. You and Red think so highly of the spiritual knowledge you both believe you have, but as soon as you are asked to respond to something most of the time we just get excuse after excuse
Empty vessels make the most noise!
ummm...no....that's not how it went:
Oh I could go through Romans 6, 7 &8 with you, that would not be a problem, but you would not accept it, just as you do not accept the words of Christ as the neccessary belief in him to have eternal life. I am sure you would come out with many weird and wonderful answers. It would be a waste of time
And as in your heart you believe you know much 'theology' and are here to give others the benefit of what you know I doubt you would have the mindset to be open and empty your mind as you put it
but, i'm asking if you would present an exposition of Romans 6, 7 & 8.
i MIGHT accept your reading.
i'm perfectly capable of emptying my mind. i don't like doing it for long, but if you will present a proper teaching on Romans 6,7,8, i will.
deal?
else how will i know where you are right and where i went wrong?
thanks.
Well as I suspect sarcasm in your words I doubt in that spirit we would get anywhere. And I do not see the point in wasting much of my time with someone who picks and chooses what they believe in the Bible and believes they have the spiritual knowledge and authority to demand of others what is not demanded in the Bible
I am afraid Zone I do not believe you could accept anything other than what you believe anyway. All that 'head theology'!!!
LBG:
if you have the correct Biblical intepretaton of the book of Romans, why wouldn't you share it?
i am asking if you would please present those 3 chapters and explain them both individually and as a whole. i want to know what you see that i do not see.
thank you.
You will never believe what I believe, it would not matter how much I wrote.
And frankly I become a little weary at having lengthy discussions with people who believe they know so much of the truth of scripture but show by what they write they do not.
And as your words are plainly not said in true sincerity that says much as well
But why don't you spend time doing an exposition of Rm 6, 7 and 8 if you like, then we can all benefit from the great knowledge you have, after all, to them that know much surely it is their duty to share what they know
so....you can't do it i guess.
thats' okay.
thanks anyways.
maybe some other time.
(i know what you mean about wearying over the suuuuuuper long debates over imaginary things)
Your welcome. Enjoy your 'head theology'
And of course, how could I ever compete with someone who knows better than Jesus what belief is required to have eternal life. After all he cannot have explained properly what belief is required, but luckily for us you are here, to further expound the neccessary beliefs required
Tell you what I'll do Zone. Lets you and me go through the first eight chapters of Romans together
I'll do an exposition of a chapter then you do one and so on. You can add your own thoughts to my chapters and me yours. Hows that?
Now obviously I have grammatical errors as you have lovingly pointed out. I can only hope if you agree to this you will be patient and bear with my lack of grammer in love
Also I have not read up on theologians as you have and have not put in the 'hard work' in this area as have you, neither would I say I am an authority on scripture, so I hope you will in love bear with my failings
Also as I have never done anything like this before I hope you will be especially patient with me and bear with me as I am sure you will at times find my inadequate exposition exasperating
So if you agree I will get statrted on CH 1 and then it is up to you if you continue with ch 2 or not, but at least I have shown willing.
RED
As this would be expositions by Zone and I, if possible could you reserve your criticism of what I write until we have finished all eight chapters. I want to be able to fully concentrate on my dialogue with Zone.
Zone, if you agree to do this, please do not make your expositions too long of each chapter, I have trouble concentrating on too much at a time to read
Thank you
CH 1
verses 1-4
Paul affirms he is a servant of Christ and called to be an Apostle of Christ who was foretold through the scriptures and was through the spirit declared to be the son of God
In verse 5 Paul who had been an arch Pharisee sets out his stall of the Gospel he has been called to preach. He stresses that obediance comes from faith.
Paul then exhorts the faith of the people he is writing to and and affirms he longs to see them.
He is not ashamed of the Gospel which is for all Jew and Gentile.
verse 17
Paul after writing that we have an obediance that comes from faith now goes further and says our righteousness before God is also by faith, and this is from first to last, the whole of our Christian lives
In other words. We could be burned alive for preaching the Gospel and give all we had to the poor but we would still only have one righteousness for Heaven, faith, and that is also our obediance.
Paul then goes on to speak of God's wrath against mankind for their ungodliness and wickedness. God's invisible qualities have been plain to see since the begining of creation from what has been made so man is without excuse to deny God exists.
Although man thought himself so wise he was foolish, exchanging the glory of God for man made images
So God gave them over to the sinful desires of their heart. Paul then speaks of the sinfulness of man, his depravity and the evil he commits. Paul says that man knew God's righteous decrees but ignored them, even though he knew he deserved death for doing so.
A pretty bleak picture of man is portrayed
Well I am sure that is not much of a start but at least I am showing willing
Please feel free to add ot what I hjave written. If you feel I should be writing more please tell me
I will do an exposition of ch 3 once you have done one on ch 2
~
um...nooooo....... but thank you.
i wanted to see your reading of it. if it flows, what illustrative language paul uses in each, how they are more than the sum total of each part. i don't think your reading/understanding would be fairly presented this way you propose. (not sure what it has to do with me - i could do one later i guess...but you already know what i believe)
the "team" idea might be an interesting experiment for some other time and purpose, though.
so...just carry on...i wanted to see your reading.
zone
OK
But I would have commented on the chapters you did expositions on so I would have commented on all the chapters you requested
But OK, never mind. I've never been asked to do a sermon/exposition on three continuous chapters before, not being a theologian or scholar I would have found it more interseting this way
CONT........