Pointing someone to Jesus who already claims to have Jesus, combined with the fact that many people that have Jesus have his beliefs because on the surface they do not seem incompatible, combined with people taking interpretative liberties with scripture, makes me think I should try a different approach than repeating something general like that he may be insulted by as I am judging him to not have enough faith.
He is already using his time to look into seeds of the earth and alien conspiracies, so I'm trying to redirect that into some conspiracies that support a biblical interpretation of our universe.
Those scripture that debunk aliens seeding the earth, I'm sure he's read genesis already or is aware of the account. He's already rejected that, I'm trying something he may be unaware of. If I thought posting the creation story would help here that would be my first choice I promise.
The conspiracies are what I needed before I could realize my rejection of scripture was wrong. I'm using personal experience and an approach that he may not heard of and rejected yet. Conspiracies are not superior to the truth or Christ, but people sometimes are not ready to accept either of those.
Why don't you try that approach instead of telling me to? With my limited understanding all I could do is post creation and tell him it's not compatible with his theory, something that fails against evolution and big bang when figurative or inaccurate interpretations are made.
He is already using his time to look into seeds of the earth and alien conspiracies, so I'm trying to redirect that into some conspiracies that support a biblical interpretation of our universe.
Those scripture that debunk aliens seeding the earth, I'm sure he's read genesis already or is aware of the account. He's already rejected that, I'm trying something he may be unaware of. If I thought posting the creation story would help here that would be my first choice I promise.
The conspiracies are what I needed before I could realize my rejection of scripture was wrong. I'm using personal experience and an approach that he may not heard of and rejected yet. Conspiracies are not superior to the truth or Christ, but people sometimes are not ready to accept either of those.
Why don't you try that approach instead of telling me to? With my limited understanding all I could do is post creation and tell him it's not compatible with his theory, something that fails against evolution and big bang when figurative or inaccurate interpretations are made.