Amen captain.
nice post
nice post
Right.
2Th2:9a "whose COMING [/ADVENT / ARRIVAL / PRESENCE / parousia is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders..."
[this is a distinct point in time from that of his later "who SITTETH" of v.4]
1) "whose COMING [/ARRIVAL / PRESENCE]" 2Th2:9a (BEGINNING of the 7 years)
2) "who SITTETH" 2Th2:4 (MIDDLE of the 7 years)
3) "whom the Lord shall CONSUME... shall DESTROY..." 2Th2:8b (END of the 7 years)
2Th2:9a "whose COMING [/ADVENT / ARRIVAL / PRESENCE / parousia is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders..."
[this is a distinct point in time from that of his later "who SITTETH" of v.4]
1) "whose COMING [/ARRIVAL / PRESENCE]" 2Th2:9a (BEGINNING of the 7 years)
2) "who SITTETH" 2Th2:4 (MIDDLE of the 7 years)
3) "whom the Lord shall CONSUME... shall DESTROY..." 2Th2:8b (END of the 7 years)
I see your point. I view the concept of the coming of the antichrist at the beginning of Daniel's 70th week as a misinterpretation of the Daniel 9:24-27 passage.