The termantichrist is unfortunate because there are two beasts (Re 13). One should be an Assyrian but why does this matter? We don't be here.
If you are here
then good luck figuring it out; but, you'll have greater troubles than that.![]()
See:
Justin Trudeau Is The Antichrist?
Hey serp. I don’t believe that a beast has to be an antichrist. I believe that the first beast of Revelation 13 (the beast from the sea) could actually be an Islamic government/empire…not a single creature or being. This first beast from the sea will rise to power and rule for 3 ½ years. It is said that it had suffered a great head wound, but now is healed. I feel that this could very well be in reference to the once mighty Islamic Ottoman Empire. While at one time it ruled most of the known world, it has since been conquered, locked back up, and subdued.
The first beast is said to be given power by the dragon (Satan) to make war against the saints and be able to conquer them. Everyone on earth will be forced to worship this beast (Islamic faith and empire). In verse 5 of Revelation 13 you can see how this beast was given a mouth to speak on behalf of the beast, as well as authority to act on behalf of the beast. This could likely be a person put in charge of this religious empire, or as they would call him in Islam…a Caliph.
The second beast (the beast from the earth) seems to be an individual who is working on behalf of the Islamic Empire (first beast). He is depicted as being the main person who will be influencing people to worship the image of the beast. He will even be given power to do great works like bringing fire down from heaven, deceiving many. He is who orders that all must take the mark of the beast. So to sum it up, I view the first beast as an empire and the second as an individual. Hope this helps