What are " conspiracy theorists " ?

[RachelBibleStudent]

Ok Rachel, I see you're totally lost in your one-sided dialogue you didn't even answer my question about 9-11 that means you are totally biased from the start for unknown reasons, and your reasonment isn't rational at all ! As we can see it clearly ! Clear thinking is the basis of truth ! And really you're talking an extremely confusing language !

well first of all it was a 'loaded question'...and secondly i didn't feel the need to reiterate what should be have been completely obvious from reading my other posts in this forum...

 

[SarahM777]

well first of all it was a 'loaded question'...and secondly i didn't feel the need to reiterate what should be have been completely obvious from reading my other posts in this forum...

Rachel,

With all the threads on here can you be sure that someone else has actually read all your posts? You might want to give him a bit of slack as he hasn't been here that long.

 

[Stephen63]

All it takes to confirm 9-11 is to watch some demolition videos. Demo experts will tell you that it's hard enough to make a building come down straight without it hitting anything, let alone accidentally. Here we have not one, but three! Not to mention some skyscrapers have burned for 14 hours straight & didn't even break off, let alone fall.

 

[jerusalem]

i have hated the term conspiracy theorist but had nothing to replace it with until now. i have the rebuttal. i am not a conspiracy theorist. i am a critical social theorist.....but even that is a compromise until i can come up with an even more accurate term. i object to being called a theorist once the theory is no longer theoretical. for instance....to claim theoretically that the ruling heads are somehow connected to each other ceases to be a theory once it is known that they are biologically related and have kept each other in power covertly for many generations. when you realize that so-called opponents in political campaigns are family members that have coordinated their efforts in such a way that regardless of who 'wins' the election they will continue to work toward the same objectives together only their collective approach to that goal is affected by the vote. the image that they present to the people so as not to be opposed by them. there is no way to question the fact that all presidents of the united states are related to each other and to the european monarchies. it defies coincidence. have a probability mathematician take a look at it if you will. and how this was arranged if the political competitions were legitimate also refuses to bear up under scrutiny. when you couple this information with the known allegiances of the various persons politic the common goal they hope to achieve also becomes undeniable. although their various religions may appear to conflict on the surface their secret society affiliations tell all. just seven days prior to j f k's assassination he spoke out against secret societies and promised to defy them. the only survivors among those who openly defy these people are those that cannot sway the public but in fact come across to the public as fools. i will continue to be a fool for Christ and i will continue to hope that you willl too

 

[DragonSlayer]

You're just a hostile little man aren't you? Where did I say let criminals run free? I also never said God was against justice. What is wrong with you?

FYI, I am not anti punishment. I do support war, and I support corporal punishment. If it is necessary to prevent evil.

This is you the " hostile little woman ". You aren't willing to answer " Yes or No " and you speak the language of hypocrisy !
I hate the language of hypocrisy ! I shouldn't have answered you from the start ! Obviously you bought the official 9-11 propaganda and you're doing the job of an advocate of the devil !
Truly, you speak for the devil, and I have nothing to do with that ! I would never trust a police investigator who enjoy to protect the true criminals, and poking fun of sincere people looking for the truth !

I am hostile against your great hypocrisy and I am right doing that ! Because if I was hypocrite like you are right now I would never had discovered the truth about the true events !

Hypocrisy ! If really you are not anti punishment why are you against proper investigation of 9-11 ? Why did you condemn me when I told victims deserve justice ! You provoke me to anger by your great hypocrisy and lies and after you call me
" hostile " like you did nothing !
You'll do a great job as an " agent provocateur " really !

 

[DragonSlayer]

I'm not fighting. I am rather confused what ticked him off. He is just a hostile person. He doesn't see I agree with him. I just don't speak in anger.

Hypocrisy ! That's your great problem ! You're eating hypocrisy for breakfast ! I hate lies and hypocrisy ! Not even willing to answer " yes or no " to a simple question ! Only liars and hypocrites refuse an open rational debate ! Only liars and hypocrites refuse to answer " yes or no " to a simple question ! Yes ma'am !

 

[DragonSlayer]

Did you miss the post where I said I supported justice? Or are you going to continue to quote the same post over and over again.
I personally find your rant amusing. You do this in many threads. I am concerned about you though. You may need to check your blood pressure.

Hypocrisy ! If you are against a proper investigation of 9-11 ! And you refuse to answer yes or no to a simple question, then you don't support justice ! You support the criminals who killed almost 3000 people ! And you enjoy making people angry ! Are you serious ? I'm concerned about you instead ! You find this amusing to play head games ! Not me ! I do not speak a language of hypocrisy and confusion like you do ! I speak the language of sincerity and clear thinking !
And when someone asks me a simple question ! I answer " yes " or " no " !

 

[zone]

DS
let's not argue with folks who aren't interesting in discussion.
it doesn't help.
just post verifiable stuff, and cite your reliable sources and maybe sometime we'll be able to discuss it
we know it was an inside job and so do billions of others.

zone

 

[DragonSlayer]

You were talking about 9-11? I didn't know. I stated I did not want to discuss it many posts ago so I figured you understood that and saw I moved on to a more broader idea of conspiracy theories. I had no idea you were still stuck on 9-11 though I politely stated I do not want to discuss it.

Now I am biased because I brought up other terrorist attacks while responding to you stating that it could happen again? Seriously, have you thought about anger management?

Here you clearly talked about 9-11 ! Hypocrisy ! This is how you do ! When you know you are wrong you tell you don't want to discuss about it ! But then you continue to speak about it ! Clearly, you're a great enemy of sincerity and clear thinking !

What are you doing here if you don't want to talk about " conspiracy theories " ? Huh ? Total non sense from a gullible " little hostile woman " who just bought the official propaganda of 9-11 without thinking for herself ! Poor her ! I pity you !

 

[DragonSlayer]

DS
let's not argue with folks who aren't interesting in discussion.
it doesn't help.
just post verifiable stuff, and cite your reliable sources and maybe sometime we'll be able to discuss it
we know it was an inside job and so do billions of others.

zone

Thanks for the advice zone ! This is the first time I have words with poor brainwashed folks who are fanatically devoted
to a one-sided conversation and totally deny sincerity and clear thinking ! This is totally beyond my comprehension !
I didn't know such a strong and absurd commitment in delusional thinking could have existed !

 

[zone]

Thanks for the advice zone ! This is the first time I have words with poor brainwashed folks who are fanatically devoted
to a one-sided conversation and totally deny sincerity and clear thinking ! This is totally beyond my comprehension !
I didn't know such a strong and absurd commitment in delusional thinking could have existed !

well, beth is my friend, i know her pretty well for internet stuff.
that`s not a good description of her.
she`s very aware of things.
this issue she`s not wanting to talk about, or make a decision on just yet.

 

[Elizabeth619]

Hypocrisy ! If you are against a proper investigation of 9-11 ! And you refuse to answer yes or no to a simple question, then you don't support justice ! You support the criminals who killed almost 3000 people ! And you enjoy making people angry ! Are you serious ? I'm concerned about you instead ! You find this amusing to play head games ! Not me ! I do not speak a language of hypocrisy and confusion like you do ! I speak the language of sincerity and clear thinking !
And when someone asks me a simple question ! I answer " yes " or " no " !

I've said nothing you've accused me of.
Today is not the day to argue with me either. You're hateful, rude, and belligerent. I have much larger issues than arguing conspiracy theories. I'm done with you.

Do not ever address me or speak of me on this forum again.
The day is hard enough for me. I don't need people like you to make it worse.

 

[Oncefallen]

Guys (and ladies), lets try taking it down a couple of notches and keep it civil please.

 

[Graybeard]

rachel.
can we put aside everything for one moment.

please look at this photo:

an airliner struck the top of the building and it disintegrates like this at virtual free fall?
not one tower....but two?

just yes or no you believe it or doubt it or whatever

......

as for believing what we want to in spite of contradictory evidence or suspicious circumstances so we can blame who we want to....did 19 arab cave dwellers do all this?

.....

personally, i trust no one who looks at the photos and video of what happened to those buildings (and the round hole in the Pentegon) and denies something other than the official narrative is likely.

there's something very wrong with anyone, no matter how learned who can look at the images and still claim airliners did this.
nope. deniers at this point are highly suspect.

Could you explain how they managed to silence the detonations of explosives so that they could not be heard, all building demolitions by imploding that I have seen all have a very loud audible bang.

 

[zone]

Could you explain how they managed to silence the detonations of explosives so that they could not be heard, all building demolitions by imploding that I have seen all have a very loud audible bang.

[video=youtube;y2A8VMg_B64]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2A8VMg_B64[/video]

it was as if they had it detonated...as if they were planning to take down the building.

boom boom boom boom

detonated

 

[zone]

[video=youtube;k2Trj_5J02k]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2Trj_5J02k[/video]

If This Does Not Get Thru To You; Nothing Will!!!

 

[zone]

[video=youtube;Oj0J_K8dgJg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Oj0J_K8dgJg[/video]

Loose Change Final Cut

2:09:55

 

[zone]

ya right.

 

[Graybeard]

[video=youtube;y2A8VMg_B64]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2A8VMg_B64[/video]

it was as if they had it detonated...as if they were planning to take down the building.

boom boom boom boom

detonated

interesting.......but wouldn't the sounds be heard far off if they were detonations, these fireman were close so maybe the sounds they heard were the building breaking up mistaking it for explosions.

 

[zone]

[video=youtube;r6R2v4wzCoU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6R2v4wzCoU[/video]

CBC: Bush Sr. Had Breakfast with bin Laden's Brother on 9/11

....

James Reynolds Bath (born August 18, 1936)[3] is a former director of Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI), a former frontman for Salem bin Laden (Osama's brother),[4] and also former part owner of Arbusto Energy with George W. Bush, with whom Bath served as a member of the Texas Air National Guard during the Vietnam War, protecting the Gulf Coast.[5] He has business interests in the aircraft business and real estate.

James R. Bath - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

....

It has been claimed that the CIA had ties with Osama Bin Laden's al-Qaeda and its "Afghan Arab" fighters when it armed Jihadist groups against the Soviet Union during the Soviet war in Afghanistan.

According to author David N. Gibbs "a considerable body of circumstantial evidence suggests ... direct Agency support for Bin Laden’s activities."[5] Both Bin Laden and the CIA "held accounts in the Bank for Credit and Commerce International (BCCI)."[5]

CIA – al-Qaeda controversy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia