Response to Critique of Calvinism

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
T

tdrew777

Guest
On foresight - if God saves us based on foresight of our faith, foresight of our good works or foresight of any other quality in us, than whatever God foresaw in us is a good work. Then we deserve salvation - God foresaw our merit! We would have a legitimate complaint if God didn't save us. This is not salvation by grace through faith as revealed in scripture.

The example of Judas sheds some light on the subject(s) at hand - Before Judas was born it was written that he would betray Christ, the price he would receive, what the money would be spent on, and the future condition of his children after his death. The plan of God would not unfold in history if Judas failed to betray Christ. Judas was predestined to betray Christ before he was born. God bears responsibility for the fact that he created a creature, Judas, who would betray Christ. God bears responsibility for the fact that he created a creature, Judas, who would act outside of God's normative ethical will. Judas had all options legitimately on the table. He was not coerced to betray Christ. He was not forced to betray Christ. He had everything he needed to choose not to betray Christ. He was outside of God's normative ethical will when he betrayed Christ; for this reason, his sin stands deserving of a just punishment. NO conflicts in any of the above. We don't need to limit the scriptural fact that God plans from eternity in order to hold a man morally accountable for his actions.

No theological lenses are necessary to interpret God's eternal planning strategy. Every detail of history was planned outside of time, great and small. Yet we are all held morally accountable not only for actions, but even for thoughts, and feelings (some of which which may seem uncontrollable - murder and adultery are examples Jesus gives).

NEW EXAMPLE NEEDING PEER REVEIW: Time is a thread, a line, segment with a beginning and an end (Christ). The creature passes along it sequentially. Eternity is not an infinite extension of the line. It would be demonstrated by existing in three dimensional room with the line segment of time contained in the room. That is why eternity, when viewed from our perspective within the timeline, gives a fixed appearance. Wherever you are on the timeline, when you look into the room at God, He is the same. Not even his shadow shifts no matter where you happen to be on the line.

Please critique the above: Does anyone know of scriptures that address "eternity past" as opposed to "eternity future"? That would tend to mitigate against my line vs. 3 D illustration (I made this illustration up recently myself, so it is ready for peer review).
 
A

Abiding

Guest
On foresight - if God saves us based on foresight of our faith, foresight of our good works or foresight of any other quality in us, than whatever God foresaw in us is a good work. Then we deserve salvation - God foresaw our merit! We would have a legitimate complaint if God didn't save us. This is not salvation by grace through faith as revealed in scripture.

The example of Judas sheds some light on the subject(s) at hand - Before Judas was born it was written that he would betray Christ, the price he would receive, what the money would be spent on, and the future condition of his children after his death. The plan of God would not unfold in history if Judas failed to betray Christ. Judas was predestined to betray Christ before he was born. God bears responsibility for the fact that he created a creature, Judas, who would betray Christ. God bears responsibility for the fact that he created a creature, Judas, who would act outside of God's normative ethical will. Judas had all options legitimately on the table. He was not coerced to betray Christ. He was not forced to betray Christ. He had everything he needed to choose not to betray Christ. He was outside of God's normative ethical will when he betrayed Christ; for this reason, his sin stands deserving of a just punishment. NO conflicts in any of the above. We don't need to limit the scriptural fact that God plans from eternity in order to hold a man morally accountable for his actions.

No theological lenses are necessary to interpret God's eternal planning strategy. Every detail of history was planned outside of time, great and small. Yet we are all held morally accountable not only for actions, but even for thoughts, and feelings (some of which which may seem uncontrollable - murder and adultery are examples Jesus gives).

NEW EXAMPLE NEEDING PEER REVEIW: Time is a thread, a line, segment with a beginning and an end (Christ). The creature passes along it sequentially. Eternity is not an infinite extension of the line. It would be demonstrated by existing in three dimensional room with the line segment of time contained in the room. That is why eternity, when viewed from our perspective within the timeline, gives a fixed appearance. Wherever you are on the timeline, when you look into the room at God, He is the same. Not even his shadow shifts no matter where you happen to be on the line.

Please critique the above: Does anyone know of scriptures that address "eternity past" as opposed to "eternity future"? That would tend to mitigate against my line vs. 3 D illustration (I made this illustration up recently myself, so it is ready for peer review).
The bible does not support Judas was "predestined" to betray Christ. Mt 26:25; Jn. 13:27-30; 17:11-12; Psa. 41:9; Acts 1:16
Surely God planned everything and rules everything. But can we go past scripture in our zeal to explain scripture? Says he fell by transgression, although that was known of God. I cant call it predestination if you mean God made him that way.

Ok i read again. Nevermind
:p
 
Last edited:
A

Abiding

Guest
Maybe you mean He was chosen for the job. Id agree. And agree God worked everything out
before He created anything to work out for His good pleasure.
Right time doesnt exist in pure light,
 

loveme1

Senior Member
Oct 30, 2011
8,083
190
63
This is something to consider about predestination....

Luke 22

And the Lord said, Simon, Simon, behold, Satan hath desired to have you, that he may sift you as wheat: 32But I have prayed for thee, that thy faith fail not: and when thou art converted, strengthen thy brethren. 33And he said unto him, Lord, I am ready to go with thee, both into prison, and to death. 34And he said, I tell thee, Peter, the cock shall not crow this day, before that thou shalt thrice deny that thou knowest me.
 
Dec 26, 2012
5,853
137
0
You are right about this, but it is the same thing with saying that "it is also possible that he knew God long before this", since that is also not biblical. Nevertheless, I was uncareful there and might have to retract the statement, for now. I did study up on it long ago...but I've forgotten the details of it. Quiet a few teachers says he was. Anyways, I'll check into it again. This aside: the meaty issue we discuss here and now is still if Abraham was chosen by God because of some quality in him (conditional election) or if God in His sovereignity based his choosing of Abraham because of His own will (unconditional election). Your take is?
Not quit the same,if something is possible it does not mean that it is true only that it is possible but it does not mean it's provable.

My take is I don't know,I don't understand how it all works. It is beyond my comprehension. I know in my own case it wasn't because of something in me. I was a broken down wreck of a human being,there was nothing in me that God should ever love me. I am not worthy of Him at all in any shape or form. All I know is He brought me to a place that I knew I needed Him. No sinners pray,just a lost sheep crying help,I can't do it anymore on my own. He found me. Nothing in any of it that I can boast that it was something I did. All I did was stop running from Him.

Do I really need to know how it works or can I rest in the fact that God is good,Holy,pure and just,and what ever He does
is good and just? Someday in eternity perhaps I will understand but is it something I really need to understand or know it works in this life?
 
T

tdrew777

Guest

Do I really need to know how it works or can I rest in the fact that God is good,Holy,pure and just,and what ever He does
is good and just? Someday in eternity perhaps I will understand but is it something I really need to understand or know it works in this life?
Thanks for your post. Here is something to chew on:

Eph 1:15 For this cause I also, having heard of the faith in the Lord Jesus which is among you, and the love which ye show toward all the saints, 16 cease not to give thanks for you, making mention of you in my prayers; 17 that the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of glory, may give unto you a spirit of wisdom and revelation in the knowledge of him; 18 having the eyes of your heart enlightened, that ye may know what is the hope of his calling, what the riches of the glory of his inheritance in the saints, 19 and what the exceeding greatness of his power to us- ward who believe, according to that working of the strength of his might 20 which he wrought in Christ, when he raised him from the dead, and made him to sit at his right hand in the heavenly places, 21 far above all rule, and authority, and power, and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this world, but also in that which is to come:
22 and he put all things in subjection under his feet, and gave him to be head over all things to the church, 23 which is his body, the fulness of him that filleth all in all.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
You are still not getting it. Your use of the term "foreseeing" and "foreknowledge" indicate that you do not understand my argument.

God knows all truth as part of His nature. Knowing Truth is as much a part of His nature as omniscience and omnipotence. In fact, it fits in that word "omniscience".

God does not view time as we do. He sees Truth. It is part of His nature to know all events in time. It is not something that He views or foresees. It is our nature to sin. We don't have to learn to sin. It comes naturally. It is God's nature to know all Truth. He doesn't have to learn it, or foresee it.

God chose Abraham because of the truth He knew to be that Abraham would respond to grace the way that he did.

This is a difficult concept. But it is more difficult for me to believe that God created certain people with the express purpose of sending them to Hell.

That may be true. And God can do as He wishes and He doesn't have to explain Himself to me, but it goes against what I believe to be God's nature of love and justice.
I am really intrigued by this idea! I have some questions though, just wonder if I should not email them to you,, or if it is ok to ask ya in the thread?
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Would God be "unjust" and "unloving" if He only predestinated certain individuals to glory and actively or passively passing by the rest?
let me ask you.

a man has two sons which were created out of a loving relationship.

both sons hated their father. did everything they can to hurt their father, did not obey him, unless it suited their interests.. and were basically his enemy.

then the time comes for the father to give his inheritance.

The father gives one all he has,, dresses him in fine clothes, gives him the best of houses, makes sure for the rest of his life he is taken care of no matter what.

the other son, he locks in a room in the basement, does not allow any light or contact with anyone,, feeds him enough just to keep him alive so he can suffer for the rest of his life.

is this a just and loving father?
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
On foresight - if God saves us based on foresight of our faith, foresight of our good works or foresight of any other quality in us, than whatever God foresaw in us is a good work. Then we deserve salvation - God foresaw our merit! We would have a legitimate complaint if God didn't save us. This is not salvation by grace through faith as revealed in scripture.
Agreed. Even though I believe God knows everything we will ever do before we do it (even before we are born scripture says) He does not save us based on a merit system. We are still saved by faith, If we were not born again into a right standing with God and made alive in him, we never would have done the deeds which scripture says we will be rewarded for. Thus even in foreknowledge, God still saved us based on the faith, which empowered us to do the works which would merit reward.

The example of Judas sheds some light on the subject(s) at hand - Before Judas was born it was written that he would betray Christ, the price he would receive, what the money would be spent on, and the future condition of his children after his death. The plan of God would not unfold in history if Judas failed to betray Christ. Judas was predestined to betray Christ before he was born. God bears responsibility for the fact that he created a creature, Judas, who would betray Christ. God bears responsibility for the fact that he created a creature, Judas, who would act outside of God's normative ethical will. Judas had all options legitimately on the table. He was not coerced to betray Christ. He was not forced to betray Christ. He had everything he needed to choose not to betray Christ. He was outside of God's normative ethical will when he betrayed Christ; for this reason, his sin stands deserving of a just punishment. NO conflicts in any of the above. We don't need to limit the scriptural fact that God plans from eternity in order to hold a man morally accountable for his actions.
Here is the hard part. Your right, it was foretold that Juds would betray Christ. so you could say it was predestined to do this.

this the question arises..

Was this because God made it so he would do it, by blinding him supernaturaly so he could never see the truth.

or was it because God looked through time (which he is able to do being outside of time) and saw everything Judas would do. and foretold these events so when we saw these things happen which God said would happen hundreds of years before they did;

1. Give credibility to God being the one true God
2. Give credibility to Christ being the true messiah, since this man and these events would happen to Christ (which go along with all the prophesies concerning Christ, his birth, his life and his death)


then the question arises,, which I think no one can answer because of our finite mind, Could Judas have gone against prophesy and changed? and if he could.. how?


No theological lenses are necessary to interpret God's eternal planning strategy. Every detail of history was planned outside of time, great and small. Yet we are all held morally accountable not only for actions, but even for thoughts, and feelings (some of which which may seem uncontrollable - murder and adultery are examples Jesus gives).

NEW EXAMPLE NEEDING PEER REVEIW: Time is a thread, a line, segment with a beginning and an end (Christ). The creature passes along it sequentially. Eternity is not an infinite extension of the line. It would be demonstrated by existing in three dimensional room with the line segment of time contained in the room. That is why eternity, when viewed from our perspective within the timeline, gives a fixed appearance. Wherever you are on the timeline, when you look into the room at God, He is the same. Not even his shadow shifts no matter where you happen to be on the line.

Please critique the above: Does anyone know of scriptures that address "eternity past" as opposed to "eternity future"? That would tend to mitigate against my line vs. 3 D illustration (I made this illustration up recently myself, so it is ready for peer review).
To me eternity past is time before creation. Eternity future is time after Gods timeline on this earth is completed. Everything else is inside of time.
 

superdave5221

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2009
1,409
31
48
I am really intrigued by this idea! I have some questions though, just wonder if I should not email them to you,, or if it is ok to ask ya in the thread?
Hey EG. Go ahead and email them. I am grieved by the contention that this discussion has wrought and I would rather not continue in this debate.

As long as both sides agree that it is God's grace that saves us, and not anything that we do to save ourselves, then it should not be an issue. But it is. I wish now that I had stayed out of this argument. But, unfortunately, we are bounded by time, and I cannot change what has been done.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Hey EG. Go ahead and email them. I am grieved by the contention that this discussion has wrought and I would rather not continue in this debate.

As long as both sides agree that it is God's grace that saves us, and not anything that we do to save ourselves, then it should not be an issue. But it is. I wish now that I had stayed out of this argument. But, unfortunately, we are bounded by time, and I cannot change what has been done.
which is exactly why I thought I would email ya, then add to the fight..lol
 
T

tdrew777

Guest
God sending anyone to hell is difficult to come to grips with. Whether He pre-planned it, foreknew it or it takes Him by surprise, it is just as hard to grasp the concept. If it took God by surprise (which we all agree is not scriptural?) that does not IN THE LEAST mitigate against the cognitive dissonance that the reality of people going to hell causes. We are not all His children; we are all his creation - that hard reality has precious little to do with predestination.
 
A

Abiding

Guest
Agreed. Even though I believe God knows everything we will ever do before we do it (even before we are born scripture says) He does not save us based on a merit system. We are still saved by faith, If we were not born again into a right standing with God and made alive in him, we never would have done the deeds which scripture says we will be rewarded for. Thus even in foreknowledge, God still saved us based on the faith, which empowered us to do the works which would merit reward.


Here is the hard part. Your right, it was foretold that Juds would betray Christ. so you could say it was predestined to do this.

this the question arises..

Was this because God made it so he would do it, by blinding him supernaturaly so he could never see the truth.

or was it because God looked through time (which he is able to do being outside of time) and saw everything Judas would do. and foretold these events so when we saw these things happen which God said would happen hundreds of years before they did;

1. Give credibility to God being the one true God
2. Give credibility to Christ being the true messiah, since this man and these events would happen to Christ (which go along with all the prophesies concerning Christ, his birth, his life and his death)


then the question arises,, which I think no one can answer because of our finite mind, Could Judas have gone against prophesy and changed? and if he could.. how?




To me eternity past is time before creation. Eternity future is time after Gods timeline on this earth is completed. Everything else is inside of time.
The if Judas could have changed inspite of foreknowledge illogical, foreknowledge knew he would change. So it
wouldnt have been recorded incorrectly. Ha. I find it strange that with all the attributes of God some want to play down
His foreknowldge. It should make people wonder whats up with that. Then, you can see how it foils a certain doctrine.
Judas shows me the opposite of what it shows some. And thats that God will make use of even the most selfcentered
people, and that the personal human will is not evil strickly because of environment. And all things will work out for good
to His own.
 

tribesman

Senior Member
Oct 13, 2011
4,612
274
83
God is fully justified in sending anyone to Hell as everyone has broken His Law. But when you combine His love in sending His Son to die on the cross to justify our sins, it seems that if everyone is guilty, and God is no respecter of persons, why would He choose to limit the atonement to only a few??

God is fully justified to send all men to hell and owes no man absolutely nothing. However God loves men, but it does not say in scripture that God loves literally "all" men and that He gives the same grace and mercy to literally "all" men or that His promises are extended to literally "all" men. In fact you will find scriptural examples where God was not interested in anything else than just to damn wicked men.

The expression "respecter of persons" seen in scriptural context has to do with race and social status and is not a hindrance for God to freely chose whom to bestow grace or withheld same. But turn this objection of "respecter of persons" around and in fact we have those who believe in free will saying that God saves some men because they believe. The calvinist will say that God unconditionally chooses sinners out of "the one lump" of corrupt, sinful humanity, while the free-willer, with his conditional election, is the one who makes God a respecter of persons.

I am not claiming to know the answers. I do know that God is Holy and just in all that He does, whether or not I understand it. I am just trying to find something that makes sense to me and does not contradict the Word of God. If my idea is unbiblical, then show me. I will accept it and move on.
We can not know all the answers. But the extent of the atonement is answered in scripture to be limited to God's people. Once we just put the issue of justification (which is wholly outside of the sinner) into right place together with propitiation and redemption we will see how this is equated. Since the atoning blood of Christ is the only thing that accomplished (accomplished - not just made potentially available, but actually accomplished by way of satisfaction in the true, factual sense of the word) the redemption in full and thereby securing the salvation of God's people, then it must mean that those not saved were not shielded or covered by same. If in doubt over that, then think about this: If the atoning blood of Christ does NOT save in this wise, then what does the atoning blood of Christ DO? Did Christ's atoning blood actually accomplish ANYTHING for ANYONE in and by itself?
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
I dont see why you guys have to leave noone knows what mix a room is going to get
and i cant see how its anyones fault to have been here when it happens. seems like
a pretty friendly room now.
Not leaving, just do not want to give some people some fuel to flame the fire.. By saying Yeah how about that!!..lol What he said intrigues me, and I want to know more without all the infighting..
 

tribesman

Senior Member
Oct 13, 2011
4,612
274
83
let me ask you.

a man has two sons which were created out of a loving relationship.

both sons hated their father. did everything they can to hurt their father, did not obey him, unless it suited their interests.. and were basically his enemy.

then the time comes for the father to give his inheritance.

The father gives one all he has,, dresses him in fine clothes, gives him the best of houses, makes sure for the rest of his life he is taken care of no matter what.

the other son, he locks in a room in the basement, does not allow any light or contact with anyone,, feeds him enough just to keep him alive so he can suffer for the rest of his life.

is this a just and loving father?
You've been there before e-g...of course that is not a just and loving father.

Problem is: all men are not the children of God.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
You've been there before e-g...of course that is not a just and loving father.

Problem is: all men are not the children of God.
Oh so God did not create all men? as that father created his two sons??

Nice try!
 
A

Abiding

Guest
Yes atoning for all atones for all in and of itself. the rest is just philosophical psychobable.
If not then find another word for gift. For God to have no respect of persons does not mean
He doesnt have respect for Himself and holiness and goodness. He does respect us and rewards
us and curses us dependent on our deeds and the same will happen on judgement day.
What He doesnt have respect for is status or racial background and petty things man respects
is the context of that. Before the cross all are the same.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Since the fall men needs to be regenerated, maybe you missed something.
nope, did not miss anything.

God created man, both sons were totally underserving.. the man offered the gift to one son, and did not even offer it to the other.. neither deserved it, so either neither should have been offered it, or they both should have been offered it. anything else would make the father an unfair, unloving and unjust father.

you see the fair thing woul dhave been offering both sons the gift. it does not mean both would recieve.

One may repent and admit he did all those wrong things to his father and does not deserve it. but thanks him anyway, The other may not repent and say I don;t care what you have, I hate you, and I do not want anything you have to offer. I am better off on my own, because I know what is right for me.

in this senario, the father is righteous, and just and loving. The one who recieved it, did nto earn it, he just trusted his father. the other rejected his fathers gift (even though it was an amasing offer no one should turn down) due to the hate he had for his father and love he had for self