where did sin come from?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.
A

Abiding

Guest
#81
You just said man was UNWILLING so hone your work to be effective.
 
A

Abiding

Guest
#82
Romans 1-3 says a ton more than merely man is unable.
Lots more. In fact that fact alone is far from the point
of the text. A read at least from chapter 1 through 4 is necessary.:p
 

homwardbound

Senior Member
Oct 24, 2012
15,123
134
63
#83
If you answer 'Lucifer' that only answers 'through whom' sin came. Besides pride is only one of sin's manifestation.

If it originated in Lucifer's heart then it is a matter of free will and what guarantee will there be that free will won't commit it anew in heaven in the future?

God is not it's author.

any ideas?
You asked and what guarantee will there be that free will won't commit it anew in heaven in the future?
Because God is sovereign and knows whois real and who is not, who wants to serve with respect and who does not all those that chose Lucifer are kicked out with Lucifer, for
John 16:11Of judgment, because the prince of this world is judged. It is finished at the cross Christ took care of it and condemned all sin to the flesh
Romans 8:3For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:
This why we are to die to the flesh and come alive to God in the Spirit of God
Romans 6:2God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?
Romans 6:4Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life.
Romans 6:7For he that is dead is freed from sin.

problem is people are not believing they are dead through belief and alive to God by the resurrection of Jesus Christ and can only be attained by beleif in God and God approving this by one's Motives if true motive come on in if not a veil remains
Romans 6:8Now if we be dead with Christ, we believe that we shall also live with him:
Romans 6:11Likewise reckon ye also yourselves to be dead indeed unto sin, but alive unto God through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Romans 8:10And if Christ be in you, the body is dead because of sin; but the Spirit is life because of righteousness.

The above is an absolute fact period but it is by whether one believes this or not and God revealing it to you
Sin is done away with in Christ by the death of Christ and we are not saved by the deathwe are saved by the life

Romans 5:10For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#84
so posting Finney as an example of bad doctrine is out:confused:
since when i wonder.
he been around since 1875.
*wonders if it was a dream*
would have thought ppl might want to see where some ideas got a good foothold and examine closer.
didn't know this was a rock concert or summink.
oh well.
 

homwardbound

Senior Member
Oct 24, 2012
15,123
134
63
#85
Should we continue to sin after being born again?
Not according to Paul

Romans 6:1What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?
Romans 6:2God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?

Problem today is people do not believe that by the cross that they are dead to sin, because Satan has spread the lie that since our bodies are still alive that we can't quit and this is an accepted practice therefore you by belief in that lie continue in the body trying and can never accomplish which is Good because we can't not ever of self but if we die in belief that by the cross we die with Christ and then ask to raised back to life as Christ is by God the Father then we are anew alive in the Spirit not back and forth as most of us are doing in and out of fellowship, when there is no in and out of fellowship. You by belief are in or you are not today is the day of salvation by belief and start dieing daily as Paul said to do
In Love of the truth that sets us free
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#86
I think that's poor exegesis bro. There is a greek word despotes, or Master, referring to God. However, this is not to be taken into comparision with the well known dictator of the day. Btw, isn't Obama becoming one lol? The objection against the sovereignity of God by such terms is mainly emotional or philosophy: "if God does something like that He's unjust".
I think your belief comes from emotion or philosophy. My belief of the sovereignty of God keeps his integrity intact. He is seen as both a loving God and a just God.. and I agree on obama..lol

No, it is not in scripture. Scripture clearly shows us how wicked and evil and turned away from God we all are. And Christ was very clear on the lostness of the lost as well. Abundantly clear. Nothing good in man, none is righteous. Surely this has everything to do with man's abilities and will. Also as to his INABILITY AND UNWILLINGNESS to repent and believe.
yes scripture is clear on how wicked and evil men are. But scripture is very clear also on mans ability to come to Christ. We can not "call out on the name of the lord" or "believe in him" if we do not have the ability, in the same token, we can not be judged for not believing, if we are not given the ability to believe.

Scripture says all who are condemned are condemned because they did not believe. They can not be rightly condemned if they are not given the opportunity to believe. this would not be righteous judgment, but unrighteous abuse of authority.


Yes. But it doesn't imply that lost men have the ability to do so. Instead it is the very opposite. Jesus is clear: CAN NOT. Why you argue with this until now is beyond me.
lol.. The argument is based on semantics. Both of us can be right. You say God helps only some, and not others. i say God knows who will respond, and draws them.. The argument itself is fruitless.. as both can be right. which takes us again back to the character of God.. which shows he has a more righteous character?

You are saying that it is within the ability of natural, carnal, unregenerate man to humble himself and have faith in Christ. You are giving the unregenerate the characteristcs of the regenerate. You have been clear on this. And you know we disagree here. You also know that I don't buy into the "God looked down the corridors of time..." as if God needed to learn something. No - He chose and predestined His people. This is what scripture says. That's what I believe. Amen.
He predestined based on foreknowledge. It does not matter if we agree or not. As for humility. Unregenerate man shows humility all the time. An unregenerate father humbles himself for his kids, his wife etc. nothing says he can not humble himself and come to Christ, it is why God sent his spirit to teach all men the things of God, including the just ocndemnation of man, so all men have the ability to humble themselves.

And that not of ourselves.
Not of WORKS lest any man should boast. It (salvation) is of faith not works.. My faith did not come from me, it came from the promise God offered me. why can;t you see this?

Tell us where you find that "ability to chose" in scripture. Do you believe in "prevenient grace"?
Can not find it in scripture. Grace is grace, all men have grace, if not for grace, we would not be here. we would have been terminated after the first sin.

this prevenient grace stuff is just a religious term to help our belief system. anmd is not found in scripture. show me one place where prevenient grace is found in scripture.
 
A

Abiding

Guest
#87
so posting Finney as an example of bad doctrine is out:confused:
since when i wonder.
he been around since 1875.
*wonders if it was a dream*
would have thought ppl might want to see where some ideas got a good foothold and examine closer.
didn't know this was a rock concert or summink.
oh well.
Not that. Exposing anyone is fine with me. But to say amil makes you catholic
is silly i think.

To say that your either calvinist or arminian is also too narrowminded.
Then heap on a name of a demonized heretic causes a temptation
of a flesh response.

Finny hardly taught anything original. He just an easy target.
And whether amil came from the church prior to the reformation
means little to me.
 
C

crosspreacher

Guest
#88
satan cannot do anything from himself unless God permit him. God put the capacity to pervert in him.
In the new heaven, there will not be any perversion. No capacity to sin anymore.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#90
Not that. Exposing anyone is fine with me. But to say amil makes you catholic
is silly i think.

To say that your either calvinist or arminian is also too narrowminded.
Then heap on a name of a demonized heretic causes a temptation
of a flesh response.

Finny hardly taught anything original. He just an easy target.
And whether amil came from the church prior to the reformation
means little to me.
I do think it is interesting. She seems to have no problem saying she wants people to see where their belief came from. but when people do the same back to her.. it is wrong..lol sortof a double standard!!

Thats why I like to stick to the word.. History is ok.. but history has been a bad thing to use to support our beliefs since history started!
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#91
Does 'unable' to sin mean a lack of choice to sin?

hmmm.....it doesn't tell us, does it?
since the former things are forgotten and not remembered any more, and since it's all glory,
and eternal,
imma go with lack of choice.
what bad could there be to choose?
it doesn't say there will ever be another judgment.
so looks like no more bad things to choose.

but who can say.
God will work it right:)

what a day!
 
A

Abiding

Guest
#92
I do think it is interesting. She seems to have no problem saying she wants people to see where their belief came from. but when people do the same back to her.. it is wrong..lol sortof a double standard!!

Thats why I like to stick to the word.. History is ok.. but history has been a bad thing to use to support our beliefs since history started!

My problem is in the examination of the hermeneutics and exegesis that some claim
to come to their conclusions. See? I never cared. Ive learned from aw pink, edwards, owen
.....to tell the truth ive learned more from calvinists more than anyone. And am thankful
for their tremendous work. I just cant turn a blind eye to what i can see. And accept what
seems bad exegesis and hermeneutic. Thats the advantage of not being a goldclub member
of any namebrand cult. Im just a ordinary heretic.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#93
My problem is in the examination of the hermeneutics and exegesis that some claim
to come to their conclusions. See? I never cared. Ive learned from aw pink, edwards, owen
.....to tell the truth ive learned more from calvinists more than anyone. And am thankful
for their tremendous work. I just cant turn a blind eye to what i can see. And accept what
seems bad exegesis and hermeneutic. Thats the advantage of not being a goldclub member
of any namebrand cult. Im just a ordinary heretic.
I guess i will be one with ya bro..

I stopped following men and religion and theologies years ago. they seemed to keep letting me down.. and I would find them to be in error when I really studied them.
 
A

Abiding

Guest
#94
I guess i will be one with ya bro..

I stopped following men and religion and theologies years ago. they seemed to keep letting me down.. and I would find them to be in error when I really studied them.

Following them? No!!!! But for example take aw pink. Several books on "gleaning" My gosh it gives me goosebumps!
I learned more in a paragraph than an entire book by others. The book on the attributes of God, i think that saved
me decades of bible study to see, if i ever would have seen it.

John Owen/Edwards/Murray combined saved me 20 lifetimes. God set people in the body, not perfect men.
But id never not read anything avaliable to me.....which doest make me a follower. I know whom i trust in.
See EG i even listened to your pastor. ha:p
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#95
If you answer 'Lucifer' that only answers 'through whom' sin came. Besides pride is only one of sin's manifestation.

If it originated in Lucifer's heart then it is a matter of free will and what guarantee will there be that free will won't commit it anew in heaven in the future?

God is not it's author.

any ideas?
since God in not the author of sin.

and He Will not choose anything but GOOD,

since that is Who and What He is....again i must say we are not told from whence came sin.
what do you think crossnote?
 
J

jimmydiggs

Guest
#96
lol. what does this have to do with anything? Satan is trying to convince the world
He tells man to be autonomous from God.

[video=youtube;dz2LTIkWIB0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dz2LTIkWIB0[/video]

He tells man every day, you and I, to disobey God and to borrow from Fleetwoodmac, to "go your own way", after all that God feller, he doesn't know what he's doing... "His laws, his ways, they're restrictive! That's not love! The law is not love, it is slavery!"

... and man falls for it everyday, but it isn't entirely because we're stupid and easily dooped, but because that's what we want! We assert our own autonomy every day when we sin.

Jesus commands us to die to ourselves:
Matthew 16
Then Jesus said to his disciples, "Whoever wants to be my disciple must deny themselves and take up their cross and follow me."

Jesus tells us to take that self autonomy and bury it, and that is something I find so refreshing about Calvinism compared to American Christianity. The free willy type, seeks to divorce God from any scripture sense of sovereignty. God doesn't rule over the universe, he doesn't command history, he isn't Lord of Lords and King of Kings... you are! Assert yourself! Woohoo! Autonomy.

Paul says:
Galatians 6:14
May I never boast except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, through which the world has been crucified to me, and I to the world.

Paul says that he is crucified to the world, and elsewhere he says "it is no longer I(Paul) who lives, but rather it is Christ living in me." These are not the words of a human asserting his own autonomy. It is of a man who is a slave to Christ, and yet the free willy objects to any notion that man not autonomous.

What bothers me the most though, are the worldly arguments used and the godless fatalism that results.


1. God is not a God of love
Yet, does he not do the opposite as well? As a multi-tour veteran of the pro-homosexual/same-sex marriage threads that frequently reoccur, and of dealing with atheism in general, it pains me to see free willys use the same arguments they do. "A God of love wouldn't do that! He wouldn't stop a loving couple!" I have a friend who is PCUSA, who used that argument. Before the summer he was against same-sex marriage and homosexual pastors, the PCUSA changed it's stance, and so did he. Now he says, "Well, God is a god of love, so how could he ever stop two homosexuals who love each other?"


2. God wants you to do his bidding and make him happy,
God commands us to obey, what's wrong with that?

He does not have you rest interests in heart (God is holding back, he knows in the day you eat you will be like him, knowing good and evil)
This is problematic to myself and others like me how? Is it because God doesn't save everyone the way you want him to? Is God not just? Not one of us deserves even a chance of salvation. Had Jesus never died on that cross, God would still be perfectly loving, and most certainly perfectly just. Yet the free willy cries "injustice!" at the notion that God does not have to save anyone. What is the best interest of man?

Interestingly enough you use an example where the devil encourages autonomy from God in support of autonomy from God.


3. God has you on a leash and will whip you into submittion,
Sure does have me on a leash, and will discipline me. Ain't nothin' wrong with that.

you are forced to do his will you have no will of your own.
Scripture? All throughout he tells us to assert our own autonomy. Do you not recall his encounter with Jesus?

"Yo Jesus, do this"
"No, for God hath said"



those are the lies of satan.
I want some bible verses up in hurrr...

Nah, a few maybe... autonomy is his lie. Go your own way.

Jesus tells us to do something very different:

Luke 22:42
"Father, if you are willing, take this cup from me; yet not my will, but yours be done."

Crucify that will of yours, and take up the Father's.


lol.. No, it was him trying to convince man God was holding back.. when he convinced man of this. pride set in..
Genesis 3
3 Now the serpent was more crafty than any of the wild animals the Lord God had made. He said to the woman, “Did God really say, ‘You must not eat from any tree in the garden’?”

2 The woman said to the serpent, “We may eat fruit from the trees in the garden, 3 but God did say, ‘You must not eat fruit from the tree that is in the middle of the garden, and you must not touch it, or you will die.’”

4 “You will not certainly die,” the serpent said to the woman. 5 “For God knows that when you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.”

6 When the woman saw that the fruit of the tree was good for food and pleasing to the eye, and also desirable for gaining wisdom, she took some and ate it. She also gave some to her husband, who was with her, and he ate it. 7 Then the eyes of both of them were opened, and they realized they were naked; so they sewed fig leaves together and made coverings for themselves.


The devil calls into question the justice of God, and the free willy makes this his main argument against those who say: "Not my will, but yours."
 
J

jimmydiggs

Guest
#97
I used to hate singing. I wasn't much good at it, and I was even kicked out of vocal class by a middle school teacher.

Psalm 40 is probably my favorite psalm to sing.

1 I waited for the Lord my God,
and patiently did bear;
At length to me he did incline
my voice and cry to hear.

2 He took me from a fearful pit,
and from the miry clay,
And on a rock he set my feet,
establishing my way.


3 He put a new song in my mouth,
our God to magnify:

Many shall see it, and shall fear,
and on the Lord rely.

4 O blessed is the man whose trust
upon the Lord relies;
Respecting not the proud, nor such
as turn aside to lies.

5 O Lord my God, full many are
the wonders thou hast done;
Thy gracious thoughts to us-ward far
above all thoughts are gone:

In order none can reckon them
to thee: if them declare,
And speak of them I would, they more
than can be numbered are.

6 No sacrifice nor offering
didst thou at all desire;

Mine ears thou bored: sin-off 'ring thou
and burnt didst not require:

7 Then to the Lord these were my words,
I come, behold and see;
Within the volume of the book
it written is of me:

8 To do thy will I take delight,
O thou my God that art;
Yea, that most holy law of thine
I have within my heart.

9 Within the congregation great
I righteousness did preach:
Lo, thou dost know, O Lord, that I
refrained not my speech.

10 I never did within my heart
conceal thy righteousness;
I thy salvation have declared,
and shown thy faithfulness:
Thy kindness, which most loving is,
concealed have not I,
Nor from the congregation great
have hid thy verity.

11 Thy tender mercies, Lord, from me
O do thou not restrain;
Thy loving-kindness, and thy truth,
let them me still maintain.

12 For ills past reck'ning compass me,
and mine iniquities
Such hold upon me taken have,
I cannot lift mine eyes:
They more than hairs are on mine head,
thence is my heart dismayed.

13 Be pleased, Lord, to rescue me;
Lord, hasten to mine aid.

14 Shamed and confounded be they all
that seek my soul to kill;
Yea, let them backward driven be,
and shamed, that wish me ill.

15 For a reward of this their shame
confounded let them be.
That in this manner scoffing say,
Aha, aha! to me.

16 In thee let all be glad, and joy,
who seeking thee abide;
Who thy salvation love, say still,
The Lord be magnified.


17 I'm poor and needy, yet the Lord
of me a care doth take:
Thou art my help and savior,
my God, no tarrying make.

I love those first few verses most.
[video=youtube;Bq1jFoSRt0A]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bq1jFoSRt0A[/video]
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#98
He tells man to be autonomous from God.
Why? because God does not have our best interests. he wants to rule us. and hold back from us.



He tells man every day, you and I, to disobey God and to borrow from Fleetwoodmac, to "go your own way", after all that God feller, he doesn't know what he's doing... "His laws, his ways, they're restrictive! That's not love! The law is not love, it is slavery!"
Thanks you just proved my point. It is not love, God does not love you. he wants you to be his slave..

... and man falls for it everyday, but it isn't entirely because we're stupid and easily dooped, but because that's what we want! We assert our own autonomy every day when we sin.
yep, we want to be our own God. because God does not love me, or he would not tell me to stop doing things which he says harm me,, to try to trick me into doing his will..

Jesus commands us to die to ourselves:
Matthew 16
Then Jesus said to his disciples, "Whoever wants to be my disciple must deny themselves and take up their cross and follow me."

Jesus tells us to take that self autonomy and bury it, and that is something I find so refreshing about Calvinism compared to American Christianity. The free willy type, seeks to divorce God from any scripture sense of sovereignty. God doesn't rule over the universe, he doesn't command history, he isn't Lord of Lords and King of Kings... you are! Assert yourself! Woohoo! Autonomy.
1. He told the people who were already his to doe to self. If we die to self to be saved, then we are teaching a gospel of works. not grace.. so which is it?
2. God does command history. He uses mens free will choices to do his will. thats why he places certain people in certain situations. he knows how they will react. He does not force them.


Paul says:
Galatians 6:14
May I never boast except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, through which the world has been crucified to me, and I to the world.

Paul says that he is crucified to the world, and elsewhere he says "it is no longer I(Paul) who lives, but rather it is Christ living in me." These are not the words of a human asserting his own autonomy. It is of a man who is a slave to Christ, and yet the free willy objects to any notion that man not autonomous.
Non of this denys free will. Paul CHOSE to do this. he was not forced to do this. and he asks all of us to CHOSE to follow him and do this also. and warns us of the consequences if we do not.

What bothers me the most though, are the worldly arguments used and the godless fatalism that results.
what bothers me is fatalism makes out God to be an evil ruler and not a loving father and creator. even to those who will ultimately reject his saving grace.

Yet, does he not do the opposite as well? As a multi-tour veteran of the pro-homosexual/same-sex marriage threads that frequently reoccur, and of dealing with atheism in general, it pains me to see free willys use the same arguments they do. "A God of love wouldn't do that! He wouldn't stop a loving couple!" I have a friend who is PCUSA, who used that argument. Before the summer he was against same-sex marriage and homosexual pastors, the PCUSA changed it's stance, and so did he. Now he says, "Well, God is a god of love, so how could he ever stop two homosexuals who love each other?"
um free will does not give us the authorityto live in sin, that's a lame excuse. and a lame reason to reject free will God gave us to chose or reject his free gift.

God commands us to obey, what's wrong with that?
God has a reason. and it is not to make him happy and us unhappy, it is because he created us, and he knows how we work.. Nice twist.


This is problematic to myself and others like me how? Is it because God doesn't save everyone the way you want him to?
the way I want him to? where does this come from? it is not my will. God said if you trust him, he will save you. there is no other way. It is not my way, it is Gods way..

Is God not just? Not one of us deserves even a chance of salvation. Had Jesus never died on that cross, God would still be perfectly loving, and most certainly perfectly just. Yet the free willy cries "injustice!" at the notion that God does not have to save anyone. What is the best interest of man?
God does not have to save everyone, He CHOSE TO offer salvation to everyone.. This makes him the loving and just God he is..


Interestingly enough you use an example where the devil encourages autonomy from God in support of autonomy from God.
Who said I am supporting anyone?

Sure does have me on a leash, and will discipline me. Ain't nothin' wrong with that.
well you take that God. I will take the one who loved me when I was his enemy. Who loved me when I hated him. Who loved me so much he came to earth and died so I could be freed from condemnation, and restoed to a relationship with him. He does not have me on a leash, he does not have to. I follow him because I KNOW he has my best interest at heart. he has proven it to me over and over again. I am not perfect. But God loves me anyway. He is my abba.


Scripture? All throughout he tells us to assert our own autonomy. Do you not recall his encounter with Jesus?

"Yo Jesus, do this"
"No, for God hath said"




I want some bible verses up in hurrr...

Nah, a few maybe... autonomy is his lie. Go your own way.

Jesus tells us to do something very different:

Luke 22:42
"Father, if you are willing, take this cup from me; yet not my will, but yours be done."

Crucify that will of yours, and take up the Father's.




Genesis 3
3 Now the serpent was more crafty than any of the wild animals the Lord God had made. He said to the woman, “Did God really say, ‘You must not eat from any tree in the garden’?”

2 The woman said to the serpent, “We may eat fruit from the trees in the garden, 3 but God did say, ‘You must not eat fruit from the tree that is in the middle of the garden, and you must not touch it, or you will die.’”

4 “You will not certainly die,” the serpent said to the woman. 5 “For God knows that when you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.”

6 When the woman saw that the fruit of the tree was good for food and pleasing to the eye, and also desirable for gaining wisdom, she took some and ate it. She also gave some to her husband, who was with her, and he ate it. 7 Then the eyes of both of them were opened, and they realized they were naked; so they sewed fig leaves together and made coverings for themselves.


The devil calls into question the justice of God, and the free willy makes this his main argument against those who say: "Not my will, but yours."
nothing else worth responding to. Alot of fluff..

Again. most of what you said ocmpletely supports my belief.. That is odd isn't it? we are almost there if you just stop listening to isms. and start looking to the loving father.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#99
Following them? No!!!! But for example take aw pink. Several books on "gleaning" My gosh it gives me goosebumps!
I learned more in a paragraph than an entire book by others. The book on the attributes of God, i think that saved
me decades of bible study to see, if i ever would have seen it.

John Owen/Edwards/Murray combined saved me 20 lifetimes. God set people in the body, not perfect men.
But id never not read anything avaliable to me.....which doest make me a follower. I know whom i trust in.
See EG i even listened to your pastor. ha:p
lol, I do not mean we should not read or listen. We should, they can teach us alot. it is the blind following of men which get us in trouble. I do not agree with everything my church says, but if I became a blind follower. I would be in trouble. and a man follower not a God follower.
 
A

Abiding

Guest
Diggs: Jesus tells us to take that self autonomy and bury it, and that is something I find so refreshing about Calvinism compared to American Christianity. The free willy type, seeks to divorce God from any scripture sense of sovereignty. God doesn't rule over the universe, he doesn't command history, he isn't Lord of Lords and King of Kings... you are! Assert yourself! Woohoo! Autonomy.

``````````````````````````````
`````````````````````````````````````
What a bold statement. I cant disagree more. Sounds as if anyone who isnt a calvinist
doesnt die to self, doest believe God is sovereign. Just another pack of group think slander.
Nothin more Diggs.

Not sure im a freewilly type tho....just dont connect the dots where the bible doesnt.
I do like alot of calvinism. Quite a bit really.
But they wont let me in their group....no heretics allowed, remember?

 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.