To comfort those who speak in tongues

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Jul 1, 2015
584
9
0
An understanding of the different usages of another seemed relevant to me. If it is not to you . . . then it's no big deal. I meant no harm.

I apologize for not reading thoroughly - but only saw "that doesn't mean any old Tom, Dick or Harry.

I meant nothing as an argument . . . just a clearer understanding. Even at the end of my post, I said: To a degree yes we are on the same page . . .

Okay . . . your just not taking in the meaning of the contraction "but" which starts off v7 . . . That contraction is used to set in contrast . . . we learn that in any English class in school.

The holy spirit is also a gift - Acts 2:38, 11:17. Elsewhere there is the "fruit" of the Spirit which manifest itself in nine characteristics: But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, meekness, temperance [Gal. 5:22]. . . . just as the manifestation of the Spirit is shown in nine manifestations [1 Cor. 12:7].

You know . . . I never meant anything I said as an argument just further elaboration on the discussion and in agreement with what you had posted. I am having trouble understanding the anger that seems to be coming from you. Anyway, I apologize if I angered you in some way . . . . .
No, I am sorry. I felt you were just going into attack mode like some others on here and I was wrong. Thank you for your response.
 
E

ember

Guest
y'all take another swing...I think I need to stop responding here ... the way I feel right now, is not a way I want to feel

I pray God's peace upon you all and His mercy for all of us
 
K

KennethC

Guest
Calling proper biblical exegesis "unbelief" is the cry of a heretic, in my opinion.

One, I learned it in Bible college, so you needed fret about there being "a large margin for error." Two, I guess you don't any dictionaries, either, it being too risky to use in order to define a word for fear of "a large margin for error."


I do, all the time. The thing us, unlike you, I also use other, more reliable sources other than myself to discern what the Spirit is telling me. You seem to think the only Source you need is the Holy Spirit, which is true only if you know absolutely, positively, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that what you "hear" from Him lines up with biblical truth.

Read this next part carefully: Your "signs-and-wonders doctrines" are a manmade teaching that sprinkles bad theology, poor exegesis, nearly no historical or lexical context with a very small bit of truth that leads to huge error on the part of your pastors, and your fellow practioners. You are not "spiritual discerning" but self-discerning. Therein lies the different in how I know the Holy Spirit, and you abuse whatever relationship you might hope to have with Him.

Really? I guess someone tore these verses out of your Bible, hm?
2 Timothy 2, NASB
15 Be diligent to present yourself approved to God as a workman who does not need to be ashamed, accurately handling the word of truth.

Titus 2
1
But as for you, speak the things which are fitting for sound doctrine.

Jude
3
Beloved, while I was making every effort to write you about our common salvation, I felt the necessity to write to you appealing that you contend earnestly [i.e., fight diligently] for the faith which was once for all handed down to the saints.​

Your doctrine, my friend, is not sound. Sound doctrine leads to life.
1 Timothy 4
16
Pay close attention to yourself and to your teaching; persevere in these things, for as you do this you will ensure salvation both for yourself and for those who hear you.

Sound doctrine is too easily left unrecognizable in our own "wisdom." The reason Paul and the other apostles constantly urge sitting under strong teaching, sound doctrine, listening to true teachers who are students of the Gospel, rather than just saying, "Rely on the Holy Spirit. He'll tell you everything you need to know," is because, without those solidly biblical teachings, which include a knowledge of the original languages, the culture and history the the times associated with the Gospel writers, the Old Testament ties to the new revelation of Christ, you will be easily misled, or you will mislead yourself, thinking your own thoughts are "the voice of God."


The word of God comes from the Holy Spirit. You would have us go directly to the source when the great risk -- as evident in your own misguided beliefs -- is that you will not "hear" God, but something else, be it the imaginings of man, or the doctrine of demons, who work tirelessly to distract us from the Gospel of faith through grace with bells and whistles like "gifts" of tongues, healings, and even claims of resurrections.
1 Thessalonians 5
21
But examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good;
22 abstain from every form of evil.

"Examine everything." Don't take your own thoughts as "evidence" of anything. Make certain what you think about a passage, a belief, a doctrine, can be biblically supported. Your's can't be supported from the Bible, no matter how many verses (taken out of context) you think you can quote to me. And you need to realize that warning isn't given by Paul out of the blue. It is obvious from the context that the Thessolonicans were dealing with similar, though not as severe, issues as the off-the-wall Corinthians and their man-based practices.
1 Thessalonians 5
12
But we request of you, brethren, that you appreciate those who diligently labor among you, and have charge over you in the Lord and give you instruction,
13 and that you esteem them very highly in love because of their work. Live in peace with one another.
14 We urge you, brethren, admonish the unruly, encourage the fainthearted, help the weak, be patient with everyone.
15 See that no one repays another with evil for evil, but always seek after that which is good for one another and for all people.
16 Rejoice always;
17 pray without ceasing;
18 in everything give thanks; for this is God's will for you in Christ Jesus.
19 Do not quench the Spirit;
20 do not despise prophetic utterances.

Paul even warns against "despising prophetic utterances" there, the canon of the Bible not being fully written at the time, but notice he doesn't say a thing about tongues or the other temporary "signs-and-wonders" gifts.


You totally ignore context here, again cherry-picking verses to "prove" and unprovable point. Paul isn't speaking of the Spirit revealing "everything you ever needed to know about God and how He works." He is talking about the Spirit helping us receive as truth the sound doctrine of biblical teaching! He isn't talking about the Spirit "zapping us" with wisdom, but of mature Christians received the wisdom of God through sound teachers.

1 Corinthains 2
3
I was with you in weakness and in fear and in much trembling,
4 and my message and my preaching were not in persuasive words of wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power,
5 so that your faith would not rest on the wisdom of men, but on the power of God.
6 Yet we do speak wisdom among those who are mature; a wisdom, however, not of this age nor of the rulers of this age, who are passing away;
7 but we speak God's wisdom in a mystery, the hidden wisdom which God predestined before the ages to our glory;

Paul is speaking to you. He is saying, "Grow up!" Be mature in Christ so you can receive the meat of the Gospel and not be distracted and needlessly entertained by sideshows run by false teachers and demons.


Why would you need other sources to explain to you what the Holy Spirit is saying ???

The Holy Spirit will tell it to you plainly and truthfully, and you would not need those outside sources for understanding Him.
He will lead us to other sources yes but only for growing and edification, not for understanding His way.

Bible colleges are man made systems that are full of doctrinal errors in their teachings, and most that I have seen that have gone to them complicate the word to much and change what is clearly being said in the word. The other thing they do is teach others to pull scriptures out and make them stand alone, that is bad exegesis !!!
 
P

PeacefulWarrior

Guest
For Ember...(hi BTW) what he is doing here, I found out, is called "projecting"...and emotional abusers are good at it. He changed the problem from himself to you....rather than see that he is behaving badly, as you and others rightly identified, he makes it your fault for raising the issue. He says it is YOU who are being loathsome when it is he, and he hopes this ploy will throw others off the scent.
There have been several occasions (on these forums) where I have been so blinded by what I perceived as offensive and destructive words that I failed to see the truth in their statements. Perhaps this is one of the difficulties that goes along with this method of communication (internet forums). Perhaps it is because I am still an infant in the faith, compared to these grandpas.

I encourage you two to go back to your OP and re-read their responses to you.
 
P

PeacefulWarrior

Guest
Why would you need other sources to explain to you what the Holy Spirit is saying ???
The Holy Spirit will tell it to you plainly and truthfully, and you would not need those outside sources for understanding Him.
Do you consider the Bible to be an outside source?
 
K

KennethC

Guest
y'all take another swing...I think I need to stop responding here ... the way I feel right now, is not a way I want to feel

I pray God's peace upon you all and His mercy for all of us

I know we don't always see eye to eye, but this is what they do is attack others and call them all kinds of names and heretics if you don't agree with their bad exegesis. For there is nothing in the bible that says tongues, prophecy, or any of the other gifts have ceased right now.
 
K

KennethC

Guest
Do you consider the Bible to be an outside source?
No because it is the Word of God therefore it is just as much of the Spirit as well, and the Holy Spirit that is given to us will guide us in the truth of what is written in the scriptures so that their is no private interpretations.

Those who seek out guidance from other sources besides the Holy Spirit and the word of God are easily lead into private interpretations. We have division in the churches because of these private interpretations and they act like all are saved, but the bible says there is only one path through Jesus unto eternal life and we must continue in that sound doctrine and not be lead away to other various doctrines.
 
P

PeacefulWarrior

Guest
I know we don't always see eye to eye, but this is what they do is attack others and call them all kinds of names and heretics if you don't agree with their bad exegesis. For there is nothing in the bible that says tongues, prophecy, or any of the other gifts have ceased right now.
1 Corinthians 13:8-12
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
uh...not

I have had words with him in other threads that have nothing to do with tongues...he is swift to get less than nice

if you agree? well then it's all peaches 'n cream

what is not understood, is that we love the Lord...we LOVE Him and we regard what is being done as tearing Him apart...His Spirit is not a thing to conduct proper biblical exegesis with! He is the third PERSON of the Trinity !
Heb 4:12 For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.

I never said He was anything less than God. But His ministry is clearly explained in the bible. He speaks not of Himself but only what He receives from the Father.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
P

PeacefulWarrior

Guest
I know we don't always see eye to eye, but this is what they do is attack others and call them all kinds of names and heretics if you don't agree with their bad exegesis. For there is nothing in the bible that says tongues, prophecy, or any of the other gifts have ceased right now.
Both "sides" do it. I'm probably guilty of it as well. I'd also like to add that it is very easy to misunderstand what someone is intending to communicate when we can only see words on a screen.
 
K

KennethC

Guest
Once again that is a misuse of 1 Corinthians 13 to say that those gifts of the Spirit do not exist right now.
This is the love chapter and the whole context is about love therefore that which is perfect comes is referring to perfect love, as it says when those gifts are done in part (without love) they will cease or be done away.

Because they are not done by the will of God or are they from God if done without love.

The proper context to be used for 1 Corinthians 13 is when perfect love comes into the world those gifts will cease because all will be fulfilled then and there would be no longer any use for those because we will be with the Lord our God for eternity.

That which is perfect comes is not the bible (scriptures) !!!
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
Roger, I am sorry, but I really do not take anything you write to me seriously.

peace...God love you and all, but it's enough

I have addressed literally thousands of folk Roger and been asked for more, so no worries...people generally appreciate and like me

if you met me in person you would probably have a high regard for me because I am anything but weird or anything but stupid or ignorant

I guess you will have to take my word for it...but I'm done getting back to you in this thread

cheers
Suit yourself but just because you address thousands of people does not create credibility in your message.

Things that are not biblical are not biblical no matter who declares them.

The over whelming evidence in the bible is that tongues have ceased per 1 Cor 13:8. The practice in the modern church only supports what the bible teaches.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
K

KennethC

Guest
Both "sides" do it. I'm probably guilty of it as well. I'd also like to add that it is very easy to misunderstand what someone is intending to communicate when we can only see words on a screen.
Well don't speak on my behalf because I have never called others heretics or other such unedifying words.

However there is a way to call others out for false teaching without using such language, and that is by using the Sword (bible scriptures) themselves to show others the proper way.
 
Jul 1, 2015
584
9
0
I am saying that the Holy Spirit only guides from within the bible and not personal feelings.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
Roger that can only mean that you are saying (not us) that you do not have the Holy Spirit in you, if you say He only speaks in His word and not through personal feelings. What else are the groanings that cannot be uttered? What else the joy of the Lord that is our strength? What else is the discernment that tells us the sorrow of a person's heart and the word we are burdened with to give them comfort? If God has not become personal to you Roger, I must say, it answers a lot of questions.
 
Jul 1, 2015
584
9
0
There have been several occasions (on these forums) where I have been so blinded by what I perceived as offensive and destructive words that I failed to see the truth in their statements. Perhaps this is one of the difficulties that goes along with this method of communication (internet forums). Perhaps it is because I am still an infant in the faith, compared to these grandpas.

I encourage you two to go back to your OP and re-read their responses to you.
I think if you were a repeated victim of his attacks you would see things differently. As one who has experienced emotional abuse first hand I have had to learn what things they do to make things your fault and not theirs, and it took me years. The trouble is, once you have seen it, you know it, and you can't pretend it is otherwise.

I regret the to and fro of discussion has caused you to second-guess yourself so much that you seem to agree with everybody. That is not a good place to be. Peacemaking is good, but agreeing with those who say half the word of God is no longer applicable, and that those who say God is the same now as He always was, are heretics....I would say, be careful what you agree with.

Can't help but love you, however.
 
P

PeacefulWarrior

Guest
Once again that is a misuse of 1 Corinthians 13 to say that those gifts of the Spirit do not exist right now.
This is the love chapter and the whole context is about love therefore that which is perfect comes is referring to perfect love, as it says when those gifts are done in part (without love) they will cease or be done away.

Because they are not done by the will of God or are they from God if done without love.

The proper context to be used for 1 Corinthians 13 is when perfect love comes into the world those gifts will cease because all will be fulfilled then and there would be no longer any use for those because we will be with the Lord our God for eternity.

That which is perfect comes is not the bible (scriptures) !!!
What makes Kenneth's context proper?
What makes the Berean Bible Studies context (a consensus based on multitudes of study) improper?
 
P

PeacefulWarrior

Guest
No time to comment presently. Will get back to you people later.
 

Angela53510

Senior Member
Jan 24, 2011
11,782
2,952
113
I know for a fact, through the writings of the early Church fathers that, while not as prevalent as they were the 1st century a.d., the Spiritual gifts continued on into the 2nd & 3rd centuries up until the creation of Amillennislism by the orthodox church in the 4th century. Cessationism, the belief that gifts have ceased, is a central component of Amillennislism, better known as Catholic eschatology.
I can't agree with this at all! I went to several churches within the ACOP, The Apostolic Church of Pentecost. They practised tongues and were amillennial, although their doctrinal statement doesn't directly state it, it was certainly known by people in the denomination and those outside.

ACOP of Canada

They were started during the Welsh Revival, so deep roots in revivals.

I confess, I rarely saw anything out of order in those churches, and the pastors were men of God who preached the whole Bible, not just cherry picking and extending a few verses!

Who knows, if I had been able to stay in that church, maybe I wouldn't have gotten so turned off by the excesses I saw growing in other charismatic churches and the incredible shallowness of doctrine, and the lack of preparedness or training of the pastors to actually preach the Bible.

As it is, I am totally amillennial, and I do not limit God if he chooses to give someone an unknown tongue to communicate the gospel. As for what passes for gifts, and the emphasis on tongues, and the self-edification, I will stick to the fruits and the many gift lists that do not not include the sensational, like Romans 12, right after the command to be transformed by the Holy Spirit. And these gifts being the result.

"so we, though many, are one body in Christ, and individually members one of another.6 Having gifts that differ according to the grace given to us, let us use them: if prophecy, in proportion to our faith;7 if service, in our serving; the one who teaches, in his teaching;8 the one who exhorts, in his exhortation; the one who contributes, in generosity; the one who leads, with zeal; the one who does acts of mercy, with cheerfulness." Romans 12:5-8


The prophecy gift here does not mean everyone shouting out things in church that usually don't make sense, nor future predictions. It refers to the study of the Bible, and using it as a means of speaking forth the truth of the Holy Spirit contained in the words of Scripture.

We had a prophecy in our church a few weeks ago by a member. He read a piece of Scripture that God laid on his heart. and encouraged people to seek God and to make those verses part of their lives! That is true prophecy, in our time!
 
Aug 2, 2013
115
14
18
A great deal of effort to make an erroneous point. The origins of χαρίσματα (charismata) are far more recent than the New Testament writings. It is, in fact, Latinized Greek from the fifteenth century.


I didn't mind putting the effort into a factual point; something at this point you have failed to prove is erroneous.

The text you're using from the Greek, as with the Interlinear Bible as a whole in the New Testament, is latinized -- retranslated from the Latin of the Catholic Church.


The above statement is a fallacy due to its generalization. Some texts may have had some Latin influence, but even those texts weren't influenced completely. The text I’m using from the Greek has not been Latinized. Lantinized or not the various Greek texts agree on the text from Romans 11:29. A good example can be found at Biblehub:
Nestle GNT 1904
ἀμεταμέλητα γὰρ τὰ χαρίσματα καὶ ἡ κλῆσις τοῦ Θεοῦ.

Westcott and Hort 1881
ἀμεταμέλητα γὰρ τὰ χαρίσματα καὶ ἡ κλῆσις τοῦ θεοῦ.

Westcott and Hort / [NA27 variants]
ἀμεταμέλητα γὰρ τὰ χαρίσματα καὶ ἡ κλῆσις τοῦ θεοῦ.

RP Byzantine Majority Text 2005
Ἀμεταμέλητα γὰρ τὰ χαρίσματα καὶ ἡ κλῆσις τοῦ θεοῦ.

Greek Orthodox Church 1904
ἀμεταμέλητα γὰρ τὰ χαρίσματα καὶ ἡ κλῆσις τοῦ Θεοῦ.

Tischendorf 8th Edition
ἀμεταμέλητα γὰρ τὰ χαρίσματα καὶ ἡ κλῆσις τοῦ θεοῦ.

Scrivener's Textus Receptus 1894
ἀμεταμέλητα γὰρ τὰ χαρίσματα καὶ ἡ κλῆσις τοῦ Θεοῦ.

Stephanus Textus Receptus 1550
ἀμεταμέλητα γὰρ τὰ χαρίσματα καὶ ἡ κλῆσις τοῦ θεοῦ

As can be seen there is no variation in the texts above. Romans 11:29 is not disputed textually. All include the plural τὰ χαρίσματα/gifts.

In the manuscripts we have
"The manuscripts we have"??? I’ve demonstrated the Greek textual agreement from various traditions. Now please bring yours to the table so we can examine it.