AM I JEW OR A GENTILE IF I KEEP THE COMMANDMENTS ?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Mar 21, 2014
1,322
8
0
Yes, i added with the lords help. the first time

but they still will not save you.. why do you think they will save you, that was my argument..

1 John 5:18 18 We know that no one who is born of God sins; but He who was born of God keeps him, and the evil one does not touch him. 19We know that we are of God, and that the whole world lies in the power of the evil one.…
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest

1 John 5:18 18 We know that no one who is born of God sins; but He who was born of God keeps him, and the evil one does not touch him. 19We know that we are of God, and that the whole world lies in the power of the evil one.…
1 John 1: 8, If we say we have no sin we deceive ourselves, and there is no truth in us.

So do you think you can be sinless??
 

KohenMatt

Senior Member
Jun 28, 2013
4,022
224
63
romans 4:
[SUP]13 [/SUP]For the promise that he would be the heir of the world was not to Abraham or to his seed through the law, but through the righteousness of faith. [SUP]14 [/SUP]For if those who are of the law are heirs, faith is made void and the promise made of no effect, [SUP]15 [/SUP]because the law brings about wrath; for where there is no law there is no transgression.

1 Corinthians 15:56
The sting of death is sin, and the strength of sin is the law.

Gal 3:
[SUP]10 [/SUP]For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse; for it is written, “Cursed is everyone who does not continue in all things which are written in the book of the law, to do them.”[SUP][e][/SUP] [SUP]11 [/SUP]But that no one is justified by the law in the sight of God is evident, for “the just shall live by faith.”[SUP][f][/SUP] [SUP]12 [/SUP]Yet the law is not of faith, but “the man who does them shall live by them.”[SUP][g][/SUP]

[SUP]13 [/SUP]Christ has redeemed us from the curse of the law, having become a curse for us (for it is written, “Cursed is everyone who hangs on a tree”[SUP][h][/SUP]), [SUP]14 [/SUP]that the blessing of Abraham might come upon the Gentiles in Christ Jesus, that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith.

[SUP]15 [/SUP]Brethren, I speak in the manner of men: Though it is only a man’s covenant, yet if it is confirmed, no one annuls or adds to it. [SUP]16 [/SUP]Now to Abraham and his Seed were the promises made. He does not say, “And to seeds,” as of many, but as of one, “And to your Seed,”[SUP][i][/SUP] who is Christ. [SUP]17 [/SUP]And this I say, that the law, which was four hundred and thirty years later, cannot annul the covenant that was confirmed before by God in Christ,[SUP][j][/SUP] that it should make the promise of no effect. [SUP]18 [/SUP]For if the inheritance is of the law, it is no longer of promise; but God gave it to Abraham by promise.

[SUP]19 [/SUP]What purpose then does the law serve? It was added because of transgressions, till the Seed should come to whom the promise was made; and it was appointed through angels by the hand of a mediator. [SUP]20 [/SUP]Now a mediator does not mediate for one only, but God is one.

[SUP]21 [/SUP]Is the law then against the promises of God? Certainly not! For if there had been a law given which could have given life, truly righteousness would have been by the law. [SUP]22 [/SUP]But the Scripture has confined all under sin, that the promise by faith in Jesus Christ might be given to those who believe. [SUP]23 [/SUP]But before faith came, we were kept under guard by the law, kept for the faith which would afterward be revealed. [SUP]24 [/SUP]Therefore the law was our tutor to bring us to Christ, that we might be justified by faith. [SUP]25 [/SUP]But after faith has come, we are no longer under a tutor.

Ephesians 2:15
having abolished in His flesh the enmity, that is, the law of commandments contained in ordinances, so as to create in Himself one new man from the two, thus making peace,

1 Timothy 1:9 knowing this: that the law is not made for a righteous person, but for the lawless and insubordinate, for the ungodly and for sinners, for the unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers,

Hebrews 7:19 for the law made nothing perfect; on the other hand, there is the bringing in of a better hope, through which we draw near to God.



How to fulfill the law

Galatians 5:14 For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this: “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.”

Galatians 5:18 But if you are led by the Spirit, you are not under the law.

Galatians 6:2 Bear one another’s burdens, and so fulfill the law of Christ.

James 2:8 If you really fulfill the royal law according to the Scripture, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself,” you do well;

OK, you've got a lot of great verses there, and a lot of truth in them. However, their context is directed towards those who are using the law for justification's sake. And even if there is some debate to their context, shouldn't they be interpreted through God's, or Jesus's words, of which you quoted none?

Again....

Matthew 5:19

"Whoever then annuls one of the least of these commandments, and teaches others to do the same, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever keeps and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven."
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
OK, you've got a lot of great verses there, and a lot of truth in them. However, their context is directed towards those who are using the law for justification's sake. And even if there is some debate to their context, shouldn't they be interpreted through God's, or Jesus's words, of which you quoted none?

Again....

Matthew 5:19

"Whoever then annuls one of the least of these commandments, and teaches others to do the same, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever keeps and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven."

and again I will ask you


If I do not commit adultery, fornication, I do not covet, I honor my parents, do not make any idols, do not steal or murder, and keep the sabbath am I a holy righteous person? a non believer can do these things, does this separate us from them?

as paul said, when gentiles who do not have the law, do the things which are written in the law by nature. what do you think he meant?


Do I need the law to show me not to do these things? or how to do those things?

Yes, If I teach someonbe to commit adultry and it is ok. I am least in the kingdom. But do I need the law to tell me this? Or is this the law written in my heart (ie the gentile quote and see also romans 1)

Romans 1:
[SUP]28 [/SUP]And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a debased mind, to do those things which are not fitting; [SUP]29 [/SUP]being filled with all unrighteousness, sexual immorality,[SUP][c][/SUP] wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, evil-mindedness; they are whisperers, [SUP]30 [/SUP]backbiters, haters of God, violent, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, [SUP]31 [/SUP]undiscerning, untrustworthy, unloving, unforgiving,[SUP][d][/SUP] unmerciful; [SUP]32 [/SUP]who, knowing the righteous judgment of God, that those who practice such things are deserving of death, not only do the same but also approve of those who practice them.
 
Mar 21, 2014
1,322
8
0
1 John 1: 8, If we say we have no sin we deceive ourselves, and there is no truth in us.

So do you think you can be sinless??
yes i do i will show you one more time and thats it 1 John 5:18 I will ask the Father, and He will give you another Helper, that He may be with you forever,


now im through with you obviusly you can mess up and evryone one as messed up the farther takes your sins away if your a child of god obviusly would you like me to show scripture for that or hopefully you have read that allready in isaih i posted earlier
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
OK, you've got a lot of great verses there, and a lot of truth in them. However, their context is directed towards those who are using the law for justification's sake.
eph was not wrritten for this purpose. that is a stretch.

2. Paul told us what the pupose of the law was. even if he was speaking against LAWyers, it does not take away what he said, Paul did not lie, or twist the truth to teach against judaism, He was telling you and I what the purpose for the law was also


3. Saying love fulfills the law. is a fact. not teaching against judaism
 
C

chubbena

Guest
1 John 1: 8, If we say we have no sin we deceive ourselves, and there is no truth in us.

So do you think you can be sinless??
So do you think you can be sinless following the law of love?
 
C

chubbena

Guest
eph was not wrritten for this purpose. that is a stretch.

2. Paul told us what the pupose of the law was. even if he was speaking against LAWyers, it does not take away what he said, Paul did not lie, or twist the truth to teach against judaism, He was telling you and I what the purpose for the law was also


3. Saying love fulfills the law. is a fact. not teaching against judaism
Do you fulfill every aspect of the law of love?
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
yes i do i will show you one more time and thats it 1 John 5:18 I will ask the Father, and He will give you another Helper, that He may be with you forever,
Did you even read 1 John 1: 8 Did he lie?? John said if you say you can be sinless you have decieved yourself


now im through with you obviusly you can mess up and evryone one as messed up the farther takes your sins away if your a child of god obviusly would you like me to show scripture for that or hopefully you have read that allready in isaih i posted earlier
I would never claim I am or can be sinless. If I ever think that, I will be just as bad as the pharisees, and God will not be able to grow me anymore.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Do you fulfill every aspect of the law of love?
what? dude your not making any sense. Are you sinless?

What does this have to do with what Paul said?

He said love fulfills the law did he lie?
 

Angela53510

Senior Member
Jan 24, 2011
11,782
2,952
113
I have NEVER said that you, a great scholar, have not studied the OT. I have said numerous times that you deny what it teaches, you have not studied the culture thoroughly enough (according to the opinions of it you have expressed) of the people to know what spiritual truths the OT represents. Your posts also express that you do not know how the OT and NT fit together, as you express by your objection to my learning from it as one illustration.

You really feel that I am wrong to study the word obsolete so thoroughly, you want it accepted as saying all is obsolete. You have objected to what I say Paul wanted us to learn about law. We do not agree! You think it is important that I see scripture your way, and I feel it is important to the very church itself that you do not teach some of these things. Your opinion and mine is not important, but what God says is. We both use scripture. I think you need to use more scripture and you think I should use more scripture. We are both used by God for teaching. We both need prayer for each other.

You know what it says, you know you do and I know you do. I feel your teaching about the word obsolete is incorrect, and if you would study bible you would also find just what is obsolete. As an example. You know the new covenant thoroughly, yet you deny anything any other covenant says, and denying scripture is wrong.
I only quoted my marks, to show you that not only have I studied the Old Testament, but the culture around it. Last year, i our church Ladies Bible Study, with over 60 women, I wrote an entire powerpoint series we did over an entire year, on the history, the culture, the geography and the archeology that concerns the Bible, and 90% of it was on the Old Testament.

You are the one who does not:

1. Understand the different between the Old Covenant and the New Covenant

2. That I am NOT saying the Old Covenant is obsolete, but the Bible itself, in so many, many passages. But the most telling is the passage that uses the word obsolete.

"In speaking of a new covenant, he makes the first one obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away." Hebrews 8:13

"In speaking of a new covenant, he makes the first one obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away." Hebrews 8:13

"In speaking of a new covenant, he makes the first one obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away." Hebrews 8:13

"In speaking of a new covenant, he makes the first one obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away." Hebrews 8:13

"In speaking of a new covenant, he makes the first one obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away." Hebrews 8:13

Who makes the first one, or the Old Covenant complete? Who makes the Old Covenant obsolete? Christ Jesus and his death on the cross. The Old Covenant was about a covenant with Abraham, based on the sacrificial system. But even that is not the whole truth, as the Abraham's real righteousness was based on believing God, not a the Mosaic law or the sacrificial system.

"Does he who supplies the Spirit to you and works miracles among you do so by works of the law, or by hearing with faith— [SUP]6 [/SUP]just as Abraham “believed God, and it was counted to him as righteousness”?" Gal. 3:5-6

We are NOT justified by works of the law.

"yet we know that a person is not justified by works of the law but through faith in Jesus Christ, so we also have believed in Christ Jesus, in order to be justified by faith in Christ and not by works of the law, because by works of the law no one will be justified." Gal. 2:16

Again, read Hebrews and Galatians for yourselves. These are the books that were specifically written to Judiazers and Hebrew Roots movement, which started back right in 48 AD, and Paul rebuking the Galatians.

I just do not understand how you can think I make this stuff up based on my "opinion!" I base it solely on the Word of God.

And if you think I am wrong about it the Old Covenant being obsolete, then stop posting opinions, and post the verses, that say the Old Covenant is still in effect. Just post the verses, the book, chapter and verses, just as I have done above. I have coloured and bolded it so it will stand out. Because God's word should stand out more than anything else.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
So do you think you can be sinless following the law of love?
no. Because I still have the flesh, And it wars with my spirit. And sometimes the flesh wins.

Do you love everyone in your life 100 % of every day?

and when you are loving them, would you break the law?
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
I only quoted my marks, to show you that not only have I studied the Old Testament, but the culture around it. Last year, i our church Ladies Bible Study, with over 60 women, I wrote an entire powerpoint series we did over an entire year, on the history, the culture, the geography and the archeology that concerns the Bible, and 90% of it was on the Old Testament.

You are the one who does not:

1. Understand the different between the Old Covenant and the New Covenant

2. That I am NOT saying the Old Covenant is obsolete, but the Bible itself, in so many, many passages. But the most telling is the passage that uses the word obsolete.

"In speaking of a new covenant, he makes the first one obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away." Hebrews 8:13

"In speaking of a new covenant, he makes the first one obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away." Hebrews 8:13

"In speaking of a new covenant, he makes the first one obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away." Hebrews 8:13

"In speaking of a new covenant, he makes the first one obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away." Hebrews 8:13

"In speaking of a new covenant, he makes the first one obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away." Hebrews 8:13

Who makes the first one, or the Old Covenant complete? Who makes the Old Covenant obsolete? Christ Jesus and his death on the cross. The Old Covenant was about a covenant with Abraham, based on the sacrificial system. But even that is not the whole truth, as the Abraham's real righteousness was based on believing God, not a the Mosaic law or the sacrificial system.

"Does he who supplies the Spirit to you and works miracles among you do so by works of the law, or by hearing with faith— [SUP]6 [/SUP]just as Abraham “believed God, and it was counted to him as righteousness”?" Gal. 3:5-6

We are NOT justified by works of the law.

"yet we know that a person is not justified by works of the law but through faith in Jesus Christ, so we also have believed in Christ Jesus, in order to be justified by faith in Christ and not by works of the law, because by works of the law no one will be justified." Gal. 2:16

Again, read Hebrews and Galatians for yourselves. These are the books that were specifically written to Judiazers and Hebrew Roots movement, which started back right in 48 AD, and Paul rebuking the Galatians.

I just do not understand how you can think I make this stuff up based on my "opinion!" I base it solely on the Word of God.

And if you think I am wrong about it the Old Covenant being obsolete, then stop posting opinions, and post the verses, that say the Old Covenant is still in effect. Just post the verses, the book, chapter and verses, just as I have done above. I have coloured and bolded it so it will stand out. Because God's word should stand out more than anything else.
it gets old posting the same stuff over and over, then still having them bear false witness against us..
 

KohenMatt

Senior Member
Jun 28, 2013
4,022
224
63

and again I will ask you


If I do not commit adultery, fornication, I do not covet, I honor my parents, do not make any idols, do not steal or murder, and keep the sabbath am I a holy righteous person? a non believer can do these things, does this separate us from them?

as paul said, when gentiles who do not have the law, do the things which are written in the law by nature. what do you think he meant?
And I said,
Obedience has nothing to do with me being seen as holy and righteous before God.
None of those things in and of themselves equate to holiness or righteousness. Only God's atonement can do that. Doing those things means nothing unless they're done with a heart to honor God, especially if unbelievers do them.

Do I need the law to show me not to do these things? or how to do those things?
Do you need the Spirit to show you not to do these things? Do you need God to? Yes we do, and since God wrote the law, that is one resource we have to know to not do those things. Not the only resource, but one of them.

Yes, If I teach someonbe to commit adultry and it is ok. I am least in the kingdom. But do I need the law to tell me this? Or is this the law written in my heart (ie the gentile quote and see also romans 1)
Matthew 5:19

"Whoever then annuls one of the least of these commandments, and teaches others to do the same, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever keeps and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven."


I don't think you're fully addressing Jesus' words here. He's telling His disciples that they need to follow the Law and teach others to do so. And if they decide not to follow the Law and they teach others they don't have to, they will be the least in the Kingdom.
 
C

chubbena

Guest
what? dude your not making any sense. Are you sinless?

What does this have to do with what Paul said?

He said love fulfills the law did he lie?
Listen up. If bragging about keeping the law of love over the OT law cannot keep you from sinless. What sense does it make? You are no better off than those you accuse of not able to keep the OT law.
 

KohenMatt

Senior Member
Jun 28, 2013
4,022
224
63
eph was not wrritten for this purpose. that is a stretch.

2. Paul told us what the pupose of the law was. even if he was speaking against LAWyers, it does not take away what he said, Paul did not lie, or twist the truth to teach against judaism, He was telling you and I what the purpose for the law was also


3. Saying love fulfills the law. is a fact. not teaching against judaism
What did Moses and/or God/Jesus say the purpose of the Law was?
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
And I said,

None of those things in and of themselves equate to holiness or righteousness. Only God's atonement can do that. Doing those things means nothing unless they're done with a heart to honor God, especially if unbelievers do them.
Your not getting my point.

Does God want me to spend every minute of every day focusing on those laws. Or focusing on who he wants me to bless, serve and love.

What good am I if my focus is on those commands?


Do you need the Spirit to show you not to do these things? Do you need God to? Yes we do, and since God wrote the law, that is one resource we have to know to not do those things. Not the only resource, but one of them.
No I don,t Because God wrote those things in my DNA, That is what Paul meant when he wrote romans 1. And when hs made it clear, that a gentile who does not have the law, BY NATURE does what is in them.

As I said a few days ago, If you do not know what is sin, and you need the HS to show you what sin is, You have more serious problems than the law can help you with.


Matthew 5:19

"Whoever then annuls one of the least of these commandments, and teaches others to do the same, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever keeps and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven."


I don't think you're fully addressing Jesus' words here. He's telling His disciples that they need to follow the Law and teach others to do so. And if they decide not to follow the Law and they teach others they don't have to, they will be the least in the Kingdom.
No.

He said whoever teaches one not to do them.

Do yuo go around teaching the law? Did Jesus do this? I do not think so. He taught salvation. Not law. People know the law. It is written on their hearts. Did you even read romans 1. Romans 1 speaks of ALL people from the beginning of creation. Do you think Abraham needed the law to know what was sin and what was not sin, and how he should act to glorify God?
 

KohenMatt

Senior Member
Jun 28, 2013
4,022
224
63
And if you think I am wrong about it the Old Covenant being obsolete, then stop posting opinions, and post the verses, that say the Old Covenant is still in effect. Just post the verses, the book, chapter and verses, just as I have done above. I have coloured and bolded it so it will stand out. Because God's word should stand out more than anything else.
Matthew 5:17-19

“Do not think that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish but to fulfill.
18 For truly I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or stroke shall pass from the Law until all is accomplished.19 Whoever then annuls one of the least of these commandments, and teaches others to do the same, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever keeps and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven."
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
What did Moses and/or God/Jesus say the purpose of the Law was?

so they would say something which contradicts paul??

Jesus said moses wrote the words which lead to him. What do you think Jesus meant?