Though not knowing us, mikko comes here and condemns everyone while proclaiming he is perfect.
If someone yells "THIEF" when you are in town do you run and hide?
Likewise if you are offended at the petition of...
God is holy, and also we should be holy, if we wish to know him.
Be holy
...what would the reason be?
When I read the OP I think it is absolutely fantastic to see an individual contending for righteousness. Why don't you think contending for holiness and purity is a good thing?
Furthermore the Mikko also wrote...
Sinless perfection?
Don't you know, that if you do sin, you are a servant of sin?
A good tree can't make bad fruits.
Do not deceive yourself.
And when I wrote about holy, I mean that we should sanctified, like purify our self for all kind of unholy values of this world, like immature behavior what we see also in here.
We should have self-control over the all kind of immature moods, which seduce us.
Are those the things you think are...
Those aren't my words, thery're his. That's blasphemous self righteousness any way you slice it.
Or was it this statement which offended you...
Originally Posted by
Willie-T
It's easier than that (since we can't do that, anyway.) We are made "Holy" through belief in, involvement with, and relationship with Jesus.
You are lost, because you do not even believe that you can come holy.
We must be holy, if we wish to truly know God, because he is holy, but if you are not, then you do not know even what kind is holy, then how can you know God?
Willie T claimed that "we can't do that anyway" as a response to "to be holy, though, we have to obey the Lord's commandments." To which Mikko responded that Willie-T is lost because he believes we cannot obey the commandments of Jesus. Instead Willie-T believes we are holy simply by "believing in Jesus, being involved, having a relationship" (ie. belief/involvement, relationship whilst being disobedient).
In your mind it is self righteousness and blasphemous to contend that we have the ability to obey the commandments of Jesus?
Your religion really leaves you with that conclusion and you do not see a problem with it?
If those statements were not what you perceived as "self righteousness and blasphemous" then what exactly was "self righteousness and blasphemous" in the words of Mikko? I would like to know.
VioletReigns asked the following direct question: Mikko, can you honestly look at God right now and say, "I am the perfect example of sanctification?" That's a valid question with only one correct answer.
That question was written in response too...
Originally Posted by
MikkoAinasoja
All the man of God have been holy even in the Bible, then don't you think that we should be also, if we are not just like old prophet's but even more, as a servant of the Lord Yeshua, God's only son?
Holiness is a part of true saints nature, and knowledge of God, but the world is against all holy, and spreading it own unholy values specific in a way of media.
So here is Mikko contending that the people of God are holy and that due to this ought we not be holy also? Mikko claims that holiness is part of the true saints nature.
Did Mikko say anything about being "the perfect example of sanctification"? NO HE DID NOT.
The phrase "perfect example of sanctification" is just another way to say "sinless perfection" and thus allude to a STRAWMAN instead of directly deal with what Mikko is contending for, which is simply obedience to God from the heart, a forsaking of all known evil, our conduct done in accordance with the Spirit of life in Jesus Christ. he is not contending for NEVER MAKING A MISTAKE or NEVER MAKING A WRONG DECISION or NEVER DOING A WRONG ACTION UNINTENTIONALLY, he is contending simply for OBEDIENCE FROM THE HEART IN ALL THINGS. Do you have an issue with obedience from the heart in all things? Do you have an issue with wholehearted obedience to God?
Will Violet or you will deal with such a subject. By all appearances you both simply mischaracterise the words of Mikko and imply he is saying something other than what he is saying.