Can you Sin and Not Die?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
I agree.

Paul was trying to obey God "in the flesh" and therefore he would "do" what he "knew not." He was carnal and sold under sin yet I don't think he had been brought under conviction unlike the wretch of Romans 7:14-28 who is under conviction.

Perhaps Paul had been brought under conviction to a degree and suppressed it which his busy law keeping. I can only speculate.

What I do know though is that the wretch of Romans 7 is a man under the law who is also under conviction. The wretch is not the present walk of a Christian who has been set free from the bondage of sin.
ugh..........no clue whatsoever.
you have not been born from above.
you don't even understand the one thing you need to know.

exit thread
unsubscribe.
 
Jan 11, 2013
2,256
17
0
I agree.

Paul was trying to obey God "in the flesh" and therefore he would "do" what he "knew not." He was carnal and sold under sin yet I don't think he had been brought under conviction unlike the wretch of Romans 7:14-28 who is under conviction.

Perhaps Paul had been brought under conviction to a degree and suppressed it which his busy law keeping. I can only speculate.

What I do know though is that the wretch of Romans 7 is a man under the law who is also under conviction. The wretch is not the present walk of a Christian who has been set free from the bondage of sin.
What caused 'the wretch' of Rom 7(as you put it) to be in the state he was in?
 
Last edited:
Nov 26, 2011
3,818
62
0
Zone it is a heart issue.

A heart can be changed in a moment of time or it can be a longer drawn out process.

I fear today that it is often a longer drawn out process simply because of all the false doctrine that abounds.

You can invent gnats to strain at all you want. It is all fluff to make an allowance for ongoing rebellion.

A human heart is either yielded to God or it isn't.

Obedience from the heart is essential to salvation. Whether that obedience is wrought in a moment or over a period of years it is still a necessity. There is no salvation in rebellion.

Salvation is SAVED FROM SIN.

The Bible teaches that those who YIELD TO SIN ARE IN BONDAGE.

Hence an important aspect of salvation is the bondage being broken.

Isn't that why Jesus came? To "redeem us from ALL iniquity" and to "purify us."


Your objection is simply due to wanting to believe in a salvation WHICH LACKS being redeemed from ALL iniquity and lacks heart purity.

You want a salvation where light and darkness mixes. Where one can walk according to the flesh and to the Spirit at the same time.

Practically every objection you make is rooted on this underlying premise. Due the Bible clearly teaching the opposite you are forced to invent gnats to strain at instead of directly addressing the SPECIFIC Bible verses I so clearly point out.

I would also really appreciate it if you could explicitly define what this "perfectionist heresy" actually is that refer to.

Thanks.


Let's examine this post in the light of Scripture and reason.

Zone sticks the label of "perfectionist heresy" to the teaching that "obedience to the truth is mandatory."

I think Zone ought specifically DEFINE what she means by "perfectionist heresy" in her own words instead of simply just banding the term around in an Ad Hominem way.

Is the cessation of rebellion in repentance "perfectionism"? I don't think so. When one forsakes their rebellion to God through a broken godly sorrow which worked a repentance unto salvation I don't think that individual is "perfect."

This "perfectionism heresy" seems to me like a strawman label which is used as a cover to denigrate the repentance message in order to make an allowance for ongoing rebellion.

Let's look at the word "Perfect" in the Bible.

Jesus said this...

Mat 5:48 Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect.

Perfect - G5046 -teleios
From G5056; complete (in various applications of labor, growth, mental and moral character, etc.); neuter (as noun, with G3588) completeness: - of full age, man, perfect.

Paul taught this...

Php 3:11 If by any means I might attain unto the resurrection of the dead.
Php 3:12 Not as though I had already attained, either were already perfect: but I follow after, if that I may apprehend that for which also I am apprehended of Christ Jesus.
Php 3:13 Brethren, I count not myself to have apprehended: but this one thing I do, forgetting those things which are behind, and reaching forth unto those things which are before,
Php 3:14 I press toward the mark for the prize of the high calling of God in Christ Jesus.
Php 3:15 Let us therefore, as many as be perfect, be thus minded: and if in any thing ye be otherwise minded, God shall reveal even this unto you.
Php 3:16 Nevertheless, whereto we have already attained, let us walk by the same rule, let us mind the same thing.

In the above passage the word "perfect" is used in verse 12 and 15. In the Greek those are two different words.

The first use is in the context of the resurrection of the dead and glorification. This word simply means perfect in the sense of the "end of something" and it can be used in many an application.

Perfect -G5048 - teleioō
From G5046; to complete, that is, (literally) accomplish, or (figuratively) consummate (in character): - consecrate, finish, fulfil, (make) perfect.

The second use is in the context of something Paul claims to have already achieved and it is the same word Jesus used in Mat 5:48.

Perfect - G5046 - teleios
From G5056; complete (in various applications of labor, growth, mental and moral character, etc.); neuter (as noun, with G3588) completeness: - of full age, man, perfect.

Were Jesus and Paul preaching a "perfectionist heresy" in these instances? Or were they teaching that one's moral character can indeed be perfect? I think the answer is clear.

What was the context of Jesus statement in Mat 5:48?

First of all Jesus described some characteristics of the people of God.

Mat 5:3 Blessed are the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
Mat 5:4 Blessed are they that mourn: for they shall be comforted.
Mat 5:5 Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth.
Mat 5:6 Blessed are they which do hunger and thirst after righteousness: for they shall be filled.
Mat 5:7 Blessed are the merciful: for they shall obtain mercy.
Mat 5:8 Blessed are the pure in heart: for they shall see God.
Mat 5:9 Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.

Jesus then taught that he came to fulfill the law and not void it. He also clearly stated that our righteousness must exceed that of the Scribes and Pharisees.

Mat 5:17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Mat 5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
Mat 5:19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
Mat 5:20 For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven.

Then Jesus explains further...

Mat 5:21 Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not kill; and whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgment:
Mat 5:22 But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire.

In the above passage Jesus refers to the "letter of the law" of "thou shalt not kill" but gives an expanded application relative to the "heart" because He ties "anger" to "murder."

Likewise Jesus does the same thing for adultery...

Mat 5:27 Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery:
Mat 5:28 But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.

What was the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees? Jesus described it like this...

Mat 23:26 Thou blind Pharisee, cleanse first that which is within the cup and platter, that the outside of them may be clean also.
Mat 23:27 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness.
Mat 23:28 Even so ye also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and iniquity.

They OUTWARDLY appeared clean but INWARDLY were defiled. Therefore if our righteousness is to exceed that of the scribes and Pharisees we must have the INSIDE of our cup clean.

This is the CLEAR CONTEXT of "be perfect as your heavenly father is perfect."

John wrote thus...

1Jn 4:16 And we have known and believed the love that God hath to us. God is love; and he that dwelleth in love dwelleth in God, and God in him.
1Jn 4:17 Herein is our love made perfect, that we may have boldness in the day of judgment: because as he is, so are we in this world.
1Jn 4:18 There is no fear in love; but perfect love casteth out fear: because fear hath torment. He that feareth is not made perfect in love.
1Jn 4:19 We love him, because he first loved us.
1Jn 4:20 If a man say, I love God, and hateth his brother, he is a liar: for he that loveth not his brother whom he hath seen, how can he love God whom he hath not seen?
1Jn 4:21 And this commandment have we from him, That he who loveth God love his brother also.

John teaches that if we dwell in love we actually dwell in God and that God also dwells in us. It is in this that our love is made perfect or complete.

Is this perfectionist heresy too?

What about this...

Gal 5:4 Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace.
Gal 5:5 For we through the Spirit wait for the hope of righteousness by faith.
Gal 5:6 For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision; but faith which worketh by love.

Is a faith which works by love that upholds the law perfectionist heresy?

Rom 3:28 Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.
Rom 3:29 Is he the God of the Jews only? is he not also of the Gentiles? Yes, of the Gentiles also:
Rom 3:30 Seeing it is one God, which shall justify the circumcision by faith, and uncircumcision through faith.
Rom 3:31 Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.

Obviously righteousness is not of the deeds of the law. The Pharisees sought their righteousness in the deeds of the law but negated the aspect of LOVE FROM THEIR HEART thus outwardly they may not literally murder but inwardly they hated. Outwardly they may not literally commit adultery but inwardly they lusted.

Paul taught this...

Gal 5:14 For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.

Jesus taught that He came to fulfill the law (Mat 5:17). Paul taught that by walking after the Spirit we fulfill the righteousness of the law.

Rom 8:4 That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.

Is that perfectionist heresy?

The fruit of the Spirit is love.
Gal 5:22 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith,
Gal 5:23 Meekness, temperance: against such there is no law.

What is the opposite of walking in love? It is this...

Gal 5:19 Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness,
Gal 5:20 Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies,
Gal 5:21 Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.

Is it any wonder that the Bible teaches that one must depart from iniquity.

Is teaching that it is MANDATORY that one must depart from iniquity perfectionist heresy?

Paul says this...

Gal 5:24 And they that are Christ's have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts.

and this...

Rom 8:13 For if ye live after the flesh, ye shall die: but if ye through the Spirit do mortify the deeds of the body, ye shall live.
Rom 8:14 For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God.

Can one be doing the above if they are still engaged in willful transgression? Is someone who is still in rebellion to God walking in the Spirit? Is walking in the Spirit MANDATORY? If one must depart from iniquity in order to WALK in the Spirit does that mean the departure from iniquity is mandatory?

Did the Prodigal Son have to depart from the pig pen or was he saved in the pig pen? Read Luke 15 to find out.

What does this verse mean?

Jas 1:21 Wherefore lay apart all filthiness and superfluity of naughtiness, and receive with meekness the engrafted word, which is able to save your souls.
Jas 1:22 But be ye doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving your own selves.

Is that "perfectionist heresy"?

What exactly is perfectionist heresy Zone? Please lay it out and with Scripture.


The Bible also speaks of the "perfecting of the saints."

Eph 4:11 And he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers;
Eph 4:12 For the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ:
Eph 4:13 Till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ:

Is this perfecting of the saints "rebelling less and less" or has the rebellion already ceased? I think clearly the rebellion has already ceased because a Saint has ESCAPED THE CORRUPTION IN THE WORLD THROUGH LUST.
2Pe 1:3 According as his divine power hath given unto us all things that pertain unto life and godliness, through the knowledge of him that hath called us to glory and virtue:
2Pe 1:4 Whereby are given unto us exceeding great and precious promises: that by these ye might be partakers of the divine nature, having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust.

The lust that draws people into sin (Jam 1:14-15) the lusts which those who are Christ's have crucified (Gal 5:24) when their old man died whereby the body of sin was done away with (Rom 6:6) that they no longer serve sin (Rom 6:7, Rom 6:16-18).

Which puts them in a state whereby they can "add diligently to their faith"...

2Pe 1:5 And beside this, giving all diligence, add to your faith virtue; and to virtue knowledge;
2Pe 1:6 And to knowledge temperance; and to temperance patience; and to patience godliness;
2Pe 1:7 And to godliness brotherly kindness; and to brotherly kindness charity.
2Pe 1:8 For if these things be in you, and abound, they make you that ye shall neither be barren nor unfruitful in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ.
2Pe 1:9 But he that lacketh these things is blind, and cannot see afar off, and hath forgotten that he was purged from his old sins.
2Pe 1:10 Wherefore the rather, brethren, give diligence to make your calling and election sure: for if ye do these things, ye shall never fall:
2Pe 1:11 For so an entrance shall be ministered unto you abundantly into the everlasting kingdom of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.

I don't claim that when one comes to Christ through repentance and faith is "perfect" in the sense that they are "perfectly holy" or "perfect in wisdom and understanding."

I simply claim that the REBELLION TO GOD HAS CEASED.

If one is in rebellion then they must forsake that rebellion and return to God.

Jas 4:7 Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you.
Jas 4:8 Draw nigh to God, and he will draw nigh to you. Cleanse your hands, ye sinners; and purify your hearts, ye double minded.
Jas 4:9 Be afflicted, and mourn, and weep: let your laughter be turned to mourning, and your joy to heaviness.
Jas 4:10 Humble yourselves in the sight of the Lord, and he shall lift you up.
 
C

cfultz3

Guest
Not quite sure what you mean Cfultz.

Yes a child rebellion does have to turn from darkness to light if they want to be saved. God's hands our outstretched to all for he wants none to perish.

As far as the l plow that is this verse...

Luk 9:56 For the Son of man is not come to destroy men's lives, but to save them. And they went to another village.
Luk 9:57 And it came to pass, that, as they went in the way, a certain man said unto him, Lord, I will follow thee whithersoever thou goest.
Luk 9:58 And Jesus said unto him, Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of man hath not where to lay his head.
Luk 9:59 And he said unto another, Follow me. But he said, Lord, suffer me first to go and bury my father.
Luk 9:60 Jesus said unto him, Let the dead bury their dead: but go thou and preach the kingdom of God.
Luk 9:61 And another also said, Lord, I will follow thee; but let me first go bid them farewell, which are at home at my house.
Luk 9:62 And Jesus said unto him, No man, having put his hand to the plough, and looking back, is fit for the kingdom of God.

It simply means that we are to leave Egypt and not look back. It is a reference to being double-minded and still having a love for the things of the world while trying to serve God at the same time.

Lot's wife was a type and shadow of one who left Sodom and looked back. She perished.

1Jn 2:15 Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him.
1Jn 2:16 For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world.
1Jn 2:17 And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever.

The world is a powerful draw but its pleasures are temporary. Our treasure is where our heart is, either on things above or on things below.

This is not to say it is wrong to enjoy a sunset of a family get together, the context is clearly in regards to idolatry where we put something in the place of God.

I hope that makes sense, I'm not sure exactly what you means in your comment.

:)
I was simplfy the following statement from you:

Does the rebellion to God have to CEASE in repentance? Or can one be in a state of salvation and in rebellion to God at the same time?

To further express it out what you are saying is not heresry:

Originally Posted by cfultz3
Are you saying that a child of the rebellion (sinner) has to (spiritually) turn from the darkness and unto the Light (single eye/ master)? Even the Christian cannot turn back from the plow (cannot live in rebellion to God's way)?
 
Jan 11, 2013
2,256
17
0
I agree.

Paul was trying to obey God "in the flesh" and therefore he would "do" what he "knew not." He was carnal and sold under sin yet I don't think he had been brought under conviction unlike the wretch of Romans 7:14-28 who is under conviction.

Perhaps Paul had been brought under conviction to a degree and suppressed it which his busy law keeping. I can only speculate.

.
The above emboldend makes no sense to me, maybe I am just a bit slow
On the one hand you say:
Paul was carnal and sold under sin(ch7:14-28) but you don't think he was brought under conviction at that point, but you do believe he was under conviction in verses 14-28

I don't understand, can you explain?
 
Nov 26, 2011
3,818
62
0
I was actually thinking about being pricked to the heart and it brought to mind what we were discussing at fellowship some time ago.

It is certainly much more difficult to be "pricked to the heart" or "brought to conviction" if one truly believes that their sin is a "result of a birth defect" as opposed to "a choice one made." Thus people often have a victim mindset as opposed to realising they are actually criminals in God's eyes.

Jesus taught this...

Mat 21:31 Whether of them twain did the will of his father? They say unto him, The first. Jesus saith unto them, Verily I say unto you, That the publicans and the harlots go into the kingdom of God before you.
Mat 21:32 For John came unto you in the way of righteousness, and ye believed him not: but the publicans and the harlots believed him: and ye, when ye had seen it, repented not afterward, that ye might believe him.

Jesus was pointing out that the tax collector or publican KNEW they were criminals and thus would see the need to repent. It is the people who are religious and think they already have it made that resist true repentance. So it is today in the church system with multitudes of people who truly believe that they sin because they were born that way and that they will be sinning to the day they die, thus they trust their salvation to a judicial exchange which simply cloaks their defilement. Once that paradigm hooks the mind it is very difficult to come out from the delusion.



In this passage are some key aspects...

Act 2:37 Now when they heard this, they were pricked in their heart, and said unto Peter and to the rest of the apostles, Men and brethren, what shall we do?
Act 2:38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.
Act 2:39 For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God shall call.
Act 2:40 And with many other words did he testify and exhort, saying, Save yourselves from this untoward generation.
Act 2:41 Then they that gladly received his word were baptized: and the same day there were added unto them about three thousand souls.
Act 2:42 And they continued stedfastly in the apostles' doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers.
Act 2:43 And fear came upon every soul: and many wonders and signs were done by the apostles.
Act 2:44 And all that believed were together, and had all things common;
Act 2:45 And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need.

Their works proved their repentance was real.

Act 26:20 But shewed first unto them of Damascus, and at Jerusalem, and throughout all the coasts of Judaea, and then to the Gentiles, that they should repent and turn to God, and do works meet for repentance.

Which is a parallel to what James taught...

Jas 2:17 Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone.
Jas 2:18 Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works.
Jas 2:19 Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble.
Jas 2:20 But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead?
Jas 2:21 Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar?
Jas 2:22 Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect?
Jas 2:23 And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God.
Jas 2:24 Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.
Jas 2:25 Likewise also was not Rahab the harlot justified by works, when she had received the messengers, and had sent them out another way?
Jas 2:26 For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also.

In that passage James connects "believing" with an "active obedient faith." It is an active obedient faith that God credits to one as righteousness.

Believing which does not bear the fruit of righteousness is akin to the faith of devils.
 
Nov 26, 2011
3,818
62
0
The above emboldend makes no sense to me, maybe I am just a bit slow
On the one hand you say:
Paul was carnal and sold under sin(ch7:14-28) but you don't think he was brought under conviction at that point, but you do believe he was under conviction in verses 14-28

I don't understand, can you explain?
Well carefully read the passage...

First it is written to those who "know the law."

Rom 7:1 Know ye not, brethren, (for I speak to them that know the law,) how that the law hath dominion over a man as long as he liveth?

Paul then defends the law against the thought that the law is evil because it wrought death.

Rom 7:7 What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.

The law simply brought the knowledge of sin and when men chose to do wrong when they knew better it wrought death to them hence (Gen 2:17, Rom 6:23, Rom 7:11, Jam 4:17, 1Joh 3:4).

The law was ordained for good because it points the way we should go but when we willfully choose to violate righteousness it is sin that brings death.

The actual law clearly clearly taught right from wrong and thus due to it being so specific (thou shalt not murder etc.) it made sin becoming exceedingly sinful.
Rom 7:13 Was then that which is good made death unto me? God forbid. But sin, that it might appear sin, working death in me by that which is good; that sin by the commandment might become exceeding sinful.

Yet even without the law of Moses death still reigned because all men have the light of conscience (Joh 1:9. Tit 2:11-12) and are thus without excuse. Therefore death still reigned before the law.

Rom 5:12 Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:
Rom 5:13 (For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law.
Rom 5:14 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come.

Whether one was a Jew and violated the letter or whether one was a Gentile and violated their conscience all are guilty before God. Hence...

Rom 2:14 For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves:
Rom 2:15 Which shew the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another;)

Rom 3:9 What then? are we better than they? No, in no wise: for we have before proved both Jews and Gentiles, that they are all under sin;
Rom 3:10 As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one:
Rom 3:11 There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God.

The above is a parallel between the Jews and the Gentiles concluding ALL UNDER SIN. Whether one sinned with the law or one sinned without the law. Doing wrong when you know to do right is sin and the wages of it is death.

Just as Israel sold themselves into sin so does everyone else.

Isa 50:1 Thus saith the LORD, Where is the bill of your mother's divorcement, whom I have put away? or which of my creditors is it to whom I have sold you? Behold, for your iniquities have ye sold yourselves, and for your transgressions is your mother put away.

Isa 52:3 For thus saith the LORD, Ye have sold yourselves for nought; and ye shall be redeemed without money.

Thus the wretch of Romans 7 has been sold into carnality.

Rom 7:14 For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin.

What the wretch does he KNOWS NOT (he is in darkness).

Rom 7:15 For that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I.

Allow - G1097 - ginōskō
A prolonged form of a primary verb; to “know” (absolutely), in a great variety of applications and with many implications (as shown at left, with others not thus clearly expressed): - allow, be aware (of), feel, (have) known (-ledge), perceive, be resolved, can speak, be sure, understand.

In other words many people "want to do what is right" but they "do not know how to do what is right" because THEY ARE IN DARKNESS and thus KNOW NOT. If they really knew what they were doing they would not do it. Living in sin is pure insanity because the result is total destruction, no-one who truly understands what sin is has anything to do with it.

Therefore the wretch does what he wouldn't do otherwise if he knew better but he admits that the righteousness that the law speaks of is good.
Rom 7:16 If then I do that which I would not, I consent unto the law that it is good.

Thus when he sins it is not him (in a figurative sense) it is the sin that dwells in him.
Rom 7:17 Now then it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.

The "sin dwelling in me" IS NOT a reference to Original Sin. That doctrine was brought into the Church by Augustine in the 4th century. The "sin dwelling in me" is a clear reference to the "body of sin."

Rom 6:6 Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin.

It is the "body of sin" that holds people in bondage. It must be destroyed by being crucified with Christ. Human beings become addicted to sin because the human brain is constructed in such a way that neuron pathways are formed in regards to the dopamine receptors and the firing off of neurotransmitters.

When someone engages in a pleasure activity whether it be sinful or not the reason they feel pleasure is because neurotransmitters are being fired off into the pleasure centers of the brain. When one engages in repeated acts of sin a "sensory reward system" is patterned in the brain and thus a strong desire to repeatedly perform the action becomes hardwired. Scientific studies into habits and addiction confirm this.

This is why sinning leads to bondage. No-one is born into bondage to sin. The bondage is acquired through long practiced habit and thus the nature by which one becomes a child of wrath is something that is a result of an ACT OF THE WILL in YIELDING TO TEMPTATION. This is why the Bible clearly states that "we sell ourselves into sin" rather than "we are born into sin." When David says he was "born into iniquity" he does not say "iniquity was born in him," rather he is referring to being born into a sinful world of iniquity.

The Bible clearly teaches that sin is a CHOICE as opposed to a DISEASE. This is one of the greatest misunderstandings in modern theology and it is the root of much error.

Paul goes on...

Rom 7:18 For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not.

This wretch is ADDICTED TO SIN. Like any addict who wants to be free of their addiction they don't know how to quit. Look at many smokers and drunks who quit for a time but fall right back into it. This is why sin cannot be defeated in the flesh. The solution is in the spiritual realm not the carnal realm.

Paul just reiterates his points here...
Rom 7:19 For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do.
Rom 7:20 Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.
Rom 7:21 I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with me.

There is something "in him" that makes him sin. It is the "body of sin" which is addicted. It's not easy for someone to break old habits is it? Do messy people become tidy people easily? No, it is extremely difficult.

This wretch delights in his knowledge of righteousness. He really does want to do the right thing. He is very conflicted.
Rom 7:22 For I delight in the law of God after the inward man:
Rom 7:23 But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members.

He is also very convicted. He is crying out for deliverance.
Rom 7:24 O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death?

This wretch IS NOT A CHRISTIAN. He is a sinner in bondage to the flesh who is under conviction who is SEEKING deliverance.

His "mind" serves the law of God but the "flesh" the law of sin. The flesh WILL ALWAYS serve the law of sin because the flesh is the raw passions and desires and it yearns gratification.
Rom 7:25 I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.

Paul continues...

Due to what Paul has just written he says this...
Rom 8:1 There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.

One MUST be IN CHRIST.

Rom 8:2 For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death.

It is the LAW OF THE SPIRIT OF LIFE IN CHRIST that sets one free.

Rom 8:3 For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:

The law cannot set one free because it is merely outward rules and regulations and simply yielding to rules does not effect the root cause of sin which is iniquity in the heart by which one yields to temptation and gratifies the flesh. Jesus came in the likeness of sinful flesh (a flesh body with the same passions and desires we have) and RULED OVER IT and thus condemned SIN IN THE FLESH. In other words Jesus gave us an example of not having sin rule over us. ie. ye shall rule over it (Gen 4:7).

True righteousness is fulfilled IN US when we WALK AFTER THE SPIRIT.
Rom 8:4 That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.

You see the solution to sin is to die with Christ in broken repentance so that one can submit to God in walking after the Spirit. It is by the Spirit that we are QUICKENED to life and that OUR MORTAL BODIES ARE QUICKENED.

Rom 8:11 But if the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you, he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by his Spirit that dwelleth in you.
Rom 8:12 Therefore, brethren, we are debtors, not to the flesh, to live after the flesh.
Rom 8:13 For if ye live after the flesh, ye shall die: but if ye through the Spirit do mortify the deeds of the body, ye shall live.
Rom 8:14 For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God.

In other words when we renew our minds our brains become hardwired to God instead of being hardwired to sin. First the heart has to be purged of iniquity and made pure and then we walk after the Spirit growing in the grace and knowledge of Jesus Christ.



One of the greatest fallacies today is the Romans 7 wretch being constantly taught as the PRESENT walk of a Christian. Alongside the fallacies of 1Joh 1:8-10 being taught as Christian's being in a perpetual state of bondage to sin.

I can lead a horse to water but I cannot make it drink. The religious systems of the world have always had it wrong. Israel was apostate, the Pharisees were apostate, and what portrays itself as modern Christianity is completely apostate.

2Th 2:3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;
2Th 2:4 Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.
2Th 2:5 Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things?
2Th 2:6 And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time.
2Th 2:7 For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way.
2Th 2:8 And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:
2Th 2:9 Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders,
2Th 2:10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.
2Th 2:11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
2Th 2:12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.


A redeemed and born again Christian is not carnal and sold under sin!
 
Last edited:
Jan 11, 2013
2,256
17
0
Well carefully read the passage...

First it is written to those who "know the law."

Rom 7:1 Know ye not, brethren, (for I speak to them that know the law,) how that the law hath dominion over a man as long as he liveth?

Paul then defends the law against the thought that the law is evil because it wrought death.

Rom 7:7 What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.

The law simply brought the knowledge of sin and when men chose to do wrong when they knew better it wrought death to them hence (Gen 2:17, Rom 6:23, Rom 7:11, Jam 4:17, 1Joh 3:4).

The law was ordained for good because it points the way we should go but when we willfully choose to violate righteousness it is sin that brings death.

The actual law clearly clearly taught right from wrong and thus due to it being so specific (thou shalt not murder etc.) it made sin becoming exceedingly sinful.
Rom 7:13 Was then that which is good made death unto me? God forbid. But sin, that it might appear sin, working death in me by that which is good; that sin by the commandment might become exceeding sinful.

Yet even without the law of Moses death still reigned because all men have the light of conscience (Joh 1:9. Tit 2:11-12) and are thus without excuse. Therefore death still reigned before the law.

Rom 5:12 Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:
Rom 5:13 (For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law.
Rom 5:14 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come.

Whether one was a Jew and violated the letter or whether one was a Gentile and violated their conscience all are guilty before God. Hence...

Rom 2:14 For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves:
Rom 2:15 Which shew the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another;)

Rom 3:9 What then? are we better than they? No, in no wise: for we have before proved both Jews and Gentiles, that they are all under sin;
Rom 3:10 As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one:
Rom 3:11 There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God.

The above is a parallel between the Jews and the Gentiles concluding ALL UNDER SIN. Whether one sinned with the law or one sinned without the law. Doing wrong when you know to do right is sin and the wages of it is death.

Just as Israel sold themselves into sin so does everyone else.

Isa 50:1 Thus saith the LORD, Where is the bill of your mother's divorcement, whom I have put away? or which of my creditors is it to whom I have sold you? Behold, for your iniquities have ye sold yourselves, and for your transgressions is your mother put away.

Isa 52:3 For thus saith the LORD, Ye have sold yourselves for nought; and ye shall be redeemed without money.

Thus the wretch of Romans 7 has been sold into carnality.

Rom 7:14 For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin.

What the wretch does he KNOWS NOT (he is in darkness).

Rom 7:15 For that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I.

Allow - G1097 - ginōskō
A prolonged form of a primary verb; to “know” (absolutely), in a great variety of applications and with many implications (as shown at left, with others not thus clearly expressed): - allow, be aware (of), feel, (have) known (-ledge), perceive, be resolved, can speak, be sure, understand.

In other words many people "want to do what is right" but they "do not know how to do what is right" because THEY ARE IN DARKNESS and thus KNOW NOT. If they really knew what they were doing they would not do it. Living in sin is pure insanity because the result is total destruction, no-one who truly understands what sin is has anything to do with it.

Therefore the wretch does what he wouldn't do otherwise if he knew better but he admits that the righteousness that the law speaks of is good.
Rom 7:16 If then I do that which I would not, I consent unto the law that it is good.

Thus when he sins it is not him (in a figurative sense) it is the sin that dwells in him.
Rom 7:17 Now then it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.

The "sin dwelling in me" IS NOT a reference to Original Sin. That doctrine was brought into the Church by Augustine in the 4th century. The "sin dwelling in me" is a clear reference to the "body of sin."

Rom 6:6 Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin.

It is the "body of sin" that holds people in bondage. It must be destroyed by being crucified with Christ. Human beings become addicted to sin because the human brain is constructed in such a way that neuron pathways are formed in regards to the dopamine receptors and the firing off of neurotransmitters.

When someone engages in a pleasure activity whether it be sinful or not the reason they feel pleasure is because neurotransmitters are being fired off into the pleasure centers of the brain. When one engages in repeated acts of sin a "sensory reward system" is patterned in the brain and thus a strong desire to repeatedly perform the action becomes hardwired. Scientific studies into habits and addiction confirm this.

This is why sinning leads to bondage. No-one is born into bondage to sin. The bondage is acquired through long practiced habit and thus the nature by which one becomes a child of wrath is something that is a result of an ACT OF THE WILL in YIELDING TO TEMPTATION. This is why the Bible clearly states that "we sell ourselves into sin" rather than "we are born into sin." When David says he was "born into iniquity" he does not say "iniquity was born in him," rather he is referring to being born into a sinful world of iniquity.

The Bible clearly teaches that sin is a CHOICE as opposed to a DISEASE. This is one of the greatest misunderstandings in modern theology and it is the root of much error.

Paul goes on...

Rom 7:18 For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not.

This wretch is ADDICTED TO SIN. Like any addict who wants to be free of their addiction they don't know how to quit. Look at many smokers and drunks who quit for a time but fall right back into it. This is why sin cannot be defeated in the flesh. The solution is in the spiritual realm not the carnal realm.

Paul just reiterates his points here...
Rom 7:19 For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do.
Rom 7:20 Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.
Rom 7:21 I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with me.

There is something "in him" that makes him sin. It is the "body of sin" which is addicted. It's not easy for someone to break old habits is it? Do messy people become tidy people easily? No, it is extremely difficult.

This wretch delights in his knowledge of righteousness. He really does want to do the right thing. He is very conflicted.
Rom 7:22 For I delight in the law of God after the inward man:
Rom 7:23 But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members.

He is also very convicted. He is crying out for deliverance.
Rom 7:24 O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death?

This wretch IS NOT A CHRISTIAN. He is a sinner in bondage to the flesh who is under conviction who is SEEKING deliverance.

His "mind" serves the law of God but the "flesh" the law of sin. The flesh WILL ALWAYS serve the law of sin because the flesh is the raw passions and desires and it yearns gratification.
Rom 7:25 I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.

Paul continues...

Due to what Paul has just written he says this...
Rom 8:1 There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.

One MUST be IN CHRIST.

Rom 8:2 For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death.

It is the LAW OF THE SPIRIT OF LIFE IN CHRIST that sets one free.

Rom 8:3 For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:

The law cannot set one free because it is merely outward rules and regulations and simply yielding to rules does not effect the root cause of sin which is iniquity in the heart by which one yields to temptation and gratifies the flesh. Jesus came in the likeness of sinful flesh (a flesh body with the same passions and desires we have) and RULED OVER IT and thus condemned SIN IN THE FLESH. In other words Jesus gave us an example of not having sin rule over us. ie. ye shall rule over it (Gen 4:7).

True righteousness is fulfilled IN US when we WALK AFTER THE SPIRIT.
Rom 8:4 That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.

You see the solution to sin is to die with Christ in broken repentance so that one can submit to God in walking after the Spirit. It is by the Spirit that we are QUICKENED to life and that OUR MORTAL BODIES ARE QUICKENED.

Rom 8:11 But if the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you, he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by his Spirit that dwelleth in you.
Rom 8:12 Therefore, brethren, we are debtors, not to the flesh, to live after the flesh.
Rom 8:13 For if ye live after the flesh, ye shall die: but if ye through the Spirit do mortify the deeds of the body, ye shall live.
Rom 8:14 For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God.

In other words when we renew our minds our brains become hardwired to God instead of being hardwired to sin. First the heart has to be purged of iniquity and made pure and then we walk after the Spirit growing in the grace and knowledge of Jesus Christ.



One of the greatest fallacies today is the Romans 7 wretch being constantly taught as the PRESENT walk of a Christian. Alongside the fallacies of 1Joh 1:8-10 being taught as Christian's being in a perpetual state of bondage to sin.

I can lead a horse to water but I cannot make it drink. The religious systems of the world have always had it wrong. Israel was apostate, the Pharisees were apostate, and what portrays itself as modern Christianity is completely apostate.

2Th 2:3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;
2Th 2:4 Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.
2Th 2:5 Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things?
2Th 2:6 And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time.
2Th 2:7 For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way.
2Th 2:8 And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:
2Th 2:9 Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders,
2Th 2:10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.
2Th 2:11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
2Th 2:12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.


A redeemed and born again Christian is not carnal and sold under sin!
Skinski

The question I asked only requires a short response from you

I will ask it one more time, if you do not answer it I will take it you do not know what the answer is
It does not demand reams of scripture verses in response, just your opinion of the following?

What caused 'the wretch' of Rom 7(as you put it) to be in the state he was in?
 
A

Ariel82

Guest
What I do know though is that the wretch of Romans 7 is a man under the law who is also under conviction. The wretch is not the present walk of a Christian who has been set free from the bondage of sin.
wow... I'm surprised I actually agree with most of what I've read you write today.

I would say the wretch is a man who is under the law of Moses and the first covenant because he has not learn of the second one mediated by Jesus. He pleads with God for a mediator and savior from the sinful fleshful desires he has that he knows go against good and righteous laws. He agrees with God that he is not righteous and in need of God's help and then thanks God for Jesus Christ and what He has done. Romans 7 describes the beginning of wisdom: fear of God and godly repentance. I like to go on reading Romans 8 about how the Holy Spirit helps people overcome.
 
Nov 26, 2011
3,818
62
0
The above emboldend makes no sense to me, maybe I am just a bit slow
On the one hand you say:
Paul was carnal and sold under sin(ch7:14-28) but you don't think he was brought under conviction at that point, but you do believe he was under conviction in verses 14-28

I don't understand, can you explain?
The context of the comment you are asking about is in regards to "who is the Roman's wretch."

The Roman's wretch is not necessarily Paul. It is a personification of a man under the law who is carnal and sold under sin who needs deliverance. Hence when I said that the wretch is under conviction yet I speculate as to the conviction of Saul I mean that in the sense that the wretch is not necessarily Saul. Paul is writing in a grammatical style known as the "Historical Present" to emphasise the importance of what he is teaching, he saw it important to defend the law because remember what he was teaching was completely against what many believed Judaism taught. Paul did not want to appear like he was teaching that the law was a bad thing.

Paul wrote the wretch passage as a defence of the law (due to what he wrote in Rom 6) and as a further explanation as to how the law cannot redeem a man. Hence Romans 6,7 and 8 all compliment each other.

Rom 6 is the methodology.
Rom 7 is the problem.
Rom 8 is the victory.

Paul presents certain things in Romans 6 which he elaborates on in Romans 7 and then in Romans 8 he paints a clear picture of what the victorious walk should look like so people will not be confused.

Paul is very detailed in his exposition of the Gospel. It is due to this detail than many twist what he wrote.
 
Last edited:
Jan 11, 2013
2,256
17
0
The context of the comment you are asking about is in regards to "who is the Roman's wretch."

The Roman's wretch is not necessarily Paul. It is a personification of a man under the law who is carnal and sold under sin who needs deliverance. Hence when I said that the wretch is under conviction yet I speculate as to the conviction of Saul I mean that in the sense that the wretch is not necessarily Saul.

Paul wrote the wretch passage as a defence of the law (due to what he wrote in Rom 6) and as a further explanation as to how the law cannot redeem a man. Hence Romans 6,7 and 8 all compliment each other.

Rom 6 is the methodology.
Rom 7 is the problem.
Rom 8 is the victory.

Paul presents certain things in Romans 6 which he elaborates on in Romans 7 and then in Romans 8 he paints a clear picture of what the victorious walk should look like so people will not be confused.
What caused 'the wretch' of Rom 7(as you put it) to be in the state he was in?

If you do not want to simply answer the question, please just tell me you don't, otherwise please answer it, with your opinion, not reams of scripture verses
 
Nov 26, 2011
3,818
62
0
Skinski

The question I asked only requires a short response from you

I will ask it one more time, if you do not answer it I will take it you do not know what the answer is
It does not demand reams of scripture verses in response, just your opinion of the following?

What caused 'the wretch' of Rom 7(as you put it) to be in the state he was in?
The wretch CHOSE to sin.
 
Jan 11, 2013
2,256
17
0
The wretch CHOSE to sin.
So you believe what caused the wretch of Rom 7 to be in the state he was in was because he chose to sin
Thank you for giving your opinion as to the question asked, I will respond to it either later tonight or tomorrow
 
Jan 11, 2013
2,256
17
0
The context of the comment you are asking about is in regards to "who is the Roman's wretch."

The Roman's wretch is not necessarily Paul. It is a personification of a man under the law who is carnal and sold under sin who needs deliverance. Hence when I said that the wretch is under conviction yet I speculate as to the conviction of Saul I mean that in the sense that the wretch is not necessarily Saul. Paul is writing in a grammatical style known as the "Historical Present" to emphasise the importance of what he is teaching, he saw it important to defend the law because remember what he was teaching was completely against what many believed Judaism taught. Paul did not want to appear like he was teaching that the law was a bad thing.

Paul wrote the wretch passage as a defence of the law (due to what he wrote in Rom 6) and as a further explanation as to how the law cannot redeem a man. Hence Romans 6,7 and 8 all compliment each other.

Rom 6 is the methodology.
Rom 7 is the problem.
Rom 8 is the victory.

Paul presents certain things in Romans 6 which he elaborates on in Romans 7 and then in Romans 8 he paints a clear picture of what the victorious walk should look like so people will not be confused.

Paul is very detailed in his exposition of the Gospel. It is due to this detail than many twist what he wrote.
So you do not believe Paul is speaking personally of his own life in Rom 7, I don't know how you come to that conclusion

'I' had not known sin but by the law..............................

 
Nov 26, 2011
3,818
62
0
What caused 'the wretch' of Rom 7(as you put it) to be in the state he was in?

If you do not want to simply answer the question, please just tell me you don't, otherwise please answer it, with your opinion, not reams of scripture verses
I use plenty of scripture references to demonstrate where my answer comes from. If I state something I ought to be able to support it with Scripture.

I like to patiently lay a foundation not only for the benefit of others but for my own benefit too.

Christianchat.com is good practice for preaching outside especially because ti allows me to address and work through any objections. Many of the people on Christianchat.com are more theologically minded than the average person I meet in the street who doesn't really pay much attention to the Bible. If someone can prove me wrong about something I love it because truth is truth and I want to align myself with it no matter what it is.

Here I get to respond to people who have been to seminary or read theological books. I haven't really read any theological books for doctrine except in researching the foundations of the common doctrines I see as false. Hence I read the Institutes, Augustine, Luther etc. to learn their reasoning and how they formed their conclusions. If what they wrote did not contradict the Bible I would not have any problem with it.

So again, when someone asks me a question I perfer not to give a "soundbyte" without presenting the reasoning behind it.
 
Jan 11, 2013
2,256
17
0
I use plenty of scripture references to demonstrate where my answer comes from. If I state something I ought to be able to support it with Scripture.

I like to patiently lay a foundation not only for the benefit of others but for my own benefit too.

Christianchat.com is good practice for preaching outside especially because ti allows me to address and work through any objections. Many of the people on Christianchat.com are more theologically minded than the average person I meet in the street who doesn't really pay much attention to the Bible.

Here I get to respond to people who have been to seminary or read theological books. I haven't really read any theological books for doctrine except in researching the foundations of the common doctrines I see as false. Hence I read the Institutes, Augustine, Luther etc. to learn their reasoning and how they formed their conclusions. If what they wrote did not contradict the Bible I would not have any problem with it.

So again, when someone asks me a question I perfer not to give a "soundbyte" without presenting the reasoning behind it.
I'm sorry Skinski, but most of the time you just recite huge swathes of scripture, it is good sometimes to give thorough explanations of what you believe scripture is saying, and your opinions , as I will give you as to how I see Rom 7

If you believe the wretch of Rom 7 was in that state because he chose to sin, what does he need saving from?
Surely if he wilfully/deliberately chose to spend his whole life sinning He was rejecting God-no?
If that is the case he needs to be rescued from not desiring to follow God, would you not agree?
 
Last edited:
Nov 26, 2011
3,818
62
0
I'm sorry Skinski, but most of the time you just recite huge swathes of scripture, it is good sometimes to give thorough explanations of what you believe scripture is saying, and your opinions , as I will give you as to how I see Rom 7

If you believe the wretch of Rom 7 was in that state because he chose to sin, what does he need saving from?
Surely if he wilfully/deliberately chose to sin He was rejecting God-no?
If that is the case he needs to be rescued from his wilfull rebellion, or not desiring to follow God, would you not agree?
If you actually read my previous posts you will clearly see my answer.

It is not simply a case of being rescued from "willful rebellion" it is a case of being released from actual "bondage."
 
Jan 11, 2013
2,256
17
0
If you actually read my previous posts you will clearly see my answer.

It is not simply a case of being rescued from "willful rebellion" it is a case of being released from actual "bondage."
NOW I am confused
On the one hand you say he was in that state because he CHOSE to sin, on the other he needed to be deliverd from bondage

What bondage?

Choosing to spend his whole life as a wilfull sinner?
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
Zone it is a heart issue.
A heart can be changed in a moment of time or it can be a longer drawn out process.
really?
who changes the heart skinski?
you?

i hope you are going to tell me WHY it is a long drawn out process.

why is a long drawn out process? who ever, ever told it wasn't? don't you know this is for life?

i really hope you have an answer for all the people you yourself have been leading to believe in sinless perfection (which you deny, but you know you have...and you most surely have seen the fallout. if you haven't there's really something wrong) - ceasing all known sin before God will save you.

you didn't. and you haven't.

you've called it by an infinite number of names. we know the schtick.

and you have made no effort whatsoever to talk directly to the Romans 6&7 people and self-taught who are actually listening to you about what it means and looks like to be saved. what it has been like for you.

you are responsible for what you teach and what you have said and done.

HERE'S THE WAY THIS HAS GONE DOWN:

you can and have placed a date in your profile that says "saved such-and-such date-last-year-whenever-recently"...you did it intentionally, and you know what that does:

that absolves you from having to admit the truth about your own experience in salvation, and how long it has taken you to get wherever you think, and say you are.


if you can't be honest about your own experience, absolutely not one thing you say can be upheld or trusted.

I fear today that it is often a longer drawn out process simply because of all the false doctrine that abounds.
i couldn't agree more.

you've had years of knowing about Jesus Christ and what the scriptures say.
and yet you were still sinning.

then suddenly you place a particular date SAVED on your profile.

just be truthful and tell me why that date. why such a long process for Scott?

You can invent gnats to strain at all you want. It is all fluff to make an allowance for ongoing rebellion.
i'm not on ingoing rebellion Scott.
i'm too old and i've been there done all that.
i want Christ and His people.
that's my life.

but i still sin sometimes. i fall short.

A human heart is either yielded to God or it isn't.
you've either been given a new heart or you haven't.

Obedience from the heart is essential to salvation.
a crushed and contrite spirit is all that's required for justification Scott.
read it.
the Spirit works in us until the day we die. that's sanctification.

you're such a heretic.

just amazing that you demand of others what you never did yourself and still don't do.

Whether that obedience is wrought in a moment or over a period of years it is still a necessity. There is no salvation in rebellion.
you said the Acts 2 people were saved in one day, repented and were baptized THEREFORE they had ceased from rebellion.
i showed you God is not like you.

Salvation is SAVED FROM SIN.
yes, it is. and it's all of the Lord.
without Him you're less than nothing.

The Bible teaches that those who YIELD TO SIN ARE IN BONDAGE.
no it doesn't.
it teaches that those who practice sin are in bondage.
if we say we have no sin we're liars.

Hence an important aspect of salvation is the bondage being broken.
of course it is.

Isn't that why Jesus came? To "redeem us from ALL iniquity" and to "purify us."
ya. do you know what He shed Blood for.
do you know what the Spirit does in a man.

you deny imputed righteousness...so how can you believe anything different.

youre so out of balance...you dont understand the working of God at all.

Your objection is simply due to wanting to believe in a salvation WHICH LACKS being redeemed from ALL iniquity and lacks heart purity.
like i said.
i have committed and been forgiven of and overcome more sin than any of that PUNK list you circulate.
combine all your lists...thats me.

now look at me.
a happy old woman who goes to church and lives in peace and has a clear conscience.

i never doubt my salvation like you.

you have no faith.

You want a salvation where light and darkness mixes. Where one can walk according to the flesh and to the Spirit at the same time.
really scott.
how do you know that.
im more than happy to post my real name, pictures of myself and my home, my pastor and my church family...a list of all my good deeds.
and i will place it alongside photos of myself and stories of my life before God saved me.
all my crimes.

i am pleased to do it.
i am pleased to step forward into the Light and stand in front of you and show my salvation is of The Lord.
no problem.

and you can decide how long it took for me to be changed - ill give you a hint - 3 months.
from being a worse criminal than you and DeSario could ever dream up....to a person no one i knew recognized.
cured from cancer and disease - radiant health, revitalization - no desire for the addictions which held me in chains. energy to go back to minister to others.

how am i doing Scott.

if you want proof, ill post it.
you can check up.

then you will make a public apology to this forum for the accusation that i am making excuses for some dark life i live in secret. what a bore you are. really. just an angry guy with a single mission. and its a flop since you go so far with - its not believable. you make a fool of yourself, and your folly is evident.

nobody on the planet and Gdo included believes with are without sin.
its a joke.

i have nothing to hide - i came into the Light of the Glorious Son of God and i am free and i have peace and assurance and no desire for the the things of the world or the flesh.

though i have ease with my Christian liberty...not all things are beneficial to me. so i make a conscious choice to say nah...or ya.

and you....can....not...stand that.

Practically every objection you make is rooted on this underlying premise. Due the Bible clearly teaching the opposite you are forced to invent gnats to strain at instead of directly addressing the SPECIFIC Bible verses I so clearly point out.
what do you want me to address. im familiar with them
ill show you my life. you can see if my life lines up with all that.
and how you measure up in comparison.

thats the real proof.
the rest is talk.
and your talk is cheap.

I would also really appreciate it if you could explicitly define what this "perfectionist heresy" actually is that refer to.
been there done it.

ya.
tell me about Scoot now.
no need to post scriptures.
be truthful about yourself or forget having any credibility at all.

why the saved date.
and what took so long.
and why do you sound now just like you did years ago.

i`ve seen all your old writings.


not bothering with typos.
 
A

Ariel82

Guest
Christianchat.com is good practice for preaching outside especially because ti allows me to address and work through any objections. Many of the people on Christianchat.com are more theologically minded than the average person I meet in the street who doesn't really pay much attention to the Bible. If someone can prove me wrong about something I love it because truth is truth and I want to align myself with it no matter what it is.

Here I get to respond to people who have been to seminary or read theological books. I haven't really read any theological books for doctrine except in researching the foundations of the common doctrines I see as false. Hence I read the Institutes, Augustine, Luther etc. to learn their reasoning and how they formed their conclusions. If what they wrote did not contradict the Bible I would not have any problem with it.

So again, when someone asks me a question I perfer not to give a "soundbyte" without presenting the reasoning behind it.
I think you misunderstand the teachings of many people you claim are false because of some preconcieved notions of what you believe they are teaching.

"If someone can prove me wrong about something I love it because truth is truth and I want to align myself with it no matter what it is."

it will be interesting if someone can show you how the concept of original sin is in the Bible.
what do you think actually happened after Adam and Eve sinned and was cast from the Garden of Eden?