Daniels 4 beasts

  • Thread starter eternally-gratefull
  • Start date
  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#61
Herod was born around 74 BC in the south (Idumea was the most southern region).[9][10] He was the second son of Antipater the Idumaean, a high-ranked official under Ethnarch Hyrcanus II, and Cypros, a Nabatean. Herod was practicing Judaism, as many Edomites and Nabateans had been commingled with the Jews and adopted their customs.[11] These "Judanized" Edomites were not considered Jewish by the dominant Pharisaic tradition, so even though Herod may have considered himself of the Jewish faith, he was not considered Jewish by the observant and nationalist Jews of Judea.[12] A loyal supporter of Hyrcanus II, Antipater appointed Herod governor of Galilee at 25, and his elder brother, Phasael, governor of Jerusalem. He enjoyed the backing of Rome but his brutality was condemned by the Sanhedrin.[13]

Herod the Great - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ....click

com·min·gle (k-mnggl)
v. com·min·gled, com·min·gling, com·min·gles
v.intr.
To become blended.
v.tr.
To cause to blend together; mix.


ECB(i) 40 And the fourth sovereigndom becomes mighty as iron: because as iron pulverizes and crushes all: and as iron shatters all these, it pulverizes and shatters. 41 And as to what you saw - the feet and digits, of clay of the potters, and of iron, the sovereigndom becomes divided; for the strength of the iron becomes therein just as you saw the iron comingled with miry clay. 42 And the digits of the feet, of iron and of clay, thus the sovereigndom - becomes mighty, and becomes partly broken. 43 And as you saw iron comingled with miry clay, they become comingled with the seed of men: but they become not this with that - behold, as iron is not comingled with clay
lol. sorry as I said before, I don;t get my doctrinal truth from wikepedia. alot of stuff on there is not true. Anyone can post on it.

and commingled. ten kings commingled, and formed into a single kingdom (which is what it meant) which will be destroyed by the return of Christ, it follows the iron kingdom. which was in its heyday during the time of Christ. Your trying to make the legs of iron and the feet one kingdom, when it is not. they are two different kingdoms.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#62
There is a basis of fact, the rest of the prophecy. First we have Babylon the immediately after is Medo-Persia then immediately after is Greece then immediately after is Rome. So according to the Prophecy immediately after is the 10 horns. There is no basis of fact for a gap for the prophecy has no gap.


there is a basis of fact. the kingdoms dealt with jerusalem and Isreal. Isreal was destroyed in 70 AD. the iron and clay would then follow 70 AD. when Isreal is no longer scattered or no longer not in jerusalem.

Thats why scripture did not mention the many gentile kingdoms which came after the fourth kingdom of rome.


Also the clay is the church
Jeremiah 18:6 KJV
(6) O house of Israel, cannot I do with you as this potter? saith the LORD. Behold, as the clay is in the potter's hand, so are ye in mine hand, O house of Israel.

The iron=Rome, The clay=The church. So the mingling iron & clay is a union of church and state and if you look at history after 476 AD that is what we see in Europe with the Papacy and also with Islam, both are church state powers.


Here we go again. God in jeremiah is using clay as a symbol to teach us a doctrinal truth, not telling us what the clay is in daniels prophesies.

If you think the church is the clay, then you have jesus the rock destroying the church. His own people!
 
L

Laodicea

Guest
#63
there is a basis of fact. the kingdoms dealt with jerusalem and Isreal. Isreal was destroyed in 70 AD. the iron and clay would then follow 70 AD. when Isreal is no longer scattered or no longer not in jerusalem.

Thats why scripture did not mention the many gentile kingdoms which came after the fourth kingdom of rome.




Here we go again. God in jeremiah is using clay as a symbol to teach us a doctrinal truth, not telling us what the clay is in daniels prophesies.

If you think the church is the clay, then you have jesus the rock destroying the church. His own people!


The iron kingdom is Rome and Rome continued until 476 AD then according to the Prophecy immediately we would see the 10 horns. Also Jesus destroys not the church but, the union of church and state. The Bible interprets itself and the Bible tells us what the clay is. You are not interpreting the prophecy according to the prophecy.
 
P

peterT

Guest
#64
This is not the same clay as in daniels prophesy, Are you kidding? the clay and iron is mixed. We are told what it means to be mixed.

41 Whereas you saw the feet and toes, partly of potter’s clay and partly of iron, the kingdom shall be divided; yet the strength of the iron shall be in it, just as you saw the iron mixed with ceramic clay.

Since it is divided, it is not united completely. thus will not be as strong as the legs which were iron with one king.

You can;t use things like this to prove your point when they are not talking of the same thing.
What? is the stone going to grinds them to powder literally or are four of the kingdoms already but dust.

Church and state iron and clay, we are mixed with the wicked world, and when the stone comes it will be no more but dust, just like the rest of the image

I have more than 6 scripture saying “we are the clay” it’s just that simple. What have you got saying we are NOT the Clay?

We are in the world but not of the world so the kingdom shall be partly strong, and partly broken.

John 15:19 If ye were of the world, the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you.

“The kingdom shall be divided”

John 17:14 I have given them thy word; and the world hath hated them, because they are not of the world, even as I am not of the world.

Iron and clay mix “The kingdom shall be divided” and “we are the clay”

Try to use scripture to show your opinion, just like I have used scripture to show you mine
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#65
The iron kingdom is Rome and Rome continued until 476 AD then according to the Prophecy immediately we would see the 10 horns. Also Jesus destroys not the church but, the union of church and state. The Bible interprets itself and the Bible tells us what the clay is. You are not interpreting the prophecy according to the prophecy.

Scripture says the ten kingdom empire will conquer the whole world. Not happened yet. it will control the worlds finances. not happened yet. It will be so strong it can destroy or kill all flesh. again, And finally it will only have power for a short time. Not a few hundred years.. It will also come into jerusalem in order to attack it and be destroyed by Christ.

Scripture also states when the stone crushes the kingdom. all the gentile kingdoms will be destroyed, and thus the age of the gentile is gone. As paul says in romans, when this happens., All Isreal will be saved, and jerusalem will be restored. Daniel states when thisw happens. The end of sin 70 weeks of daniel will have been completed. And Isreal will have repented and confessed her sin to God. no longer to commit adultry with foreign Gods. but worship her messiah.

so how can it be that kingdom. You need to interpret prophesy together. not just assume you know what it means. prophesy is found in many places. and all talks of the same events.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#66
What? is the stone going to grinds them to powder literally or are four of the kingdoms already but dust.

Church and state iron and clay, we are mixed with the wicked world, and when the stone comes it will be no more but dust, just like the rest of the image

I have more than 6 scripture saying “we are the clay” it’s just that simple. What have you got saying we are NOT the Clay?

We are in the world but not of the world so the kingdom shall be partly strong, and partly broken.

John 15:19 If ye were of the world, the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you.

“The kingdom shall be divided”

John 17:14 I have given them thy word; and the world hath hated them, because they are not of the world, even as I am not of the world.

Iron and clay mix “The kingdom shall be divided” and “we are the clay”

Try to use scripture to show your opinion, just like I have used scripture to show you mine

lol. We are not the clay. the clay and iron mixed speaks of EACH TEN KINGS. not two divisions. We are not the clay.. You have God destroying the church. when he puts an end to gentile rule. We see the iron and clay destroyed in rev 19.. Where is the church destroyed then??
 
P

peterT

Guest
#67
lol. We are not the clay. the clay and iron mixed speaks of EACH TEN KINGS. not two divisions. We are not the clay.. You have God destroying the church. when he puts an end to gentile rule. We see the iron and clay destroyed in rev 19.. Where is the church destroyed then??
No, God is not destroying the Church he is destroying what is

A kingdom divided, church and state, a kingdom partly strong, and partly broken.

You are still not using scripture mate
 
P

peterT

Guest
#68
lol. We are not the clay. the clay and iron mixed speaks of EACH TEN KINGS. not two divisions. We are not the clay.. You have God destroying the church. when he puts an end to gentile rule. We see the iron and clay destroyed in rev 19.. Where is the church destroyed then??
There is nothing about the clay in RV19 you are just making that up
 
L

Laodicea

Guest
#69

Scripture says the ten kingdom empire will conquer the whole world. Not happened yet. it will control the worlds finances. not happened yet. It will be so strong it can destroy or kill all flesh. again, And finally it will only have power for a short time. Not a few hundred years.. It will also come into jerusalem in order to attack it and be destroyed by Christ.

Scripture also states when the stone crushes the kingdom. all the gentile kingdoms will be destroyed, and thus the age of the gentile is gone. As paul says in romans, when this happens., All Isreal will be saved, and jerusalem will be restored. Daniel states when thisw happens. The end of sin 70 weeks of daniel will have been completed. And Isreal will have repented and confessed her sin to God. no longer to commit adultry with foreign Gods. but worship her messiah.

so how can it be that kingdom. You need to interpret prophesy together. not just assume you know what it means. prophesy is found in many places. and all talks of the same events.

According to Daniel 2 the 10 kings are divided not one kingdom. You are saying that scripture states but are not showing any.
Daniel 2:41 KJV
(41) And whereas thou sawest the feet and toes, part of potters' clay, and part of iron, the kingdom shall be divided; but there shall be in it of the strength of the iron, forasmuch as thou sawest the iron mixed with miry clay.

 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#70
According to Daniel 2 the 10 kings are divided not one kingdom. You are saying that scripture states but are not showing any.
Daniel 2:41 KJV
(41) And whereas thou sawest the feet and toes, part of potters' clay, and part of iron, the kingdom shall be divided; but there shall be in it of the strength of the iron, forasmuch as thou sawest the iron mixed with miry clay.


Daniel is shown 5 kingdoms.

head babylon
chest and arms media persia
thighs greece
legs rome
feet reformed roman empire

dan 7 shows that out of this ten king empire. one will take power. and rule the earth

rev tells us this one is the beast from the sea (he is powered by the dragon (satan) and ends up conquering every nation tribe and tongue, controlling all the worlds finances. and according to Christ, be able to kill all flesh, prompting his return to earth because of the elect.

again, you have to take prophesy as a whole. not just one peace.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#71
No, God is not destroying the Church he is destroying what is

A kingdom divided, church and state, a kingdom partly strong, and partly broken.

You are still not using scripture mate

no your not using scripture. it is not a two headed kingdom, it is a ten headed kingdom with ten crowns (kings) with the little horn coming from among these ten kings and taking power.

Your the one not using scripture my friend.
 
L

Laodicea

Guest
#72
Daniel 7:24 KJV
(24) And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise: and another shall rise after them; and he shall be diverse from the first, and he shall subdue three kings.

Again this shows that they are divided not one kingdom.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#73
There is nothing about the clay in RV19 you are just making that up
Rev 19 is the kingdom of the beast. which we are shown in rev 13 - 18 as comming from a ten kingdom empire.

I am not making up. your not reading the whole of prophesy.. nor did you read what I origionally posted. because it proves this.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#74
repost to show who the kingdom destroyed in rev 19 is..

According to the interpretation of dan 7, we are told this about the reformed empire;

1. 10 horns are ten kings, which will arise out of the original beast
2. another will arise (the little horn)
3. he will subdue three of the kings and these kingdoms will be added to his kingdom (leaving 7 kingdoms)
4. shall speak blasphemies against the most high God
5. change times and laws
6. Shall gain control of the whole earth
7. saints are given to him, and he will persecute them for times time and half a time (3 1/2 years)
8. slain at the end by Christ and sent to burning flame
9. Kingdom given to the Christ, and all men and nations and languages shall serve him.

Who is this Little horn? Do we see him again spoken of in prophesy?

Beast of revelation, given to John .


Ch 13:
1. Had characteristics of all of daniels beasts (leopard, bear and Lion) and is itself the 4th beast
2. Given power by satan himself (son of perdition)
3. Was mortally wounded (lost his power) but was restored to life (Rome died, and even though many have tried to revive it, No one has succeeded, Satan will revive this power)
4. Spoke pompous words (blasphemies)
5. Given power for 42 months (3 ½ years)
6. Given power to persecute the saints of God
7. Power is greater than any previous empire. As it is worldwide in scope (every tribe, language and nation were given to his hand) how many more ways can God say worldwide, every human alive at this time will be under his power.

Ch 17:
1. Was (had power) is not (lost power) will ascend out of the abyss (powered by Satan himself) will be destroyed (perdition)
2. 7 kings, 5 have fallen (Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, media-persia, Greece. One is (rome) and one is yet to come (Rome 2 or iron and clay)
3. He will continue a short time
4. 10 kingdom nation (splintered, they will give power to the beast, but will not be unified.
5. Will make war with God himself (the saints) but will be destroyed by the lamb

Rev 19
1. Beast and worlds armies gather together to make war with the lamb
2. Christ defeats beast and worlds armies (so many bodies are left in this battle that birds feast on them for months)
3. Beast is captured, and thrown to the fire
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#75
Daniel 7:24 KJV
(24) And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise: and another shall rise after them; and he shall be diverse from the first, and he shall subdue three kings.

Again this shows that they are divided not one kingdom.
The kingdom is divided, that is what the clay stands for. The one which arises after them takes power. and according to rev, is powered by satan, It is Christ who destroys this kingdom, and throws the little horn into the fire.

Each part was a kingdom. The prophesy did not all of a sudden take a twist and turn and talk about ten kingdoms. each part represented one kingdom. The four kings of greece was still considered one kingdom. but it was splintered, and caused its fall.

The same goes for the final kingdom.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#76
lol. sorry as I said before, I don;t get my doctrinal truth from wikepedia. alot of stuff on there is not true. Anyone can post on it.
k.


Jewish Virtual Library
Idumea/Edom
Idumea or Edom in Hebrew was the region south of Judea originally inhabited by the reputed descendents of Jacob's brother Esau. Edom was periodically subjected to Judea (under David & Solomon [10th c. BCE] & the Maccabees [2nd c. BCE]). Homeland of the house of Herod. There were no natural boundaries between Idumea & Judea, so the borders were always in flux. The distinction between Edomites & Jews was blurred by Johanan Hyrcanus' forced conversion of Idumea to Judaism [ca. 130 BCE]. During the 1st c. CE pressure by the Arab Nabateans pushed the territory of the Edomites to within 15 miles of Jerusalem. The region was bounded by the city state of Gaza on the west and the Dead Sea on the east. Herod's wilderness fortress of Masada that served as the final base of Jewish resistance to Roman rule lay within its borders. After 70 CE Idumea was detached from Judea until it was captured by modern Israel in the Six-Day War [1967].

Idumea/Edom < click


EDOX, IDUMEA (, '&#921;&#948;&#959;&#957;&#956;&#940;&#953;&#945;):
Jewish Encyclopedia
After the conquest of Judah by the Babylonians, the Edomites were allowed to settle in southern Palestine. At the same time they were driven by the Nabatæans from Idumea. In southern Palestine they prospered for more than four centuries. Judas Maccabeus conquered their territory for a time (B.C. 163; "Ant." xii. 8, §§ 1, 6). They were again subdued by John Hyrcanus (c. 125 B.C.), by whom they were forced to observe Jewish rites and laws (ib. xiii. 9, § 1; xiv. 4, § 4). They were then incorporated with the Jewish nation, and their country was called by the Greeks and Romans "Idumea" (Mark iii. 8; Ptolemy, "Geography," v. 16). With Antipater began the Idumean dynasty that ruled over Judea till its conquest by the Romans. Immediately before the siege of Jerusalem 20,000 Idumeans, under the leadership of John, Simeon, Phinehas, and Jacob, appeared before Jerusalem to fight in behalf of the Zealots who were besieged in the Temple (Josephus, "B. J." iv. 4, § 5).

From this time the Idumeans ceased to be a separate people, though the name "Idumea" still existed the time of Jerome.

According to the Law (Deut. xxiii. 8, 9), the congregation could not receive descendants of a marriage between an Israelite and an Edomite until the fourth generation. This law was a subject of controversy between R. Simeon and other Talmudists, who maintained that female descendants were also excluded until the fourth generation, contrary to R. Simeon, who regarded the limitation as applicable in only to male descendants (Yeb. 76b).

Use of Name.
The name "Edom" is used by the Talmudists for the Roman empire, and they applied to Rome every passage of the Bible referring to Edom or to Esau. In Leviticus Rabbah (xiii.) Rome, under the name of "Edom," is compared to a boar, and the symbolic name "Seir" was used by the poets of the Middle Ages not only for Rome (comp. Ecclus. 1. 26, Hebr.), but also for Christianity (Zunz, "Literaturgesch." p. 620).

On this account the word "Edom" was often expunged by the censor and another name substituted (Popper, "Censorship of Hebrew Books," p. 58). In place of "Edom," the word "&#7716;azir" (swine) was occasionally used, perhaps as a mere term of reproach (but see Epstein, "Beiträge zur Jüd. Alterthumskunde," p. 35). In Midrash Tan&#7717;uma Bereshit, Hadrian is called "the King of Edom." The Talmudists, however, made an exception in favor of Antoninus Pius, whom they assured would attain paradise, because he had not acted in the manner of Esau ('Ab. Zarah 10b). 'Abodah Zarah 10a, however, explaining Obadiah, verse 2, says that Edom had neither written nor spoken language. This is inconsistent with its application to Rome.

EDOX, IDUMEA - JewishEncyclopedia.com < click
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#77
k.


Jewish Virtual Library
Idumea/Edom
Idumea or Edom in Hebrew was the region south of Judea originally inhabited by the reputed descendents of Jacob's brother Esau. Edom was periodically subjected to Judea (under David & Solomon [10th c. BCE] & the Maccabees [2nd c. BCE]). Homeland of the house of Herod. There were no natural boundaries between Idumea & Judea, so the borders were always in flux. The distinction between Edomites & Jews was blurred by Johanan Hyrcanus' forced conversion of Idumea to Judaism [ca. 130 BCE]. During the 1st c. CE pressure by the Arab Nabateans pushed the territory of the Edomites to within 15 miles of Jerusalem. The region was bounded by the city state of Gaza on the west and the Dead Sea on the east. Herod's wilderness fortress of Masada that served as the final base of Jewish resistance to Roman rule lay within its borders. After 70 CE Idumea was detached from Judea until it was captured by modern Israel in the Six-Day War [1967].

Idumea/Edom < click


EDOX, IDUMEA (, '&#921;&#948;&#959;&#957;&#956;&#940;&#953;&#945;):
Jewish Encyclopedia
After the conquest of Judah by the Babylonians, the Edomites were allowed to settle in southern Palestine. At the same time they were driven by the Nabatæans from Idumea. In southern Palestine they prospered for more than four centuries. Judas Maccabeus conquered their territory for a time (B.C. 163; "Ant." xii. 8, §§ 1, 6). They were again subdued by John Hyrcanus (c. 125 B.C.), by whom they were forced to observe Jewish rites and laws (ib. xiii. 9, § 1; xiv. 4, § 4). They were then incorporated with the Jewish nation, and their country was called by the Greeks and Romans "Idumea" (Mark iii. 8; Ptolemy, "Geography," v. 16). With Antipater began the Idumean dynasty that ruled over Judea till its conquest by the Romans. Immediately before the siege of Jerusalem 20,000 Idumeans, under the leadership of John, Simeon, Phinehas, and Jacob, appeared before Jerusalem to fight in behalf of the Zealots who were besieged in the Temple (Josephus, "B. J." iv. 4, § 5).

From this time the Idumeans ceased to be a separate people, though the name "Idumea" still existed the time of Jerome.

According to the Law (Deut. xxiii. 8, 9), the congregation could not receive descendants of a marriage between an Israelite and an Edomite until the fourth generation. This law was a subject of controversy between R. Simeon and other Talmudists, who maintained that female descendants were also excluded until the fourth generation, contrary to R. Simeon, who regarded the limitation as applicable in only to male descendants (Yeb. 76b).

Use of Name.
The name "Edom" is used by the Talmudists for the Roman empire, and they applied to Rome every passage of the Bible referring to Edom or to Esau. In Leviticus Rabbah (xiii.) Rome, under the name of "Edom," is compared to a boar, and the symbolic name "Seir" was used by the poets of the Middle Ages not only for Rome (comp. Ecclus. 1. 26, Hebr.), but also for Christianity (Zunz, "Literaturgesch." p. 620).

On this account the word "Edom" was often expunged by the censor and another name substituted (Popper, "Censorship of Hebrew Books," p. 58). In place of "Edom," the word "&#7716;azir" (swine) was occasionally used, perhaps as a mere term of reproach (but see Epstein, "Beiträge zur Jüd. Alterthumskunde," p. 35). In Midrash Tan&#7717;uma Bereshit, Hadrian is called "the King of Edom." The Talmudists, however, made an exception in favor of Antoninus Pius, whom they assured would attain paradise, because he had not acted in the manner of Esau ('Ab. Zarah 10b). 'Abodah Zarah 10a, however, explaining Obadiah, verse 2, says that Edom had neither written nor spoken language. This is inconsistent with its application to Rome.

EDOX, IDUMEA - JewishEncyclopedia.com < click
Obediah 18: 18 The house of Jacob shall be a fire,
And the house of Joseph a flame;
But the house of Esau shall be stubble;
They shall kindle them and devour them,
And no survivor shall remain of the house of Esau,”
For the LORD has spoken.

No survivor. Funny How scripture makes things clear. When edom is destroyed (as it was by Judah) then NO SURVIVOR WILL REMAIN from the house of esau!


do we trust God. or some secular writtings?
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#78
Obediah 18: 18 The house of Jacob shall be a fire,
And the house of Joseph a flame;
But the house of Esau shall be stubble;
They shall kindle them and devour them,
And no survivor shall remain of the house of Esau,&#8221;
For the LORD has spoken.

No survivor. Funny How scripture makes things clear. When edom is destroyed (as it was by Judah) then NO SURVIVOR WILL REMAIN from the house of esau!


do we trust God. or some secular writtings?
EG....the trouble is sometimes your timelines. and sometimes things like ALL israel will be saved.
ALL israel won't be saved - so SOEMTHING else is meant.

and we have to know what happened to israel, what became of israel (both faithful and cut off).

for some reason you are reluctant to really look at what happened (and who the players were) during the time Jesus walked the Land, and afterward to 70AD. it's like: its okay to look at SOME history; and its okay to interpret scripture according to some future headlines or predicted events involving entities we THINK will arise....but it's not okay to look at recorded history...and see that it doesn't contradict God's Word.

~

"The pagan colonists were placed "by the king of Assyria in Samaria and the cities thereof" 2 Kings 17:24, probably to hold the people in the country in check. The remnant of "the house of Joseph" dwelt in the open country and the villages.

And the house of Esau for stubble - At some time after the first desolation by Nebuchadnezzar, Esau fulfilled the boast which Malachi records, "we will return and build up the desolate places" Malachi 1:4. Probably during the oppression of Judah by Antiochus Epiphanes, they possessed themselves of the South of Judah, bordering on their own country, and of Hebron (1 Macc. 5:65), 22 miles from Jerusalem , where Judah had dwelt in the time of Nehemiah Neh 11:25. Judas Maccabaeus was reduced to (1 Macc. 4:61) "fortify Bethzur," literally "house of the rock," (20 miles only from Jerusalem) (Eusebius), "that the people might have a defense against Idumaea." Maresha and Adoraim, 25 miles southwest of Jerusalem, near the road to Gaza, were cities of Idumaea. (Josephus, Ant. xiii. 15. 4.) The whole of Simeon was absorbed in it. (Josephus, Ant. v. 1. 22.) Edom was still on the aggressive, when Judas Maccabaeus smote them at Arrabatene. It was (1 Macc. 5:3) "because they beset Israel round about," that "Judas fought against the children of Esau in Idumea at Arrabatene and gave them a great overthow."

His second battle against them was in Judaea itself. He (1 Macc. 5:65.) "fought against the children of Esau in the land toward the South, where he smote Hebron and her daughters, and pulled down its fortress and burned the towns thereof round about." About 20 years afterward, Simon had again to recover Bethzur (1 Macc. 11:65, 66), and again to fortify it, as still lying on the borders of Judah. (1 Macc. 14:33). Twenty years later, John Hyrcanus, son of Simon, (1 Macc. 13:53). (Josephus, Ant. xiii. 9, 1) "subdued all the Edomites, and permitted them to remain in the country, on condition that they would receive circumcision, and adopt the laws of the Jews." This they did, continues Josephus; "and henceforth became Jews." Outwardly they appear to have given up their idolatry. For although Josephus says , "the Edomites "account" (not, accounted) Koze a god," he relates that, after this forced adoption of Jewish customs, Herod made Costobar, of the sacerdotal family, prefect of Idumaea and Gaza. Their character remained unchanged.

The Jewish historian, who knew them well, describes them as "a tumultuous disorderly race, ever alive to commotions, delighting in change, who went to engagements as to a feast" : "by nature most savage for slaughter." 3, b.c. they took part in the sedition against the Romans , using, as a pretext probably, the Feast of Pentecost, to which they went up with those of Galilee, Jericho, the country beyond Jordan, and "the Jews themselves." Just before the last siege of Jerusalem, the Zealots sent for them, on pretext that the city was betrayed to the Romans. "All took arms, as if in defense of their metropolis, and, 20,000 in number, went to Jerusalem" . After massacres, of which, when told that they had been deceived, they themselves repented, they returned; and were, in turn, wasted by Simon the Gerasene . Simon took it. "He not only destroyed cities and villages, but wasted the whole country. For as you may see wood wholly bared by locusts, so the army of Simon left the country behind them, a desert. Some things they burnt, others they razed."

After a short space, "he returned to the remnant of Edom, and, chasing the people on all sides, constrained the many to flee to Jerusalem" . There they took part against the Zealots , "were a great part of the war" against the Romans, and perished , "rivals in phrensy" with the worst Jews in the thee of that extreme, superhuman, wickedness. Thenceforth, their name disappears from history. The "greater part" of the remmant of the nation had perished in that dreadful exterminating siege; if any still survived, they retained no known national existence. Arabian tradition preserves the memory of three Jewish Arab tribes, none of the Edomites.
Barnes



"The house of Jacob shall be a fire - After their return from captivity, the Jews, called here the house of Jacob and the house of Joseph, did break out as a flame upon the Idumeans; they reduced them into slavery; and obliged them to receive circumcision, and practise the rites of the Jewish religion. See 1 Maccabees 5:3, etc.; 2 Maccabees 10:15-23; and Josephus Antiq., lib. 13 c. 17.

There shall not be any remaining - As a people and a nation they shall be totally destroyed. This is the meaning; it does not signify that every individual shall be destroyed."
Clarkes



"house of Jacob . Joseph-that is, the two kingdoms, Judah and Ephraim or Israel [Jerome]. The two shall form one kingdom, their former feuds being laid aside (Isa 11:12, 13; 37:22-28; Jer 3:18; Ho 1:11). The Jews returned with some of the Israelites from Babylon; and, under John Hyrcanus, so subdued and, compelling them to be circumcised, incorporated the Idumeans with themselves that they formed part of the nation [Josephus, Antiquities, 13.17; 12.11]."
JFBC
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#79
EG...like...if the Herods weren't Edomites, who were they?:)

Judahites? seriously?
Romans?

Matthew 14
The Death of John the Baptist

1At that time Herod the tetrarch heard about the fame of Jesus, 2and he said to his servants, &#8220;This is John the Baptist. He has been raised from the dead; that is why these miraculous powers are at work in him.&#8221; 3For Herod had seized John and bound him and put him in prison for the sake of Herodias, his brother Philip&#8217;s wife,a 4because John had been saying to him, &#8220;It is not lawful for you to have her.&#8221; 5And though he wanted to put him to death, he feared the people, because they held him to be a prophet. 6But when Herod&#8217;s birthday came, the daughter of Herodias danced before the company and pleased Herod, 7so that he promised with an oath to give her whatever she might ask. 8Prompted by her mother, she said, &#8220;Give me the head of John the Baptist here on a platter.&#8221; 9And the king was sorry, but because of his oaths and his guests he commanded it to be given. 10He sent and had John beheaded in the prison, 11and his head was brought on a platter and given to the girl, and she brought it to her mother. 12And his disciples came and took the body and buried it, and they went and told Jesus.
 
Last edited:
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#80
EG...like...if the Herods weren't Edomites, who were they?:)

Judahites? seriously?
1. If Edom was totally destroyed so no one was left alive of the house of Esau, then how can they be an edomite?

2. It still does not answer the ten kingdom issue even if they were edomites. These ten kings ruled together, they each had their own autonomous nation (Herod was a puppet. he was not a king, he answered to ceasar) Unless you think ceasar was the little horn. which again makes no sense. His kingdom was not fragmented and divided. (as the ten toes were) He was supreme ruler. And he did not rule over every nation tribe and tongue. no kingdom has as of yet..

To many wholes in your theory. I am sorry but I can not buy a theory with so many holes in it.