Exactly when and what triggered the ceasing of the gifts of the Spirit?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
P

psychomom

Guest
#61
could somebody please tell me where the Bible says I am to call my husband 'master'?

my secretary's gonna be calling ME master if i don't start gettin' my memos!

right...so 1 Peter 3 i know. in my NASU it says 'just as Sarah obeyed Abraham, calling him lord...'.
but...not the same thing...right?
 
H

hattiebod

Guest
#63
Where in scripture does it say women spoke in tongues to crowds of men and women.

Where in scripture does it show where women preached to a crowd at all?

We are all equal spiritually but that doesn't mean men and women have the same roles.
We do not have the same roles, that much I think is obvious. When there is abuse in this area, it is usually because the man is in scriptural disobedience and expects the woman to be scripturally obedient...not going to work!! If we read the Bible, we will see that it is written in the context of a parochial society, a mysognist society but Christ spoke against this again and again. First God, then Christ, then the angels, then man. I will not bother to write screeds of verses to support this position...I just ask you, as Christians....look at the whole Bible, not out of context. Man and woman are to be one together in their place under Christ. If a man was indeed in a relationship with Christ, there would not be abuse of this as he would value and esteem his wife, treating her 'as he would treat Christ'. And vice versa. Quite simply put, as a man treats his wife, so he treats Christ. End of. Women did teach in the Bible, they also ruled. God will raise up who He sees fit. <><
 
P

Professor

Guest
#64
I know a very godly man who speaks in tongues.

I think the 'gifts of the spirit of God' ceased with writing of the Bible. The gospel could be shared more easily once it was written (until the Catholic church banned lay folk from reading it).

The Bible does say that shortly before the return of Christ gifts will return. But it doesn't say how near the return or what gifts.

The important thing is that they are not given now. And so the person you hear speaking in tongues or giving prophecies or healing with a touch.... well, I'll leave the conclusion up to you :)
 
P

Professor

Guest
#65
Whoa! So when I posted the above, you all have gone waaay beyond that! :)
 

Katy-follower

Senior Member
Jun 25, 2011
2,719
155
63
#66
For the sake of understanding, I believe this is worth repeating. Anyone who has experienced a miracle in the name of our Lord, Jesus Christ, is able to say by the Holy Spirit that miracles do occur. These people do not look for miracles, they serve God, and God uses them. The same hold true for signs. Those who believe Jesus Christ do not look for signs as did thos hypocrites who asked Him for a sign to prove Who He is, the signs come because they do not ask, but they are given. As for visions, again, anyone who has had a vision has received it from above, though not petitioned, they simply are given.

Now no one can say by the Holy Spirit that miracles do not occur, nor signs, nor visions. No one can limit God's will to an opinion. All of us who are saved by the Blood of Jesus Christ are open to whatever God may want for us regarding service to Him. Again, that sinful generation asking for a sign was an unbelieving generation (flesh) not those who believe. Also, again, those who experience the power of God only do for the glory of God Almighty in the name of Jesus Christ. Signs and wonders are not demanded to prove God, they are given to those who serve God, without asking.
I love this post of yours, Jack.

As witnesses to the truth, we all have a personal testimony on how we were saved. The same is said of how God continues to work in our lives, including His use of visions, dreams and healing, directly from Him. No one can take this witness away from you, because it's yours. Everyone has a personal relationship with Him and He works in several ways.

We testify to what God has done and continues to do in our lives, because all these things are true.

When I mentioned healing, I mean directly from God, when you call out to Him and if it's His will then He will heal you.

It's God's will. Things given from God are not asked for, as you said. These things will usually happen when least expected and it may be years before He gives a vision or maybe never again, but we don't depend on such things, for we are already believers and we walk by faith.

All we can do is testify to the truth and what has happened in our lives :)
 

RickyZ

Senior Member
Sep 20, 2012
9,635
787
113
#67
So much confusion indeed. God the same yesterday, today, and tomorrow, except today isn't the same as yesterday, and tomorrow will be different still; people claiming the gifts have ceased but saying they've witnessed them nonetheless; people saying the gifts live but operating above and beyond the will of God; people who mine symbolism yet say stop seeking so much symbology; one side mocking the other as deceived and deceiving and vise versa; all of us seeking the truth but not willing to accept that the other side may have some to share too...

and satan stands back laughing 'what a fine mess I've made'

The gifts live. They are not at our beck and call but at God's. It is not our place to call upon them, but it is our place to make ourselves available. And it is better to not use them than to do so irresponsibly.

As one said early on, seek the Giver, not the gift. Be available to receive, don't grab and take. And test the spirits, that they glorify God and nothing else.
 
R

RachelBibleStudent

Guest
#68
this is a summary of my research on the history of the spiritual gifts that i have posted a couple times before...

in the early second century AD justin martyr wrote in his 'dialogue with trypho the jew' that healing and tongues and prophecy were common in the christian church...

in the late second century irenaeus...a student of john's student polycarp...wrote in his book 'against heresies' that many in the churches spoke in tongues and received prophecy and performed healings...

in the early third century origen wrote in his book 'against celsus' that the tongues were temporary and that they no longer happened...but he also reported that he was a witness to ongoing prophecy and healings...

in the late third century john chrysostom indicated in his 'homily on 1 corinthians 12' that tongues no longer occurred and admitted that the church's understanding of the nature of tongues had been obscured by the passage of time...chrysostom is also the first to use the term 'cessation'

in the early fourth century the church historian eusebius of caesarea...based on the writings i already mentioned and other reports that we no longer have...concluded in his 'ecclesiastical history' that the tongues had continued only through irenaeus' time...

in the mid fourth century epiphanius of salamis wrote in his anti heretical 'medicine chest' that prophecy was welcomed in the church...he argued against the montanists that the church had not rejected the spiritual gifts but only had denounced the montanists' charisma as not being authentic spiritual gifts...

in the late fourth century augustine wrote in his 'homily on 1 john' that the tongues were for the early church and were no longer present in his time...

in the early fifth century augustine wrote in his 'city of God' that miracles still occurred...but that they were not as widely reported as the earlier miracles...and he described several contemporary healings that he was aware of or even witnessed himself... most of the contemporary healings augustine tells about happened through prayer or through the sacraments...especially baptism... augustine also argued in the same work that although the miracles still happened they were no longer spiritually necessary because 'the whole world' had come to believe the gospel...

although the church fathers were fallible and often uncritical and prone to repeating hearsay...most of these post apostolic testimonies seem to reflect the widespread consensus of 'common knowledge' in the church regarding the gifts in their respective time periods...

from all of these ancient testimonies my conclusion is that the tongues continued into the late second century and then ceased... healings continued at least into the fifth century although by that time they were usually the result of prayer or sacrament...healing by direct command as in the new testament appears to have largely ceased by then... prophecy continued at least into the fourth century and it is not clear whether it ever fully ceased...

because of my research i take a position i call 'tentative cessationism'...i regard the ceasing of tongues and the ceasing of healing by direct command as a -historical- fact...though i don't have any -theological- reason for it being so...and consequently i am neutral on the question of whether or not these miraculous gifts could be revived and whether or not the pentecostal or charismatic movements represent such a revival in modern times
 
1

1still_waters

Guest
#69
this is a summary of my research on the history of the spiritual gifts that i have posted a couple times before...

in the early second century AD justin martyr wrote in his 'dialogue with trypho the jew' that healing and tongues and prophecy were common in the christian church...

in the late second century irenaeus...a student of john's student polycarp...wrote in his book 'against heresies' that many in the churches spoke in tongues and received prophecy and performed healings...

in the early third century origen wrote in his book 'against celsus' that the tongues were temporary and that they no longer happened...but he also reported that he was a witness to ongoing prophecy and healings...

in the late third century john chrysostom indicated in his 'homily on 1 corinthians 12' that tongues no longer occurred and admitted that the church's understanding of the nature of tongues had been obscured by the passage of time...chrysostom is also the first to use the term 'cessation'

in the early fourth century the church historian eusebius of caesarea...based on the writings i already mentioned and other reports that we no longer have...concluded in his 'ecclesiastical history' that the tongues had continued only through irenaeus' time...

in the mid fourth century epiphanius of salamis wrote in his anti heretical 'medicine chest' that prophecy was welcomed in the church...he argued against the montanists that the church had not rejected the spiritual gifts but only had denounced the montanists' charisma as not being authentic spiritual gifts...

in the late fourth century augustine wrote in his 'homily on 1 john' that the tongues were for the early church and were no longer present in his time...

in the early fifth century augustine wrote in his 'city of God' that miracles still occurred...but that they were not as widely reported as the earlier miracles...and he described several contemporary healings that he was aware of or even witnessed himself... most of the contemporary healings augustine tells about happened through prayer or through the sacraments...especially baptism... augustine also argued in the same work that although the miracles still happened they were no longer spiritually necessary because 'the whole world' had come to believe the gospel...

although the church fathers were fallible and often uncritical and prone to repeating hearsay...most of these post apostolic testimonies seem to reflect the widespread consensus of 'common knowledge' in the church regarding the gifts in their respective time periods...

from all of these ancient testimonies my conclusion is that the tongues continued into the late second century and then ceased... healings continued at least into the fifth century although by that time they were usually the result of prayer or sacrament...healing by direct command as in the new testament appears to have largely ceased by then... prophecy continued at least into the fourth century and it is not clear whether it ever fully ceased...

because of my research i take a position i call 'tentative cessationism'...i regard the ceasing of tongues and the ceasing of healing by direct command as a -historical- fact...though i don't have any -theological- reason for it being so...and consequently i am neutral on the question of whether or not these miraculous gifts could be revived and whether or not the pentecostal or charismatic movements represent such a revival in modern times
If what you present is true, it's interesting the fading out time is around the same time the nt was officially being compiled.
 

RickyZ

Senior Member
Sep 20, 2012
9,635
787
113
#70
because of my research i take a position i call 'tentative cessationism'...i regard the ceasing of tongues and the ceasing of healing by direct command as a -historical- fact...though i don't have any -theological- reason for it being so...and consequently i am neutral on the question of whether or not these miraculous gifts could be revived and whether or not the pentecostal or charismatic movements represent such a revival in modern times
Very interesting study and I love your conclusion. There's no doubt that the gifts most definately fell out of favor and have only seen a small fraction of the use they did at first. But like you say, is that man or is that God?

First question I'd ask is if there is "anyone(s)" who hold authority here and now who would have an interest in seeing God's powers fall out of use with man? If I were an entity seeking to spread, say, desease amongst man, I sure wouldn't want them running around with the idea that they could heal themselves.

Secondly, this whole debate smacks of the crazy man who stands on the corner insisting cars died out in the 50's while they whiz right by him apparently unnoticed. It IS happening out there people, and so to claim by any rationalization that it's not is insanity. Since it IS happening, better to figure out why most stopped doing it, than to be the crazy man on the corner ignoring the obvious.

Sorry to be so blunt. But in the end those who are not functional in this are threatened to go apostate. Matthew 24:10.
 
Last edited:
Feb 19, 2013
87
3
0
#71
You know why the gifts stopped?
Because noone believes in them anymore.

There are still some people out there with enough faith to actually help people and look out for peoples well-being.
But for the most part, I think the Churches head has outgrown the heart.
the gifts have never stoped! I speak in tongues, heal the sick, prophecy, etc. Miracles are a normal part of true christianity! If you are in a church that has no power: you in the wrong church!
 

Elizabeth619

Senior Member
Jul 19, 2011
6,397
109
48
#72
the gifts have never stoped! I speak in tongues, heal the sick, prophecy, etc. Miracles are a normal part of true christianity! If you are in a church that has no power: you in the wrong church!
In a church that has no power? No church has ever had "power"
 
Aug 15, 2009
9,745
179
0
#73
In a church that has no power? No church has ever had "power"
Not to sound disrespectful, but by what authority do you make such an absolute statement? I would like to know in detail.
 
D

danschance

Guest
#74
I would say the early church had the power of God. The gifts of the Spirit were in full operation. We even see Annanias and his wife drop dead because they lied to God. I call that power.
 

Elizabeth619

Senior Member
Jul 19, 2011
6,397
109
48
#75
Not to sound disrespectful, but by what authority do you make such an absolute statement? I would like to know in detail.
Evidently I've failed to fully explain myself with short statements. I apologize. That's my fault.

The church itself has no power. Only through the Holy Spirit it does. Also, power comes at the will of The Lord not on our own will. The power comes from God. Not us as humans. That's all I was meaning.

If I need to elaborate more I will. But later. Just let me know I need a nap. Lol. Long day.
 

RickyZ

Senior Member
Sep 20, 2012
9,635
787
113
#76
In a church that has no power? No church has ever had "power"
Kinda. Power resides in the people. But when two or more are together, when you neglect not the assembly, there is more power. But the power of the assembly is dependent upon the power of those who make it up, so an assembly of unfunctional people is itself unfunctional.
 
S

Scribe

Guest
#77
When that which is perfect is come. When we will be like him. 1cor12 and 13
Since we are not glorified and not perfect we need the gifts of the spirit to help us in our current state of Looking Through a Glass darkly.
 
D

danschance

Guest
#78
could somebody please tell me where the Bible says I am to call my husband 'master'?

my secretary's gonna be calling ME master if i don't start gettin' my memos!

right...so 1 Peter 3 i know. in my NASU it says 'just as Sarah obeyed Abraham, calling him lord...'.
but...not the same thing...right?

Sorry, but that is a new one on me. I am certain it is not in the bible.
 
D

danschance

Guest
#79
this is a summary of my research on the history of the spiritual gifts that i have posted a couple times before...

in the early second century AD justin martyr wrote in his 'dialogue with trypho the jew' that healing and tongues and prophecy were common in the christian church...

in the late second century irenaeus...a student of john's student polycarp...wrote in his book 'against heresies' that many in the churches spoke in tongues and received prophecy and performed healings...

in the early third century origen wrote in his book 'against celsus' that the tongues were temporary and that they no longer happened...but he also reported that he was a witness to ongoing prophecy and healings...

in the late third century john chrysostom indicated in his 'homily on 1 corinthians 12' that tongues no longer occurred and admitted that the church's understanding of the nature of tongues had been obscured by the passage of time...chrysostom is also the first to use the term 'cessation'

in the early fourth century the church historian eusebius of caesarea...based on the writings i already mentioned and other reports that we no longer have...concluded in his 'ecclesiastical history' that the tongues had continued only through irenaeus' time...

in the mid fourth century epiphanius of salamis wrote in his anti heretical 'medicine chest' that prophecy was welcomed in the church...he argued against the montanists that the church had not rejected the spiritual gifts but only had denounced the montanists' charisma as not being authentic spiritual gifts...

in the late fourth century augustine wrote in his 'homily on 1 john' that the tongues were for the early church and were no longer present in his time...

in the early fifth century augustine wrote in his 'city of God' that miracles still occurred...but that they were not as widely reported as the earlier miracles...and he described several contemporary healings that he was aware of or even witnessed himself... most of the contemporary healings augustine tells about happened through prayer or through the sacraments...especially baptism... augustine also argued in the same work that although the miracles still happened they were no longer spiritually necessary because 'the whole world' had come to believe the gospel...

although the church fathers were fallible and often uncritical and prone to repeating hearsay...most of these post apostolic testimonies seem to reflect the widespread consensus of 'common knowledge' in the church regarding the gifts in their respective time periods...

from all of these ancient testimonies my conclusion is that the tongues continued into the late second century and then ceased... healings continued at least into the fifth century although by that time they were usually the result of prayer or sacrament...healing by direct command as in the new testament appears to have largely ceased by then... prophecy continued at least into the fourth century and it is not clear whether it ever fully ceased...

because of my research i take a position i call 'tentative cessationism'...i regard the ceasing of tongues and the ceasing of healing by direct command as a -historical- fact...though i don't have any -theological- reason for it being so...and consequently i am neutral on the question of whether or not these miraculous gifts could be revived and whether or not the pentecostal or charismatic movements represent such a revival in modern times

I find your post to be very interesting and far above the typical type of posts we see. Even tho' it is a good post, it leaves me wondering and groping for answers.
 

Elizabeth619

Senior Member
Jul 19, 2011
6,397
109
48
#80
I find your post to be very interesting and far above the typical type of posts we see. Even tho' it is a good post, it leaves me wondering and groping for answers.
Rachael is one smart cookie. She studies intensely. I have a huge respect for her. She has helped me figure out ALOT in scripture I was confused on.