I have to say that I think it is a shame that people will misuse the bible to promote their own personal agendas. This seems very evident in this thread, and even in the creation of this thread.
The bible makes it very clear that there is a difference between murder and defending one's self, family, and property. It also makes it clear that we live in the world, and we have to make decisions every day that are based on our experience, reason, and statistical odds, as well as our faith in God.
We are expected to have an active faith in Jesus Christ. This means that we make decisions every day that cause us to act in ways that promote the kingdom of God. Nowhere in the bible are we told to sit back passively and allow our families to be brutalized by armed intruders into our homes.
There is no consistency in the arguments being made. On the one hand we are being told to not arm ourselves and God will take care of us. On the other hand we are told to wear seat belts, to protect OURSELVES in an accident. Which is it?
Should we do like some of the Amish do and not innoculate our children against polio and other debilitating diseases? If your logic and "faith" is consistent, I would think that you should not. Do you have as much faith as the Amish do?
If your neighbors are sick or hungry, do you just pray for God to help them? Why not? Don't you have faith? I believe that to help the neighbors, I should go next door and take them food and medicine or whatever they need. This is what God expects us to do.
Christ is the head of the Church and we are the body. Jesus expects us to help ourselves, and others. God endowed us with intelligence, and reason, and a conscience, in order that we should act on our faith. As James said, faith without works is dead.
I will give just two examples of the misuse of Scripture in the promotion of the theme of this thread.
Jesus said that if someone hits you on the cheek, offer him the other one also.
Does this mean that if someone breaks into your home and rapes one of your two teenage daughters that you should offer him the other one also?
The one about Job not getting a weapon to protect his family against a windstorm. What weapon should he have chosen?
I cringe at this blatant misuse of Scriptures. You just keep throwing out Scriptures that have nothing to do with the argument, as if somehow a quantity of scriptures quoted will somehow win your agrument for you. If you have a personal vendetta against guns, please take it somewhere else, and don't misuse bible verses to promote a misguided view that we are to do nothing to prepare against possible attacks against our families. Your views are more a faith in your own arrogance that you are somehow more godly than others, than in an active faith that God expects us to have.