i assure you, that if i gave you the names, you would still not believe.
i was under the impression we were discussing the things Mr Hovind was teaching, such as saying humans and dinosaurs existed together. If then you disagree with what he taught, then show what he taught that you disagree with. But it seems to me you are calling him a fraud based solely on what a particular state charged him with and not on what he taught. Tell me, is every person who is charged with fraud is guilty of fraud 100% of the time? Are you one of those who believe there is no innocent person in prison? That there is not one person charged of fraud that did not commit fraud. What is your evidence that Mr Kovind indeed commit fraud, aside from a particular state arrested him for that, what support do you have, what evidence do you have to support that he did commit fraud. And if he did, what does that fraud have to do with what he taught?
^i^ Responding to post # 595