Is Dr. Dino (Kent Hovind) a total joke?
- Thread starter JackH
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
That is very good.
But the problem with bible interpretation is everyone has one.
Scientific evidence is an entirely different matter.
YECs have no credible scientific evidence to support a young earth, dinosaurs coexisting with humans, and a global flood.
What YECs have is Dr. Dino videos from his prison cell and Ken Ham's museum with fake dinosaurs.
But the problem with bible interpretation is everyone has one.
Scientific evidence is an entirely different matter.
YECs have no credible scientific evidence to support a young earth, dinosaurs coexisting with humans, and a global flood.
What YECs have is Dr. Dino videos from his prison cell and Ken Ham's museum with fake dinosaurs.
R
actually i posted several pieces of scientific evidence for discussion...but after an initial question you failed to respond any further...
in fact it is becoming quite clear that you have no intention of engaging the evidence at all...the only thing you apparently want to do is focus on easy targets such as hovindists...and avoid any substantial evidence based discussion so that you can continue to pretend that young earth creationists 'have no credible scientific evidence'
in fact it is becoming quite clear that you have no intention of engaging the evidence at all...the only thing you apparently want to do is focus on easy targets such as hovindists...and avoid any substantial evidence based discussion so that you can continue to pretend that young earth creationists 'have no credible scientific evidence'
P
Uh,you can not have evening w/o morning. No brainer there.
Now,carefully consider that if we are in the evening now,and ff to morning,we could not posibly get there w/o first having a night. (due to the obvious rotation of the earth.)
Therefore it would appear that God had this covered from the start (no pun intened)
Evening to morning,one day
Now,carefully consider that if we are in the evening now,and ff to morning,we could not posibly get there w/o first having a night. (due to the obvious rotation of the earth.)
Therefore it would appear that God had this covered from the start (no pun intened)
Evening to morning,one day
This is really my biggest argument as well. God came into me as the Holy Spirit, forever ripping the veil. opening my eyes and heart, and showing me He is Truth and that Jesus is the ONLY hope any man has. It also showed me that the Bible is His word and I believe it word for word, that tends to happen when you KNOW God is real, in my experience at least. I can tell you one thing, I will take Gods word over anything a man says, and I don't care what letters are before or after their names. That's what's really important for mans salvation, not how old the earth is, or mocking people for that matter.
I understand what you are saying but what you said and the part i have quoted also depends on what is meant to be understood by the word 'scientific' and what is meant by 'evidence'.
It's a very important and serious undertaking to interpret the Bible and its true meaning, i'm glad i'm not in charge or someone who has to oversee it all.
But as that article pointed out or states,
the truth of the Bible is under serious attack based upon the claim, bysome, that the Earth is only about 6,000 to 10,000 years old.
Non-believers who decide to explore the Bible and the claims of Christ will typically start with the first page of the Bible. If the opponents of Christianity can impugn the truthfulness of the Bible on the first page, the claims of Christ may never be seriously considered.
It's a very important and serious undertaking to interpret the Bible and its true meaning, i'm glad i'm not in charge or someone who has to oversee it all.
But as that article pointed out or states,
the truth of the Bible is under serious attack based upon the claim, bysome, that the Earth is only about 6,000 to 10,000 years old.
Non-believers who decide to explore the Bible and the claims of Christ will typically start with the first page of the Bible. If the opponents of Christianity can impugn the truthfulness of the Bible on the first page, the claims of Christ may never be seriously considered.
Before I delve into your post #768 where you cite discoveries of soft tissue, I have several comments on this post (#713).
You put it much milder than I would about the fossil footprints. Despite the lack of evidence you speak of, some YECs persist in foolishly using the footprints as a taking point. Viligant_Warrior did at he beginning of this thread and eternally-grateful did it recently.
Why don't YECs who know better correct other YECs who make this claim? Seems intellectually dishonest to me. YECs seldom challenge other YECs who make outrageous statements, at least on this thread. They just go on "Liking" absurd posts as long as they disagree with me. I find it quite amusing, actually.
The soft tissue issue is the one that interests me the most and I have read everything I can find on that issue over the last several years.
I'll be getting to your post #768 real soon if the usual suspects don't distract me with garbage that stinks so bad I can't ignore it.
You put it much milder than I would about the fossil footprints. Despite the lack of evidence you speak of, some YECs persist in foolishly using the footprints as a taking point. Viligant_Warrior did at he beginning of this thread and eternally-grateful did it recently.
Why don't YECs who know better correct other YECs who make this claim? Seems intellectually dishonest to me. YECs seldom challenge other YECs who make outrageous statements, at least on this thread. They just go on "Liking" absurd posts as long as they disagree with me. I find it quite amusing, actually.
The soft tissue issue is the one that interests me the most and I have read everything I can find on that issue over the last several years.
I'll be getting to your post #768 real soon if the usual suspects don't distract me with garbage that stinks so bad I can't ignore it.
You posted this a couple days ago (#746).
I challenged you several times to provide your evidence of dinosaur and human footprints, which you did not do. I can understand your reluctance based upon what Rachel wrote.
Now, you accused me of "false slander" in this post and you repeated that in another post.
Sounds like a serious accusation to me.
Maybe they'll throw me in a cell with Dr. Dino.
What is your definition of false slander?
What exactly did I write that is false slander?
I need to know so that I can determine if you are bearing false witness and I should rebuke you for violating one of the 10 Commandments and you can repent.
We don't want you ending up in the Lake of Fire, now do we?
I challenged you several times to provide your evidence of dinosaur and human footprints, which you did not do. I can understand your reluctance based upon what Rachel wrote.
Now, you accused me of "false slander" in this post and you repeated that in another post.
Sounds like a serious accusation to me.
Maybe they'll throw me in a cell with Dr. Dino.
What is your definition of false slander?
What exactly did I write that is false slander?
I need to know so that I can determine if you are bearing false witness and I should rebuke you for violating one of the 10 Commandments and you can repent.
We don't want you ending up in the Lake of Fire, now do we?
Is science at total joke??? Of course it is, it's a religion and just like all false religions it has a little truth mixed in with a lot of lies. Only a cult following moron believes man came from monkeys, the earth is billions of years old, man-made global warming (sorry the earth isn't warming any more so it's called climate change now) exists, genetically modified food is good for you and Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC are legitimate news sources.