Boy is that ever true.
It doesn't even matter that articles are linked to prove the fire and brimstone Hell in contemporary versions of the Bible were never in the original texts at all. There remain those dedicated to the new versions of the Bible.
And some, when really working to ignore the original texts and the whole idea of an omniscient Father choosing who would be saved and who would not, and as pertains to those who believe in that fire and brimstone eternal bottomless pit of suffering, accept that that omniscient Father would necessarily have created the destiny of those who he foreknew would not be saved to suffer eternally in fire. And they then invoke, when up against it, that Hell is real because God the Father's word is inerrant.
Which version? The 1611 KJV that had 14 books that the current KJV does not? Those omitted books means the words of God are not inerrant.
That's because God is perfect and The Word is too. While man's invention of the printing press insured man would eventually arrive at hundreds of versions of what God has to say to the world. And that makes man's word what is published. While God remains perfect. And his original words his message. No Hell.
When the introduction of a fire eternal suffering place has a history of being interpolated into the written scriptures, that's man's doing. That's man's history of abrogating God's original words. People don't believe that. But yet they believe utterly in the culmination of that in all those many versions that came to pass.
Weird.
It doesn't even matter that articles are linked to prove the fire and brimstone Hell in contemporary versions of the Bible were never in the original texts at all. There remain those dedicated to the new versions of the Bible.
And some, when really working to ignore the original texts and the whole idea of an omniscient Father choosing who would be saved and who would not, and as pertains to those who believe in that fire and brimstone eternal bottomless pit of suffering, accept that that omniscient Father would necessarily have created the destiny of those who he foreknew would not be saved to suffer eternally in fire. And they then invoke, when up against it, that Hell is real because God the Father's word is inerrant.
Which version? The 1611 KJV that had 14 books that the current KJV does not? Those omitted books means the words of God are not inerrant.
That's because God is perfect and The Word is too. While man's invention of the printing press insured man would eventually arrive at hundreds of versions of what God has to say to the world. And that makes man's word what is published. While God remains perfect. And his original words his message. No Hell.
When the introduction of a fire eternal suffering place has a history of being interpolated into the written scriptures, that's man's doing. That's man's history of abrogating God's original words. People don't believe that. But yet they believe utterly in the culmination of that in all those many versions that came to pass.
Weird.
- 1
- Show all