S
[quote=PneumaPsucheSoma;399428]You continue to selectively use Sola Scriptura from your Protestant roots. I do not, but you accuse me of doing so.
Hupostasis cannot be superimposed where it doesn't exist. I'm not being Sola Scriptura when saying that.
YOU insist on a Sola Scriptura NEGATIVE to prove Trinity. You are both inconsistent and irrational.
Just stop.[/quote]
I am not inconsistent or irrational. I didn't say everything must be in Scripture. But you insist I produce a Scripture that says "persons" or "Trinity" before you will believe it. I'm not Sola Scriptura. You sound like you are asking for proof based on Scripture alone. I'm not being inconsistent. And besides, some of your thinking doesn't come from Scripture. You meander into inconsequential matters, and mulberry tree is not a doctrinal teaching of the Bible, even if you can wander away from the main point and find mulberry trees in the OT! Go figure. You also use your own irrational thinking about Siamese things. It's not something that shows anyone they should not believe in persons or Trinity. You're just trying to understand what was not intended to be understood: Who, what finite, sinful man, can hope to understand God in His nature and persons? Even in His persons, there is no analogy to human nature. How can the one God be three persons? We just have to believe it and accept it as a child believes, for a childlike faith, according to Christ, is what Christ values; thus He said let the little children come unto Him, and forbid them not, for of such is the kingdom of heaven. We need to become like little children, not thinking and rationalizing for ourselves. And seeking to come up with new doctrines through many years of private study. The Bible is public revelation, and the public Church has always taught and believed in the Holy Trinity. A little child believes what Mother Church says, and not his own private opinions based on his own unguided personal private reading of the Scriptures.
Many people have misused the Scriptures, reading things on their own: they deny the Trinity, and some of these anti-Trintarians even devolve into violent cults like the Branch Davidians and David Koresh, calling themselves Messiahs and Christs. No, I'm not saying that you are going to that extreme. But all sectarians and private interpreters of Scripture deny the Trinity by some heretical private opinion made up on their own whims.
Waiting for the "going of the sound of the mulberries" in their minds before they will finally reveal "the truth" to a world that needs the truth now, not tomorrow. Of course, when we know the truth, we don't know every truth of the Bible. We know in part, and say in part. We just know some of the truth, not every truth in Scripture. But we can know the wholly true thing, the truth, even if we can't say everything about the truth in one short period of time. Truth, Jesus Christ, is a Person beyond our finite, rational human minds. In Erie PA Scott R. Harrington
Hupostasis cannot be superimposed where it doesn't exist. I'm not being Sola Scriptura when saying that.
YOU insist on a Sola Scriptura NEGATIVE to prove Trinity. You are both inconsistent and irrational.
Just stop.[/quote]
I am not inconsistent or irrational. I didn't say everything must be in Scripture. But you insist I produce a Scripture that says "persons" or "Trinity" before you will believe it. I'm not Sola Scriptura. You sound like you are asking for proof based on Scripture alone. I'm not being inconsistent. And besides, some of your thinking doesn't come from Scripture. You meander into inconsequential matters, and mulberry tree is not a doctrinal teaching of the Bible, even if you can wander away from the main point and find mulberry trees in the OT! Go figure. You also use your own irrational thinking about Siamese things. It's not something that shows anyone they should not believe in persons or Trinity. You're just trying to understand what was not intended to be understood: Who, what finite, sinful man, can hope to understand God in His nature and persons? Even in His persons, there is no analogy to human nature. How can the one God be three persons? We just have to believe it and accept it as a child believes, for a childlike faith, according to Christ, is what Christ values; thus He said let the little children come unto Him, and forbid them not, for of such is the kingdom of heaven. We need to become like little children, not thinking and rationalizing for ourselves. And seeking to come up with new doctrines through many years of private study. The Bible is public revelation, and the public Church has always taught and believed in the Holy Trinity. A little child believes what Mother Church says, and not his own private opinions based on his own unguided personal private reading of the Scriptures.
Many people have misused the Scriptures, reading things on their own: they deny the Trinity, and some of these anti-Trintarians even devolve into violent cults like the Branch Davidians and David Koresh, calling themselves Messiahs and Christs. No, I'm not saying that you are going to that extreme. But all sectarians and private interpreters of Scripture deny the Trinity by some heretical private opinion made up on their own whims.
Waiting for the "going of the sound of the mulberries" in their minds before they will finally reveal "the truth" to a world that needs the truth now, not tomorrow. Of course, when we know the truth, we don't know every truth of the Bible. We know in part, and say in part. We just know some of the truth, not every truth in Scripture. But we can know the wholly true thing, the truth, even if we can't say everything about the truth in one short period of time. Truth, Jesus Christ, is a Person beyond our finite, rational human minds. In Erie PA Scott R. Harrington