Martin Luther - the founder of Protestantism: Anti-Semitic?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#61
Go ahead. You can post all the pictures of German heads of state shaking hands with clergy that you like. Post all the slanted Catholic-bashing protestant idiocy that you wish. You'll only be putting on display your ignorance on the subject, and I'll be happy to make garbage of it.

You fail to understand that the Church too was persecuted in Nazi Germany - it's priest rounded up, sent to the concentration camps where they were starved and killed along with the Jews and other outcasts of the Third Reich.
It is commonly understood that Hitler planned the destruction of Christianity within the Reich. Churches within the Reich were systematically closed and most priests were systematically killed, imprisoned, or deported. 80% of the Catholic clergy and five bishops of Warhegau for example were sent to concentration camps in 1939; 108 of them martyrs. In Dachau alone 2,600 Catholic priests from 24 different countries were killed. The Church in Poland was no exception where more than 3000 members of Polish clergy were murdered, nearly 2000 dying in concentration camps.

Under the Nazi policy of Gleichschaltung, which sought to establish totalitarian control and coordination of all aspects of German society, the Catholic Church in Germany faced a number of restrictions. Although most Germans were either Protestant or Catholic, the Nazi Fuhrer Adolf Hitler and senior lieutenants including Martin Bormann and Alfred Rosenberg were hostile to Christianity, and ultimately intended to eradicate the churches under a Nazi future. The Catholic Church sought to preserve its position in Germany by signing a Concordat in 1933 (6 years before WWII). Thus, despite various Nazi violations of the Concordat, the Church was among the very few institutions in Germany which retained a measure of independence from the state. Hitler walked a fine line. He wanted to eradicate the Church from Germany so tried suppressing her, though he was painfully aware that publicly defying the Catholic Church would have been extremely disadvantageous to the power which he held over the German people.

The Vatican issued two encyclicals opposing the policies of Mussolini and Hitler: Non Abbiamo Bisogno in 1931 and Mit Brennender Sorge in 1937, respectively. Mit Brennender Sorge was written partially in response to the Nuremburg Laws and included criticisms of Nazism and racism. Following the outbreak of World War Two, the Vatican, under Pope Pius XII pursued a policy of neutrality publicly, while working discretely against Nazi policy. The Holy See advocated for peace and spoke against racism, selfish nationalism, atrocities in Poland, the bombardment of civilians and other issues. The Pope allowed national hierarchies to assess and respond to their local situations, but established the Vatican Information Service to provide aid to thousands of war refugees, and saved further thousands of lives by instructing the Church to provide discreet aid to Jews.


Now, back to your ridiculous claims, zone. Show us where Luther actually "fought for the Jews and insisted they be treated with respect and dignity." Anyone who knows squat about Luther knows that that is pure nonsense.
But go ahead. Please.
AND THIS WAS ALL LUTHER'S FAULT, RIGHT?
 
Aug 15, 2009
9,745
179
0
#62
http://www.heritagebbc.com/library/martinluthermasterofdeceit.pdf
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#64
oh 7seven7.
i thought the point by your buddy Maynard was to connect Luther with Hitler.
while deflecting from the Catholic Church's abominations.
sorry if i got that wrong.



 
7

7seven7

Guest
#65
oh 7seven7.
i thought the point by your buddy Maynard was to connect Luther with Hitler.
while deflecting from the Catholic Church's abominations.
sorry if i got that wrong.
*It is commonly understood that Hitler planned the destruction of Christianity within the Reich.....
*Although most Germans were either Protestant or Catholic, the Nazi Fuhrer Adolf Hitler and senior lieutenants including Martin Bormann and Alfred Rosenberg were hostile to Christianity, and ultimately intended to eradicate the churches under a Nazi future.

And then brother Maynard went on to say this:
Show us where Luther actually "fought for the Jews and insisted they be treated with respect and dignity."
Asking you to back your claims that Luther fought for the Jews. It was a valid point.

But anyway, how have you been? Happy Easter, and God bless you and your family on this awesome celebration of our Lord's rising!!!
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,727
3,661
113
#66
well then He must've don'e something extremely bad to be excommunicated from the Catholic Church, like share views of the kind that brother Maynard posted earlier from Luther. It's not easy to be excommunicated.
Yes, he prooclaimed that Scripture was our ultimate authority, not councils , popes or tradition. He wanted to see biblical proof of unbiblical practices e.g. indulgences etc.
 
7

7seven7

Guest
#67
Yes, he prooclaimed that Scripture was our ultimate authority, not councils , popes or tradition. He wanted to see biblical proof of unbiblical practices e.g. indulgences etc.
Indulgences in what?
 
7

7seven7

Guest
#68
Yes, he prooclaimed that Scripture was our ultimate authority, not councils , popes or tradition. He wanted to see biblical proof of unbiblical practices e.g. indulgences etc.
But counsels and Popes get their authority and teachings from Scripture, and tradition comes from the Early Church, which is why St. Paul and St. Peter encouraged their flock to maintain the traditions passed on from them. See crossnote, again, it is not Scripture OR Tradition, but rather Scripture AND Tradition.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#69
Show us where Luther actually "fought for the Jews and insisted they be treated with respect and dignity."
Asking you to back your claims that Luther fought for the Jews. It was a valid point.
HE WROTE THIS AS A SCATHING COUNTER TO THE WAY THE JEWS HAD BEEN TREATED BY THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH:


MARTIN LUTHER, "That Jesus Christ Was Born a Jew" (1523) - excerpts

Since for the sake of others, however, I am compelled to answer these lies, I thought I would also write something useful in addition, so that I do not vainly steal the reader's time with such dirty rotten business. Therefore, I will cite from Scripture the reasons that move me to believe that Christ was a Jew born of a virgin, that I might perhaps also win some Jews to the Christian faith. Our fools, the popes, bishops, sophists, and monks-the crude asses' heads-have hitherto so treated the Jews that anyone who wished to be a good Christian would almost have had to become a Jew. If I had been a Jew and had seen such dolts and blockheads govern and teach the Christian faith, I would sooner have become a hog than a Christian.

2.

They have dealt with the Jews as if they were dogs rather than human beings; they have done little else than deride them and seize their property. When they baptize them they show them nothing of Christian doctrine or life, but only subject them to popishness and monkery. When the Jews then see that Judaism has such strong support in Scripture, and that Christianity has become a mere babble without reliance on Scripture, how can they possibly compose themselves and become right good Christians? I have myself heard from pious baptized Jews that if they had not in our day heard the gospel they would have remained Jews under the cloak of Christianity for the rest of their days. For they acknowledge that they have never yet heard anything about Christ from those who baptized and taught them.

I hope that if one deals in a kindly way with the Jews and instructs them carefully from Holy Scripture, many of them will become genuine Christians and turn again to the faith of their fathers, the prophets and patriarchs. They will only be frightened further away from it if their Judaism is so utterly rejected that nothing is allowed to remain, and they are treated only with arrogance and scorn. If the apostles, who also were Jews, had dealt with us Gentiles as we Gentiles deal with the Jews, there would never have been a Christian among the Gentiles. Since they dealt with us Gentiles in such brotherly fashion, we in our turn ought to treat the Jews in a brotherly manner in order that we might convert some of them. For even we ourselves are not yet all very far along, not to speak of having arrived.

When we are inclined to boast of our position we should remember that we are but Gentiles, while the Jews are of the lineage of Christ. We are aliens and in-laws; they are blood relatives, cousins, and brothers of our Lord. Therefore, if one is to boast of flesh and blood, the Jews are actually nearer to Christ than we are, as St. Paul says in Romans 9[:5]. God has also demonstrated this by his acts, for to no nation among the Gentiles has he granted so high an honor as he has to the Jews. For from among the Gentiles there have been raised up no patriarchs, no apostles, no prophets, indeed, very few genuine Christians either. And although the gospel has been proclaimed to all the world, yet He committed the Holy Scriptures, that is, the law and the prophets, to no nation except the Jews, as Paul says in Romans 3[:2] and Psalm 147[:19-20], "He declares his word to Jacob, his statutes and ordinances to Israel. He has not dealt thus with any other nation; nor revealed his ordinances to them."

17.

Now let someone tell me: Where will one find a prince, or Messiah, or king, with whom all this accords so perfectly, as with our Lord Jesus Christ? Scripture and history agree so perfectly with one another that the Jews have nothing they can say to the contrary. They certainly are painfully conscious of their destruction, which is immeasurably greater than any they have ever endured. They cannot point to any transgression so great that they would have merited such punishment (because they feel it is not a sin that they crucified Jesus, and that they committed greater sins before that but suffered less punishment). It would be unthinkable that God would leave them so long without prophets unless they were finished and all Scripture fulfilled.

But there are still more prophecies, as for example in Haggai 2[:91], where God says of the rebuilt temple, "The splendor of this latter house shall be greater than that of the former," which is also very conclusive; and Zechariah 8[:23], "In those days ten men of all languages of the Gentiles shall take hold of the robe of a Jew, saying: We want to go with you; for we have heard that the Lord is with you," etc. There are many more, but it would take too long to discuss them all clearly and at length. For the present the two prophecies just cited54 are enough for a beginning.

If the Jews should take offense because we confess our Jesus to be a man, and yet true God, we will deal forcefully with that from Scripture in due time. But this is too harsh for a beginning. Let them first be suckled with milk, and begin by recognizing this man Jesus as the true Messiah; after that they may drink wine, and learn also that he is true God. For they have been led astray so long and so far that one must deal gently with them, as people who have been all too strongly indoctrinated to believe that God cannot be man.

Therefore, I would request and advise that one deal gently with them and instruct them from Scripture; then some of them may come along. Instead of this we are trying only to drive them by force, slandering them, accusing them of having Christian blood if they don't stink, and I know not what other foolishness. So long as we thus treat them like dogs, how can we expect to work any good among them? Again, when we forbid them to labor and do business and have any human fellowship with us, thereby forcing them into usury, how is that supposed to do them any good?

......


as i said....he later made regrettable unacceptable statements.

many people are shocked and outraged when they discover what Talmud actually says about Jesus (sinner, sorcerer, boiling in hot semen and excrement in hell) and His Mother (a whore) and gentiles (subhuman), among other things.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,727
3,661
113
#70
Indulgence

Read at least the last two short paragraphs. Also read Luther's 95 Theses (all over the www).
 
7

7seven7

Guest
#71
HE WROTE THIS AS A SCATHING COUNTER TO THE WAY THE JEWS HAD BEEN TREATED BY THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH:


MARTIN LUTHER, "That Jesus Christ Was Born a Jew" (1523) - excerpts

Since for the sake of others, however, I am compelled to answer these lies, I thought I would also write something useful in addition, so that I do not vainly steal the reader's time with such dirty rotten business. Therefore, I will cite from Scripture the reasons that move me to believe that Christ was a Jew born of a virgin, that I might perhaps also win some Jews to the Christian faith. Our fools, the popes, bishops, sophists, and monks-the crude asses' heads-have hitherto so treated the Jews that anyone who wished to be a good Christian would almost have had to become a Jew. If I had been a Jew and had seen such dolts and blockheads govern and teach the Christian faith, I would sooner have become a hog than a Christian.

2.

They have dealt with the Jews as if they were dogs rather than human beings; they have done little else than deride them and seize their property. When they baptize them they show them nothing of Christian doctrine or life, but only subject them to popishness and monkery. When the Jews then see that Judaism has such strong support in Scripture, and that Christianity has become a mere babble without reliance on Scripture, how can they possibly compose themselves and become right good Christians? I have myself heard from pious baptized Jews that if they had not in our day heard the gospel they would have remained Jews under the cloak of Christianity for the rest of their days. For they acknowledge that they have never yet heard anything about Christ from those who baptized and taught them.

I hope that if one deals in a kindly way with the Jews and instructs them carefully from Holy Scripture, many of them will become genuine Christians and turn again to the faith of their fathers, the prophets and patriarchs. They will only be frightened further away from it if their Judaism is so utterly rejected that nothing is allowed to remain, and they are treated only with arrogance and scorn. If the apostles, who also were Jews, had dealt with us Gentiles as we Gentiles deal with the Jews, there would never have been a Christian among the Gentiles. Since they dealt with us Gentiles in such brotherly fashion, we in our turn ought to treat the Jews in a brotherly manner in order that we might convert some of them. For even we ourselves are not yet all very far along, not to speak of having arrived.

When we are inclined to boast of our position we should remember that we are but Gentiles, while the Jews are of the lineage of Christ. We are aliens and in-laws; they are blood relatives, cousins, and brothers of our Lord. Therefore, if one is to boast of flesh and blood, the Jews are actually nearer to Christ than we are, as St. Paul says in Romans 9[:5]. God has also demonstrated this by his acts, for to no nation among the Gentiles has he granted so high an honor as he has to the Jews. For from among the Gentiles there have been raised up no patriarchs, no apostles, no prophets, indeed, very few genuine Christians either. And although the gospel has been proclaimed to all the world, yet He committed the Holy Scriptures, that is, the law and the prophets, to no nation except the Jews, as Paul says in Romans 3[:2] and Psalm 147[:19-20], "He declares his word to Jacob, his statutes and ordinances to Israel. He has not dealt thus with any other nation; nor revealed his ordinances to them."

17.

Now let someone tell me: Where will one find a prince, or Messiah, or king, with whom all this accords so perfectly, as with our Lord Jesus Christ? Scripture and history agree so perfectly with one another that the Jews have nothing they can say to the contrary. They certainly are painfully conscious of their destruction, which is immeasurably greater than any they have ever endured. They cannot point to any transgression so great that they would have merited such punishment (because they feel it is not a sin that they crucified Jesus, and that they committed greater sins before that but suffered less punishment). It would be unthinkable that God would leave them so long without prophets unless they were finished and all Scripture fulfilled.

But there are still more prophecies, as for example in Haggai 2[:91], where God says of the rebuilt temple, "The splendor of this latter house shall be greater than that of the former," which is also very conclusive; and Zechariah 8[:23], "In those days ten men of all languages of the Gentiles shall take hold of the robe of a Jew, saying: We want to go with you; for we have heard that the Lord is with you," etc. There are many more, but it would take too long to discuss them all clearly and at length. For the present the two prophecies just cited54 are enough for a beginning.

If the Jews should take offense because we confess our Jesus to be a man, and yet true God, we will deal forcefully with that from Scripture in due time. But this is too harsh for a beginning. Let them first be suckled with milk, and begin by recognizing this man Jesus as the true Messiah; after that they may drink wine, and learn also that he is true God. For they have been led astray so long and so far that one must deal gently with them, as people who have been all too strongly indoctrinated to believe that God cannot be man.

Therefore, I would request and advise that one deal gently with them and instruct them from Scripture; then some of them may come along. Instead of this we are trying only to drive them by force, slandering them, accusing them of having Christian blood if they don't stink, and I know not what other foolishness. So long as we thus treat them like dogs, how can we expect to work any good among them? Again, when we forbid them to labor and do business and have any human fellowship with us, thereby forcing them into usury, how is that supposed to do them any good?

......


as i said....he later made regrettable unacceptable statements.

many people are shocked and outraged when they discover what Talmud actually says about Jesus (sinner, sorcerer, boiling in hot semen and excrement in hell) and His Mother (a whore) and gentiles (subhuman), among other things.
Ok, brother, so you would agree that the even though the Catholic Church has made some corrupt mistakes in the past, just like Luther, the Catholic Church shouldn't be judged by them?
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,727
3,661
113
#72
Zone nice post it really shows a drastic difference in attitude between the young/middle age Luther and the older Luther.
 
7

7seven7

Guest
#73
Indulgence

Read at least the last two short paragraphs. Also read Luther's 95 Theses (all over the www).
I'll do that tonight, thanks brother. But have you researched the Catholic Churches position on all this? Or have you simply taken these writings as gospel, hoping they're right? If you haven't, then I'll be more than happy to post them on here for you. Gotta run. Got to get to an Easter celebration bar-b-que. The fifth one in a day and a half lol I think my arteries are starting to get blocked by pieces of beef and chicken lol

God bless.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#74
Ok, brother, so you would agree that the even though the Catholic Church has made some corrupt mistakes in the past, just like Luther, the Catholic Church shouldn't be judged by them?
WANNA POST THE LUTHER HITLER PICS AGAIN 777....or what.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#75
Zone nice post it really shows a drastic difference in attitude between the young/middle age Luther and the older Luther.
ya...Luther was okay. a man of the times.

as i said though: this stuff about Jesus (not to mention calling Mary a whore etc) is upsetting for any christian to come across, especially one who initially didnt know it, and had tried to help, and never was told about any of it:

The Talmud (Babylonian edition) records other sins of "Jesus the Nazarene
":

He and his disciples practiced sorcery and black magic, led Jews astray into idolatry, and were sponsored by foreign, gentile powers for the purpose of subverting Jewish worship (Sanhedrin 43a).

He was sexually immoral, worshipped statues of stone (a brick is mentioned), was cut off from the Jewish people for his wickedness, and refused to repent (Sanhedrin 107b; Sotah 47a).

He learned witchcraft in Egypt and, to perform miracles, used procedures that involved cutting his flesh—which is also explicitly banned in the Bible (Shabbos 104b).
 
7

7seven7

Guest
#76
Zone nice post it really shows a drastic difference in attitude between the young/middle age Luther and the older Luther.
So the Luther that broke away from the Church was the young/middle aged one, the same one that made these fatal mistakes? Not the older, wiser, corrected one? So I wonder what he would've taught if he were to live another 50 years if he kept correcting himself as he lived on.
 
7

7seven7

Guest
#77
WANNA POST THE LUTHER HITLER PICS AGAIN 777....or what.
You mean the picture that doesn't show anything? Just you making speculations? For all you know, sister, that picture could've been taken at a time when the Catholic Church was trying to bring peace about at a time of hardship for Her people. How will you bring peace by not engaging with the enemy? Stop speculating. And stop getting upset lol. Relax.

Sorry again for calling you brother. Its that name, zone. I always thought you were a man. Not meaning that in a derogatory way, honestly.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,727
3,661
113
#78
I'll do that tonight, thanks brother. But have you researched the Catholic Churches position on all this? Or have you simply taken these writings as gospel, hoping they're right? If you haven't, then I'll be more than happy to post them on here for you. Gotta run. Got to get to an Easter celebration bar-b-que. The fifth one in a day and a half lol I think my arteries are starting to get blocked by pieces of beef and chicken lol

God bless.
I read Martin Chemnitz's four volume work on The Examination of the Council of Trent written in the 16th century. Rome has not backed of Her position of Trent (after all She doesn't change her positions does She?). Rome never disputed Chemnitz' work so I guess it gives me a good picture. Anyways, back to Luther.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,727
3,661
113
#80
So the Luther that broke away from the Church was the young/middle aged one, the same one that made these fatal mistakes? Not the older, wiser, corrected one? So I wonder what he would've taught if he were to live another 50 years if he kept correcting himself as he lived on.
He changed His attitude towards the Jews over time. He kept firm his attitude toward Rome and their errors from about 1519-1546.