Mary, the mother of God

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jan 8, 2009
7,576
23
0
#81
I guess you're right. It's not such a big issue if Mary was or wasn't a virgin.
 
L

lil-rush

Guest
#82
No, but this is entirely different. You're not anything CLOSE to what Yeshua was :p
you realize Jesus and the holy spirit are both part of the trinity, right?
 

QuestionTime

Senior Member
Feb 16, 2010
1,435
20
38
#83
I don't think you know what the word "blasphemy" means.
Maybe not, I'll have to check.

So if Yeshua is divine, she is the mother of G-d, because she is his mother.
Was God in heaven while Jesus was on earth? Yes, indeed He was. Jesus is only one revelation of who God is.

Wow. No offense, but you are a prideful jerk.
None taken. This has nothing to do with pride. I am putting mary in her place. I will also put paul there, and peter and john also. Even john wesley as well. These people are men and women used by God. They deserve no special glory.

quest
 
Feb 27, 2007
3,179
19
0
#84
Guys, I'm pretty sure browncoat can in no way understand the Holy Spirit until he receives Jesus as his lord & savior. He believes in Jesus but I dont know that he's received him. Correct me if I'm wrong Browncoat, have you asked Jesus to be your savior to be your redeemer and requested him into your heart & life? I truly do hope if you havent you will and suddenly these spiritual things that seem to perplex you will have a whole new meaning once you experience the filling of the Holy Spirit... truly nothing compares to this. Bless your heart as you seek the truth and receive Jesus as your Lord.
 
Feb 19, 2010
467
2
0
#85
you realize Jesus and the holy spirit are both part of the trinity, right?
You realize I don't believe the trinity, right?

That's a different issue. Regardless of the trinity, you're still nothing close to being what Yeshua was. It's a completely different scenario.
 
Feb 19, 2010
467
2
0
#86
Correct me if I'm wrong Browncoat, have you asked Jesus to be your savior to be your redeemer and requested him into your heart & life?
No, and here's why:

1) I don't have to ask him to be my saviour and redeemer, because whether I ask him or not he IS the saviour and redeemer of mankind. That is Scripture :)
2) I submitted myself fully to him and to G-d, which GAVE him my heart and life.

So he's there. I just didn't ask :)
 
Feb 19, 2010
467
2
0
#87
Was God in heaven while Jesus was on earth? Yes, indeed He was. Jesus is only one revelation of who God is.
So Yeshua is not G-d, he is merely a reflection of G-d.

None taken. This has nothing to do with pride. I am putting mary in her place. I will also put paul there, and peter and john also. Even john wesley as well. These people are men and women used by God. They deserve no special glory.
Capitalizing someone's name isn't giving them glory, it's being grammatically correct.
 
Feb 27, 2007
3,179
19
0
#89
hee hee... perhaps you should fling something at it :D
 

QuestionTime

Senior Member
Feb 16, 2010
1,435
20
38
#90
So Yeshua is not G-d, he is merely a reflection of G-d.
So Jesus was on earth praying to Himself? The Holy Spirit descended upon Him even though God is one? What is this Holy Spirit that descended upon Him?

I am uncertain as to why people choose to believe against the majority when so many great saints have affected the beliefs of the majority. Jesus tells us that we know them by their fruits, so when we see great Christians like Wesley and Booth go converting tens of thousands of souls, we ought to listen to what they have to say. This, instead of listening to little known men who have done no great works.

Quest
 
K

kujo313

Guest
#91
Anybody see my point, yet? Catholics are going to defend Mary until they die. It doesnt matter to them what evidence or Scripture you put before them: in the end, Mary gets the glory.

Just as in divorce cases of the past when it was almost impossible for fathers to get physical custody of their kids, God gets the backseat on this one.

The prophets worshipped God and prophesied of the coming Messiah. People in the first century followed Jesus, not Mary. Many died because of their devotion of Jesus, not Mary.

Paul- Peter, James and John wrote of Jesus and how He is the promised Messiah and how to, in His name, live a Godly life.

John was left on an island for life.

Peter was crucified.

John the Baptist was beheaded.


All because of Jesus.

Yet, they'll STILL respond with "but Mary...." and who they want her to be.
 
Feb 19, 2010
467
2
0
#92
So Jesus was on earth praying to Himself?
I don't know, you tell me :) You're the one that believe Yeshua was G-d, correct?

I am uncertain as to why people choose to believe against the majority when so many great saints have affected the beliefs of the majority. Jesus tells us that we know them by their fruits, so when we see great Christians like Wesley and Booth go converting tens of thousands of souls, we ought to listen to what they have to say. This, instead of listening to little known men who have done no great works.
"Right is right, even if everyone is against it; and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it."
- William Penn, English Quaker leader and founder of Pennsylvania, 1644-1718
 
L

Lauren

Guest
#93
But her blood ran through Yeshua's veins. She was his mother, he called her his mother, he loved her like his mother, and you believe he was G-d.
Just as an aside, her blood did not run through His veins. A baby's blood is from the male sperm. The woman's egg carries no blood, the blood comes from the father's side.

The mother's and baby's blood usually does not mix or circulate together during the pregnancy term.
 
Feb 19, 2010
467
2
0
#94
Just as an aside, her blood did not run through His veins. A baby's blood is from the male sperm. The woman's egg carries no blood, the blood comes from the father's side.

The mother's and baby's blood usually does not mix or circulate together during the pregnancy term.
USUALLY, but that doesn't mean it didn't happen!!!! It could have!!!

...yeah, I'm kidding :p I didn't know that. Very interesting. Thanks for the information :)
 

QuestionTime

Senior Member
Feb 16, 2010
1,435
20
38
#95
Anybody see my point, yet? Catholics are going to defend Mary until they die. It doesnt matter to them what evidence or Scripture you put before them: in the end, Mary gets the glory.

Just as in divorce cases of the past when it was almost impossible for fathers to get physical custody of their kids, God gets the backseat on this one.

The prophets worshipped God and prophesied of the coming Messiah. People in the first century followed Jesus, not Mary. Many died because of their devotion of Jesus, not Mary.

Paul- Peter, James and John wrote of Jesus and how He is the promised Messiah and how to, in His name, live a Godly life.

John was left on an island for life.

Peter was crucified.

John the Baptist was beheaded.

All because of Jesus.

Yet, they'll STILL respond with "but Mary...." and who they want her to be.
I rarely find in a thread that a post is made that discloses the perfect conclusion to the matter debated. This response is one of those rare gems.

This simply, is a viewpoint that is so absolutely senseless to even bother debating. The scriptural evidence, as well as the historical experience of real true Bible believing and doing Christians, is vast and overwhelmingly weighted against Marianism.

Marianism ought forever to be reserved - where it already is - with other perpetually rejected doctrines such as Universalism, Purgatory and Annihilationism. These are called "Minority Christian Doctrines" for a reason; particularly due to the quantity of verses in opposition.

Quest
 
Last edited:
L

lil-rush

Guest
#96
You realize I don't believe the trinity, right?

That's a different issue. Regardless of the trinity, you're still nothing close to being what Yeshua was. It's a completely different scenario.
Whether you believe in the trinity or not, if the trinity is true, then my example makes perfect sense and there is a basis for comparison between Jesus and me.

Jesus was a human; I am a human. Jesus had God living inside of him(part of the trinity); I have the holy spirit living inside of me (part of the trinity). No, I am not saying I am the same as Jesus. There are fundamental differences between Jesus and me, which I am aware of, but that does not mean I am not allowed to make elementary comparisons between the two in order to make a point.

My argument throughout this entire thread has been that man cannot create the spirit. Man cannot give birth to the spirit. Man only gives birth to man. The Spirit gives birth to spirits.

Just like my mom is not the mother of the holy spirit living in me, Mary was not the mother of the God living inside of Jesus. In order to be a mom, you either have to adopt the child or give birth to the child. Mary did not adopt God, and Mary did not give birth to God, so Mary is not the mother of God.
 
Feb 19, 2010
467
2
0
#97
Whether you believe in the trinity or not, if the trinity is true, then my example makes perfect sense and there is a basis for comparison between Jesus and me.

Jesus was a human; I am a human. Jesus had God living inside of him(part of the trinity); I have the holy spirit living inside of me (part of the trinity). No, I am not saying I am the same as Jesus. There are fundamental differences between Jesus and me, which I am aware of, but that does not mean I am not allowed to make elementary comparisons between the two in order to make a point.

My argument throughout this entire thread has been that man cannot create the spirit. Man cannot give birth to the spirit. Man only gives birth to man. The Spirit gives birth to spirits.

Just like my mom is not the mother of the holy spirit living in me, Mary was not the mother of the God living inside of Jesus. In order to be a mom, you either have to adopt the child or give birth to the child. Mary did not adopt God, and Mary did not give birth to God, so Mary is not the mother of God.
But if Yeshua is G-d, his man part doesn't matter. He is still G-d, Mary still gave birth to him, Mary is still called his mother, therefore Mary is the mother of G-d.
 
L

lil-rush

Guest
#98
But if Yeshua is G-d, his man part doesn't matter. He is still G-d, Mary still gave birth to him, Mary is still called his mother, therefore Mary is the mother of G-d.
Uhm... I don't know how else to explain it so that you'll get what I'm saying.
 
Feb 3, 2010
1,238
3
0
#99
Anybody see my point, yet? Catholics are going to defend Mary until they die. It doesnt matter to them what evidence or Scripture you put before them: in the end, Mary gets the glory.

Just as in divorce cases of the past when it was almost impossible for fathers to get physical custody of their kids, God gets the backseat on this one.

The prophets worshiped God and prophesied of the coming Messiah. People in the first century followed Jesus, not Mary. Many died because of their devotion of Jesus, not Mary.

Paul- Peter, James and John wrote of Jesus and how He is the promised Messiah and how to, in His name, live a Godly life.

John was left on an island for life.

Peter was crucified.

John the Baptist was beheaded.


All because of Jesus.

Yet, they'll STILL respond with "but Mary...." and who they want her to be.
I think the fact that the history of women is not detailed in the NT is more of an indication of 1st century misogyny, rather than the lack of female involvement.

Also, you are relying on extra-biblical sources to describe the fate of John and Peter - why is it ok to rely on these sources for John and Peter, but not Mary?

And, again why does it matter? Mary is only a big deal to people outside the Catholic Church.

blessings
 
Feb 3, 2010
1,238
3
0
Whether you believe in the trinity or not, if the trinity is true, then my example makes perfect sense and there is a basis for comparison between Jesus and me.

Jesus was a human; I am a human. Jesus had God living inside of him(part of the trinity); I have the holy spirit living inside of me (part of the trinity). No, I am not saying I am the same as Jesus. There are fundamental differences between Jesus and me, which I am aware of, but that does not mean I am not allowed to make elementary comparisons between the two in order to make a point.

My argument throughout this entire thread has been that man cannot create the spirit. Man cannot give birth to the spirit. Man only gives birth to man. The Spirit gives birth to spirits.

Just like my mom is not the mother of the holy spirit living in me, Mary was not the mother of the God living inside of Jesus. In order to be a mom, you either have to adopt the child or give birth to the child. Mary did not adopt God, and Mary did not give birth to God, so Mary is not the mother of God.
I do not always agree with you lil-rush, but I respect your ability to write clear and logical posts. I enjoy reading what you have to say.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.