Um, no, you're thoroughly confused and are twisting the meaning. Either this is out of you being confused or it is purposeful.
Its purposeful.no confusion on my part.
The meaning speaks for itself no need to twist it.
Its what it reads.
Even you underlined the subject (without understanding)
If a person does not understand what they are teaching how could others understand what God is saying?
If we desire to be teachers of the law we must understand the law.
As I urged you when I was going to Macedonia, remain at Ephesus so that you may charge certain persons not to teach any different doctrine, nor to devote themselves to myths and endless genealogies, which promote speculations rather than the stewardship from God that is by faith.The aim of our charge is love that issues from a pure heart and a good conscience and a sincere faith.Certain persons, by swerving from these, have wandered away into vain discussion,desiring to be teachers of the law, "without understanding" either what they are saying or the things about which they make confident assertions.
Its the perfect law of God as that which alone can quicken our soul giving us simply one His understanding. No law no gospel.
Last edited: