why is my bible missing acts 8:37?!?!

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
D

DesiredHaven

Guest
#62
Hey,that looks like my bible :eek:
Too cool I knew I could find more of ya's ;)

My people are out there
(marker crazy folks)


oh my goodness these folks exist.jpg

Seriously though its easier to find stuff when you know what color your looking for when you know which things are in what color. As you flip through you might stop at all the yellows, or the purples, or whichever other color, then the side writing to its connecting verses in other books makes it easier to find them when you highlight those in the color you are to look for.

Its strange but sort of fun lol
 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,144
614
113
70
Alabama
#63
I randomly clicked on a YouTube religion video that sounded interesting, and I skipped forward 20 mins for no apparent reason, and it started talking about how a lot of the new bibles are missing passages, mostly dealing with Jesus Christ. A few of the more modern translations are missing up to 16 passages?!?! What is going on here? I NEVER would have noticed, I'm currently reading ACTS and I totally missed that my esv bible was missing acts 8:37. I thought this bible was great... It was much easier to understand what was going on.

How can it be that a bible misses the most important part of that entire section "37And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God."

The odds that I would find that YouTube video, and skip forward to the exact part dealing with the bible and exact chapters of acts that I've been reading the last 3 or 4 days really have my head spinning!!

What else am I missing??

How do I choose the right bible then??

Is this common knowledge among christians? And if it is WTF can the reasoning behind it be?? I heard some say BC it probly wasn't in the original translation... But I'm not buying that.

How in the world does this happen?

That single passage totally changes that whole page for me, if you guys can give me some advice it would help me a bunch because I'm freaked out.

Do I need to discard all of what I've read from this esv bible, and start over?? (I chose to read the esv BC it was easier to understand, after trying the king James).

Please answer any of the above questions if you wish, im just super confused now and super disappointed.
Hello ctc. I hope everything is going well for you. I noticed Angela's response on page one and she is absolutely correct. In fact hers is the best answer on this thread. Email me and let me know how you are doing.
 

p_rehbein

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2013
30,670
6,860
113
#64
Excerpt From Article:

[TABLE]
[TR]
[TD="width: 4%"][/TD]
[TD="width: 91%, align: left"][FONT=Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,Swiss,SunSans-Regular]Bible Question: Why is Acts 8:37 not in the most modern translations? [/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,Swiss,SunSans-Regular]Bible Answer: [/FONT] [FONT=Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,Swiss,SunSans-Regular] Acts 8:37 reads as follows,

[/FONT] [TABLE]
[TR]
[TD="width: 5%"] [/TD]
[TD="width: 95%"][FONT=Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,Swiss,SunSans-Regular] And Philip said, “If you believe with all your heart, you may.” And he answered and said, “I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.” (NASB) Acts 8:37 [/FONT] [/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

[FONT=Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,Swiss,SunSans-Regular] This verse occurs in the middle of a section of scripture that describes the conversion of the Ethiopian eunuch. This verse has been either eliminated or retained with an explanation that the verse does not appear in the best ancient manuscripts.
The verse did not occur in the earliest and best manuscripts of the New Testament. The verse did not appear until about 500-600 A.D. in a manuscript now known as Codex Laudianus. This passage was apparently inserted by a scribe who wanted to explain why the Ethiopian eunuch was baptized. It is clear from the rest of scripture the eunuch was not saved by being baptized.
Scripture does not include every word that was spoken by a person or between people. It does not even try. If scripture did include everything the Bible would be either huge or contain many volumes. Listen to the apostle John,

[/FONT] [TABLE]
[TR]
[TD="width: 5%"] [/TD]
[TD="width: 95%"][FONT=Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,Swiss,SunSans-Regular] And there are also many other things which Jesus did, which if they were written in detail, I suppose that even the world itself would not contain the books which were written. (NASB) John 21:25 [/FONT] [/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

[FONT=Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,Swiss,SunSans-Regular] Scripture does not try to explain every detail and event. Scripture seeks to communicate to us a message. [/FONT]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Found Here:

  1. [h=3]Why is Acts 8:37 not in the most modern...[/h]




 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,776
13,534
113
#65
No. The majority of translations do not have the word "study" here at Biblehub,

or here at Biblegateway.

my bad, i thought what you meant was ((as you said, the important thing)) that it was for God that we should be diligent. no translation i found was written with the sense that our care should be taken for the sake of anyone but for God.


The actual problem is that the KJV there does not specifically mean academic study when it says 'study', and the underlying Greek in 2 Tim does not call for a specifically academic context. It simply means to devote oneself or to work at something, not necessarily academically. So Shakespeare can write in a Winter's Tale: "to be more thankful to thee shall be my study, and my profit therein the heaping friendships."

One must always be careful not to read 21st century meanings into 17th century words.
yes

is exactly the same word "σπούδασον" that in 2 Timothy 2:15 the KJV renders "study" as in 2 Timothy 4:9, 2 Timothy 4:21, and Titus 3:12 -- where the KJV calls it "do thy diligence" and various others use phrases like "hasten" or "make every effort" or "do your best."
(( using a concordance, not a dictionary ))

the context isn't academic study. ironically, the immediate context is warnings not to engage in meaningless quarrels over words (lol!) and irreverent going-on that does no good but only leads to ruin. it's in this that Timothy ought to be diligent to remind the believers of, and to keep himself from, so that he may be found unashamed before God.

:)

((reminds))

 
P

prodigal

Guest
#66
Acts 8 English Standard Version (ESV)

36 And as they were going along the road they came to some water, and the eunuch said, “See, here is water! What prevents me from being baptized?”[e]

Footnotes:
e.:Acts 8:36 Some manuscripts add all or most of verse 37: And Philip said, “If you believe with all your heart, you may.” And he replied, “I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.”


The footnotes explain why and which verse is missing. So its not an Illuminati conspiracy after all.




 
Last edited:
A

atwhatcost

Guest
#67
I randomly clicked on a YouTube religion video that sounded interesting, and I skipped forward 20 mins for no apparent reason, and it started talking about how a lot of the new bibles are missing passages, mostly dealing with Jesus Christ. A few of the more modern translations are missing up to 16 passages?!?! What is going on here? I NEVER would have noticed, I'm currently reading ACTS and I totally missed that my esv bible was missing acts 8:37. I thought this bible was great... It was much easier to understand what was going on.

How can it be that a bible misses the most important part of that entire section "37And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God."

The odds that I would find that YouTube video, and skip forward to the exact part dealing with the bible and exact chapters of acts that I've been reading the last 3 or 4 days really have my head spinning!!

What else am I missing??

How do I choose the right bible then??

Is this common knowledge among christians? And if it is *** can the reasoning behind it be?? I heard some say BC it probly wasn't in the original translation... But I'm not buying that.

How in the world does this happen?

That single passage totally changes that whole page for me, if you guys can give me some advice it would help me a bunch because I'm freaked out.

Do I need to discard all of what I've read from this esv bible, and start over?? (I chose to read the esv BC it was easier to understand, after trying the king James).

Please answer any of the above questions if you wish, im just super confused now and super disappointed.
This is how I understand it. Luke writes this letter to some folks -- a brief history of Christianity. It's a cool letter, but you can't really pass one letter around to hundreds of different people, so scribes copied it. They start to circulate, but there still isn't enough to go around, so scribes copy those. This goes on and on until the Gutenberg Press, where it becomes possible to get it right once and keep using the same press (and then other presses) to make enough available copies for everyone who wants a copy.

Luke died in the first century. The Gutenberg Press didn't show up until the 15th century. Luke's original disintegrated somewhere along the line. The copies of that original disintegrated somewhere along the line. Amazingly, some old copies were still around for hundreds, and then thousands of years. (There is still a small shred of one of John's letters copied from somewhere in the second century still around. It's the oldest NT copy we have. That's pretty amazing, even though it's not John's original.)

Have you ever hand copied, or even typed someone else's writing? Did you get it exactly right? Which did you do, add or subtract from it? It's very hard not to do one or the other, isn't it? In my mind, I think it's amazing that that many scribes had at it, and it's still -- almost -- verbatim. On a rare occasion, there's an extra line (or did someone add that?) added or something deleted. After 2000 years, it kind of hard to tell. But there are still Biblical scholars who check out the oldest MSS we have of all those books in the Bible to try to present the most accurate account they can muster.

So, yeah, maybe there is a line added or missed. Honestly? I'm too lazy to do all the background legwork required to figure out which way it goes. (I knew the guy who translated the book of Jude and a couple of Psalms for the NIV. It took him close to 50 years to do that, and, in case you forgot, Jude is only one page long. There's a LOT of legwork required. He looked up a lot of the oldest MSS available online, but he also traveled to different countries that own that fragment, because some historians won't photocopy for fear of damaging the piece. It's that difficult.) So, I just go with they did the best they could, and God did the rest. And then I stop worrying about it.

All in all, the really important stuff is still there. To me, that's miraculous in itself.
 
A

atwhatcost

Guest
#68
No, I'm not a troll lol, I'm just new to reading the bible. I'm going to do some more research into what else is missing and which bibles are the most accurate. If there are more missing passages dealing specifically with Jesus or other substantial parts I'm definitely going back to the earliest/most accurate version possible. I'll have to get a bunch of input from others more informed than myself and do my own research. Thanks.
Since you want to do the research (too), check out "The Books and The Parchments" by F.F. Bruce. He tells the history of how the Bible came to be.
 
A

atwhatcost

Guest
#70
First, nobody truly speaks or writes Biblical Greek. For don't you think Paul would correct people today on their Greek? Second, You are going off a dictionary created by James Strong and his friends. They were not inspired by God and they only provide you with a multiple choice choose your own adventure type Bible.

If God did not preserve His Word today, then His Word would have failed.
I know some guys who could. I also knew a transplanted Greek, who says he can almost understand them. I figure it's probably a bit like understanding Old English -- related, but nothing we speak today, except English professors who think it wows the ladies. lol
 
D

DesiredHaven

Guest
#71
I dont even see the problem with it being in there or not being in there.

Afterall Philip is preaching Jesus Christ out of the book of Isaiah, identifying the man in Isaiah as Him (who died and was raised again) and who said them (just before he ascended) in Mark 16:16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.

Jesus sends them out to preach what he just told them. Philip would be speaking in accord with Jesus words in Mark,which was
He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved... However, if Philip never said anything then how did the eunuch know about believing and being water baptized at all? And why bother just getting wet for the sake of getting wet in the middle of nowhere when you could get a bath later and make it count that way? Philip would have had to inform him because after Phillip preaches Jesus to him in verse 35 it says in verse 36 And as they went on their way, they came unto a certain water: and the eunuch said, See, here is water; what doth hinder me to be baptized? He apparently does believe what Philip preached (Jesus) and so he would like to be baptized too (believe and be baptized) and he is pushing his own baptism (where Philip joins him). Taking it out, just shows the eunuch asking
of his own accord and still in accord with Jesus Christs who Phillip just preached to him. Sure doesnt really hurt anything either way. Having it in there just sort of indicates that Philip told him what Jesus said and after believing the eunuch wanted to be baptized (even by water) as he understood it and as Philip did went down with him.

 
Last edited:
V

VioletReigns

Guest
#72
​Does anyone want to lay bets on how long it will take before I become a not-a-real-person? I'll be happy to hold the money. lol
Actually, if it is a real person, it is a HUMAN SPAMMER. Google "forum spammers" to learn how they get users to generate visability for advertisers by getting people to respond to them.

Better yet, Google ctc1989 and see what comes up. :eek:

Or you can waste your time answering their questions... and did you notice they haven't been replying to you? :rolleyes: That's because they don't need to reply. You guys have generated 4 pages for them already. You've accomplished their mission for them. You're actually doing just what they want, arguing among yourselves as always. CARRY ON! :eek:
 
Last edited:

Dan_473

Senior Member
Mar 11, 2014
9,054
1,051
113
#73
I randomly clicked on a YouTube religion video that sounded interesting, and I skipped forward 20 mins for no apparent reason, and it started talking about how a lot of the new bibles are missing passages, mostly dealing with Jesus Christ. A few of the more modern translations are missing up to 16 passages?!?! What is going on here? I NEVER would have noticed, I'm currently reading ACTS and I totally missed that my esv bible was missing acts 8:37. I thought this bible was great... It was much easier to understand what was going on.

How can it be that a bible misses the most important part of that entire section "37And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God."

The odds that I would find that YouTube video, and skip forward to the exact part dealing with the bible and exact chapters of acts that I've been reading the last 3 or 4 days really have my head spinning!!

What else am I missing??

How do I choose the right bible then??

Is this common knowledge among christians? And if it is *** can the reasoning behind it be?? I heard some say BC it probly wasn't in the original translation... But I'm not buying that.

How in the world does this happen?

That single passage totally changes that whole page for me, if you guys can give me some advice it would help me a bunch because I'm freaked out.

Do I need to discard all of what I've read from this esv bible, and start over?? (I chose to read the esv BC it was easier to understand, after trying the king James).

Please answer any of the above questions if you wish, im just super confused now and super disappointed.
hello, ctc1989, and welcome to CC forums!

something to ponder, maybe... why is it that when people see that some versions have more words than others, it's assumed that some are missing words? why not that some versions have added words?

another good question is 'who added this stuff to the scriptures, and why'...
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
#74
I know some guys who could. I also knew a transplanted Greek, who says he can almost understand them. I figure it's probably a bit like understanding Old English -- related, but nothing we speak today, except English professors who think it wows the ladies. lol
No. Biblical Greek is not the same as Greek today. Yes, they are related but they are not the same. The only way you could run into a guy who actually knew Biblical Greek is to run into an apostle who traveled to the future in our time who knew Biblical Greek. It is ignorant to assume people would not be corrected by Paul today. People are relying upon a language that they do not know how to write or speak. The only way you can know what it says is in understanding it in your own language. For did the Holy Spirit speak to people in Hebrew and Greek at pentecost" Or did the Holy Spirit communicate to people in their own languages? Why do you think God cannot communicate to us in our language perfectly today? Why do you think He is powerless today to communicate like He did back then?

It's because people believe in a powerless God who cannot do miracles anymore.
 
Last edited:

Yonah

Senior Member
Oct 31, 2014
1,074
103
48
#75
shalom (peace) please don't be concerned and theres really no reason for confusion; the Fathers arm is not shortened that he cannot save, he knows what you need to set your feet on the path, His spirit will guide and lead you into all truth, but you must ask, don't worry about what may or may not have been added ot left out, just pray, ask for guidance and you will get what you need, trust Him , He knows what hes doing....
 
Feb 7, 2015
22,418
413
0
#76
I mean, he did the same thing when he tempted Jesus. He eliminated from Scripture when he quoted it to the Lord.

Huh, wonder why the devil did that?
Be careful, Jesus also did that.
 
F

Femalelamb

Guest
#78
I use a bible site called biblegateway.com. You can research many different translations very easily. One way of looking at all of this is realizing every Bible is merely a translation from the original text.not one translation is perfect but if you study several you can get a full picture with not too much being left out. When you feel ready to study the original language begin to pray about which words to look up individually. I'm sure,myself included but you do not know me well, that there are people that will gladly come along side you and help you learn. Pray about who they might be. Remember that no one has the corner on GodbutGod ho created allow the Universe cares very much about you, and you not being confused. He gave people the gift of teaching so do be willing to read books that will help you grow, but ask for books from people you trust. I'm sure if you posted a request for Bible study recommendations you'd get tons of stuff. Are you a member of a fellowship? If not ask someone you see the fruit of the Spirit (Galatians 5:20) in them and get some guidance in picking one out. I was very uneducated when I first became a believer and I had to learn everything from no real Bible back ground. I am sincere and non judge metal and ore than willing to be of any help. Feel free to add me as a friend and ask me anything. Also, I agree with several overdose. First of all pray that Jesus be your guide in this. Second ask God to remove all confusion. God has not given you a spirit of confusion, but of sound mind and wisdom. I totally agree that you should be very careful on whom you listen to on line as well as websites like you tube and facebook an even Google. You were right to seek out Godly counsel on this. That was very wise. I would find a group of sincere Bible lovers that do not point you to just one translation. Remember that God is in control and Hewill I've you wisdom if you ask Him. I'm praying for you today. I hope that I helped you some. Try to spend more time in prayer and just reading your Bible rather than websites. There is so much against the Lord out there. When you've become full of the Holy Spirit more and the Bible is deep in your heart and mind you can weed through false teaching to find the good out there. All of us are still learning but there are wise people who have been close to Him and in the words or many years that He can put i. Your life to help. Just always hold everything up to the Word. God is big enough to keep His Word in tact and do not let anyone's tee you into the myths and false teachings otherwise.

A good guide for scripture is reading one proverb a day. :) There is 31 so you can almost read them in order.
Here are a few verses to encourage you, and know that I am praying them over you today. I used several different translations. A good rule of thumb is to stay away from translations from groups that say "Only use this translation". Especially stay away from those religious books that those groups use their own for their religious group... Like Muslims use a Koran, or Mormons us a book writen by one guy... Some groups even added their own books to the original Bible, and then some like Jehovah witness will use only the KJV but will use "the Watch Tower" teachingsBove the Bible. Also be careful of people who try to teach that parts of the Bible don't matter anymore, because Jesus aid not one part of His word will ever pass away.

I hope I have helped a little.

Philippians 4:6-7 Don’t worry about anything; on the contrary, make your requests known to God by prayer and petition, with thanksgiving. Then God’s shalom, passing all understanding, will keep your hearts and minds safe in union with the Messiah Jesus.

Proverbs 1:2, 5 That people may know skillful and godly Wisdom and instruction, discern and comprehend the words of understanding and insight, The wise also will hear and increase in learning, and the person of understanding will acquire skill and attain to sound counsel so that he may be able to steer his course rightly—

Proverbs 2:11-12 Discretion shall watch over you, understanding shall keep you, To deliver you from the way of evil and the evil men, from men who speak perverse things and are liars,

Ephesians 1:17-19 For I always pray to the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of glory, that He may grant you a spirit of wisdom and revelation of insight into mysteries and secrets in the deep and intimate knowledge of Him, By having the eyes of your heart flooded with light, so that you can know and understand the hope to which He has called you, and how rich is His glorious inheritance in the saints His set-apart ones, And so that you can know and understand what is the immeasurable and unlimited and surpassing greatness of His power in and for us who believe, as demonstrated in the working of His mighty strength,

Philemon 1:3-6 Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ. I thank my God, making mention of you in my prayers, hearing of your love and faith which you have toward the Lord Jesus and toward all the saints, that the sharing of your faith may become effective by the acknowledgment of every good thing which is in you in Christ Jesus.

2 Peter 3:16-18 Speaking of this as he does in all of his letters. There are some things in those epistles of Paul that are difficult to understand, which the ignorant and unstable twist and misconstrue to their own utter destruction, just as they distort and misinterpret the rest of the Scriptures. Let me warn you therefore, beloved, that knowing these things beforehand, you should be on your guard, lest you be carried away by the error of lawless and wicked persons and fall from your own present firm condition your own steadfastness of mind. But grow in grace undeserved favor, spiritual strength and recognition and knowledge and understanding of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ the Messiah. To Him be glory honor, majesty, and splendor both now and to the day of eternity. Amen so be it!

2 Timothy 1:7 For God hath not given us the spirit of fear, but of power and of love and of a sound mind.

Ephesians 4:11-16 And he gave the apostles, the prophets, the evangelists, the shepherds and teachers, to equip the saints for the work of ministry, for building up the body of Christ, until we all attain to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to mature manhood, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ, so that we may no longer be children, tossed to and fro by the waves and carried about by every wind of doctrine, by human cunning, by craftiness in deceitful schemes. Rather, speaking the truth in love, we are to grow up in every way into him who is the head, into Christ, from whom the whole body, joined and held together by every joint with which it is equipped, when each part is working properly, makes the body grow so that it builds itself up in love.
 
Feb 7, 2015
22,418
413
0
#79
Actually, if it is a real person, it is a HUMAN SPAMMER. Google "forum spammers" to learn how they get users to generate visability for advertisers by getting people to respond to them.

Better yet, Google ctc1989 and see what comes up. :eek:

Or you can waste your time answering their questions... and did you notice they haven't been replying to you? :rolleyes: That's because they don't need to reply. You guys have generated 4 pages for them already. You've accomplished their mission for them. You're actually doing just what they want, arguing among yourselves as always. CARRY ON! :eek:
Really makes little difference, right? A very valid and interesting subject was generated by the question... whatever the original motive.
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
#80
No. Biblical Greek is not the same as Greek today. Yes, they are related but they are not the same. The only way you could run into a guy who actually knew Biblical Greek is to run into an apostle who traveled to the future in our time who knew Biblical Greek. It is ignorant to assume people would not be corrected by Paul today. People are relying upon a language that they do not know how to write or speak. The only way you can know what it says is in understanding it in your own language. For did the Holy Spirit speak to people in Hebrew and Greek at pentecost" Or did the Holy Spirit communicate to people in their own languages? Why do you think God cannot communicate to us in our language perfectly today? Why do you think He is powerless today to communicate like He did back then?

It's because people believe in a powerless God who cannot do miracles anymore.
It's because God's Word is offensive to people and they would rather not be held accountable to it. For having one Word of God or final Word of authority in their life would mean they could not twist the Word of God to suit their own purpose.