Do you believe being gay is a choice?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Dec 11, 2014
20
0
0
#61
I am struggling with the fact that my 16 year old son is gay. Ever since he was VERY young he showed signs of femininity. Over the years, he has been bullied in so many ways but the most common was being called gay, faggot and all the other names you associate with homosexuality. He has been to counseling and finally when he was 14, one night he had a major breakdown. He cornered himself in his room and wouldn't let me come near him. He said he couldn't do it anymore. Finally, I got him to admit that he was gay (not what I wanted to hear, because of the beliefs that I grew up with). But here was my son, tormented with trying to deal with who he was and who he was suppose to be. How do you deal with this as a mother? I love my son unconditionally and I have told him this on numerous occasions. We have a very close relationship but I admit I am very protective. A preacher told me once that you are not born gay but that the devil has influenced the behavior of a person. I don't believe that my son chose this way of life because he fought it so hard for so long. I have no one to talk to about this, I need to know how to lead my son to Our Lord Jesus Christ. God gave me the responsibility to care and nurture His child but I feel I have failed. Please help!!
Hi corkeyw4,

It goes against all common sense and reason to believe homosexuals are unnatural. Homosexuality, homosexual desire, and homosexual sex are 'not' sins in and of themselves. Only 'abusive' homosexual sex, or sex with pagan male prostitutes is condemned in the Bible. To condemn or treat the way a person was born as a 'sin' is the gravest sin of all. Homosexuals are born in every place around the planet; from the smallest mountain village to the smallest desert village. It is not something 'learned' or 'taught' to them. It is innately the way they were born, as God created them, and it is 'natural' for them to be attracted to, and fall in love with, their own gender, upon reaching puberty, just as it is 'natural' for a heterosexual to feel and do the same with the opposite gender upon reaching puberty.


Levitical purity laws, (which are mistranslated in almost all English Bibles concerning homosexuality) do not apply to Christians, and so the people who bring up Leviticus to attack gay people with are gravely mistaken, not to mention utterly hypocritical.



Jesus and homosexuality:



It is worthwhile to check the words attributed to Jesus by the author of the Gospel of Matthew. He created a comprehensive list of sins that would bring doom on a person: Matt 15:18-20: "...those things which proceed out of the mouth come forth from the heart; and they defile the man. For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies. These are the things which defile a man..." It is even more worth noting that homosexual behavior is not one of the behaviors that is mentioned in this passage. The conclusion is that Jesus did not consider it a sin.



The options open to a Christian:



A Christian has two options with regard to the Christian Scriptures (New Testament):



1. To accept a favorite (and safely familiar) English translation as accurately containing the words of the original authors. This is a simple and straightforward approach because biblical passages related to lesbians, gays, bisexuals, transgender persons and transsexuals (LGBT) in English Bibles are universally condemning. No further effort is needed.



2. To base the interpretation of these passages on the most ancient available Greek manuscripts of 1 Corinthians and 1 Timothy. This is as close as we are able to get to the original autograph copies written by the author(s). This option is much more demanding, because we then find that the Bibles that now use the word 'homosexual' or a variant of 'homosexual', is a false translation. Even worse, a convincing case can be made that 1 Timothy was written by a second century forger, many decades after Paul was executed.


If Paul had wanted to condemn homosexual behavior in general, the word for it at the time was paiderasste. What he did, rather than simply use one of the many existing, quite precise Greek terms for aspects of homosexuality (or for homosexuality in general) – words that he would have been quite aware of – is create an entirely new word.



The word "arsenokoitai" in 1 Corinthians and 1 Timothy:



"Arsenokoitai" is a Greek word that appears to have been uniquely created by Paul when he was writing 1 Corinthians 6:9-10. No record remains of any writer having using the term before Paul. It has been translated as "abusers of themselves with mankind" in the King James Version (KJV):



"Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God."



The KJV was finished 1611 CE when there was no single word in the English language that referred to homosexuals or homosexuality. The translators were forced to use this awkward phrase. The term "homosexual" was only created in the late 19th century.



More recent versions of the Bible translate arsenokoitai here as:



• "homosexuals," (NASB);
• "homosexual perversion," (NEB);
• "homosexual offenders," (NIV).



In doing this, they appear to have little respect or attention to the actual meaning of the original Greek verse. By using the term "homosexual" the translators changed the scope of the verse. The original Greek refers to men only; the English translation refers to both males and females; i.e. to gays and lesbians. We suspect that the temptation to attack lesbians overcame the translators' desire to be accurate.



The author of 1 Timothy also used "arsenokoitai." The KJV translated it similarly:



"Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine."



Christian theologians generally agree that Paul wrote 1 Corinthians circa 55 CE. However, they differ on the authorship and date of the three Pastoral Epistles -- 1 Timothy, 2 Timothy and Titus.



• Some scholars believe that Paul wrote the Pastoral epistles during the interval 62 to 64 CE just before his death.



• Many other scholars believe that they were written up to 85 years after Paul's execution, circa 100 to 150 CE by an unknown person who pretended to be Paul.



What does "arsenokoitai" really mean?



"Arsenokoitai" is made up of two parts: "arsen" means "man"; "koitai" means "beds."



Although the word in English Bibles is interpreted as referring to homosexuals, we can be fairly certain that this is not the meaning that Paul wanted to convey. If he had, he would have used the word "paiderasste." That was the standard Greek term at the time for sexual activity between males. We can conclude that he probably meant something different than people who engaged in male-male adult sexual behavior.



Many religious scholars have speculated about the meaning of "arsenokoitai:"



• "Homosexual offenders:" The NIV contains this phrase. Suppose for the moment that Paul had attacked "heterosexual offenders" or "heterosexual sexual offenders." We would not interpret this today as a general condemnation of heterosexuality. It would be seen as an attack only on those heterosexuals who commit sexual offences. Perhaps the appropriate interpretation of this verse is that it does not condemn all homosexuals. Rather it condemns only those homosexuals who engage in sexual offences (e.g. child sexual abuse, rape, unsafe sex, manipulative sex, coercive sex, etc).



• Male prostitutes in Pagan temples: One source states that the Septuagint (an ancient, pre-Christian translation of the Old Testament into Greek made between the 3rd and 1st centuryBCE) translated the Hebrew "quadesh" inI Kings 14:24, 15:12 and 22:46 into a Greek word somewhat similar to "arsenokoitai." This passage referred to "male temple prostitutes" -- people who engaged in ritual sex in Pagan temples. Some leaders in the early Christian church also thought 1 Corinthians was referring to temple prostitutes. Some authorities believe that it simply means male prostitutes with female customers - a practice which appears to have been a common practice in the Roman empire.



• Pimp: Another source refers to other writings, written later than 1 Corinthians, which contains the word "arsenokoitai:" This includes the Sibylline Oracles 2.70-77, Acts of John, and Theophilus of Antioch's Ad Autolycum. The source suggests that the term refers "to some kind of economic exploitation by means of sex (but not necessarily homosexual sex)." Probably "pimp" or "man living off of the avails of prostitution" would be the closest English translations. It is worth noting that an enormous amount of Greek homosexual erotic literature has survived, none of it contains the word arsenokoitai."



• Masturbators. At the time of Martin Luther, "arsenokoitai" was universally interpreted as masturbator. But by the 20th century, masturbation had become a more generally accepted behavior. So, new translations abandoned references to masturbators and switched the attack to homosexuals. The last religious writing in English that interpreted 1 Corinthians 6:9 as referring to masturbation is believed to be the [Roman] Catholic Encyclopedia of 1967.



• Abusive pedophiles: Many would consider "malakoi" -- the word preceding "arsenokoitai," in 1 Corinthians -- to refer to a catamite: a boy or young male who engaged in sexual activities with men. Such boys were often slaves, owned by rich men as sex partners. The second term might then refer to the men who engaged in sex with the catamites. That is, they were abusive pedophiles or hebephiles. The New American Bible contains a footnote which reads:



"The Greek word translated as 'boy prostitutes' [in 1 Cor. 6:9] designated catamites, i.e. boys or young men who were kept for purposes of prostitution, a practice not uncommon in the Greco-Roman world....The term translated 'practicing homosexuals' refers to adult males who indulged in homosexual practices with such boys."



In their footnote, the translators recognize that the term refers to abusive male pedophiles, but apparently cannot resist the temptation to attack all homosexuals -- both gays and lesbians, non-abusive and abusive.



Harper's Bible Commentary (1998) states that the passage refers to:



"... both the effeminate male prostitute and his partner who hires him to satisfy sexual needs. The two terms used here for homosexuality... specify a special form of pederasty that was generally disapproved of in Greco-Roman and Jewish Literature."



Many religious scholars agree that the center portion of 6:9 might be accurately translated as: "male child abusers and the boys that they sexually abuse." i.e. the two behaviors probably relate to male pedophiles who are also child rapists, and the male children that they victimize. The verse would then refer to the crime of child sexual abuse and has no relation to homosexuality in the normal sense of the term: i.e. to consensual sexual relations between adults of the same gender.



Male prostitutes: Here is an interesting analysis of 1 Corinthians. There is a pattern in verse 9 and 10. They are composed up of pairs or triads of related groups of people:



The lawless & disobedient: two near synonyms



The ungodly & sinners: also two near synonyms



The unholy & profane: two synonyms



The murderers of fathers & murderers of mothers & manslayers: three kinds of murderers



Whoremongers & "arsenokoitai" & menstealers



Liars & perjurers etc.: again, two near synonyms.



From the repeated pairs or triads made up of synonyms or near synonyms, one might expect that whoremongers, "malakoi arsenokoitai," and menstealers are interconnected with a common theme -- just like the other pairs and triads in the list.



In the original Greek, the first of the three words is "pornov." An online Greek lexicon notes that this is Strong's Number 4205, and was derived from the Greek word "pernemi" which means to sell. Its meanings are:



A man who prostitutes his body to another's lust for hire.



A male prostitute.



A man who indulges in unlawful sexual intercourse, a fornicator.



The second term is "arsenokoitai" which has not been given a Strong Number because it is a made-up word that is almost never found in the Greek language other than in 1 Timothy and 1 Corinthians.



The last of the three words is "andrapodistes," the stem of the word andrapodistai. It is Strong's Number 405 which means:



A slave-dealer, kidnapper, man-stealer -- one who unjustly reduces free men to slavery or who steals the slaves of others and sells them.



If we assume that the three words refer to a common theme, as the other five groups are, then we have to look for some sense which the words have in common. Cannon suggests:



"pornoi" refers to an enslaved male prostitute.



"arsenokoitai" refers to a man who forces sex on an enslaved male prostitute



"andrapodistes" refers to a person who kidnaps and enslaves people.



The common theme is slavery. Cannon suggests a translation: "It is as if Paul were saying, 'male prostitutes, men who sleep with them, and slave dealers who procure them'." That is, all three words deal with slavery. They are unrelated to homosexual behavior in the modern sense of the term i.e. consensual sex between persons of the same sex.



• A boy sex slave



Again, the common theme is slavery.



Translating "arsenokoitai" as a boy who is kept as a sex slave has some support in at least two Bible translations:



As noted above, a footnote in the New American Bible (NAB), interprets "arsenokoitai" as a " boy prostitute."



The Jerusalem Bible translates the triad in 1 Timothy as: "those who are immoral with women or with boys or with men." In 1 Corinthians 6:9 the same word "arsenokoitai" is translated as "catamite."

An acurate translation of 1 Timothy 1:10 would be: "...male prostitutes, boys who have sex with men, and slave dealers who enslave them both."


As you may have observed by now, attempts to distort the Bible into a message of hate are badly misguided. The passages in Leviticus and Paul's three letters specifically apply to people engaging in ritual activity with pagan priests or sacred prostitutes. The references to 'sodomites' in Deuteronomy, etc., are a clear error in translation that refer to the same thing. The Sodom and Gomorrah references clearly refer to inhospitality and not to homosexuality at all.



Here's the most fundamental weakness in such thinking: the Bible does not condemn lesbians. There is a proscription against women wearing men's clothing, and a letter from Paul 'mentions' "women [who] did change the natural use into that which is against nature" – whatever that means – but nothing else. Any translations that apply to 'homosexuals' (i.e., including females as well as males) are mis-translations, possibly intentional, certainly political.



So it is entirely within Christ's teachings to welcome and celebrate the unique way that God created homosexuals, and to encourage them to find another to marry and live a monogamous life with, rather than to condemn and/or cast them out, which almost inevitably leads to despair, and a promiscuous and dangerous lifestyle in an attempt to gain the physical affection and love they were denied.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
36,862
13,197
113
#62
Hi corkeyw4,

It goes against all common sense and reason to believe homosexuals are unnatural.

guess why this guy got banned?

because he is saying things flatly contradicted by scripture.

Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.
(Romans 1:26-27)

just thought to clear that up.
 

Dan58

Senior Member
Nov 13, 2013
1,991
338
83
#63

guess why this guy got banned?

because he is saying things flatly contradicted by scripture.
Or because he's guilty of writing exceptionally long post

 

presidente

Senior Member
May 29, 2013
9,093
1,756
113
#64
Tarod70 said:
Although the word in English Bibles is interpreted as referring to homosexuals, we can be fairly certain that this is not the meaning that Paul wanted to convey. If he had, he would have used the word "paiderasste."
I see this approach to arguing a case, but it's just logic. It's like if people were debating about an English text in which someone wrote "Put out the fire." Then, someone, thousands of years from now, proposes that 'put' can mean a million things, and if the speaker wanted to say put out the fire, he would have used the English word 'extinguish.'

Since Paul was a Jew, it does make sense that he would have used a word that referred to Deuteronomy 20:13, arsenokoite. It could be that 'malakos' in I Corinthians 6 refers to one of the participants in a homosexual acts. But it doesn't make sense to say that this only applies to abused children. Why would an abuse child who is raped not inherit the kingdom of God, while an adult that willfully indulges in 'vile affections' be innocent? That makes no sense, and it's one of the problems with LGBTQ sophistry on this issue.
 

Grace10

Junior Member
Nov 28, 2014
6
0
0
#65
We all struggle with sins. Some sins are stronger than others. Forget the labels. Lust itself is a sin. So the men that lust after multiple women are sinning as well. This is why we need our father's merciful forgiveness.
 
K

Kaycie

Guest
#66
There is no doubt in my mind. Sin is not a matter of opinion, it is a matter of what God says. And God would not tell us to do something that was impossible for us to do. God knows what evil is and He says it's evil. I'll take His Word for it. People are not born murderers, thieves, homosexuals, or kidnappers- these are choices. We are all tempted by different things, but to give into that desire is sin.
 
M

Mitspa

Guest
#67
The last "Christian" forum I left was in part over this issue....Its seems there is a very vocal group trying to impose on believers that we must accept and approve this particular sin and approve in the name of "love". Now Love (biblical) love, keeps all the laws of God but its made clear that agape would not ever commit or approve of this act anymore than it would commit or approve of adultery, that uses the name of love. There cannot be a "gay" Christian anymore than they can be a adulteries Christian , although many "Christians" can be caught in the condition of sin and need deliverance by obedience to the truth. A lie does not help anyone and only leaves these poor people in a condition of bondage to their sin and lust. God bless
 

Atwood

Senior Member
May 1, 2014
4,995
53
48
#68
Being a sinner is not a choice, but the result of being born as a descendant of Adam, genetically present in Adam when Adam sinned. All sin is genetic and inherited.

The question remains whether varieties of sinful tendencies are inherited specifically. Do thieves beget thieves? Do sodomists beget sodomists? Of course pure sodomy yields no offspring.

If a preference for one type of sin is inherited, that would not make that type of sin OK (OK on the grounds that inheritor can't help it).

At any rate, I know of no proof that sodomite tendencies are inherited. Since sodomy produces no offspring, it would seem unlikely.

But for a man to insert into the wrong orifice to enjoy friction is understandable, if disgusting (understandable a learned behavior via positive feedback). To commit this act for the sake of the pleasurable friction and hormone release following, activity which activates pleasure circuits in the grain, while at the same time not refraining because of the harm that this does to the anatomical region of the person who receives, does have a genetic component, that of the sinful, selfish nature of Adam -- choosing pleasure at the cost of the suffering of others -- selfishness.

A capacity to put God's commandments out of mind and to walk in delusion (denying the obvious meaning of scripture for sake of a pleasure) is genetic; for it is Adamic.

Thus there is a genetic component to Sodomy, that of the sinful nature of Adam. But Romans 1 refers to the willful component of this sin when it results from refusing to have God in mind & thus being given up to a reprobate mind.
 
K

kaylagrl

Guest
#69
Being a sinner is not a choice, but the result of being born as a descendant of Adam, genetically present in Adam when Adam sinned. All sin is genetic and inherited.

The question remains whether varieties of sinful tendencies are inherited specifically. Do thieves beget thieves? Do sodomists beget sodomists? Of course pure sodomy yields no offspring.

If a preference for one type of sin is inherited, that would not make that type of sin OK (OK on the grounds that inheritor can't help it).

At any rate, I know of no proof that sodomite tendencies are inherited. Since sodomy produces no offspring, it would seem unlikely.

But for a man to insert into the wrong orifice to enjoy friction is understandable, if disgusting (understandable a learned behavior via positive feedback). To commit this act for the sake of the pleasurable friction and hormone release following, activity which activates pleasure circuits in the grain, while at the same time not refraining because of the harm that this does to the anatomical region of the person who receives, does have a genetic component, that of the sinful, selfish nature of Adam -- choosing pleasure at the cost of the suffering of others -- selfishness.

A capacity to put God's commandments out of mind and to walk in delusion (denying the obvious meaning of scripture for sake of a pleasure) is genetic; for it is Adamic.

Thus there is a genetic component to Sodomy, that of the sinful nature of Adam. But Romans 1 refers to the willful component of this sin when it results from refusing to have God in mind & thus being given up to a reprobate mind.

Im sorry but I dont think the Bible teaches that.I believe sin is totally our choice.Free will.The Bible does not teach that we cant help ourselves. I dont believe sins are inherited either.How would that be just and fair? Sorry I just dont agree.Homosexuality is a choice and the wrong path for a believer,I do agree with that.
 

presidente

Senior Member
May 29, 2013
9,093
1,756
113
#70
The last "Christian" forum I left was in part over this issue....Its seems there is a very vocal group trying to impose on believers that we must accept and approve this particular sin and approve in the name of "love". Now Love (biblical) love, keeps all the laws of God but its made clear that agape would not ever commit or approve of this act anymore than it would commit or approve of adultery, that uses the name of love. There cannot be a "gay" Christian anymore than they can be a adulteries Christian , although many "Christians" can be caught in the condition of sin and need deliverance by obedience to the truth. A lie does not help anyone and only leaves these poor people in a condition of bondage to their sin and lust. God bless
I think we need to be careful how we say this. The LGBTQ movement is teaching people that 'gay' or 'homosexual' is the way they are born, that it is part of their nature. So someone who accepts that who struggles with same sex attraction thinks that he's 'gay' or 'homosexual' even if he hasn't acted on it. They try to persuade them younger and younger if they have their way.

So then you have these confused young people who've accepted this philosophy that says they are 'gay.' When you say gays or homosexuals can't be Christians, they think they are born with something that disqualifies them from being a Christian.

Someone could be a Christian and struggle with same sex attraction, just like someone could be a Christian and have to resist the temptation to fornicate, or to use something of the same level, struggle with temptations to have incestuous sex or engage in zoophilia. One can struggle with temptation and still be a Christian.

LGBTQ interpretations of the Bible that teach that these thing are okay are not loving because, as I Corinthians 13 says, love does not delight in iniquity, but rejoices in the truth.
 
M

Mitspa

Guest
#71
I think we need to be careful how we say this. The LGBTQ movement is teaching people that 'gay' or 'homosexual' is the way they are born, that it is part of their nature. So someone who accepts that who struggles with same sex attraction thinks that he's 'gay' or 'homosexual' even if he hasn't acted on it. They try to persuade them younger and younger if they have their way.

So then you have these confused young people who've accepted this philosophy that says they are 'gay.' When you say gays or homosexuals can't be Christians, they think they are born with something that disqualifies them from being a Christian.

Someone could be a Christian and struggle with same sex attraction, just like someone could be a Christian and have to resist the temptation to fornicate, or to use something of the same level, struggle with temptations to have incestuous sex or engage in zoophilia. One can struggle with temptation and still be a Christian.

LGBTQ interpretations of the Bible that teach that these thing are okay are not loving because, as I Corinthians 13 says, love does not delight in iniquity, but rejoices in the truth.
I agree we should always show the grace of God but yet always uphold the desired effect of the Spirit of grace working in the believer to overcome these things. Grace and truth came by Jesus Christ...When we deny that we are all called to walk in the life of the Spirit we only harm those we desire to help...God Bless
 
May 3, 2013
8,719
75
0
#72
it´s not your fault! Just look at it as another sin. Remove the stain or bias you have on it and see it as it is: a sin.

Years ago I wanted to teach "well" my own children and tought them "extremely" well to be manly that I had to ask them to stop it, because they were engaged with more than one girl at the time... It´s a heavy burden a parent can feel on those shoulders but, do the best you can. I have seen many turning to the best road, just ask Him to teach you on new ways to work it out a way less painful and, sometimes, some shame bother us a little.

The moment you see it as it is, that feeling will change. :)
 
L

Lis45

Guest
#73
AMEN AND THANK YOU BEN FTW!
 
L

Lis45

Guest
#74
hey corkey. You are not alone. 1 1/2 years ago, I found out my then 17 year old autistic spectrum son is gay. I was crushed, heartbroken....and so was he. He struggled with this for about 2 years prior....scared to death to say anything to me for fear of hurting me and being rejected in the process. He was very depressed during that time, but I didn't know why. He did NOT choose this, but this is the hand he has been dealt. I love him dearly. I will never turn him away, and may God show him what unconditional love looks like in and through me. More than anything, my son needs the love, grace, and forgiveness of God. He can't change the fact that he's homosexual, and neither can I. I can pray though...pray that God intervenes in his life, saving him, and loving him, and changing him from the inside out...even if it takes the rest of his life. If you ever need to talk, please don't hesitate to contact me. I often feel so alone in this struggle as a Christian mother of a gay "child".
 

eyoung63

Junior Member
Mar 18, 2015
6
1
3
#75
Let me share something for the heart. If someone is gay, and have attraction to the same sex is not the sin part.. The sin part is acting on it. If someone is born gay or not I will not debate it. My point is that he must learn how to abstain from the act. Like a heterosexual must abstain from fornication. With the Holy Spirit this is possible. Many single people abstain from fornication. Now is it possible from breaking from these feeling, absolutely.. There is a gentleman called Joe Dallas, he was it this life style for years. He is now married and has children.. You may want to google this for your child. I think we live in an age of sin that the people are being drawn into. So I would encourage your son not to give up hope, but look upward to his redeemer. I hope this has helped.
 
B

BarlyGurl

Guest
#76
I am struggling with the fact that my 16 year old son is gay. Ever since he was VERY young he showed signs of femininity. Over the years, he has been bullied in so many ways but the most common was being called gay, faggot and all the other names you associate with homosexuality. He has been to counseling and finally when he was 14, one night he had a major breakdown. He cornered himself in his room and wouldn't let me come near him. He said he couldn't do it anymore. Finally, I got him to admit that he was gay (not what I wanted to hear, because of the beliefs that I grew up with). But here was my son, tormented with trying to deal with who he was and who he was suppose to be. How do you deal with this as a mother? I love my son unconditionally and I have told him this on numerous occasions. We have a very close relationship but I admit I am very protective. A preacher told me once that you are not born gay but that the devil has influenced the behavior of a person. I don't believe that my son chose this way of life because he fought it so hard for so long. I have no one to talk to about this, I need to know how to lead my son to Our Lord Jesus Christ. God gave me the responsibility to care and nurture His child but I feel I have failed. Please help!!
NO ONE is born HOMOSEXUAL. Some are born with "imbalanced" hormone function and some are born with "improper or incomplete sex organs".... NONE of these scenarios MAKES a person HOMOSEXUAL. We are all born with a sin nature and "bent" toward some kind of sin (some more obvious than others), a person with hormone or sex organ mal-development can be influenced by the body AND external "nurture" development and to be clear here.... you as the mother are not the only one who has "nurtured" your son over the years.

Yet you mentioned SINGLE MOM... so I am guessing the absence of a proper Father and witnessing a proper male female relationship probably had SOME influence in his developing a sense of attraction for boys. That said, he also could just be confused at this point... (this is where I am leaning) because 14year olds REALLY shouldn't have enough "sexuality" to be making that determination about their identity. So I am more inclined to go with his lifelong struggle with being "softer" and treated unkindly for it has pushed him in that direction.

None the less.... sexual immorality is SINFUL so it would be a good idea to study the bible and instruct him in the matter of fact that sex is crated by GOD for MARRIAGE and in God's word... homosexual MARRAIGE is forbidden... so whether he gets delivered by Jesus from his "wrong identity" that's is AWESOME... but if he chooses to remain in it... celibacy is what his life is going to be about.
 
S

Starsdance

Guest
#77
Dear father, please save her 16 year old son. Although there are some female factors existed in his character, nothing could prevent your great love and mighty power to change this boy. Boy is boy, which is the truth. Please inject him MAN elements into his heart, spirit and body. Give him a new life, a REAL MAN life! Amen.
Sister, I think you should analyse him in the depth of his heart, I think maybe he is lack of something in some aspects. He needs to relocate his male role in the life, lead him to know who he is again in the front of God. And try your best to change the environment around him that could tempt him to sin easily.
 
M

magicrick

Guest
#78
I don't know if it is a choice, I do know it is choice for SOME. For me personally it's something I have to live with. But then again we all have our weaknesses, bad traits that could make us sin. For a christian it's a constant struggle, a battle that we cannot win without the help of Jesus Christ. Leave it at the Cross. Amen!
 
J

James4redemption

Guest
#79
As Christians I feel we have to handle situations like this as delicately as possible, since you don't want to offend anyone or push them away from Christ.

As for this child, he could have been bullied into thinking it's true, since I don't have a clue if it's a choice or not. I saw a video on youtube where a man who was under the same kind of insults from his peers, was even molested at one point, and he just thought he was Homosexual only to find Christ.

How to achieve that? Well, from my personal experience as a lost, blatant sinner...the only way I know to get to Christ is to answer when he knocks. Faith, believing before seeing, believing in him thoroughly. After that, it's limitless what he can do for you, but it will always be on you to return to him and be obedient to receive proper guidance.

I'll pray for discernment for your child though Corkey, all children in this situation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Xaldien

Junior Member
Oct 6, 2015
8
0
1
#80
i want to address quickly these comments that say expose him to manly things and he will become a man

i grew up in a female family my dad walked out before i was born so it was me my mother and two sisters, am i Gay? no i'm not


The best thing you can do for your son is love him and accept him for who he is all children are gods blessings its no choice to be gay like we never chose to be heterosexual we just knew we was

god will give you all the strength you and your son need to get through

god bless to you :)