CHINA says That A “State Of War” Now Exists With UNITED STATES

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

prove-all

Senior Member
May 16, 2014
5,977
400
83
63
#81
January , 2018 Chinese President Orders Army to Prepare for War.

“Here I give my orders,” announced Chinese President Xi Jinping to thousands of assembled
troops. “The military at all levels should strengthen military training and war preparedness.”
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/wo...ing-prepares-army-for-war-USA-North-Korea-WW3-
Nuclear-missile-video-

Christina Zhao of Newsweek reported that “during his speech, Xi encouraged the troops to
‘enhance their military training and combat readiness’ to ‘grasp the capability to win battles’
as dictated by the Chinese Communist Party.”
China: President Xi Jinping Tells Army Not to Fear Death at Enormous Military Assembly
-

The president’s direct orders to the pla are another big step for Xi in securing power
for both himself and his nation.

“This is the first time since the founding of the country that instructions on military training
have been directly issued by the chairman of the [Central Military Commission],” said Xu
Guangyu, a retired major general and adviser of the China Arms Control and Disarmament
Association, speaking of President Xi. “t shows that improving combat readiness is now
a strategic mission for the Chinese military.”

Xi Jinping is quickly becoming an authoritarian leader in the tradition of Mao.
 

prove-all

Senior Member
May 16, 2014
5,977
400
83
63
#82
January 2018 Pentagon: Russia and China Capable of Destroying U.S. Satellites by 2020

Russia and China are developing weaponry that can destroy vital American satellites,
according to a new report by the Pentagon’s Joint Staff intelligence directorate.

Washington Free Beacon quoted officials familiar with the report on January 30 as saying,
“China and Russia will be capable of severely disrupting or destroying U.S. satellites in
low-Earth orbit” by 2020.
Pentagon: China, Russia Soon Capable of Destroying U.S. Satellites

The new report echoes the warnings issued in May 2017 by Director of National Intelligence Dan
Coats. “We assess that Russia and China perceive a need to offset any U.S. military advantage
derived from military, civil or commercial space systems and are increasingly considering attacks
against satellite systems as part of their future warfare doctrine,” Coats said in a testimony to
Congress. “Both will continue to pursue a full range of anti-satellite weapons as a means to
reduce U.S. military effectiveness.”

Experts say that these weapons include ground-launched missiles, lasers and electronic jammers,
as well as small dirigible satellites that can maneuver up to an orbiting satellite, seize it, and tear
it apart.Low-Earth orbit extends from 100 miles to about 1,240 miles above the Earth’s surface.

More than 800 satellites currently operate in this zone, including those used by the United States
military and those used by the Orbcomm, Iridium and Globalstar systems.“All these low-Earth
orbit satellites are now highly vulnerable to Chinese or Russian anti-satellite weapons and
capabilities,” Washington Free Beacon said.

Steve Lambakis, an international affairs analyst specializing in space power, said, “U.S. space
systems are among the most fragile and vulnerable assets operated by the U.S. military. …

This vulnerable communications and data collection, processing, and distribution infrastructure
is worth billions of dollars and is vital to nearly every activity of the United States and,
increasingly, the armed forces of U.S. allies.”
 

prove-all

Senior Member
May 16, 2014
5,977
400
83
63
#83
Russia and China are developing more advanced weapons of war, improving existing
arms systems, and possibly practicing for preemptive strikes on American targets.

The editors of Popular Mechanics discussed some of these developments in their
Threat Report 2017: New Dangers and the American Tech to Beat Them
https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a25062/threat-report-russia-china/

In modern warfare, owning the sky is everything. And the cheapest way to own the sky is
to shoot down, from the ground, anything that tries to fly in it. The Russian military is curr-
ently fielding a new mid-range surface-to-air missile system, the Buk-M3, that has the
potential to change everything. And by change we mean destroy. Start with the eyes:
a powerful phased-array radar that steers its beams electronically to track targets.

The vehicle has a new digital brain that can accept data from longer-range radar, which
means the M3 will be able to shoot before some systems would have even identified the
incoming aircraft. It has six radar-guided missiles with a range of up to 43 miles—a huge
improvement over the 28-mile range in the older Buk-M2.
-

Russia also has “the world’s most deadly” tank now very near to deployment. Popular Mec.
wrote: “Russia’s new T-14 tank, currently in field tests, is the world’s most deadly. For the
first time in a turreted main battle tank, the entire crew is cocooned inside an armored capsule
in the hull. The T-14 is also the first main battle tank to have fully automated, unmanned turret.”
-

Both Russia and China have developed a new class of stealth warplanes, which Popular
Mechanics says are “adding new lines to the foreheads” of Department of Defense officials
in Washington. Russia’s pak-fa and China’s J-20 and J-31 are causing planners to worry for
the first time in many years about the possibility of losing United States jets in dogfights.

There is also concern, according to Popular Mechanics, that these Russian and Chinese aircraft
“could slip past radar to bomb air bases” and other vital targets. “Stealth airplanes revolutionized
modern warfare for the U.S., as they’re used to eliminate air defenses so that older, easily seen
aircraft can attack other targets,” Popular Mechanics said. “Now we have to deal with potential
enemies having them too.”
-

Russian Aerospace Force Commander in Chief Viktor Bondarev recently said that Russia’s MiG
-35 fighter jets are rapidly replacing older models and may soon be armed with laser weapons.
The tass news agency quoted the commander as saying: “This plane can use all the types of the
newest weaponry and laser weapons as well.” Calling the MiG-35 a “splendid creation,”
TASS: Military & Defense - MiG-35 warplane to become Russia’s sole light fighter jet

Mr. Bondarev said the jet is “capable of engaging in super-maneuverable air fights and strike
targets both at sea and in the air.” He said the Russians have “proved with the development
of the Su-30SM and Su-34 aircraft that we have the best engines.”
 

prove-all

Senior Member
May 16, 2014
5,977
400
83
63
#84
Chinese military forces may be “practicing preemptive missile strikes against U.S. bases.”

On February 6, 2017 War on the Rocks speculated that Chinese military forces may
already be “practicing preemptive missile strikes against U.S. bases.” Thomas Shugart,
a Senior Military Fellow at the Center for a New American Security and a U.S. Navy officer,
said that “the greatest military threat to U.S. vital interests in Asia” may be China’s ability
to carry out such strikes.
https://warontherocks.com/2017/02/h...preemptive-missile-strikes-against-u-s-bases/

Mr. Shugart wrote:

This is a time of increasing tension, with China’s news organizations openly threatening war.
U.S. leaders and policymakers should understand that a preemptive Chinese missile strike
against the forward bases that underpin U.S. military power in the Western Pacific is a very
real possibility, particularly if China believes its claimed core strategic interests are threat-
ened in the course of a crisis and perceives that its attempts at deterrence have failed.

Such a preemptive strike appears consistent with available information about China’s missile
force doctrine, and … satellite imagery … points to what may be real-world efforts to practice
its execution.
-

To protect allies and project power, the U.S. maintains an arc of bases in the Asia-Pacific
region, including Yokosuka, Sasebo, Osan and Kadena on Okinawa. Because of the vast
distance from the continental American territory, if a war broke out in the Asia-Pacific, U.S.
forces would rely heavily on these bases. The satellite imagery that War on the Rocks
analyzed suggests that China’s preparations to preemptively strike ships in port and aircraft
bunkers at such bases are considerably more advanced than analysts previously thought.
-

Mr. Shugart continues:

In terms of sequencing, the study suggested that an initial wave of ballistic missiles would
neutralize air defenses and command centers and crater the runways of military air bases,
trapping aircraft on the ground. These initial paralyzing ballistic missile salvos could then be
followed by waves of cruise missiles and Chinese aircraft targeting hardened aircraft shelters,
aircraft parked in the open, and fuel handling and maintenance facilities.

These capabilities may already have been tested at a ballistic missile impact test site located
on the edge of the Gobi Desert in western China. Commercial satellite images seem to show
a range of test targets representing just the sort of objectives discussed in the doctrine above..

The demonstrated ability to precisely deliver penetrating warheads to facilities such as
command centers in a matter of minutes could also provide a key capability to destroy them,
with their command staffs, in the initial waves of an attack. …China has not been shy about
displaying the advancing capabilities of the pla [People’s Liberation Army] Rocket Force.

Beijing openly displayed some of its latest missiles … in its 70th anniversary parade in 2015
and painted the missiles’ identification on their sides in western characters, in case anyone
missed the point. … Specifically, the pla Rocket Force appears to have been practicing on
several ship targets of a similar size to U.S. Arleigh Burke-class destroyers moored in a mock
port that is a near-mirror image of the actual inner harbor at the U.S. naval base in Yokosuka.
-


China is expanding into airspace over certain waters in Asia and the East China Sea,
in waters claimed by Japan and South Korea. Those are our allies! And they’re really,
really in a furor over what’s going on, and America is doing nothing to help them,
and nobody here seems to be that concerned about it.
 

prove-all

Senior Member
May 16, 2014
5,977
400
83
63
#85
February, 2018 The future of nuclear warfare is becoming far more destructive.

The Chinese Academy of Sciences announced last week that state-backed researchers
at a facility in Lanzhou had successfully fired superheated beams of Tantalum 181.

Tantalum 181 is a radioactive isotope that could be added to nuclear warheads to
increase their devastating fallout.
A beam, a bomb and a burning question: could China be rebooting a nuclear doomsday device? | South China Morning Post

Adding Tantalum 181 to a warhead could theoretically produce a “salted” nuclear bomb. After
causing extreme damage with the initial explosion, a salted bomb would release a cloud of
radioactive isotopes that spread over a far larger area than those of an ordinary nuclear bomb.


The purpose of a salted nuclear weapon is to spread deadly fallout as broadly as possible,
contaminating huge areas and rendering them uninhabitable for years or possibly decades.
If enough of these devices were detonated, the radioactive clouds could merge together,
making the effects exponentially worse.

The Chinese Academy of Sciences has acknowledged its project in Lanzhou has direct
military applications, saying the research is an effort to “meet a critical strategic demand
of China’s national defense.”
-

China’s leadership has no desire to wipe out all human life on the planet.But in recent years,
Beijing has focused on boosting the power of its nuclear arsenals and has said it seeks to
attain a high degree of nuclear deterrence with a comparatively small number of weapons.
Developing salted bombs would rapidly advance that strategy.

There is some logic in a strategy of developing weapons of deterrence.

As Martin Amis wrote in Einstein’s Monsters, “How do we prevent the use of nuclear
weapons? By threatening the use of nuclear weapons. And we can’t get rid of nuclear
weapons, because of nuclear weapons.”

American astronomer Carl Sagan echoed Amis’s sentiments by describing just how
maniacal the nuclear buildup had become: “The nuclear arms race is like two sworn
enemies standing waist-deep in gasoline, one with three matches, the other with five.”

In a major nuclear war, no one wins. And when salted nuclear weapons are added into
the equation, the notion of being the first to drop a match becomes even more irrational.

But the trouble is that people are not always rational or clearheaded. History shows
that when war breaks out, men ultimately do not sit on their most potent weapons.
They use them. And Bible prophecy indicates that nuclear weapons of all kinds will
be used en masse in a third world war.

During that era of Roman rule, warfare entailed hand-to-hand combat with spears,
swords and pila. The closest thing to a weapon of mass destruction would have perhaps
been a catapult. For centuries thereafter, the technological situation remained basically
the same: The weaponry to wipe out all life on Earth did not exist.

Today, nations continue to hold each other at nuclear gunpoint. If China is developing
Tantalum 181-laced nuclear bombs, then mankind’s ability to wipe out life from the
planet has increased even further—just as Christ warned would the case in the end time.

World War iii will be interrupted! Before mankind fires enough weapons—salted or
otherwise—to annihilate itself, Jesus Christ will cut the conflict short. Immediately
after that time of unprecedented death and destruction, He will establish a new age
of unprecedented peace and prosperity. Christ will rule Earth as King of kings and
Lord of lords. He will usher in an epoch of worldwide peace.

Regarding this future era of global harmony, Isaiah 2:4 says: “[N]ation shall not
lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more.”
 

prove-all

Senior Member
May 16, 2014
5,977
400
83
63
#86
Russia’s Nuclear Weapons Deep in Europe ‘Should Hardly Be Cause for Concern’

Russia has deployed additional nuclear-capable missiles to its Kaliningrad Oblast.
Neighboring Lithuania has voiced concern about the missiles, but on February 6,
Russia scolded the Lithuanians for what it called their unjustified fears.

Lithuanian President Dalia Grybauskaitė told reporters that Russia’s nuclear-capable
“Iskander missiles are being stationed in Kaliningrad for permanent presence.”
Lithuanian officials: Russian Federation permanently stationing Iskander in Kaliningrad

Kaliningrad is a non-contiguous Russian territory on the Baltic Sea roughly 650 miles
west of Moscow. It lies west of Lithuania, Latvia, Belarus, Estonia and Ukraine, and is
only about 150 miles from Warsaw, the capital city of Poland, and about 250 miles from
the German border. Grybauskaitė said its location deep in Europe means “half of all
European countries” are within range of these missiles.

One of Russia’s most sophisticated and versatile missile systems, the Iskander
reportedly has a range of up to 250 miles and can accommodate ground-penetrating
bunker busters, electromagnetic pulse weapons and nuclear warheads.

Russia confirmed that it has installed new Iskander missile systems in Kaliningrad,
but government spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Grybauskaitė and other Europeans
are wrong to criticize the deployment.

“I want to remind you that placing particular armaments and deploying specific military
units on Russian territory are solely the sovereign issue of Russia,” Peskov said to
Russia’s Tass News Agency.“Russia has never threatened and does not threaten anyone,
but Russia, naturally, has the sovereign right [to deploy armaments on its territory],
and that is why this should hardly be a cause for someone’s concern.”

TASS: Russian Politics & Diplomacy - Kremlin: Russia deploying arms on its soil not cause for other countries’ concern
-
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2001/jan/04/20010104-020454-1623r/
-

For anyone who has been watching Russia’s foreign policy, particularly over the last
decade, Peskov’s words are not reassuring. The people of Lithuania are deeply alarmed
by those moves—and with good cause.

Like Georgia and Ukraine, Lithuania was part of the Soviet Union before its collapse.
Many Lithuanians rightfully view Russia’s aggression in Georgia and Ukraine as Russian
President Vladimir Putin’s attempt to reinstate domination over the area once ruled by the
Soviet Union. Some fear that Lithuania will be next on the list.
 
Last edited:

tourist

Senior Member
Mar 13, 2014
41,313
16,301
113
69
Tennessee
#87
We had fish yesterday for dinner. I'm not sure if it was Chinese or not but do know that it came out of a box. Mrs. Paul's. That sounds American to me. The fortune cookie it came with was a little disconcerting though. It said that I was gong to have a bad hair day and that certainly was the case. Gonna switch to Gorton's.
 
Feb 28, 2016
11,311
2,972
113
#88
Brother Tourist,

you really need to do some serious reading and acknowledgment of what is going-on
in this day and age - this is said in Love for you and your family...
 

prove-all

Senior Member
May 16, 2014
5,977
400
83
63
#89
Putin claims Russia has nuclear arsenal capable of avoiding missile defenses

MOSCOW - Russia has developed nuclear weapons that can avoid missile-defense systems
and plans to bolster its arsenal with nuclear-powered cruise missiles capable of hitting any point
in the world, President Vladimir Putin claimed Thursday in his annual state of the nation address.

Russia has a new array of nuclear-capable weapons including an intercontinental
ballistic missile that renders defense systems “useless,” President Vladimir Putin
announced Thursday , MARCH 01, 2018

The ICBM has a longer range than any other and can reach almost any target
in the world, Putin said in his annual address to lawmakers and political elites.

Other new technologies he highlighted included supersonic missiles
and drone submarines that he said cannot be stopped.

Putin unveils new Russian nuclear missile, says it renders defenses ‘useless
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rpZfu8FR_QA
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/vladimir-putin-set-state-union-speech-election-looms-n852211
-

Putin's marathon speech came 17 days before a presidential election
in which he is seeking an unprecedented fourth term in power.

Polls suggest Putin, who has dominated Russian politics as president or prime
minister for 18 years, is on track to comfortably secure another six-year term.
 
S

Susanna

Guest
#90
Yet there are people in the US having a soft spot for Putin and Russia.

The Western world needs to stand united.
 

prove-all

Senior Member
May 16, 2014
5,977
400
83
63
#92
February 27, 2018 The Real Russian Disaster
https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/02/russia-spreading-chaos-fooling-media-exposing-fbi/

“Start with two givens: Vladimir Putin is neither stupid nor content to watch an aging,
shrinking, corrupt, and dysfunctional — but still large and nuclear — Russia recede
to second- or third-power status.

"From 2009 to 2015, in one of the most remarkable and Machiavellian efforts in recent
strategic history, Putin almost single-handedly parlayed a deserved losing hand into a
winning one. He pulled this off by flattering, manipulating, threatening, and outsmarting
an inept and politically obsessed Obama administration."

Under the Obama presidency and the tenures of Secretaries of State Hillary Clinton and
John Kerry, Russia made astounding strategic gains — given its intrinsic economic, social,
and military weaknesses. The Obama reaction was usually incoherent (Putin was caricatured
as a “bored kid in the back of the classroom” or as captive of a macho shtick).

After each aggressive Russian act, the administration lectured that “it is not in Russia’s interest
to . . . ” — as if Obama knew better than a thuggish Putin what was best for autocratic Russia.

"At very little cost, Russia has embarrassed American democracy, played the media for the
partisans they are, completely discredited the Clinton campaign and name, and created a
year of nonstop hysteria to undermine the Trump administration."

And it is not over yet.
 

prove-all

Senior Member
May 16, 2014
5,977
400
83
63
#93
MARCH 7, 2018 Putin sends the West another deadly message
Another Russian spy poisoned under mysterious circumstances

Poisoned Spy Is a Warning to the West, Courtesy of Putin
Poisoning of Russian Spy Sergei Skripal Reeks of Putin’s Dirty Work | Observer

Another Russian spy who’s taken up residence in the West has been poisoned under
mysterious circumstances. At this hour, he is in intensive care, his fate undetermined.

Worse, his daughter was poisoned with him and likewise is in dire condition. To anyone
acquainted with what [the Kremlin terms wetwork], this all looks depressingly familiar…
-

The 9 Russian Words That Explain KremlinGate- "the term wetwork"
The 9 Russian Words That Explain KremlinGate | Observer
-

Putin's Kremlin employs assassination abroad as state policy in a manner
not seen in Moscow since Stalin.


The Return of Wetwork: KGB Goons Radiated a Former Associate in London
The Return of Wetwork: KGB Goons Radiated a Former Associate in London | Observer

Putin’s assassinations abroad over the last 15 years have been more aggressive than
anything done during the Russian president’s KGB career. Moreover, his views on
turncoats are well known: “Traitors always end badly,” he famously explained.
-

In 2010, the year Skripal was swapped to Britain, Putin chillingly stated, “Traitors will kick
the bucket. Trust me. These people betrayed their friends, their brothers-in-arms. Whatever
they got in exchange for it, those thirty pieces silver they were given, they will choke on them.”

Ex-KGB chief Putin hinted at the way Russia deals with spies | Daily Mail Online
Putin threatened Russian traitors the year Sergei Skripal went to UK - Business Insider


The message being sent is clear: Traitors are never safe, anywhere. Wherever you are hiding,
the Kremlin can find you and kill you (and your family), even living in the west.
 

prove-all

Senior Member
May 16, 2014
5,977
400
83
63
#94
March 7, 2018 Navy, Marine Corps leaders warn that China is 'weaponizing capital'
Navy, Marine Corps leaders warn that China is 'weaponizing capital' | TheHill

Top Navy and Marine Corps officials expressed concern over China’s expanding global
reach and said the superpower was rapidly buying up foreign land to “win without fighting.”

“When it comes to China, the bottom line there is the checkbook,” Navy Secretary
Richard V. Spencer told lawmakers during a House Appropriations defense sub. hearing.

“Not only in the dollars and cents that they are writing to support their military expansion
and their technological work, but what they’re doing around the globe ... weaponizing capital.”

Spencer referred to Beijing’s current funding of a Sri Lankan port project,
a move not done as aid but rather in order to secure it for themselves.

China has said the project is part of its $1.4 trillion "Belt and Road Initiative," which is
meant to bolster trade routes by extending roads outside the country and building up ports.
“Their open checkbook keeps me up at night,” Spencer said.

Marine Corps Commandant Gen. Robert Neller, who also spoke at the hearing,
said the Chinese “are playing the long game.”

“Their concern with human rights is not there, they’ve got big bags of cash. They’re buying
airfields and ports to extend their reach ... they want to win without fighting,” Neller said.
-

Neller also pointed to a Russian threat in all domains, including underseas, in the air and
on the ground. “The Russians, I think, are a little more in your face,” Neller said.

“I don’t think they want to fight us, personally, but I think they want to be able to impose
their will and use intimidation.” Neller added that Russia is using its military involvement
in the Syrian civil war as a “live-fire evaluation” for its systems.

“We pay attention to it, it’s something we watch,” he said.

Spencer, meanwhile, said when it comes to Russia, “one of the things that keep me up
is their underwater capabilities, they never let up on that.”

Russia last week touted new ballistic weapons and drone submarines that President
Vladimir Putin said cannot be stopped and make defense systems "useless.”

It’s unclear, however, whether Moscow and its economy can sustain such a military
buildup for long, Spencer said.
 

prove-all

Senior Member
May 16, 2014
5,977
400
83
63
#95
Xi Jinping: Emperor for Life?

One-Man Rule, President Xi Jinping’s recent power grab will affect the future of China
and the world. The announcement from Beijing on February 25 was a bombshell.

China’s ruling Communist Party has decided to abolish a constitutional clause that limits
presidential service to two terms. The move clears the way for President Xi Jinping—
already China’s most powerful ruler in decades—to rule the country for as long as he desires.
CPC proposes change on Chinese president's term in Constitution - Xinhua | English.news.cn

In early March, the National People’s Congress will decide whether to approve this proposal.
But this is essentially a “rubber stamp” parliament, so there is very little chance that it will not
sign off on the revision. The line to be deleted states that the president and vice president
“shall serve no more than two consecutive terms.”

It is true that even before this revision, Xi would have been able to retain his positions as
leader of the Chinese Communist Party (ccp) and as commander in chief of the People’s
Liberation Army (pla), indefinitely. The constitutional term limits pertain strictly to the
office of president, which is intrinsically less powerful than the two other posts.

But if he had been made to step down as president, while retaining the other two offices,
it would have left room for questions to arise over who was in charge.

What Can Happen in the Absence of Power Limits

The two-term limit was established in 1982 under President Deng Xiaoping. It was put in place,
along with other checks on presidential power, in an effort to prevent China from ever returning
to the era of chaos it had suffered under Deng’s predecessor, Mao Zedong.

Mao founded the People’s Republic of China in 1949. He ruled the nation with almost god-like
status for nearly 3 decades. Tens of millions of Chinese people died as a result of his disastrous
leadership, and the only force that brought an end to his rule was his death in 1976 at age 82.

The Tyrant Mao, as Told by His Doctor
https://www.nytimes.com/1994/10/02/world/the-tyrant-mao-as-told-by-his-doctor.html?pagewanted=all

He was accountable to no one and scornful of all advice. The combination of his ruthlessness and
incompetence made his rule incomparably tragic. Mao’s name is etched in history as the man re-
sponsible for the deaths of more people than any other individual. “It ranks alongside the gulags
and the Holocaust as one of the three greatest events of the 20th century,” said historian Frank
Dikötter. “It was like [the Cambodian com dictator] Pol Pot’s genocide multiplied 20 times over.”

In light of this history, the people of China should be alarmed to see the checks on the president’s
power being removed. But there are signs that it may be too late for the people of China to reverse
the nation’s lurch toward authoritarianism.
-

Within China, the critics of Xi’s power grab do not appear to be numerous. And this heavy-handed
Internet censorship may be enough to keep the criticism from spreading. But if it persists, the
government could take things a step further.

China’s propaganda machine on overdrive to counter any criticism.
https://chinadigitaltimes.net/2018/02/sensitive-words-emperor-xi-jinping-ascend-throne/

f the momentum continues to build and netizens continue to look for other ways to express their
displeasure with Xi, we could reach a critical point where the authorities might have to consider
‘turning off’ the Internet, however they might do that,” said Charlie Smith, the alias of the cofounder
of GreatFire.org, an organization that studies Chinese censorship.

And there is little reason to doubt that Xi would resort to such an extreme measure. Even before
this latest power grab, Xi had little patience for disagreement, and he often countered it with force.

During his first five years, instead of maintaining the “first among equals” style of leadership used by
his recent predecessors, he adopted a strongman approach. He bypassed State Council authorities by
forming policymaking party groups, many of which he chairs himself.

He took personal control of writing policy on everything from China’s economy and international
relations to its environmental strategies and Internet regulations. He implemented painful military
reforms that positioned him as unchallenged commander in chief of the enormous pla.

Xi also waged an anticorruption campaign resulting in the punishment or imprisonment of a breath-
taking 1.5 million ccp members, including numerous former political rivals and senior military officials.

This would be equivalent to the entire population of San Diego suddenly being fired from important
government positions and, in many cases, incarcerated.

These moves placed Xi at the center of what Time’s Hannah Beech called “a personality cult not
seen in the People’s Republic since the days when frenzied Red Guards cheered Chairman Mao’s
launch of the Cultural Revolution” (March 31, 2016).
-

Xi Jinping: Emperor for Life? China’s Great Leap Toward One-Man Rule Should Alarm Us All
https://www.thetrumpet.com/16989-chinas-great-leap-toward-one-man-rule-should-alarm-us-all
https://www.thetrumpet.com/16542-xi-jinping-emperor-for-life

There is clear recognition in the highest echelons of Chinese leadership that, in order to attain
superpower status, China’s 1.4 billion people need a ruler whose hands are not bound by red tape
 
Last edited:

prove-all

Senior Member
May 16, 2014
5,977
400
83
63
#96
March 11, 2018 Xi cleared to rule indefinitely as China officially scraps term limits

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...63893265565_story.html?utm_term=.11fd14f55431
https://www.bing.com/news/search?q=China+One-man+Rule&qpvt=china+One-Man+Rule&FORM=EWRE



BEIJING — China’s National People’s Congress on Sunday approved a plan to abolish
presidential term limits, making it possible for President Xi Jinping to stay in power
indefinitely and cementing a dramatic shift in Chinese politics.
 
Last edited:

prove-all

Senior Member
May 16, 2014
5,977
400
83
63
#97
The Western world needs to stand united.
Yes The Western world needs to stand united more then ever.


"The United States is more united than it has ever been. The nation is filled with optimism and
righteousness. God is on our side. We can conquer any obstacle with American ingenuity and
hard work—because we’re America, and that’s what Americans do".


That’s a brief summary of what U.S. President Donald Trump said during his State of the
Union address. And as an American, we want to agree with him. But America is in serious
trouble. Only God can fix our problems and make America great again.

We can just look at America’s fierce political division compared to what the bible says.

But He, knowing their thoughts, said to them: “Every kingdom divided against itself
is brought to desolation, and a house divided against a house falls. - Luke 11:17, Mark 3:25

The looming economic crisis, racial tensions, endemic social upheaval and the multiple
billion-dollar weather-related disasters that happened just last year. These are not signs
of a healthy, prosperous nation! America is sharply divided, and it has become more
divided since President Trump took office.
-

The people will be oppressed, Every one by another and every one by his neighbor;
The child will be insolent toward the elder, And the base toward the honorable.”

As for My people, children are their oppressors, And women rule over them.
O My people! Those who lead you cause you to err, And destroy the way of your paths.”

That sounds just like what America is becoming today.
-

We used to say in schools "The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag: "I pledge allegiance
to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands,

one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."


Now they teach 3rd graders in school to question there gender idenity, and
the theory that we evolved from slim ingraned in there minds, to name a few.


I believe God would heal our land, if we turn from our wicked ways, but we will not.


If My people who are called by My name will humble themselves,
and pray and seek My face, and turn from their wicked ways,

then I will hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin and heal their land.
 
Last edited:

prove-all

Senior Member
May 16, 2014
5,977
400
83
63
#98
well, they do 'own' us...
-Yes that is a shame, Americans have a spending problem, the whole country is addicted to dept.
Here are more of the highlights from President Trump’s State of the Union address. He said:

Tonight, I’m calling on Congress to produce a bill that generates at least $1.5 trillion for the
new infrastructure investment that our country so desperately needs. … We will build gleaming
new roads, bridges, highways, railways and waterways all across our land. And we will do it with
American heart, American hands and American grit.

-How do we pay for it all? Our government is already trillions upon trillions of dollars in debt,
yet we’re still shelling out money. President Trump continued:

The first pillar of our framework generously offers a path to citizenship for 1.8 million illegal
immigrants who were brought here by their parents at a young age. That covers almost three
times more people than the previous administration covered.

-In this section of the speech, President Trump capitulated to the Democrats. He is going to let
the Dreamers stay in the country—1.8 million of them. As he even said, that is three times as
many immigrants as the Obama administration let in. That concession is right out of the liberal
playbook—but not even that will placate the anti-Trump Democrats. And devided they stand.
-

The rich rules over the poor, And the borrower is servant to the lender.

For the Lord your God will bless you just as He promised you; you shall lend to many nations,
but you shall not borrow; you shall reign over many nations, but they shall not reign over you.

The Lord will open to you His good treasure, the heavens, to give the rain to your land in its season,
and to bless all the work of your hand. You shall lend to many nations, but you shall not borrow.

-Our leaders have a serious spending problem, they should have taken Gods advice in the bible.
Our money says "in God we trust" but do the vast Americans trust or even know God today?

A good man leaves an inheritance to his children’s children,
But the wealth of the sinner is stored up for the righteous.
-

We have left nothing but a bill to our children, and it keeps getting bigger all the time.
What would happen if China just up and [stopped buying our treasury bonds] ?
 
Last edited:

prove-all

Senior Member
May 16, 2014
5,977
400
83
63
#99
February 27, 2018 The Real Russian Disaster
https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/02/russia-spreading-chaos-fooling-media-exposing-fbi/

"From 2009 to 2015, in one of the most remarkable and Machiavellian efforts in recent
strategic history, Putin almost single-handedly parlayed a deserved losing hand into a
winning one. He pulled this off by flattering, manipulating, threatening, and outsmarting
an inept and politically obsessed Obama administration."

Under the Obama presidency and the tenures of Secretaries of State Hillary Clinton and
John Kerry, Russia made astounding strategic gains — given its intrinsic economic, social,
and military weaknesses. The Obama reaction was usually incoherent (Putin was caricatured
as a “bored kid in the back of the classroom” or as captive of a macho shtick).

After each aggressive Russian act, the administration lectured that “it is not in Russia’s
in-terest to . . .” — as if Obama knew better than a thuggish Putin what was best for
autocratic Russia.

"At very little cost, Russia has embarrassed American democracy, played the media for the
partisans they are, completely discredited the Clinton campaign and name, and created a
year of nonstop hysteria to undermine the Trump administration."

And it is not over yet.
 

prove-all

Senior Member
May 16, 2014
5,977
400
83
63
What Will Putin Do With Six More Years

Vladimir Putin surprised no one by securing another term as Russia’s president.
Putin has six more years at the helm of the world’s largest country and second-most
powerful military. And the 144 million people of the nation largely support his
ongoing dominance of Russia.

Vyacheslav Volodin, the speaker of the Russian parliament, summarized
this common sentiment in 2014 by saying, “If there is Putin, there is Russia.
If there is no Putin, there is no Russia.”

When the Soviet Union collapsed, the West rejoiced, proclaiming it a victory for liberty,
a triumph for democracy, and evidence of the supremacy of capitalism over socialism.

But Putin does not view this as a positive event, because it decimated Moscow’s
power in the world. He said in 2005, “[T]he demise of the Soviet Union was the
greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the century.”

Vladimir Putin wishes the Soviet Union never fell. He wishes it were still here today.
And he has been working to restore Russian power to its Soviet levels.

When Putin became president, Russia was in chaos. It was threatened internally
and externally. But Putin aggressively consolidated the country socially, politically,
militarily and economically.

More recently, falling oil prices and Western sanctions have pounded the value
of the ruble, and living standards have declined to a degree. Yet because of Putin’s
record of lifting millions from poverty and restoring Moscow’s international re-
levance, the Russian people remain fiercely loyal to him.

Instead of seeing him as the cause of the current troubles,
they continue to view him as the solution.
-

At the end of Putin’s second presidential term in 2008, he faced a problem:
The Russian Constitution says, “One person may not hold the position of
Russian president for more than two terms in a row.” So Putin left the
presidency—but only in the letter of the law, not the spirit. Bypassing Law

He stepped aside to become prime minister, handing the presidency to his loyal
protégé, Dmitry Medvedev. But throughout Medvedev’s term, Putin remained
in charge. He remained Russia’s ruler in all but official title, with Medvedev
serving essentially as his puppet.

In August 2008, Russian forces invaded the former Soviet republic of Georgia,
easily conquering all resistance. Moscow assumed control of 20 percent of
Georgia’s territory, and it remains in control to this day.

In 2012, Putin returned to the presidency with a newly extended six-year
presidential term. His rule over Russia was official once again.

March of 2014, Russian forces stealthily invaded Ukraine’s Crimean Peninsula
and annexed it to Mother Russia. Crimea is viewed within Russia as the nation’s
greatest victory in decades, and as a righting of historical wrongs. To reinforce
this message, this year’s presidential election was held on the fourth anniversary
of the takeover.

Since seizing Crimea, Putin has continued to destabilize eastern Ukraine, sending
Russian forces to help pro-Russian rebels in a protracted conflict that has claimed
10,000 lives so far, with more deaths almost every day.

He has forcefully prevented Georgia, Ukraine and other former Soviet countries
from strengthening their relationships with Europe.

He pushed the U.S. out of his backyard in 2013 by pressuring Kyrgyzstan to evict
American forces from Manas Air Base, the U.S.’s last remaining military base
in Central Asia.

Meanwhile, beyond the Soviet regions, Russia has helped the murderous regimes
of Syrian President Bashar Assad and North Korean tyrant Kim Jong-un to retain
power. And Putin has been instrumental in letting Iran continue its treacherous
pursuit of nuclear weapons.

Moscow now spends a higher percentage of its gross domestic product
on its military than does America. The efforts have paid massive dividends.

“The Russian military is now better equipped and more capable of conducting modern
combat operations than at any point since the fall of the Soviet Union, which has
caught analysts in the West by surprise,” wrote the Strategist’s Mitchell Yates in 2016.

And don’t forget: Russia has a vast nuclear arsenal, larger by number even than
that of the United States. It has publicly stated that nuclear weapons remain vital
to its defense strategy and that in certain circumstances it might launch preemptive
nuclear strikes to defend its interests.

Eliminating Internal Enemies

Throughout all his years of working to restore Russia’s power on the global stage,
Putin has worked ruthlessly to quash all opposition from fellow Russians.

He has crippled Russia’s democracy, enfeebled its parliament, and seized control
of some of Russia’s most profitable firms. Putin’s internal wars have slaughtered
more than 150,000 Russians in the Islamic region of Chechnya.

With kgb-style methods, he has crushed or silenced all forms of independent
journalism and turned the Russian media into a personal propaganda machine.

Evidence suggests that he has murdered more than 130 journalists inside Russia and
numerous dissenting Russians exiled in foreign nations, such as the United Kingdom.
A list from human-rights group Memorial shows that 142 people are currently in
Russian prisons for their political or religious beliefs. Quartz wrote, “In this, Putin’s
Russia is continuing Tsarist and Soviet traditions: Political dissenters are still being
sent to Siberia or to work camps as in Stalinist days.”
https://memohrc.org/ru/pzk-list

Russia’s Constitution still states that the president may serve no more than two
consecutive terms, meaning Putin would be obligated to step down in 2024. But
with such a tight grip on the levels of power, he could easily amend the Constitution,
orchestrate another rendition of the “Medvedev shuffle,” or devise some other