-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
okay, so here's a question.
when a dress is flesh-colored, is it more "revealing" or "scandalous" than the same kind/style of dress in another fabrication?
this is something i'm quite curious what you guys think, since i've recently had a debate with a friend about this.
see, one thing many people don't know (mostly men) is that dresses that are more in that hue are often lined, so even though you think you're seeing someone's "flesh" they're actually seeing the nude liner, which is obscuring what is behind it.
for reference, i'm not talking about the above dress in the previous specifically, because it is pretty scant.
but what about, say a dress such as this, below?
is it more "immodest" BECAUSE of its flesh/nude coloration? because that dress below, would pretty much blend into my skin--without much line of demarcation. please note, that this dress is 100% lined, so there would be no actual skin seen, but it might APPEAR that way because of the open lace design.
okay, so here's a question.
when a dress is flesh-colored, is it more "revealing" or "scandalous" than the same kind/style of dress in another fabrication?
this is something i'm quite curious what you guys think, since i've recently had a debate with a friend about this.
see, one thing many people don't know (mostly men) is that dresses that are more in that hue are often lined, so even though you think you're seeing someone's "flesh" they're actually seeing the nude liner, which is obscuring what is behind it.
for reference, i'm not talking about the above dress in the previous specifically, because it is pretty scant.
but what about, say a dress such as this, below?
is it more "immodest" BECAUSE of its flesh/nude coloration? because that dress below, would pretty much blend into my skin--without much line of demarcation. please note, that this dress is 100% lined, so there would be no actual skin seen, but it might APPEAR that way because of the open lace design.
I know exactly what you're talking about. When I was in band our color guard uniforms looked ridiculoously low cut, I mean like down to the waist! But upon close inspection you see that's its just a flesh-colored fabric that starts at their neck. Its a good thing for them too because we had to perform in 40 degree weather. Ever try to play drums with frozen fingers?
