the (old) mosaic covenant with it's laws and regulations is abolished. do you agree?
It says that the Old Covenant is abolished, seeing that the Christ brought in a New Covenant. But, as to the Law, specifically, the moral Laws of God, has Christ abolished the morals of God? Nay. But, He says that the one who teaches against them are least in the Kingdom from the Heavens. Even the Christian is to walk before God pleasingly, otherwise, who are we to warn against a lascivious gospel? Surely, we have not been liberated to be immoral. Otherwise, God's judgment would not be just. This is quite clear.
it's quite clear. the jews don't like this, and is one reason they reject Christ. it's the same reason certain individuals wrench the scriptures and attempt to keep what is obsolete alive for the forgiven in Christ.
If you are saying that some are saying that we as Christians are to place ourselves under the Old Covenant as a covenant between us and God, then they who do, have Christ to no prevail. But, that does not negate that God is a God of morals and in order for us to walk in faith, we must do so faithfully, not living according to the dictates of the flesh, but according to the dictates of the Spirit who speaks God's Law which are written upon our hearts.
what is the heart of the new covenant? sins forgotten forever, no yearly reminder involving earthly priests and animal blood (covering).
Neither you nor I would teach a lascivious gospel, knowing that such is teaching one to live immorally without penalty. Seeing that Scripture says that one has an appeasing and perpetual sacrifice before God through Christ, are we Christians free to abuse that covering or does it not also say that we are to remain faithful to the One leading until the end? Can we be as a fallen Hebrew and still make it to His Rest, although it was their unhearkening heart which caused them to fall?
Hebrews 8
12 For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness, and their sins and their iniquities will I remember no more.
13 In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away.
True, He will not record our sins, so as to damn us by such. But, since we Christians are rewarded according to our Spiritual fruits and are not rewarded according to those acts which are burnt by the Fire, then there has to be some remembrance of our deeds in order for us to be or not to be rewarded accordingly. If there is a remembrance, then there also must be some gauge by which He judges. And that gauge is by those moralistic Laws He gave us, those Laws which are satisfied by love.
But, then again, how long can a Christian resist the correction of the Spirit, the testifying of our heart, and our nagging conscious which all say that God's Law must be followed and still think he is being led by the Spirit?
yet you have men and women who love their awful paper tiger mosaic religious postering so much they're trying to say the new covenant is just a better old one.
To this part I agree with you, circumcision (that which we do to enter into a Covenant with God) is now spiritual. If we try to enter a Covenant with God with the flesh, then Christ is no prevail to the fleshly one, seeing that the flesh speaks to the things of the flesh and the Spirit to the things of the spirit. A soul is either lead by its flesh or by its spirit.