Hizikyah said:
Paul should be understood as being filtered through Messiah,
not Messiah filtered through Paul,
This principle is problematic.
Jesus lived and taught under the OT.
He presented nowhere near the full teaching of his new order (Heb 9:10)
in his new covenant (Lk 22:20), for he had not yet died, and
there was yet no basis for the full gospel of his atoning death (Ro 3:25).
He personally gave massive new revelation of the full gospel to Paul, which we find in Paul's writings,
which are the
words spoken by the Son in these last days (Heb 1:1-2) in the NT writers.
Jesus' first NT revelation (the gospels) is not adequately understood apart from
his second NT revelation which more fully develops it through the NT writers.
To set Jesus' revelation through the NT writers in the gospels against
Jesus' revelation through the NT writers in the epistles is heresy.
Jesus does not contradict himself in the gospels and the epistles.
If one does not
understand the gospels and epistles in harmony,
then one does not correctly understand the NT.
Setting the Scriptures against themselves is the root of the problem here.