Sorry, I'm a bit confused. Just want to make sure we're on the same page before I go digging through the website to see what he says about it.
Are you asking about Daniel 11 being connected to Matthew 24:3?
Or are you asking about the chronological nature of Matthew 24:3 compared to Revelation?
If it's the latter, he talks about that on this page:
http://daniel11truth.com/matthew-24-explained.htm
( you can just read the text I copied below: )
In a nut shell, Matthew 24 must match Revelation, because end times can only have one correct timeline. It was natural to think that Mathew 24 was chronological, and most people took it that way, throughout history, because they didn’t understand the Seals and Revelation’s timeline. However, now that the correct interpretation of the Seals has been revealed, which makes Revelation straight-forward and logical, it’s obvious that the same two groups in Revelation 7 are also in Matthew 24. The 144,000 Jews stay on earth, and get martyred in Rev. 14, but the Christians are ‘gathered’ immediately to heaven.
In the following illustration and graph, I’ve identified the three sections of the most disputed passage of Matthew 24. Clearly, verse 29 is talking about the severe distress caused by the abomination and rapture in section 1, not the extended distress, when the false prophet arrives, described in Revelation 13 (post-rapture).
Section 3 takes place simultaneously with section 2, but at the beginning, since section 3 is much shorter. When you think about it, Matthew had to write it in that order because it would have sounded strange to talk about a “gathering” by angels and then an extended distress on earth. However, that’s exactly what Revelation does with the two groups in chapter 7. Naturally, Jesus couldn’t explain as many details as Revelation does, to the disciples, but doesn’t it make sense to use the more detailed version of end times (Revelation) to interpret the vaguer (Mathew) instead of the other way around? It’s just a matter of understanding Revelation but since I show that the 1st 5 Seals are in the past (last 2000-years), Revelation is simple and straight-forward.
(See Seals page for more details) On the other hand, everyone who takes Matthew 24 to be sequential, in modern times, folds and over-laps Revelation to fit. That introduces contradictions and inevitably leaves some things out, which is forbidden in Rev. 22:19. Therefore, anyone who teaches Revelation should know that but they still do it and fail to tell unsuspecting followers.
Yet, it should be common sense not to change God’s prophecy. Jesus said, “If a blind man leads a blind man, both will fall into a pit.” Therefore, don’t be deceived by post-tribs who twist Revelation but insist on Matt. 24 being chronological. After all, the rest of Matt. 24 (after verse 31) isn’t chronological so why do verses 29-31 have to be chronological? The answer is: “They don’t.”