Not an odd sect. Baptist. ( all my life )
As I said before, I was taught the pre-trib deception while growing up. However, through personal Bible Study, I discovered the truth and discerned the error...
well all sects are odd in the sense that they're not Scriptural, not the New Testament pattern.
But, so, it wasn't them who taught you your reading of Daniel............it is purely your idea? I mean it occurred to you in reading Daniel 9 alone, before you knew anyone else shared it? Likewise this tribulation/wrath distinction stuff?
I don't believe Jesus will touch the earth either,
How bizarre. Is this odd teaching from the people who create this site? Is it from Britain or Australia?
I never heard this oddness until now, til I visited here.
Degraded Christianity for long has had the "Heaven" preoccupation and fantasy. So I guess this "Jesus doesn't touch the earth" stuff is simply a logical extension of the fantasy. Trying to spell it out or justify it in the Bible.
Is it Arian?
Because (no offence) contrary to such nonsense, the Bible:
"He was lifted up and a cloud took Him away from their sight...This Jesus who has been taken up from you into heaven, will come in the same way as you beheld Him going into heaven. Then they returned to Jerusalem from the Mount called Olivet"
Acts 1:9-12.
"Jehovah will go forth and fight against those nations...And His feet will stand in that day on the Mount of Olives..."
Zechariah 14:3-4.
when He comes He will meet them in the air, the saved will Go to His Father's house (God the father), the raised and the raptured together.
To the contrary, He (and His lovers) already are His Father's house.
"If anyone loves Me, he will keep My word, and My Father will love him, and We will come to him and make an abode with him"
John 14:23.
"That Christ may make His home in your hearts through faith" Eph 3:17.
"The house of God which is the church of the living God, the pillar and base of the truth" 1 Tim 3:15.
We don't go anywhere to be His house. Rather, He and His Father (and His Spirit) come into us. He went......to and through death and resurrection to accomplish this. Jn 14:2---17:26; 18:1--20:22.
i have studied Daniel 9 and the 70 week prophesy and i can't see how you can just split it up and move the last week into the future. There is no verse given to prove this and the last week was perfectly fulfilled.
The verses given to prove this are Daniel 9:26-27.
After the 62 weeks Messiah will be cut off and will have nothing; and the people of the prince who will come will destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end will be with a flood, and even to the end there will be war; desolations are determined.
And he [the prince whose people came] will make a firm covenant with the many for one week...
The people of the prince who will come destroy the city happens after the end of the 62 weeks (after Messiah was crucified). And yet the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple is not part of the following, final, week. It's not part of the first 69 (7+62) weeks, because it does not refer to Messiah Himself. It did not happen before Messiah was crucified. In fact, Messiah prophesied it would happen....in the future, Mt 24:1-2.
He answered and said to them, Do you not see all these things? Truly I say to you, There shall by no means be left here a stone upon a stone, which shall not be thrown down.
Dan 9:27 goes on,
And he [not Messiah the Prince] will make a firm covenant with the many for one week.
There is the last week. There is a gap of unknown (at present) duration in time between the end of the 69th week---Messiah's crucifixion---and the Roman prince (Antichrist in this case, as in the rest of Daniel's end-times prophecies) making a "firm covenant with the many for one week." A covenant set to last for one week (7 years), which of course it does not. Based on the rest of verse 27.
History too, along with the Bible, verifies this gap happened.........and still is happening