“When you call upon the Lord to save you it is that you trust in Him to come to your aid. Inherent in your calling is the essential faith that He can and will save you. So, in essence, to call on the name of the Lord unto salvation is to trust in Him to save you.” mailmandan
Amen! Calling on the name of the Lord here signifies an exercise of faith in Christ, not an additional requirement to become saved after faith.
Response: And now why do you delay? Arise, and be baptized, and wash away your sins, calling on His name. (Acts 22: 16) When Paul was baptized his sins were washed away and he called upon His name. Clearly, baptism, a work of faith, preceded the washing away of his sins (salvation from his sins). In addition he was calling on the name of the Lord. For what?
The first question that must be answered is "when was Paul saved?" Paul tells that he did not receive or hear the Gospel from Ananias, but rather he heard it directly from Christ. Galatians 1:11-12 says, "For I would have you know, brethren, that the gospel which was preached by me is not according to man.
For I neither received it from man, nor was I taught it, but I received it through a revelation of Jesus Christ." Paul had repented (Acts 9:6). "Lord, what will you have me to do?" Repentance means a "change of mind," and is wrought by the grace of God. Paul once persecuted the Lord (Acts 9:5), but is now ready to serve Him. Paul had believed. He had Christ as his Lord (Acts 9:6). The Bible tells us that "no man can say that Jesus is Lord except "by" the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 12:3). Paul had, by the work of the Holy Spirit, submitted to Christ as Lord. Paul prayed (Acts 9:11). "Behold, he is praying," the Lord said to Ananias. This indicates that Paul's praying was pleasing to God. People in the church of Christ teach that God does not hear an unsaved man's prayer, quoting in this regard John 9:31 - "We know that God does not listen to sinners. He listens to the godly man who does his will." Well, Paul was a worshipper of God, calling Christ "Lord" and ready to serve Him. All of these things characterized Paul
before he was baptized. So, Paul heard and believed in Christ prior to getting water baptized. Paul had already believed in Christ when Ananias came to pray for him to receive his sight (Acts 9:17). It also should be noted that Paul at the time when Ananias prayed for him to receive his sight, he was
filled with the Holy Spirit (Acts 9:17)--this was
before he was water baptized (Acts 9:18). Verse 17 connects his being filled with the Spirit with the receiving of his sight. We know that he received his sight
prior to his water baptism. It is also interesting that when Paul recounted this event again later in Acts (Acts 26:12-18), he did not mention Ananias or what Ananias said to him at all. Verse 18 again would confirm the idea that Paul received Christ as Savior on the road to Damascus since here Christ is telling Paul he will be a messenger for Him concerning forgiveness of sins for Gentiles as they have faith in Him. It would seem unlikely that Christ would commission Paul if Paul had not yet believed in Him and was not saved.
Jamison, Fausset, and Brown Commentary makes note of the importance of the Greek in Ananias' statement. When Ananias tells Paul to "arise, be baptized, wash away your sins, calling on the name of the Lord," the tense of the last command is literally "having called" (aorist middle participle). "Calling on [epikalesamenos] --- 'having (that is, after having) called on,' referring the confession of Christ which preceded baptism." [Jamison, Fausset, and Brown Commentary, vol. 3 pg. 160]. Kenneth Wuest picks up on this Greek nuance and translates the verse as follows: "And now, why are you delaying? Having arisen, be baptized and wash away your sins, having previously called upon His Name." (Acts 22:16, Wuest's Expanded NT). Scripture must harmonize with other scripture. As with any single verse or passage, we discern what it teaches by first filtering it through what we know the Bible teaches on the subject at hand. In the case of baptism and salvation, the Bible is clear that salvation is by grace through faith in Jesus Christ, not by works of any kind, including baptism (Ephesians 2:8-9; Titus 3:5; 2 Timothy 1:9). So, any interpretation which comes to the conclusion that baptism, or any other work which follows faith, is necessary for salvation, is a faulty interpretation. Faith is not baptism and faith precedes baptism and we are saved through faith. It's just that simple.
And corresponding to that, baptism now saves you---not the removal of dirt from the flesh, but an appeal to God for a good conscience--- (1Peter 3: 21) Clearly, when we are baptized, we are asking God to give us a good conscience, the forgiveness of our sins. How? When we obey Christ, we are sprinkled with his blood. (! Pet. 1: 2)
The genitive in the Greek text is correctly translated as the pledge of a good conscience, not for a good conscience. It is a
pledge made from a good conscience. Baptism is a pledge to God made from a good conscience. It is that aspect (what is signified, “the answer of a good conscience toward God”) rather than the external rite (the sign, the application of water) that saves. The symbol and the reality are closely related and the symbol is sometimes used to refer to the reality and that seems to be what is confusing you. A FLOOD OF CONFUSION. By saying,
"not the removal of dirt from the flesh, but an appeal to God for a good conscience - through the resurrection of Jesus Christ, Peter guards against saving power to the physical ceremony itself. So in 1 Peter 3:21; it's not the water itself that saves us, but the "appeal-to-God-for-good-conscience". Just as the eight people in the ark were "saved THROUGH water" as they were IN THE ARK. They were not literally saved "by" the water. Hebrews 11:7 is clear on this point (..built an
ARK for the
SAVING of his household). NOTE: The context reveals that ONLY the righteous (Noah and his family) were DRY and therefore SAFE. In contrast, ONLY THE WICKED IN NOAH'S DAY CAME IN CONTACT WITH THE WATER AND THEY ALL PERISHED.
As our bodies are washed with pure water, our hearts our sprinkled clean from an evil conscience. (Heb. 10: 22) Our conscience is cleansed from dead works by the blood of Christ. (Heb. 9: 14)
Having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience, an evident allusion to the sprinkling of blood in the old tabernacle (Hebrews 9:18-22) and the shedding of Christ's blood for the cleansing of our consciences (Hebrews 10:1-4). 1 Peter 1:2 says for "the sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ." Our bodies washed with pure water, old verb to bathe, to wash. See Ephesians 5:26; Titus 3:5 for the use of loutron. Strong's Greek Concordance with Vine's Number 3067 - (Loutron) "a bath, a laver" is used
*metaphorically of the Word of God, as the instrument of spiritual cleansing,* Ephesians 5:26; and Titus 3:5, of the "washing of regeneration" which water baptism
symbolizes and pictures. Water can only cleanse the flesh
outwardly; it does not cleanse the heart from sin -
"not the removal of the filth of the flesh" but "the answer of a good conscience toward God."
It's the blood of Christ that has the power to remove sins, not water. Now if you can only come to understand that our sins are forgiven when we
BELIEVE (Acts 10:43; Romans 3:24-26)
BEFORE we are water baptized. The Bible teaches that we are
saved through faith (Ephesians 2:8) and
justified by faith (Romans 5:1). People who are saved and justified are not lost and still in need of having their sins literally washed away. Also, faith
precedes water baptism. Since we are saved and justified at the moment of faith, then we don't need to comply with any further conditions/works to have our sins forgiven and literally washed away. *In Acts 10:43 we see that whosoever
BELIEVES IN HIM shall receive
REMISSION OF SINS. *What happened to baptism? It's not mentioned until verse 47 -
"Can anyone forbid water, that these should not be baptized who have received the Holy Spirit just as we have?" These Gentiles had already believed, received the Holy Spirit (also see Acts 11:17), spoke in tongues and were saved
BEFORE water baptism. *In Romans 3:24-26, we see that: Being
justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus: Whom God hath set forth to be a
propitiation THROUGH FAITH IN HIS BLOOD, to declare His righteousness for the
REMISSION OF SINS that are past, through the forbearance of God; To declare, I say, at this time His righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier of him which
BELIEVES IN JESUS. *What happened to baptism?
Our work of faith, baptism, perfects our faith making it acceptable to God. (James 2: 22)
So you admit that baptism is a "work" done out of and after faith is established. We are saved through faith, not works (Ephesians 2:8,9). In James 2:21, notice closely that James
does not say that Abraham's work of offering up Isaac resulted in God's accounting Abraham as righteous. The accounting of Abraham's faith as righteousness was made in Genesis 15:6,
many years before his work of offering up Isaac recorded in Genesis 22. The work of Abraham did not have some kind of intrinsic merit to save his soul, but it
proved or manifested the genuineness of his faith. He was "shown to be righteous." This is the sense in which Abraham was justified by works. James is not saying that Abraham was not saved by works. James is not using the word "justified" here to mean "accounted as righteous" but is "shown to be righteous." James is discussing the
proof of faith
(says-claims to have faith but has no works/I will show you my faith by my works), not the initial act of being accounted as righteous with God (Romans 4:2-3). Works bear out the justification that already came by faith. Also, in James 2:22, Faith made perfect or complete by works means bring to maturity, carry to the end, to complete like love in 1 John 4:18.
It doesn't mean he was finally saved based on his works. When Abraham performed the good work in Genesis 22; he fulfilled the expectations created by the pronouncement of his faith in Genesis 15:6.
So, in essence, to call on the name of the Lord unto salvation is to be baptized in the name of Christ.
That's false. Again, Jamison, Fausset, and Brown Commentary makes note of the importance of the Greek in Ananias' statement. When Ananias tells Paul to "arise, be baptized, wash away your sins, calling on the name of the Lord," the tense of the last command is literally "having called" (aorist middle participle). "Calling on [epikalesamenos] --- 'having (that is, after having) called on,' referring the confession of Christ which preceded baptism." [Jamison, Fausset, and Brown Commentary, vol. 3 pg. 160]. Kenneth Wuest picks up on this Greek nuance and translates the verse as follows: "And now, why are you delaying? Having arisen, be baptized and wash away your sins, having previously called upon His Name." (Acts 22:16, Wuest's Expanded NT).
Is calling on the name of the Lord unto salvation, trusting in Him to save you?
Yes because when you call upon the Lord to save you it is that you trust in Him to come to your aid. Why would someone call upon the name of the Lord to save them if they did not believe He could save them?
No, because we read in Rom. 10: 14 that one cannot call on the name of the Lord until we believe. How can we call on God whom we have not believed? Calling on the name of the Lord follows faith.
The Bible says that we are saved through faith, yet you say that we are not saved through faith but by works that we accomplish after faith. We must believe "mental assent" in the person and historical facts about Jesus before we can call upon the name of the Lord and believe (trust, rely) in Him for salvation, believe the gospel/saving belief. "Mental assent" belief (Romans 10:14) precedes (belief, trust, reliance) saving belief (Romans 1:16). For I am not ashamed of the
gospel of Christ for it is the
power of God unto salvation to everyone who
BELIEVES.. Are you trying to tell me that Paul was wrong here and we are still lost when we believe the gospel and are actually saved by works that we accomplish "after" we believe the gospel?
You left some questions unanswered from my last post:
If water baptism is absolutely required for salvation, then why did Jesus not mention it in the following verses? (3:15,16,18; 5:24; 6:29,40,47; 11:25,26). What is the ONE requirement that Jesus mentions 9 different times in each of these complete statements? What happened to baptism?
Who is it that perseveres under trial and loves the Lord? Believers or unbelievers? Do you attend the church of Christ?
Please prayerfully consider the truth and God bless.