W
Perhaps you'd be interested in what Winston Churchill said just before Great Britain was forced into war with Germany.
The issue of personal liberty must be defended at all cost, up to the point that defending them threatens our ultimate freedoms, and the very existence of our nation. That was what Churchill believe Great Britain faced in 1939, and it is what we are facing in the United States in 2015.
While I admire Rand Paul's vehement defenses of the First and Fourth Amendments (he never mentioned the Second in the debate, and it is irrelevant to the question) he is dead wrong in attempting to prevent all DHS access to certain records which, if you are not a terrorist, gives you no concern.
The issue of personal liberty must be defended at all cost, up to the point that defending them threatens our ultimate freedoms, and the very existence of our nation. That was what Churchill believe Great Britain faced in 1939, and it is what we are facing in the United States in 2015.
While I admire Rand Paul's vehement defenses of the First and Fourth Amendments (he never mentioned the Second in the debate, and it is irrelevant to the question) he is dead wrong in attempting to prevent all DHS access to certain records which, if you are not a terrorist, gives you no concern.
I agree, Dr. Carson is a Christ-Follower.
I am not keen on the Churchill example as a justification for infringing upon Constitutional rights from a moral/ethical, at-face-value perspective. However, I am also not qualified to make an educated opinion on the matter of Counter-terrorism as it relates to National Security.
Last edited: