Got to say, missing the difference to faith counted as righteousness and righteousness of Jesus counting his sacrifice as worthy for all. Maybe this distinction is too much for some, clearly that is true.
If one accepts Jesus's righteousness is given as a gift to us, then it does not matter what we do. If you hold that once you have faith you are counted as perfect before God, then you can enter heaven with no change.
The trouble with certain ways of discussing such an issue, just making fun is not an answer. I have never held to imputed righteousness to us, because people do not teach it from scripture, it only seems to come up when talking calvanism.
We were talking about sin before, but all sin was forgiven through the cross, so righteousness was not an issue at all.
I find that interesting that those believers did not think imputed righteousness was relevant. So I wonder who actually holds to this doctrine and why?
If one accepts Jesus's righteousness is given as a gift to us, then it does not matter what we do. If you hold that once you have faith you are counted as perfect before God, then you can enter heaven with no change.
The trouble with certain ways of discussing such an issue, just making fun is not an answer. I have never held to imputed righteousness to us, because people do not teach it from scripture, it only seems to come up when talking calvanism.
We were talking about sin before, but all sin was forgiven through the cross, so righteousness was not an issue at all.
I find that interesting that those believers did not think imputed righteousness was relevant. So I wonder who actually holds to this doctrine and why?