Pros and Cons Speaking in Tongues

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
U

UnderGrace

Guest
Roger, here's the deal:

If you don't want to speak in tongues, you don't have to. Paul said he wished we all would, but he also acknowledged that not all would. In choosing to not speak in tongues, you are ok.

Paul told us to not forbid others from speaking in tongues. In this you are NOT ok.

Jesus told us that those who ascribe genuine works of the Holy Spirit to satan are eternally condemned. In this you are in GRAVE DANGER.

Just a word to the wise, my friend.

Jesus told us that those who ascribe genuine works of the Holy Spirit to satan are eternally condemned
Oh really, where is that?
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
It appears there are human languages and angelic languages. There have been literally thousands of different languages and dialects throughout the history of man - who knows anything about angelic languages? People can be speaking any number of these languages through the Holy Spirit within them.

If we try to figure this out with our natural reasoning - this will be all foolishness to us and our natural minds - we cannot interpret the scriptures using our natural reasoning - it must be revealed by the Holy Spirit alone.

1 Corinthians 13:1 (KJV)
[SUP]1 [/SUP]
Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal.

Paul is not indicating that some Christians speak an “angelic” (ecstatic) language.

Paul is saying that even if one could ascend to a new height, and communicate on the level of angels, if he did not exercise love by speaking in an understandable fashion, he still would be nothing but noise.
The apostle’s argument does not hint of a mysterious, unintelligible utterance; in fact, it says just the opposite.

Paul uses the same technique here.

“But though we, or an angel from heaven, should preach unto you any gospel other than that which we preached unto you, let him be anathema” (Gal. 1:8)

The point is one of emphasis, even if an angel were to preach a different gospel, there would be no validity in it, and he would fall victim to divine wrath.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

RickyZ

Senior Member
Sep 20, 2012
9,635
787
113
Oh really, where is that?
Matthew 12 22Then they brought him a demon-possessed man who was blind and mute, and Jesus healed him, so that he could both talk and see. 23All the people were astonished and said, “Could this be the Son of David?”
24But when the Pharisees heard this, they said, “It is only by Beelzebul, the prince of demons, that this fellow drives out demons.”
25Jesus knew their thoughts and said to them, “Every kingdom divided against itself will be ruined, and every city or household divided against itself will not stand. 26If Satan drives out Satan, he is divided against himself. How then can his kingdom stand? 27And if I drive out demons by Beelzebul, by whom do your people drive them out? So then, they will be your judges. 28But if it is by the Spirit of God that I drive out demons, then the kingdom of God has come upon you.
29“Or again, how can anyone enter a strong man’s house and carry off his possessions unless he first ties up the strong man? Then he can plunder his house.
30“Whoever is not with me is against me, and whoever does not gather with me scatters. 31And so I tell you, every kind of sin and slander can be forgiven, but blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven. 32
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
Matthew 12 22Then they brought him a demon-possessed man who was blind and mute, and Jesus healed him, so that he could both talk and see. 23All the people were astonished and said, “Could this be the Son of David?”
24But when the Pharisees heard this, they said, “It is only by Beelzebul, the prince of demons, that this fellow drives out demons.”
25Jesus knew their thoughts and said to them, “Every kingdom divided against itself will be ruined, and every city or household divided against itself will not stand. 26If Satan drives out Satan, he is divided against himself. How then can his kingdom stand? 27And if I drive out demons by Beelzebul, by whom do your people drive them out? So then, they will be your judges. 28But if it is by the Spirit of God that I drive out demons, then the kingdom of God has come upon you.
29“Or again, how can anyone enter a strong man’s house and carry off his possessions unless he first ties up the strong man? Then he can plunder his house.
30“Whoever is not with me is against me, and whoever does not gather with me scatters. 31And so I tell you, every kind of sin and slander can be forgiven, but blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven. 32
Well to applying this to Roger really not a good thing to do.

Only unbelievers can be guilty of blaspheming the Holy Spirit, and I do read any mention of the gift of tongues in this passage.

What is the one thing that cannot be forgiven, it is dying without Jesus!
 

BenFTW

Senior Member
Oct 7, 2012
4,834
981
113
34
No one is babbling incoherent words, they are words that are incoherent to us who are unlearned in those specific languages. These languages can go extremely far back into history, or recent, but nonetheless they are languages. This doesn't mean the language is currently on the earth or even was, it simply means it is an existent language or at least was at one point in time.

Consider, if the words being uttered need an interpretation both the tongue speaker and interpreter don't know what is being said unless the Holy Spirit grants them interpretation. The gift of tongues is quite varied in its use, it is useful for many things. Pentecost is not the be all and end all of what the gift of tongues is. It is simply a glimpse of how the gift operates. Only one aspect of a varied gift.
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
Roger, here's the deal:

If you don't want to speak in tongues, you don't have to. Paul said he wished we all would, but he also acknowledged that not all would. In choosing to not speak in tongues, you are ok.

Paul told us to not forbid others from speaking in tongues. In this you are NOT ok.

Jesus told us that those who ascribe genuine works of the Holy Spirit to satan are eternally condemned. In this you are in GRAVE DANGER.

Just a word to the wise, my friend.
The thrust of the argument is that you cannot reconcile what you call tongues with the bible so how can you claim them as tongues from God?

Only by totally discarding doctrine can you make an argument for your position.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
No one is babbling incoherent words, they are words that are incoherent to us who are unlearned in those specific languages. These languages can go extremely far back into history, or recent, but nonetheless they are languages. This doesn't mean the language is currently on the earth or even was, it simply means it is an existent language or at least was at one point in time.

Consider, if the words being uttered need an interpretation both the tongue speaker and interpreter don't know what is being said unless the Holy Spirit grants them interpretation. The gift of tongues is quite varied in its use, it is useful for many things. Pentecost is not the be all and end all of what the gift of tongues is. It is simply a glimpse of how the gift operates. Only one aspect of a varied gift.
Where pray tell are the interpreters in Acts 2? What biblical evidence do you have for varied tongues?

Paul spoke several languages. When men speak in languages it is possible to have an interpreter to translate the language. the conditions at Corinth would lend themselves to many languages being spoken as they were a trade city and here someone to interpret the languages especially in the church would be necessary or no one would comprehend what was being said.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
Nov 22, 2015
20,436
1,430
0
Paul is not indicating that some Christians speak an “angelic” (ecstatic) language.

Paul is saying that even if one could ascend to a new height, and communicate on the level of angels, if he did not exercise love by speaking in an understandable fashion, he still would be nothing but noise.
The apostle’s argument does not hint of a mysterious, unintelligible utterance; in fact, it says just the opposite.

Paul uses the same technique here.

“But though we, or an angel from heaven, should preach unto you any gospel other than that which we preached unto you, let him be anathema” (Gal. 1:8)

The point is one of emphasis, even if an angel were to preach a different gospel, there would be no validity in it, and he would fall victim to divine wrath.
I understand your opinion but I will have to stick with Paul saying that there are in fact languages of men and of angels. I see Paul was talking in terms of speaking in tongues in 1 Cor 13:1 not in trying to ascend to a new height and communicate on the level of angels.

It's really in the scheme of things irrelevant. The point was only made about angels have their own language is for those that try to dismiss people who speak in tongues as not being a "recognized language" and the fact is that we don't know any language of angels.
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
No one is babbling incoherent words, they are words that are incoherent to us who are unlearned in those specific languages. These languages can go extremely far back into history, or recent, but nonetheless they are languages. This doesn't mean the language is currently on the earth or even was, it simply means it is an existent language or at least was at one point in time.

Consider, if the words being uttered need an interpretation both the tongue speaker and interpreter don't know what is being said unless the Holy Spirit grants them interpretation. The gift of tongues is quite varied in its use, it is useful for many things. Pentecost is not the be all and end all of what the gift of tongues is. It is simply a glimpse of how the gift operates. Only one aspect of a varied gift.
Well that is very interesting way to look at it, so they are true human languages that may or not be in use presently on this earth.

So then why do you need to pray in a foreign language

Does God like a variety
 
Nov 22, 2015
20,436
1,430
0
Where pray tell are the interpreters in Acts 2? What biblical evidence do you have for varied tongues?

Paul spoke several languages. When men speak in languages it is possible to have an interpreter to translate the language. the conditions at Corinth would lend themselves to many languages being spoken as they were a trade city and here someone to interpret the languages especially in the church would be necessary or no one would comprehend what was being said.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
They didn't need interpreters in Acts 2 because one of the aspect of speaking in tongues is that we speak the mighty deeds of God ( Acts 2:11 ) - the original 120 were not "giving a message" out to the listeners - they were just filled with the Holy Spirit and speaking out of their spirits.

Another aspect is that we give thanks and bless Him as can be seen in 1 Cor 14:16-17 when we speak in tongues.

Roger I realize that this whole conversation with you on tongues is completely useless as you don't believe that tongues are for today. I have to say that anyone that says that to me is like an atheist coming up to me and telling me that Jesus is not real. I know both are as real as the earth is real so in reality this conversing is a complete waste of time so we should just let it all go. We are all still brothers here if we are all in Christ.
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
I understand your opinion but I will have to stick with Paul saying that there are in fact languages of men and of angels. I see Paul was talking in terms of speaking in tongues in 1 Cor 13:1 not in trying to ascend to a new height and communicate on the level of angels.

It's really in the scheme of things irrelevant. The point was only made about angels have their own language is for those that try to dismiss people who speak in tongues as not being a "recognized language" and the fact is that we don't know any language of angels.
But, but, but ....I was just starting to have fun!

Okay.

Can I ask really in a non-judgemental way, is not the grace of God enough and the love that is shed abroad in our hearts why the extra private prayer language.

Really does not the bible say that we have prayers that are too deep for words, not that we need different of better words.
 

Cee

Senior Member
May 14, 2010
2,169
473
83
Not sure how you guys are just ignoring all of 1 Co 14 that is specifically written about tongues. It says clearly no one understands, but God. And you're speaking to God. Which is exactly what Acts 2 shows, they were praising God, they weren't talking to the people.
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
They didn't need interpreters in Acts 2 because one of the aspect of speaking in tongues is that we speak the mighty deeds of God ( Acts 2:11 ) - the original 120 were not "giving a message" out to the listeners - they were just filled with the Holy Spirit and speaking out of their spirits.

Another aspect is that we give thanks and bless Him as can be seen in 1 Cor 14:16-17 when we speak in tongues.

Roger I realize that this whole conversation with you on tongues is completely useless as you don't believe that tongues are for today. I have to say that anyone that says that to me is like an atheist coming up to me and telling me that Jesus is not real. I know both are as real as the earth is real so in reality this conversing is a complete waste of time so we should just let it all go. We are all still brothers here if we are all in Christ.
Okay okay, your mind is made up ...mine was still trying to understand at least a little bit maybe. Time to move on I guess.
 

RickyZ

Senior Member
Sep 20, 2012
9,635
787
113
Well to applying this to Roger really not a good thing to do.

Only unbelievers can be guilty of blaspheming the Holy Spirit, and I do read any mention of the gift of tongues in this passage.

What is the one thing that cannot be forgiven, it is dying without Jesus!
Roger has, in past threads, said that those who speak in tongues do so with a demon.

The passage, while specifically dealing with the casting out of demons, can be applied to any work of the Holy Spirit. That is the point of the lesson. Casting out of demons and the speaking of tongues are tied together in Mark 16:17 And these signs will accompany those who believe: In my name they will drive out demons; they will speak in new tongues;

Can believers commit the unpardonable sin? I tend to think not. But we can tell who does not have the Spirit, which is a sign of true salvation - 1 Cor 2:14 The person without the Spirit does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God but considers them foolishness, and cannot understand them because they are discerned only through the Spirit.

I'm not going to question Roger's salvation, that's between him and God. But the math just does not add up in his favor. Thus the warning that he will continue to ignore.
 

Cee

Senior Member
May 14, 2010
2,169
473
83
The people in Acts 2 all had the interpretation of tongues. Because the ones speaking in tongues were praising God NOT talking to them.
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
Not sure how you guys are just ignoring all of 1 Co 14 that is specifically written about tongues. It says clearly no one understands, but God. And you're speaking to God. Which is exactly what Acts 2 shows, they were praising God, they weren't talking to the people.
Well I do not think I am ignoring Chapter 14....I do see though where it says that tongues will cease in Chapter 13.

It seems to me that Paul is trying to settle this Corinthian group down in many ways, they were obviously misusing this gift.

Anyway, not a huge issue for me I am just learning as I go through the posts and the scripture.

I really do not see just from a rational-logical point of view the need for this gift of tongues beyond the time of the apostles.

Unless of course you believe the office of the apostle is ongoing....well that is a whole other conversation me thinks.
 
Nov 22, 2015
20,436
1,430
0
But, but, but ....I was just starting to have fun!

Okay.

Can I ask really in a non-judgemental way, is not the grace of God enough and the love that is shed abroad in our hearts why the extra private prayer language.

Really does not the bible say that we have prayers that are too deep for words, not that we need different of better words.

LOL..just starting to have fun!

One would think that the fact that our sins are completely forgiven would be enough - then there is the awesome love of God for us. Our Father loves to give good things to us - just like us natural parents like to do with our own kids.


The root word for gifts is "grace". The gifts of the Spirit are really grace gifts.

There is a personal devotional side of tongues where your spirit prays to the Lord and you speak "mysteries" to Him. What these "mysteries" are - I don't know. It could be praying out the will of God for the future. It could be praying for other people that we have no earthly idea what is happening to them I have heard many stories of people praying for missionaries and then come to find out that when these others were praying in tongues - it was the same time they got delivered or healed from a sickness. There are tons of stories like that.

Tongues also "edifies" the person - or builds up the person.

1 Corinthians 14:2 (NASB)
[SUP]2 [/SUP] For one who speaks in a tongue does not speak to men but to God; for no one understands, but in his spirit he speaks mysteries.

1 Corinthians 14:4 (NASB)
[SUP]4 [/SUP] One who speaks in a tongue edifies himself; but one who prophesies edifies the church.



The other aspect of our minds not understanding what we are praying with our spirit - is that we are praying God's will in our lives and in the lives of others. If we knew with our minds what we are praying - we would not believe it or even might rebel against it because we are not ready spiritually for things to happen as God sees us in His timeless future as we truly are in Christ.
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
The people in Acts 2 all had the interpretation of tongues. Because the ones speaking in tongues were praising God NOT talking to them.
And yet in no example of tongues in the book of Acts do we see any interpretation. We see only tongues as a sign for the Jews who were there to spy on the apostles.

Frankly I think you are parsing the word of God because you know it does not support your position.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
Nov 22, 2015
20,436
1,430
0
Originally Posted by Grace777x70


They didn't need interpreters in Acts 2 because one of the aspect of speaking in tongues is that we speak the mighty deeds of God ( Acts 2:11 ) - the original 120 were not "giving a message" out to the listeners - they were just filled with the Holy Spirit and speaking out of their spirits.

Another aspect is that we give thanks and bless Him as can be seen in 1 Cor 14:16-17 when we speak in tongues.

Roger I realize that this whole conversation with you on tongues is completely useless as you don't believe that tongues are for today. I have to say that anyone that says that to me is like an atheist coming up to me and telling me that Jesus is not real. I know both are as real as the earth is real so in reality this conversing is a complete waste of time so we should just let it all go. We are all still brothers here if we are all in Christ.




Okay okay, your mind is made up ...mine was still trying to understand at least a little bit maybe. Time to move on I guess.
This post was directed towards Roger as he has denied tongues are real and from the Holy Spirit for 9 months that I have seen and actually thinks they are from the devil so that is why I said that to Roger.