Yes I understand all about the thorn in the flesh, but Paul was having serious eye trouble in Galatia to the point where the Galatians were wanting to give Paul their own eyes. So either that's a separate event and he wasn't healed, or it was a part of the thorn in the flesh incident and he wasn't healed. Either way, he wasn't healed.
You haven't address, Timothy or Trophimus either.
So we have Paul, Timothy and Trophimus who were not healed.
What's wrong with what you said? I'll address this comment. What if instead of thinking God can heal you, you think it is God's will to heal you now? Then you can have faith, because you expect the healing. You do not only hope to be healed, and believe in His capabilities but you also expect God to heal you because He has revealed in His word that that is His very will (through Jesus Christ).
You are saying if we aren't healed we only have hope and that if we had faith we could command it to be so and we would be healed.
This is not written in my bible anywhere. I believe you mean well, but this is simply more condemnation poured out upon the poor soul who's not healed. It's the person's fault.
Ben, I mean this question with all due respect. Why are you wearing eyeglasses?
Hey DesertRose, I'm sorry if what I said has been misunderstood. Let me clarify. I am
not saying "if we aren't healed we only have hope and that if we had faith we could command it to be so..." If you'll reread my post you'll notice I said that this
isn't a critique so much so for the sick individual as it is
the minister.
Someone who is intentionally going to people and praying for healing would have much better results understanding the dynamic of faith, expectation, belief, and so on. Even so, the will of God (as the Lord leads them). People mistakenly pray for healing as opposed to operating in the name of Jesus (authority) and commanding healing. An example is in order.
If you have back pain, and a Christian notices this they can in the name of Jesus administer (not pray for, though this is also a fine route) healing. What I mean is where people often pray for God to heal a person you'll notice that the apostles and Jesus mostly just commanded it. "Rise and walk." There was no pleading to God, there was authority. In the same way Jesus has given us the privilege of using His name, in order to glorify the Father.
Its a whole 'nother concept of commanding healing of oneself. I don't know about that. What I am speaking of is like the roman centurion. Having faith for another. Commanding healing ("Be healed in Jesus' name") over someone in faith that God will act through you for His glory.
As for my glasses, I've had them since I was a child. I've shared this story on here before but it brings a deeper understanding to this question you have asked. I'll shorten it, because this post is already getting long. A minister goes to a village to evangelize, but the village is across a raging river. So the man prays to the Lord to walk on water as to reach these lost souls. He steps and lo and behold he is above the water, crossed it and preaches the Gospel to the lost. Many are saved.
Now, he left after ministering and its been about six months. He decides to return but as he approaches the village he notices that the river now has a bridge to cross over. He takes the bridge. As he crosses a young child runs up to the minister and asks, "Preacher, why didn't you walk on the water again!?" He simply said, "Because there is a bridge."
In the same way that I could seek healing for my eyes from the Lord, I have a natural solution like the bridge. The glasses. I could choose the glasses or I could choose to seek healing. The man could walk on water, but why would he when there is a bridge right there? Maybe as a sign, and in that case if God so wills to heal my eyes for His glory so be it. Either way, my glasses are a testament to God providing man innovation and not a stumbling block to healing.
Hope that clarifies some of the things typed out.