King James Bible ONLY? Or NOT?
- Thread starter Dai3234
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Hm, I tried to respond for myself and formulate it properly, but I think it will be better to just post some old creeds and to say I agree with them so that I will not be inventing a wheel again:
The Nicene Creed (385):
We believe in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible.
And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, begotten of the Father before all worlds (æons), Light of Light, very God of very God, begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father, by whom all things were made;
And for example The Second Helvetic Confession (1534):
"GOD IS THREE. Notwithstanding we believe and teach that the same immense, one and indivisible God is in person inseparably and without confusion distinguished as Father, Son and Holy Spirit so, as the Father has begotten the Son from eternity, the Son is begotten by an ineffable generation, and the holy Spirit truly proceeds from them both, and the same from eternity and is to be worshipped with both.
Thus there are not three gods, but three persons, cosubstantial, coeternal, and coequal; distinct with respect to hypostases, and with respect to order, the one preceding the other yet without any inequality. For according to the nature or essence they are so joined together that they are one God, and the divine nature is common to the Father, Son and Holy Spirit."
The Nicene Creed (385):
We believe in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible.
And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, begotten of the Father before all worlds (æons), Light of Light, very God of very God, begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father, by whom all things were made;
And for example The Second Helvetic Confession (1534):
"GOD IS THREE. Notwithstanding we believe and teach that the same immense, one and indivisible God is in person inseparably and without confusion distinguished as Father, Son and Holy Spirit so, as the Father has begotten the Son from eternity, the Son is begotten by an ineffable generation, and the holy Spirit truly proceeds from them both, and the same from eternity and is to be worshipped with both.
Thus there are not three gods, but three persons, cosubstantial, coeternal, and coequal; distinct with respect to hypostases, and with respect to order, the one preceding the other yet without any inequality. For according to the nature or essence they are so joined together that they are one God, and the divine nature is common to the Father, Son and Holy Spirit."
Hebrews 10:5 Wherefore when he cometh into the world, he saith, Sacrifice and offering thou wouldest not, but a body hast thou prepared me:
A body was prepared for the Word to become flesh and dwell among us. That seed that was placed inside Mary's womb was placed there by God not Joseph. The Word moved inside that prepared body and became the only begotten Son of the Father. He was not merely God's only Son, but His only begotten Son. It all has to do with the origins of the body prepared for Him.
A body was prepared for the Word to become flesh and dwell among us. That seed that was placed inside Mary's womb was placed there by God not Joseph. The Word moved inside that prepared body and became the only begotten Son of the Father. He was not merely God's only Son, but His only begotten Son. It all has to do with the origins of the body prepared for Him.
I quite wonder you quoted the Hebrews 10:5 which proves your KJV OT is corrupted 
Can you find for me that God prepared a body for the Son, in your OT?
Psalm 40:6 (KJV)
"Sacrifice and offering thou didst not desire; mine ears hast thou opened: burnt offering and sin offering hast thou not required."
Psalm 40:6 (LXX)
"Sacrifice and offering thou wouldest not; but a body hast thou prepared me."
Can you find for me that God prepared a body for the Son, in your OT?
Psalm 40:6 (KJV)
"Sacrifice and offering thou didst not desire; mine ears hast thou opened: burnt offering and sin offering hast thou not required."
Psalm 40:6 (LXX)
"Sacrifice and offering thou wouldest not; but a body hast thou prepared me."
Last edited:
I quite wonder you quoted the Hebrews 10:5 which proves your KJV OT is corrupted
Can you find for me that God prepared a body for the Son, in your OT?
Psalm 40:6 (KJV)
"Sacrifice and offering thou didst not desire; mine ears hast thou opened: burnt offering and sin offering hast thou not required."
Psalm 40:6 (LXX)
"Sacrifice and offering thou wouldest not; but a body hast thou prepared me."
Can you find for me that God prepared a body for the Son, in your OT?
Psalm 40:6 (KJV)
"Sacrifice and offering thou didst not desire; mine ears hast thou opened: burnt offering and sin offering hast thou not required."
Psalm 40:6 (LXX)
"Sacrifice and offering thou wouldest not; but a body hast thou prepared me."
Psalm 139:15-16 KJV
My substance was not hid from thee, when I was made in secret, and curiously wrought in the lowest parts of the earth.
[16] Thine eyes did see my substance, yet being unperfect; and in thy book all my members were written, which in continuance were fashioned, when as yet there was none of them.
Again, you must do this apparent twist to defend your KJV consistency
And then to come with the conspiracy theory of Christians rewriting the LXX to fit with the NT.
And with making the unbelieving Jews the perfect keepers of the OT prophecies about Christ (where, suprisingly, all such mesianic references are not to be found)
And then to come with the conspiracy theory of Christians rewriting the LXX to fit with the NT.
And with making the unbelieving Jews the perfect keepers of the OT prophecies about Christ (where, suprisingly, all such mesianic references are not to be found)
Again, you must do this apparent twist to defend your KJV consistency
And then to come with the conspiracy theory of Christians rewriting the LXX to fit with the NT.
And with making the unbelieving Jews the perfect keepers of the OT prophecies about Christ (where, suprisingly, all such mesianic references are not to be found)
And then to come with the conspiracy theory of Christians rewriting the LXX to fit with the NT.
And with making the unbelieving Jews the perfect keepers of the OT prophecies about Christ (where, suprisingly, all such mesianic references are not to be found)