I asked at the beginning of this thread if the Biblical text actually states eternal security, or if it is a doctrine that comes from the overall teaching of Scripture.
I take it from your statement: "The rest of the bible is read and interpreted through the truth of eternal security"that you are saying that the doctrine of eternal security comes from the overall teaching of Scripture. Then from that overall teaching/understanding of scripture we need to interpret the Bible according to this truth.
Am I understanding correctly what you were trying to say here?
I take it from your statement: "The rest of the bible is read and interpreted through the truth of eternal security"that you are saying that the doctrine of eternal security comes from the overall teaching of Scripture. Then from that overall teaching/understanding of scripture we need to interpret the Bible according to this truth.
Am I understanding correctly what you were trying to say here?
Does not come into condemnation..
Will never perish..
No condemnation...
Sealed FOR the day of redemption..
I give them eternal life..
that they shall KNOW they have eternal life..
Clear, dogmatic, unambiguous language.
So all the warning verses that require some study and knowledge of His word and are a bit "tough" to understand are/have to be read through this truth.
So the 'warning' verses seen through this truth, speak of our service and our discipleship. Not our salvation and the free Gift of Gods grace.
If we don't advance in His plan there are major consequences for believers. Divine discipline,loss of reward,reaping what we sow, a miserable life, shame at his Bema seat, saved As if through fire and more.
It just isn't loss of salvation.