ANIMAL SACRIFICES to resume FOR US in the future!

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

PlainWord

Senior Member
Jun 11, 2013
7,080
151
63
Why don't you read what I posted again and read it carefully and thoughtfully? This has nothing to do with OUR FUTURE but it has everything to do with God's eternal purposes. Why does everything have to be about "us" and "ours"? God has an eternal plan for a regenerated Israel just as He has a plan for the regenerated Church. They run parallel to each other, and there is absolutely no conflict or confusion in the mind of God.
I've read a lot of your theories. No offense, but they are mostly incorrect. Bottom line is, "Israel" the true Israel is the Church and the Church is the true Israel. Believing Gentiles are grafted in with the natural branches which were the believing Jews. Apostate Israel was destroyed in the "great tribulation" in the first century. There is no distinction between believing Jew or believing Gentile anymore. Both are part of the Bride/Church.

I'm not sure what your definition for "regeneration" is, but it has absolutely NOTHING to do with any country or the church for that matter. As Peter taught in Acts 3, as they were living in the last days, the times of refreshing/regeneration was the restoration to God made possible by the blood of Christ. This refreshing came at the Parousia of Christ as Apostate Israel was destroyed while the "saints" met in the "air" (spirit).

The connection to God was lost as a result of the original sin. Spiritual death is defined as separation from God. This separation was Hades upon death but Christ had the keys to Death and set the captives free. The Saints are now all in heaven with God.
 
Last edited:

MHz

Banned
Feb 14, 2018
201
1
0
Give me a bit of time to go through your points. In the meantime perhaps this will give you some food for thought.

There are no sinners on any part of the earth after the 1st day of the 1,000 year reign. If there are no sinners then why would any sacrifice be justified?

The birds and beasts of the fields that come to a supper prepared for them die after than and for the whole period of the 1,000 year reign the only flesh on the planet are the people that qualify fot life in that era. there are no sinners among them.

Ho:4:3:
Therefore shall the land mourn,
and every one that dwelleth therein shall languish,
with the beasts of the field,
and with the fowls of heaven;
yea,
the fishes of the sea also shall be taken away.

The Law starting when that era begins is the one given in Re:21 rather than the 10 Commandments. How do you murder an immortal? You can't but the other flesh that men have dominion over can be killed so that is who is being referenced. Sacrificing them seem to be impossible really. The best argument is in the verses that tell us how much god likes blood sacrifices to begin with. He was the one to kill the first animal. it was done so Adam and Eve had clothes to protect them.

Isa:1:10-17:
Hear the word of the LORD,
ye rulers of Sodom;
give ear unto the law of our God,
ye people of Gomorrah.
To what purpose is the multitude of your sacrifices unto me?
saith the LORD:
I am full of the burnt offerings of rams,
and the fat of fed beasts;
and I delight not in the blood of bullocks,
or of lambs,
or of he goats.
When ye come to appear before me,
who hath required this at your hand,
to tread my courts?
Bring no more vain oblations;
incense is an abomination unto me;
the new moons and sabbaths,
the calling of assemblies,
I cannot away with;
it is iniquity,
even the solemn meeting.
Your new moons and your appointed feasts my soul hateth:
they are a trouble unto me;
I am weary to bear them.
And when ye spread forth your hands,
I will hide mine eyes from you:
yea,
when ye make many prayers,
I will not hear:
your hands are full of blood.
Wash you,
make you clean;
put away the evil of your doings from before mine eyes;
cease to do evil;
Learn to do well;
seek judgment,
relieve the oppressed,
judge the fatherless,
plead for the widow.
 

miknik5

Senior Member
Jun 2, 2016
7,833
591
113
Hello friends,

It appears we have a dozen Scripturally-grounded reasons which jointly confirm that animal sacrifices will (in the future) be resumed in conjunction with the full restoration of Priestly/Levitical duties. And, we will participate in these activities as fellow Israelite participants in the covenants between God and Israel. Most of us Christians are unaware of our future destiny in Israel; I hope this thread begins (in at least some small way) the process of correcting this unfortunate circumstance.

1. A. Dt. 30:1-8 is not yet fulfilled.
B. Dt. 30:1-8 guarantees the restoration of priestly/Levitical/sacrificial Torah-obedience.
C. Priestly/Levitical/sacrificial Torah-obedience will occur in the future.

2. A. Eze. 40-47 is not yet fulfilled.
B. Eze. 40-47 guarantees the restoration of priestly/Levitical/sacrificial activity.
C. Priestly/Levitical/sacrificial activity will occur in the future.

3. A. Jer. 33:20-22 is not yet fulfilled.
B. Jer. 33:20-22 guarantees the restoration of priestly/Levitical/sacrificial Torah-obedience.
C. Priestly/Levitical/sacrificial Torah-obedience will occur in the future.

4. A. Zec. 14 guarantees future GLOBAL participation in the sacrifice-laden feast of Sukkot (with punishment upon the nations who do not participate).
B. Therefore, global participation in sacrifice-laden feasts will occur in the future, and it will be required, and it will be good to obey, and it will be bad to disobey.

5. A. Mal. 3:1-4 guarantees that the Messiah will RESTORE the covenant with Levi, complete with sacrifices to be offered again in the future.
B. We should not oppose what the Messiah will come to restore in the forthcoming kingdom rule.

6. A. Is. 66 guarantees future restoration of Levitical/priestly/sacrificial activities associated with new moon and Sabbath observance.
B. We should not oppose what Isaiah guarantees will occur in the future.

7.A. The Old Covenant is READY (Gr. "engoos", Heb. 8:13) to disappear.
B. That which is ready to disappear has NOT yet disappeared (from the meaning of "engoos").
C. The Old Covenant was still in force (as of the New-Covenant-era time of the writing of Hebrews) (from B).
D. The inauguration of the New Covenant does NOT entail termination of the Old Covenant (from C).
E. Old Covenant Levitical/priestly/sacrificial activities are good and proper to persist into the New Covenant era (from D).

8. A. Many New-Covenant-era priests were disciples of the Messiah (Ac. 6:7).
B. Priests perform sacrificial/priestly/Levitical duties.
C. Priestly sacrificial/Levitical duties are acceptable in the New-Covenant-era (from A and B).

9. A. Thousands of first-century disciples were zealous for Torah (Ac. 21:20).
B. Torah-obedience requires sacrificial/priestly/Levitical duties (when performed properly).
C. Thousands of first-century disciples were zealous for Torah-obedient sacrificial/priestly/Levitical activity.
D. These disciples encouraged Paul (and Paul agreed!) to condone a vow (evidently the sacrifice-laden Nazirite vow) for the purpose of publicly affirming that Paul likewise walked orderly according to the Torah.
E. Sacrifices are, thus, affirmed as a valid ongoing New-Covenant-era practice.


10. A. Sabbath Torah is (present tense!) a shadow of the substance in Christ (Col. 2:16-17).
B. Col. 2 was written after the inauguration of the New-Covenant era.
C. Col. 2 is, thus, evidence that Sabbath Torah (which, of course, includes associated sacrificial activity when properly performed) is an ONGOING FUNCTIONING SHADOW which CONTINUES to point to the substance in Christ.

11. A. Christians are included as fellow Israelites who partake in the Torah-laden covenants between YHVH and Israel (Eph. 2).
B. The covenants (Abrahamic, Mosaic, Davidic, and New) are all still in force, and we Christians partake in these covenants (plural! Eph. 2:12).
C. The covenants entail Levitical/priestly/sacrificial activity when properly performed.
D. Thus, we Christians should condone the proper restoration and participation in the Levitical/priestly/sacrificial activities associated with the Torah-laden covenants in which we participate.

12. A. Israelites will again participate in Levitical/priestly/sacrificial activity when they return from ALL the countries to which they have been scattered (Eze. 20:30-44).
B. This return has not yet occurred.
C. Animal sacrifices will occur in the future (from A and B).
D. We Christians are included as fellow Israelite participants in the covenants between YHVH and Israel (e.g., Jer. 31).
E. Thus, we are Israelites who will participate in the restoration of animal sacrifices in the future.



CONCLUSION: We appear to have a dozen (I could list many more!) Scripturally-grounded lines of reasoning which jointly confirm that Levitical/priestly/sacrificial activity is good and proper and forthcoming.

Yes, sin offerings point to the Lamb of God (Jesus) who is the ultimate sin-offering on our behalf. But this is no excuse to terminate the ONGOING SHADOW FUNCTION authorized by Scripture, affirmed by Scripture, and guaranteed (in Scripture) to properly occur in the future, just as it also properly occurred even AFTER the inauguration of the New Covenant in the first century.

Then again, maybe I'm wrong on all 12 arguments. I'm open to correction from any better-justified viewpoint.

If you agree with my 12 arguments, please let me know, because that would be encouraging to me.

If you disagree, please help me understand:
1. Which specific premise(s) in my 12 arguments do you reject (and why)?
2. Which Scriptural passage do you believe disconfirms my position (and why)?

Let's study and learn together, growing in love and grace and knowledge in our Lord Jesus Christ.

blessings to you all...


What? Did I hear you say that the restoration of the levitical priesthood is actually....good?

You are not even going to want to know the scriptures which came to mind
 

miknik5

Senior Member
Jun 2, 2016
7,833
591
113
Give one reason why sacrifices should be reinstated in a rebuilt, earthly temporal and temporary temple?
 

miknik5

Senior Member
Jun 2, 2016
7,833
591
113
I have one question

Has the house if Levi received his inheritance?
According to revelation he has

And, unlike before CHRIST, there is no distinction in the tribe of Levi from his brothers All receive the same inheritance

Levi is no longer a priest in service to the other tribes.
in fact all twelve have received the same inheritance which had in the past been designated to only the Levitical house


that inheritance was in the LORD


so what offerings are required
 
Last edited:

miknik5

Senior Member
Jun 2, 2016
7,833
591
113
Hello friends,

It appears we have a dozen Scripturally-grounded reasons which jointly confirm that animal sacrifices will (in the future) be resumed in conjunction with the full restoration of Priestly/Levitical duties. And, we will participate in these activities as fellow Israelite participants in the covenants between God and Israel. Most of us Christians are unaware of our future destiny in Israel; I hope this thread begins (in at least some small way) the process of correcting this unfortunate circumstance.

1. A. Dt. 30:1-8 is not yet fulfilled.
B. Dt. 30:1-8 guarantees the restoration of priestly/Levitical/sacrificial Torah-obedience.
C. Priestly/Levitical/sacrificial Torah-obedience will occur in the future.

2. A. Eze. 40-47 is not yet fulfilled.
B. Eze. 40-47 guarantees the restoration of priestly/Levitical/sacrificial activity.
C. Priestly/Levitical/sacrificial activity will occur in the future.

3. A. Jer. 33:20-22 is not yet fulfilled.
B. Jer. 33:20-22 guarantees the restoration of priestly/Levitical/sacrificial Torah-obedience.
C. Priestly/Levitical/sacrificial Torah-obedience will occur in the future.

4. A. Zec. 14 guarantees future GLOBAL participation in the sacrifice-laden feast of Sukkot (with punishment upon the nations who do not participate).
B. Therefore, global participation in sacrifice-laden feasts will occur in the future, and it will be required, and it will be good to obey, and it will be bad to disobey.

5. A. Mal. 3:1-4 guarantees that the Messiah will RESTORE the covenant with Levi, complete with sacrifices to be offered again in the future.
B. We should not oppose what the Messiah will come to restore in the forthcoming kingdom rule.

6. A. Is. 66 guarantees future restoration of Levitical/priestly/sacrificial activities associated with new moon and Sabbath observance.
B. We should not oppose what Isaiah guarantees will occur in the future.

7.A. The Old Covenant is READY (Gr. "engoos", Heb. 8:13) to disappear.
B. That which is ready to disappear has NOT yet disappeared (from the meaning of "engoos").
C. The Old Covenant was still in force (as of the New-Covenant-era time of the writing of Hebrews) (from B).
D. The inauguration of the New Covenant does NOT entail termination of the Old Covenant (from C).
E. Old Covenant Levitical/priestly/sacrificial activities are good and proper to persist into the New Covenant era (from D).

8. A. Many New-Covenant-era priests were disciples of the Messiah (Ac. 6:7).
B. Priests perform sacrificial/priestly/Levitical duties.
C. Priestly sacrificial/Levitical duties are acceptable in the New-Covenant-era (from A and B).

9. A. Thousands of first-century disciples were zealous for Torah (Ac. 21:20).
B. Torah-obedience requires sacrificial/priestly/Levitical duties (when performed properly).
C. Thousands of first-century disciples were zealous for Torah-obedient sacrificial/priestly/Levitical activity.
D. These disciples encouraged Paul (and Paul agreed!) to condone a vow (evidently the sacrifice-laden Nazirite vow) for the purpose of publicly affirming that Paul likewise walked orderly according to the Torah.
E. Sacrifices are, thus, affirmed as a valid ongoing New-Covenant-era practice.


10. A. Sabbath Torah is (present tense!) a shadow of the substance in Christ (Col. 2:16-17).
B. Col. 2 was written after the inauguration of the New-Covenant era.
C. Col. 2 is, thus, evidence that Sabbath Torah (which, of course, includes associated sacrificial activity when properly performed) is an ONGOING FUNCTIONING SHADOW which CONTINUES to point to the substance in Christ.

11. A. Christians are included as fellow Israelites who partake in the Torah-laden covenants between YHVH and Israel (Eph. 2).
B. The covenants (Abrahamic, Mosaic, Davidic, and New) are all still in force, and we Christians partake in these covenants (plural! Eph. 2:12).
C. The covenants entail Levitical/priestly/sacrificial activity when properly performed.
D. Thus, we Christians should condone the proper restoration and participation in the Levitical/priestly/sacrificial activities associated with the Torah-laden covenants in which we participate.

12. A. Israelites will again participate in Levitical/priestly/sacrificial activity when they return from ALL the countries to which they have been scattered (Eze. 20:30-44).
B. This return has not yet occurred.
C. Animal sacrifices will occur in the future (from A and B).
D. We Christians are included as fellow Israelite participants in the covenants between YHVH and Israel (e.g., Jer. 31).
E. Thus, we are Israelites who will participate in the restoration of animal sacrifices in the future.



CONCLUSION: We appear to have a dozen (I could list many more!) Scripturally-grounded lines of reasoning which jointly confirm that Levitical/priestly/sacrificial activity is good and proper and forthcoming.

Yes, sin offerings point to the Lamb of God (Jesus) who is the ultimate sin-offering on our behalf. But this is no excuse to terminate the ONGOING SHADOW FUNCTION authorized by Scripture, affirmed by Scripture, and guaranteed (in Scripture) to properly occur in the future, just as it also properly occurred even AFTER the inauguration of the New Covenant in the first century.

Then again, maybe I'm wrong on all 12 arguments. I'm open to correction from any better-justified viewpoint.

If you agree with my 12 arguments, please let me know, because that would be encouraging to me.

If you disagree, please help me understand:
1. Which specific premise(s) in my 12 arguments do you reject (and why)?
2. Which Scriptural passage do you believe disconfirms my position (and why)?

Let's study and learn together, growing in love and grace and knowledge in our Lord Jesus Christ.

blessings to you all...


You're wrong

Haggai 2
Ezra 3
Zechariah 4

GOD forewarned thst we pay careful attention to the foundation


We don't add anything to the foundation...anything added by the hands of a man is just that:

An addition to the foundation by the hands of men


the levitical priesthood was a temporary ministry
CHRIST took back what belonged to HIM from the beginning

HE as THE HIGH PREIST FOREVER offered up one sacrifice and that one sacrifice was sufficient

anyone offering anything above that doesn’t know as he should know
 

MHz

Banned
Feb 14, 2018
201
1
0
Hello friends,

It appears we have a dozen Scripturally-grounded reasons which jointly confirm that animal sacrifices will (in the future) be resumed in conjunction with the full restoration of Priestly/Levitical duties. And, we will participate in these activities as fellow Israelite participants in the covenants between God and Israel. Most of us Christians are unaware of our future destiny in Israel; I hope this thread begins (in at least some small way) the process of correcting this unfortunate circumstance.
1. A. Dt. 30:1-8 is not yet fulfilled.
B. Dt. 30:1-8 guarantees the restoration of priestly/Levitical/sacrificial Torah-obedience.
C. Priestly/Levitical/sacrificial Torah-obedience will occur in the future.

1a Any prophecy that deals with the bruise to satan's head is unfulfilled.
1b The question is not about an altar or the sacrifice. The question is about what sacrifice will be acceptable and which will not. Today our sacrifice is what we say in our prayer to God. The 1,000 years runs on the same principals as the new earth runs on. The population in the 1,000 years is a static population and they are the first of man that are immprtal and sinless. Cain and Able brought tw offerings. The one that was rejected in a sinful world will be the one that is acceprable in a sinless world so the rejected sacricice will become the accepted one starting at the beginning of the 1,000 year reign. Zec:14 is a preview of how the New earth will worl only both the 12 Tribes and the Church will inhabit New Jerusalem as they assume their roles as Priests and Kings to the everr growing number of people that will make their homesoutside of the wall of New Jerusalem once the New Earth begins. The Feast of the Tabernacles will happen each year for 1,000 times.
1c The resurrection of the whole House of israel will go all the way back to the sons of Abraham. The duties of a Prtiest of God is not the same in a sinless world as it is in a sinful world. The ones that become alive at the start are students rather than teachers. Below Jesus is the 24 Elders fom the Re:4 Temple. They are the 'many Saints' that came out of the graves the same morning as Jesus did. They all ascended to that temple to be glorified, only Jesus came back and that was onlt to help the ones He baptised to get through the same 40 dat fast He went through when He was baptised by God.

2. A. Eze. 40-47 is not yet fulfilled.
B. Eze. 40-47 guarantees the restoration of priestly/Levitical/sacrificial activity.
C. Priestly/Levitical/sacrificial activity will occur in the future.

2a Zec:6 and many other places prompote a temple and an altar being present during the 1,000 year reign. You will find nothing that suppors a blood sacrifice as that ended with the cross and the next 40 years of the practice was an abomonation to God and shoul any flesh be killed in the new earth it means that person is sent to the fiery lake.
2b Eze:37 defines the whold House of Israel. Able's sacrife is no longer the acceptable sacrifice. Any member of the 12 tribes can do it and they will still be raised with all the rest. A Gentile doing so gives up his place in the 1,000 year reign and is resurrected with 'the rest'instead.
3c. The activities taught to tem durin the 1,000 year Zec:14 represents will be what both groups do when they are both living inside New Jerusalem. Israel will be taught all there is to know about being Priests and the Gentile Church members will be taught all there is to know about being kings to the nations that will exist outside the walls of New Jerusalem. They arte Shepherds to a very large Flock.

3. A. Jer. 33:20-22 is not yet fulfilled.
B. Jer. 33:20-22 guarantees the restoration of priestly/Levitical/sacrificial Torah-obedience.
C. Priestly/Levitical/sacrificial Torah-obedience will occur in the future.

3a Nor has the punishment of the Nations in Jer:25 or the gathering of the 12 Tribes as defined in Jer:31.
3b okay
3c okay

4. A. Zec. 14 guarantees future GLOBAL participation in the sacrifice-laden feast of Sukkot (with punishment upon the nations who do not participate).
B. Therefore, global participation in sacrifice-laden feasts will occur in the future, and it will be required, and it will be good to obey, and it will be bad to disobey.

4a Feast of the tabernacles doesn't mention blood sacrifice. After the feast the Church wanders around the globe seeing how to build cities as that willbe part of their duris in the New Earth era. Cities mena the megaliths that are in ruins today rather than it is referncing all the cities we have on our maps, they will never be rebuilt. Since the Church has rain it can grow crops and the produce is what they bring to the feat.Grapes are grrown is Israel in that time so the Gentiles procide the fine flower that is a substitute of a live sacrifice if none were available. there will be no flesh in the 1,000 years that is available for sacrifice. The only other flesh that is alive is the fish in the former dead sea as stated in Eze:47.
4b Why would either group want to fall into sin. Coming tpo a feast where Jesus is the host does not sound like aburden at all, in fact it shounds like it is a celebration of sorts.

5. A. Mal. 3:1-4 guarantees that the Messiah will RESTORE the covenant with Levi, complete with sacrifices to be offered again in the future.
B. We should not oppose what the Messiah will come to restore in the forthcoming kingdom rule.

5a That book also says Eligiah will come first. He would be with Moses and Elias and the rest of the 12 Tribes that arte resurrected as soom as Jesus kills allthe existing sinners on the globe. The only wrathnthat come after that is when God sents the ramaining fallen angels to the fiery lake. The fire Jesus used sent a few fallen angels there and it only melted Satan's Babylon. The next wrath does the same to the rest on the planet and it looks like that when New Jerusalem lands on it at the end of Re:22.
The arrival is the beginning of the restoration, by the time satan is releassed Jerusalem is called 'the glorious city' and the surrounding land is called 'the campof the Saints', it is a mirror image of what that paryt of the garden would look like if sin had never entered the world.

6. A. Is. 66 guarantees future restoration of Levitical/priestly/sacrificial activities associated with new moon and Sabbath observance.
B. We should not oppose what Isaiah guarantees will occur in the future.

6a true, it also promotes the existance of a new earthn that is not yet made. The new covenant mentione in Hebrews is made with an immortal and sinless group rAther than sinful men who can die.
6b you need to evaluate all the references rather tyhan habging a complicated doctrine on a single verse from a passage that may or may not be in the proper context. That is actually a sign that a doctrine is weak and not supported by the book

7.A. The Old Covenant is READY (Gr. "engoos", Heb. 8:13) to disappear.
B. That which is ready to disappear has NOT yet disappeared (from the meaning of "engoos").
C. The Old Covenant was still in force (as of the New-Covenant-era time of the writing of Hebrews) (from B).
D. The inauguration of the New Covenant does NOT entail termination of the Old Covenant (from C).
E. Old Covenant Levitical/priestly/sacrificial activities are good and proper to persist into the New Covenant era (from D).

7a. Nope. The iron/clay kingdom from Da:2 hasn't even began yet.it begins when the 7th trump sounds. The 12 books listed after Daniel only detail how the transitio from taht to the 1,000 year reign happens. Even the 'latter days' from the De:4:30 prophecy is unfulfilled. The sacttering from that prophecy and Luke:21:24 happened in 70 AD.
7b any prophecy about the return is unfulfilled, any to do with the bruise to the heel from Ge:3;15 vwas fulfilled when Jesus said, 'It is finished,'just before He died on nthe cross. All two brusies are completed when He says,'It is done.;'when He pours out the 7th vialin Re16.
7c the only law from the that survived the transition is the 10 Commandments. The 10 Commandments are retired at the start of the 1,000 year reign.
7d I'm afraid it does as only one version of Law can esist at one toime. The Law before the 10 commandments was the one the sons of God in Ge:6 were under. That Law ceased to be the Law of the land when the last giant died in the exodus wars. that is when the 10 commandments became law. A law that exists onlt for the time it takes for Ge:3:15 to be fulfilled. That day is the day the 7th trumps sounds. The new covenant is made with an immortal and sinless people. People born in the new earth will attain taht level when they are 120 years old.
7d what do they do with their day if nobpody has any sins to confess?


8. A. Many New-Covenant-era priests were disciples of the Messiah (Ac. 6:7).
B. Priests perform sacrificial/priestly/Levitical duties.
C. Priestly sacrificial/Levitical duties are acceptable in the New-Covenant-era (from A and B).

8a Okay,the last one that could do any of the 'signs following' died by 100AD
8b If it was a blood sacrifice in the temple it was an abomination mentioned in the 70th week prophecy. Killing Stephen and allowing the money-changes back were also abominations by that time. This doesn't fit in well with the reference to this specific chapter made a little earlier.

Isa:66:3:
He that killeth an ox is as if he slew a man;
he that sacrificeth a lamb,
as if he cut off a dog's neck;
he that offereth an oblation,
as if he offered swine's blood;
he that burneth incense,
as if he blessed an idol.
Yea,
they have chosen their own ways,
and their soul delighteth in their abominations.

8c a sin after the 1,000 years starts will get yo a seat beside satan in nthe fiery lake. God will prevent tyhat from happenming. Removing all other flesh will prevent any blood sacrifice. God does it so no other flesh than fallen angesl gets sent to the lake. Only beings that are sinless and know about good and evil are saved from the fire hat melts the whole earth.

9. A. Thousands of first-century disciples were zealous for Torah (Ac. 21:20).
B. Torah-obedience requires sacrificial/priestly/Levitical duties (when performed properly).
C. Thousands of first-century disciples were zealous for Torah-obedient sacrificial/priestly/Levitical activity.
D. These disciples encouraged Paul (and Paul agreed!) to condone a vow (evidently the sacrifice-laden Nazirite vow) for the purpose of publicly affirming that Paul likewise walked orderly according to the Torah.
E. Sacrifices are, thus, affirmed as a valid ongoing New-Covenant-era practice.

9a God's book is 66 books rather than 5.

Re:22:18:
For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book,
If any man shall add unto these things,
God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:
Re:22:19:
And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy,
God shall take away his part out of the book of life,
and out of the holy city,
and from the things which are written in this book.

9b All of Re:12 is an expansion of Ge:3:15 if you are looking for comfirmation of what 'the book actually means.

9c You would actually try and slaughter one of the birds or beasts of the field that come to the supper Christ prepares for them when it is payback for so many of them being killed as an atonement to man's own sin. I don't see that working out for the men really. lol

9d No Apostleor Disciple ever took part in a blood sacrifice after the cross. Believer were the minority and were ignored when they spoke.

9e if NT believers cannot eat the meat that is ki9llen in a religios ritual what is the purpose of the death??

10. A. Sabbath Torah is (present tense!) a shadow of the substance in Christ (Col. 2:16-17).
B. Col. 2 was written after the inauguration of the New-Covenant era.
C. Col. 2 is, thus, evidence that Sabbath Torah (which, of course, includes associated sacrificial activity when properly performed) is an ONGOING FUNCTIONING SHADOW which CONTINUES to point to the substance in Christ.

10a The reference is to the 613 laws rather than the 10 Commandments.
10b Jesus introduce a modified Passover meal that excluded meat. we bare still under the old covenant as the new covenant is means for when we have a glorified body like the one Jesus has after His return for 40 days.
10c not at all

11. A. Christians are included as fellow Israelites who partake in the Torah-laden covenants between YHVH and Israel (Eph. 2).
B. The covenants (Abrahamic, Mosaic, Davidic, and New) are all still in force, and we Christians partake in these covenants (plural! Eph. 2:12).
C. The covenants entail Levitical/priestly/sacrificial activity when properly performed.
D. Thus, we Christians should condone the proper restoration and participation in the Levitical/priestly/sacrificial activities associated with the Torah-laden covenants in which we participate.

11a That is not true
11b The prophecy in the last 3 verses of Zec:13 are the start of the passage that covers all of the next chapter. The 'little pones' start with the gentioles that God sent to peter in Acts:10. Their judgment on the day the 7th trump sounds sees 2/3 of all of them on the planet dying. The 1/3 that do not die have repented their sins and theu are joined by the gentioles included in verse Re:20:4 and when combined the qualify aqs 'the Church' Any female Gentiles that were taken captive during the exodus wars have their whole families become part of the whole House of israel.
11c Gentiles werc alway goint to be saved. The ber=ruise to the heel was first so the 12 tribes bacame the first to be gathered.

Isa:40:15:
Behold, the nations are as a drop of a bucket,
and are counted as the small dust of the balance:
behold,
he taketh up the isles as a very little thing.

11d. Not a good plan to start killing after you have been is=nstructed to stop killing as a way to please God.


12. A. Israelites will again participate in Levitical/priestly/sacrificial activity when they return from ALL the countries to which they have been scattered (Eze. 20:30-44).
B. This return has not yet occurred.
C. Animal sacrifices will occur in the future (from A and B).
D. We Christians are included as fellow Israelite participants in the covenants between YHVH and Israel (e.g., Jer. 31).
E. Thus, we are Israelites who will participate in the restoration of animal sacrifices in the future.

12a That isn't until the return, and the land of the enemy in Jer:31 is the grave rather than it being a gentile country. The verse below is referencing gentile countries though.

Eze:39:28:
Then shall they know that I am the LORD their God,
which cause them to be led into captivity among the heathen:
but I have gathered them unto their own land,
and have left none of them any more there.

12b The return is not until just after all 7 vials kill all the sinners in nthe world.
12c No they won't.
12d Israel is raised whole, the Gentilkes alive for the 1,000 years area remant of all gentikle. Gentiles will be a wholepeople at the end og Judgment Day that comes after satan is in the fiery lake.
12e Won't ever happen as there is zero support for that. What will happen is both groups who are alive according to Zec:14 will both reside in New Jerusalem in the New earth. Priests and Kings (to the nations) are as close as the get to bong one people. The is no blood sacrifice at any time after the 7th trump sounds.

Hope that is helpful.
 

Locutus

Senior Member
Feb 10, 2017
5,928
685
113
Not really - you need to get up to GHz speed and separate your comments from what you are addressing.
 

MHz

Banned
Feb 14, 2018
201
1
0
Sorry about my spelling. I ran out of time to spellcheck it before posting. I am a horrible typist, don't hesitate to ask for some clarity.
 

MHz

Banned
Feb 14, 2018
201
1
0
Normally I would do that in this case 1A is replied to in the 2nd 1a
 

Locutus

Senior Member
Feb 10, 2017
5,928
685
113
The best way is to address just one point and hammer the response home - that way no wall of text (that tends to get skipped over) and address the next point in another post and so on.
 

MHz

Banned
Feb 14, 2018
201
1
0
Take 2
1. A. Dt. 30:1-8 is not yet fulfilled.
B. Dt. 30:1-8 guarantees the restoration of priestly/Levitical/sacrificial Torah-obedience.
C. Priestly/Levitical/sacrificial Torah-obedience will occur in the future.
1a Any prophecy that deals with the bruise to Satan's head is unfulfilled.
1b The question is not about an altar or the sacrifice. The question is about what sacrifice will be acceptable and which will not. Today our sacrifice is what we say in our prayer to God. The 1,000 years runs on the same principals as the new earth runs on. The population in the 1,000 years is a static population and they are the first of man that are immortal and sinless. Cain and Able brought two offerings. The one that was rejected in a sinful world will be the one that is acceptable in a sinless world so the rejected sacrifice will become the accepted one starting at the beginning of the 1,000 year reign. Zec:14 is a preview of how the New earth will work only both the 12 Tribes and the Church will inhabit New Jerusalem as they assume their roles as Priests and Kings to the ever growing number of people that will make their homes outside of the wall of New Jerusalem once the New Earth begins. The Feast of the Tabernacles will happen each year for 1,000 times.
1c The resurrection of the whole House of Israel will go all the way back to the sons of Abraham. The duties of a Priest of God is not the same in a sinless world as it is in a sinful world. The ones that become alive at the start are students rather than teachers. Below Jesus is the 24 Elders from the Re:4 Temple. They are the 'many Saints' that came out of the graves the same morning as Jesus did. They all ascended to that temple to be glorified, only Jesus came back and that was only to help the ones He baptized to get through the same 40 day fast He went through when He was baptized by God.

2. A. Eze. 40-47 is not yet fulfilled.
B. Eze. 40-47 guarantees the restoration of priestly/Levitical/sacrificia
l activity.
C. Priestly/Levitical/sacrificial activity will occur in the future.

2a Zec:6 and many other places promote a temple and an altar being present during the 1,000 year reign. You will find nothing that supports a blood sacrifice as that ended with the cross and the next 40 years of the practice was an abomination to God and should any flesh be killed in the new earth it means that person is sent to the fiery lake.
2b Eze:37 defines the whole House of Israel. Abel's sacrifice is no longer the acceptable sacrifice. Any member of the 12 tribes can do it and they will still be raised with all the rest. A Gentile doing so gives up his place in the 1,000 year reign and is resurrected with 'the rest' instead.
3c. The activities taught to them during the 1,000 year Zec:14 represents will be what both groups do when they are both living inside New Jerusalem. Israel will be taught all there is to know about being Priests and the Gentile Church members will be taught all there is to know about being kings to the nations that will exist outside the walls of New Jerusalem. They are Shepherds to a very large Flock.

3. A. Jer. 33:20-22 is not yet fulfilled.
B. Jer. 33:20-22 guarantees the restoration of priestly/Levitical/sacrificial Torah-obedience.
C. Priestly/Levitical/sacrificial Torah-obedience will occur in the future.
3a Nor has the punishment of the Nations in Jer:25 or the gathering of the 12 Tribes as defined in Jer:31.
3b okay
3c okay

4. A. Zec. 14 guarantees future GLOBAL participation in the sacrifice-laden feast of Sukkot (with punishment upon the nations who do not participate).
B. Therefore, global participation in sacrifice-laden feasts will occur in the future, and it will be required, and it will be good to obey, and it will be bad to disobey.
4a Feast of the tabernacles doesn't mention blood sacrifice. After the feast the Church wanders around the globe seeing how to build cities as that will be part of their duties in the New Earth era. Cities means the megaliths that are in ruins today rather than it is referencing all the cities we have on our maps, they will never be rebuilt. Since the Church has rain it can grow crops and the produce is what they bring to the feat.Grapes are grown is Israel in that time so the Gentiles provide the fine flower that is a substitute of a live sacrifice if none were available. there will be no flesh in the 1,000 years that is available for sacrifice. The only other flesh that is alive is the fish in the former dead sea as stated in Eze:47.
4b Why would either group want to fall into sin. Coming tpo a feast where Jesus is the host does not sound like a burden at all, in fact it sounds like it is a celebration of sorts.

5. A. Mal. 3:1-4 guarantees that the Messiah will RESTORE the covenant with Levi, complete with sacrifices to be offered again in the future.
B. We should not oppose what the Messiah will come to restore in the forthcoming kingdom rule.
5a That book also says Elijah will come first. He would be with Moses and Elias and the rest of the 12 Tribes that are resurrected as soon as Jesus kills all the existing sinners on the globe. The only wrath that come after that is when God sends the remaining fallen angels to the fiery lake. The fire Jesus used sent a few fallen angels there and it only melted Satan's Babylon. The next wrath does the same to the rest on the planet and it looks like that when New Jerusalem lands on it at the end of Re:22.
The arrival is the beginning of the restoration, by the time Satan is released Jerusalem is called 'the glorious city' and the surrounding land is called 'the camp of the Saints', it is a mirror image of what that paryt of the garden would look like if sin had never entered the world.

6. A. Is. 66 guarantees future restoration of Levitical/priestly/sacrificial activities associated with new moon and Sabbath observance.
B. We should not oppose what Isaiah guarantees will occur in the future.
6a true, it also promotes the existence of a new earth that is not yet made. The new covenant mentioned in Hebrews is made with an immortal and sinless group rather than sinful men who can die.
6b you need to evaluate all the references rather than hanging a complicated doctrine on a single verse from a passage that may or may not be in the proper context. That is actually a sign that a doctrine is weak and not supported by the book

7.A. The Old Covenant is READY (Gr. "engoos", Heb. 8:13) to disappear.
B. That which is ready to disappear has NOT yet disappeared (from the meaning of "engoos").
C. The Old Covenant was still in force (as of the New-Covenant-era time of the writing of Hebrews) (from B).
D. The inauguration of the New Covenant does NOT entail termination of the Old Covenant (from C).
E. Old Covenant Levitical/priestly/sacrificial activities are good and proper to persist into the New Covenant era (from D).
7a. Nope. The iron/clay kingdom from Da:2 hasn't even began yet.it begins when the 7th trump sounds. The 12 books listed after Daniel only detail how the transition from that to the 1,000 year reign happens. Even the 'latter days' from the De:4:30 prophecy is unfulfilled. The scattering from that prophecy and Luke:21:24 happened in 70 AD.
7b any prophecy about the return is unfulfilled, any to do with the bruise to the heel from Ge:3;15 was fulfilled when Jesus said, 'It is finished,'just before He died on the cross. All two bruises are completed when He says,'It is done.;'when He pours out the 7th vialin Re16.
7c the only law from the that survived the transition is the 10 Commandments. The 10 Commandments are retired at the start of the 1,000 year reign.
7d I'm afraid it does as only one version of Law can exist at one time. The Law before the 10 commandments was the one the sons of God in Ge:6 were under. That Law ceased to be the Law of the land when the last giant died in the exodus wars. that is when the 10 commandments became law. A law that exists only for the time it takes for Ge:3:15 to be fulfilled. That day is the day the 7th trumps sounds. The new covenant is made with an immortal and sinless people. People born in the new earth will attain that level when they are 120 years old.
7d what do they do with their day if nobody has any sins to confess?

8. A. Many New-Covenant-era priests were disciples of the Messiah (Ac. 6:7).
B. Priests perform sacrificial/priestly/Levitical duties.
C. Priestly sacrificial/Levitical duties are acceptable in the New-Covenant-era (from A and B).
8a Okay,the last one that could do any of the 'signs following' died by 100AD
8b If it was a blood sacrifice in the temple it was an abomination mentioned in the 70th week prophecy. Killing Stephen and allowing the money-changes back were also abominations by that time. This doesn't fit in well with the reference to this specific chapter made a little earlier.

Isa:66:3:
He that killeth an ox is as if he slew a man;
he that sacrificeth a lamb,
as if he cut off a dog's neck;
he that offereth an oblation,
as if he offered swine's blood;
he that burneth incense,
as if he blessed an idol.
Yea,
they have chosen their own ways,
and their soul delighteth in their abominations.

8c a sin after the 1,000 years starts will get yo a seat beside Satan in the fiery lake. God will prevent that from happening. Removing all other flesh will prevent any blood sacrifice. God does it so no other flesh than fallen angesl gets sent to the lake. Only beings that are sinless and know about good and evil are saved from the fire hat melts the whole earth.

9. A. Thousands of first-century disciples were zealous for Torah (Ac. 21:20).
B. Torah-obedience requires sacrificial/priestly/Levitical duties (when performed properly).
C. Thousands of first-century disciples were zealous for Torah-obedient sacrificial/priestly/Levitical activity.
D. These disciples encouraged Paul (and Paul agreed!) to condone a vow (evidently the sacrifice-laden Nazirite vow) for the purpose of publicly affirming that Paul likewise walked orderly according to the Torah.
E. Sacrifices are, thus, affirmed as a valid ongoing New-Covenant-era practice.
9a God's book is 66 books rather than 5.

Re:22:18:
For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book,
If any man shall add unto these things,
God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:
Re:22:19:
And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy,
God shall take away his part out of the book of life,
and out of the holy city,
and from the things which are written in this book.

9b All of Re:12 is an expansion of Ge:3:15 if you are looking for confirmation of what 'the book actually means.

9c You would actually try and slaughter one of the birds or beasts of the field that come to the supper Christ prepares for them when it is payback for so many of them being killed as an atonement to man's own sin. I don't see that working out for the men really. lol

9d No Apostle or Disciple ever took part in a blood sacrifice after the cross. Believer were the minority and were ignored when they spoke.

9e if NT believers cannot eat the meat that is ki9llen in a religions ritual what is the purpose of the death??

10. A. Sabbath Torah is (present tense!) a shadow of the substance in Christ (Col. 2:16-17).
B. Col. 2 was written after the inauguration of the New-Covenant era.
C. Col. 2 is, thus, evidence that Sabbath Torah (which, of course, includes associated sacrificial activity when properly performed) is an ONGOING FUNCTIONING SHADOW which CONTINUES to point to the substance in Christ.
10a The reference is to the 613 laws rather than the 10 Commandments.
10b Jesus introduce a modified Passover meal that excluded meat. we bare still under the old covenant as the new covenant is means for when we have a glorified body like the one Jesus has after His return for 40 days.
10c not at all

11. A. Christians are included as fellow Israelites who partake in the Torah-laden covenants between YHVH and Israel (Eph. 2).
B. The covenants (Abrahamic, Mosaic, Davidic, and New) are all still in force, and we Christians partake in these covenants (plural! Eph. 2:12).
C. The covenants entail Levitical/priestly/sacrificial activity when properly performed.
D. Thus, we Christians should condone the proper restoration and participation in the Levitical/priestly/sacrificial activities associated with the Torah-laden covenants in which we participate.

11a That is not true
11b The prophecy in the last 3 verses of Zec:13 are the start of the passage that covers all of the next chapter. The 'little pones' start with the gentiles that God sent to peter in Acts:10. Their judgment on the day the 7th trump sounds sees 2/3 of all of them on the planet dying. The 1/3 that do not die have repented their sins and they are joined by the gentiles included in verse Re:20:4 and when combined the qualify aqs 'the Church' Any female Gentiles that were taken captive during the exodus wars have their whole families become part of the whole House of Israel.
11c Gentiles werc alway goint to be saved. The ber=bruise to the heel was first so the 12 Tribes became the first to be gathered.

Isa:40:15:
Behold, the nations are as a drop of a bucket,
and are counted as the small dust of the balance:
behold,
he taketh up the isles as a very little thing.

11d. Not a good plan to start killing after you have been instructed to stop killing as a way to please God.

12. A. Israelites will again participate in Levitical/priestly/sacrificial activity when they return from ALL the countries to which they have been scattered (Eze. 20:30-44).
B. This return has not yet occurred.
C. Animal sacrifices will occur in the future (from A and B).
D. We Christians are included as fellow Israelite participants in the covenants between YHVH and Israel (e.g., Jer. 31).
E. Thus, we are Israelites who will participate in the restoration of animal sacrifices in the future.
12a That isn't until the return, and the land of the enemy in Jer:31 is the grave rather than it being a gentile country. The verse below is referencing gentile countries though.

Eze:39:28:
Then shall they know that I am the LORD their God,
which cause them to be led into captivity among the heathen:
but I have gathered them unto their own land,
and have left none of them any more there.

12b The return is not until just after all 7 vials kill all the sinners in the world.
12c No they won't.
12d Israel is raised whole, the Gentiles alive for the 1,000 years area remnant of all gentiles. Gentiles will be a whole people at the end o Judgment Day that comes after Satan is in the fiery lake.
12e Won't ever happen as there is zero support for that. What will happen is both groups who are alive according to Zec:14 will both reside in New Jerusalem in the New earth. Priests and Kings (to the nations) are as close as the get to bong one people. The is no blood sacrifice at any time after the 7th trump sounds.

Hope that is readable.
 

MHz

Banned
Feb 14, 2018
201
1
0
Responses to my post can take that form. I tend to do more detailed posts so shortness is not included. If U did one point at a time it would be after Easter before I covered the last point. If people can't read a long post I doubt their reply contains much useful info really.
 

PlainWord

Senior Member
Jun 11, 2013
7,080
151
63
Responses to my post can take that form. I tend to do more detailed posts so shortness is not included. If U did one point at a time it would be after Easter before I covered the last point. If people can't read a long post I doubt their reply contains much useful info really.
Are we believers today still waiting for the Kingdom to come or are we living in the kingdom now?
 

MHz

Banned
Feb 14, 2018
201
1
0
Are we believers today still waiting for the Kingdom to come or are we living in the kingdom now?
We have a book to guide us until Jesus returns. That is the day we enter the Kingdom of Heaven. The world of today is full of death and sin.
This verse below is the time of the change and it is in our future rather than our past.

Re:11:15-19:
And the seventh angel sounded;
and there were great voices in heaven,
saying,
The kingdoms of this world are become the kingdoms of our Lord,
and of his Christ; and he shall reign for ever and ever.
And the four and twenty
elders,
which sat before God on their seats,
fell upon their faces,
and worshipped God,
Saying,
We give thee thanks,
O Lord God Almighty,
which art,
and wast,
and art to come;
because thou hast taken to thee thy great power,
and hast reigned.
And the nations were angry,
and thy wrath is come,
and the time of the dead,
that they should be judged,
and that thou shouldest give reward unto thy servants the prophets,
and to the saints,
and them that fear thy name, small and great;
and shouldest destroy them which destroy the earth.
And the temple of God was opened in heaven,
and there was seen in his temple the ark of his testament:
and there were lightnings,
and voices,
and thunderings,
and an earthquake,
and great hail.
 
May 19, 2016
417
2
0
Ezekiel was already being fulfilled when Paul wrote to the Corinthians and quotes directly from the prophet

2 Cor 6:16 And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people.


A comparison between Ezekiel and Corinthians shows that Paul is virtually repeating the prophets words and applying them to the Gentiles:

Ezekiel 37:26-27 I will make a covenant of peace with them. It shall be an everlasting covenant with them. And I will set them in their land and multiply them, and will set my sanctuary in their midst forevermore. My dwelling place shall be with them, and I will be their God, and they shall be my people.

2 Cor 6:16 And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people.

What is significant about Paul's use of Ezekiel here is prior to the above is the regathering of Israel under on stick - bringing the tribes together as one:

Ezek 37:16 Moreover, thou son of man, take thee one stick, and write upon it, For Judah, and for the children of Israel his companions: then take another stick, and write upon it, For Joseph, the stick of Ephraim, and for all the house of Israel his companions:

Ezek 37:17 And join them one to another into one stick; and they shall become one in thine hand.

Now if what Paul is stating from Ezekiel's prophecy is happening at Corinth in the 1st century AD "they shall be my people" then it must follow that the previous actions were already under way "I will take the children of Israel from among the heathen".

Ezek 37:21 And say unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I will take the children of Israel from among the heathen, whither they be gone, and will gather them on every side, and bring them into their own land:

And this is exactly what we find happening in James' letter:

James 1:1 James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting.

Thus in the 1st century AD we have the 12 tribes being called together to be one "stick" and the Gentiles as "I will be their God, and they shall be my people" in the body of Christ.


Ezekiel 37 is one continuous prophecy of the "resurrection":

Ezek 37:4 Again he said unto me, Prophesy upon these bones, and say unto them, O ye dry bones, hear the word of the LORD.

Ezek 37:5 Thus saith the Lord GOD unto these bones; Behold, I will cause breath to enter into you, and ye shall live:

Ezek 37:12 Therefore prophesy and say unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, O my people, I will open your graves, and cause you to come up out of your graves, and bring you into the land of Israel.

In Israelite speak or poetic/metaphoric language being separated from God and or the land was to be dead or in the grave.

What Ezekiel is describing is bringing the living diaspora back into fellowship with him from exilic death and their graves - not a bringing up of decomposed bodies out of the ground.

Hello,

I see you have an unjustified presupposition lurking in your mind regarding the nature of Paul's quotation of a prophetic passage.

Also, you have needlessly resorted to a "poetic/metaphoric" interpretation, when a literal interpretation is perfectly sufficient. (Of course, literal interpretations should be preferred, absent good reasons to favor nonliteral interpretations, but you have violated this hermeneutics principle).

Ok...here is the evidence to support my critique.

You wrote: "Now if what Paul is stating from Ezekiel's prophecy is happening at Corinth in the 1st century AD "they shall be my people" then it must follow that the previous actions were already under way "I will take the children of Israel from among the heathen".

My response: Paul never said that all the details of Ezekiel's prophecy were happening at Corinth in the 1st century.

A NT citation of a principle in a prophetic passage does not entail that everything in the quoted passage was happening at the time of the quotation.

So, that's the hole in your argument here.

Furthermore, all Israelites clearly did NOT return to the land of Israel in (or before) the 1st century. Why?

Because the prophesied return will never again be followed by a diaspora (Am. 9:15).

And a diaspora clearly HAS occurred subsequent to AD 70.

And a return of all Israelites has NOT occurred since AD 70.

Thus, Am. 9:15 (and the return of all Israelites in Eze. 37) remains unfulfilled.

In addition, if the Israelites all returned to Israel in the 1st century, then James (actually, Jacob was his name) would not have referred to the tribes as being still dispersed/scattered (Jas. 1:1).

Yet again, we have found a problem with your position.

Paul can cite a principle emphasized in the prophets (i.e., the principle that true believers should not associate with idols) without requiring that everything in the quoted prophetic passage be fulfilled at that time.

And, literal interpretations are preferable to metaphorical interpretations, absent good reasons to favor nonliteral interpretations.

The prophesied return to the land will be a return of all Israelites to the physical SOIL/GROUND/LAND (Heb. "adamah", Jer. 23:7-8). That's a return to the physical land, not a metaphor. This has not yet happened.

Again, this is why your position is inconsistent with Scripture.

And is Mal. 3 (restoration by Jesus of the Levitical priesthood) just another metaphor?

And is Dt. 30:1-8 just another metaphor?

And is Eze. 40-47 just another metaphor?

And is Is. 66 (Sabbath and, by implication, associated restoration of Sabbath sacrificial activity) another metaphor?

And is Eze. 20 another metaphor?

And is Zec. 6 (rebuilding of temple and, by implication, restoration of priestly temple activities) another metaphor?

And is the explicit guarantee of ongoing future Levitical activity (per the Davidic Covenant, Jer. 33) just another metaphor?

Yikes! You're poetic/metaphor hermeneutic is doing gross injustice to the prophets.

I choose to the believe the prophets.

No need for poetic/metaphoric substitutes grounded in faulty hermeneutics.

Anyway, that's the way I see it...

Regards....
 
May 19, 2016
417
2
0
There is nothing in that portion of scripture that instructs us ceremonial laws as shadows used in the period of time of Kings has not been restored to previous time period, at the time of reformation.

The veil is rent .

We are in the last days We await the promised eternal land not the temporal In Jerusalem . That temporal land is already here who would seek by faith something already seen? It’s what the pagan nations of the world seek after walking by sight as if the kingdom of God came by observation..

I would think the Christian that recognizes Christ has come in the temporal flesh would not try and suggest he must come again for another demonstration as in crucifying him over and over, as if one demonstration was not enough to keep the veil rent.

The Holy Ghost this signifying,( to make known by relating it to something already known) that the way into the holiest of all was not yet made manifest, while as the first tabernacle was yet standing:Which was a figure(parable) for the time then present, in which were offered both gifts and sacrifices, that could not make him that did the service perfect, as pertaining to the conscience;Which stood only in meats and drinks, and divers washings, and carnal ordinances, “imposed on them” until the time of reformation. Heb 9:8

When looking at the portion above. At the time of reformation the Leviticus priesthood is passed on to the Jew and Gentile, as one Kingdom of Priest one bride sent out with the gospel of salvation as Ambassadors sent from a foreign land (the new heavens and earth) for Him.

2Corinthians 5:7 (For we walk by faith, not by sight:)

2Co 4:18 While we look not at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen: for the things which are seen are temporal; but the things which are not seen are eternal.

I would ask what would be the hope of mending the rent veil? Is it a sign required?
Hello,

You wrote: "There is nothing in that portion of scripture [Dt. 30:1-8] that instructs us ceremonial laws as shadows used in the period of time of Kings has not been restored to previous time period, at the time of reformation.

My response: Not a complete sentence there....

But Dt. 30:8 clearly refers to a future obedience to 100% of Torah (which, of course, entails obedience to Torah rules pertaining to animal sacrifices).

And, this 100% obedience will occur AFTER return to the land (Dt. 30:5).

First the RETURN (Dt. 30:5), THEN 100% obedience to all Torah again (Dt. 30:8).

Since the return has not yet happened, it follows that 100% obedience to all Torah is yet FUTURE, even though the veil is already torn.

Now, Heb. 9:10 does NOT state that the time of reformation entails an abolition of Levitical/ceremonial/priestly activity. After all, Paul CONDONED sacrificial activity (Ac. 21) for the purpose of proving he walked orderly in obedience to Torah.

AND, many disciples were animal-sacrifice-performing priests (Ac. 6).

AND, thousands of 1st century disciples were zealous (Ac. 21) for Torah (which, of course, includes animal sacrifices).

So, Paul and the 1st century disciples (which includes priests) were not contradicting Heb. 9:10.

Furthermore, the writer of Hebrews had just stated that the Old Covenant was READY/NEAR to disappearing (Heb. 8:13) which, of course, entails that it had NOT yet disappeared and, thus, was still in force, thereby confirming that the Old Covenant and New Covenant function simultaneously.

So then, the time of reformation (Heb. 9:10) could not be referring to a TERMINATION of Levitical/priestly/sacrificial activity.

Rather, the passage confirms that the time of reformation consists of new realities which benefit the believer in Christ (Heb. 9:11-28).

And, there is no good reason to suppose that these new realities can not coexist with the ongoing shadow function of the law (even animal-sacrifice law). In fact, Paul says this shadow-function IS (present tense) a function in Col. 2:17, thereby confirming that the law CONTINUES (even in the New Covenant era) to be a shadow that points to greater realities of substance in Christ.

And, the prophets guarantee restoration of animal sacrifices in the future (Eze. 20; Eze. 40-47; Dt. 30; Is. 66; Zec. 6; Mal. 3; Jer. 33). So again, Heb. 9:10 can NOT require termination of the very sacrifices which the prophets GUARANTEE will occur in the future.

So then, we need not mend a rent veil.

Christ has entered the heavenly tabernacle and made permanent atonement for our sins.

And the animal-sacrifice laws shall continue to function as a shadow which points to our need for the greater realities in Christ, just as the prophets promise will happen.

Your position has not accounted for these considerations.

Please revise your viewpoint accordingly...

regards...
 
May 19, 2016
417
2
0
Well that is a good point, but then that begs several questions. Why do the jews still perform animal sacrifices, if they are not performing their animal sacrifice in the temple, nor according to the regulations of the Torah, nor done by the Levites? Why do they not restore the temple? Why do they not restore and cleanse the altar? Why do they not follow the commands of God in the Torah? Why are the Levites illegitimate? Why are their rabbis illegitimate?

If then they perform illegitimate sacrifices in illegitimate places on illegitimate altars by the hand of illegitimate lowborn and mix-breed men; are they not in total transgression of the Torah? What is the proscription in the Torah and the Prophets for such transgressions?

Who is the legitimate King of the Jews? Who is the legitimate High Priest? Where is the legitimate Temple? What is the legitimate sacrifice?

Ultimately all these questions a pointed to one point even; why do these people stubbornly seek sacrifices and priests and temples and not believe in the God Most High? Why do these people seek after sacrifices and not rather obey the Lord?

Truly truly it is said by the prophet; to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken is better than the fat of rams for rebellion is as witchcraft and stubbornness is as idolatry, because you have rejected the word of the Lord, he has also rejected thee.
Hello,

Yes, the Jewish establishment has problems with its belief and practice. (They value many Torah portions, but tend to neglect and oppose their Messiah).

But then again, our Christian establishment is not perfect either! (We value the Messiah, but tend to neglect and oppose Torah portions which are presently observable and/or prophesied to be properly observed in the future).

And, I am not aware of a Torah-sanctioned restoration of Levitical/priestly/sacrificial activity in a tabernacle/temple.

So, the restoration of animal sacrifices (as assured by the prophets, Eze. 20; Eze. 40-47; Jer. 33; Is. 66; Mal. 3; Dt. 30; Zec. 6) is evidently yet future.

Yes, personal obedience is better than offering sacrifice due to one's personal disobedience (1 Sa. 15:22).

But not all sacrifices are offered due to one's personal disobedience. Some are offered simply as daily or weekly ongoing functions (e.g., Nu. 28).

And obedience entails OBEYING THE LORD'S VOICE (1 Sa. 15:22).

And obedience to the Lord's voice entails Torah-obedience (Dt. 13:18; Dt. 15:5).

And Torah-obedience entails ongoing animal sacrifices (Nu. 28).

So then, let us OBEY the Lord's voice (even in obedience to animal-sacrificial laws, when they become properly observable in the future), rather than offer sacrifices for our own disobedience, recognizing all the while that these laws are a shadow pointing to the greater substance in Christ (Col. 2:17) who has once-for-all made atonement for our sins, saving us by His grace, through faith, not by any faithless works of our own.

blessings...
 
May 19, 2016
417
2
0
You said “Christians are included as fellow Israelites.”- exactly. What changed that they are now included? God switched from physical to spiritual in the New Testament. Now (in the last days) things are fulfilled spiritually. The physical things in the Old Testament only represented the real way (spiritual way) to come with Christ. “These were only a shadow of the things to come, the reality however is found in Christ.” For example...

Old Testament = physical lamb sacrifice.
New Testament = spiritual Lamb (of God) sacrificed one time for all people.

Therefore the animal sacrifices of the future are spiritual not physical.
Hello OneFaith,

You have not adequately engaged the position I've set forth.

Many points I raised have not even been addressed by your comments.

And, the shadow IS (present tense, Col. 2:17) an ongoing function.

And, Paul CONDONED sacrificial activity (Ac. 21) to prove he walked orderly in accordance with the law which, of course, entails obedience to animal-sacrifice laws.

And, many disciples were sacrifice-performing priests (Ac. 6).

And, thousands of 1st-century disciples were zealous for Torah (Ac. 21) which, of course, entails obedience to animal-sacrifice laws.

And, the Old Covenant is ready/near (Heb. 8:13) to disappear, implying it had NOT yet disappeared as of the New-Covenant-era time of the writing of the book of Hebrews, thereby confirming that the Old Covenant and the New Covenant function simultaneously.

So, your viewpoint contradicts the actions of Paul, the statements of Paul, the statements in Hebrews, the actions of the 1st-century disciples, and the guarantee from the prophets that animal sacrifices will again resume (Eze. 20; Eze. 40-47; Jer. 33; Dt. 30; Zec. 6; Mal. 3; Is. 66).

So sure, your viewpoint is commonplace, but it does not account for the objections I've raised against it.

regards...
 
May 19, 2016
417
2
0
Hello Bibleguy,

Thanks for the invite here. My prayer is that the scriptures presented here will help you.

What I will do here however as you have invited me is to honestly examine what you are saying here to see if the scriptures you provide support your belief that animal sacrifices will once more be a part of the Christian faith in the NEW Covenant. Then by God's help go through the scriptures that disagree with your interpretation of these scriptures. I will address each of your 12 points separately in each post sent here.

PART 1/12

Let's examine your premise in this thread and that is you believe the scriptures you provide here shows that Christians will once again practice animal sacrifices.....

1. A. Dt. 30:1-8 is not yet fulfilled.
B. Dt. 30:1-8 guarantees the restoration of priestly/Levitical/sacrificial Torah-obedience.
C. Priestly/Levitical/sacrificial Torah-obedience will occur in the future.


Your argument here is that Deuteronomy 30:1-8 are not yet fulfilled and are future correct? Let's examine your claims here to see if this is true or not.

Deuteronomy 30:1-8 is in refrence to the covenant of blessings and the curses outlined in Deuteronomy 28:1-68 for obedience and disobediance to God's LAW as the children of Israel were entering into the promised land and fighting the nations around them (Deuteronomy 29:1-29; 29:9-12; 14-15).

Deuteronomy 29:20-29 is talking about the curse of those who serve other God's would be cast into other lands. These scriptures set the scene for Deuteronomy 30:1-8.

Now we have the context let's look at the scriptures....

Deuteronomy 30
1,
And it shall come to pass, when all these things are come on you (What things? curses for disobedience Deut 29), the blessing and the curse, which I have set before you, and you shall call them to mind among all the nations, where the LORD your God has driven you,

Referring to Deuteronomy 29:25-28 being driven out to another land through the curses of disobedience...

2, And shall return to the LORD your God, and shall obey his voice according to all that I command you this day, you and your children, with all your heart, and with all your soul;
3, That then the LORD your God will turn your captivity, and have compassion on you, and will return and gather you from ALL the nations, where the LORD your God has scattered you.
4, If any of your be driven out to the outmost parts of heaven, from there will the LORD your God gather you, and from there will he fetch you:
5, And the LORD your God will bring you into the land which your fathers possessed, and you shall possess it; and he will do you good, and multiply you above your fathers.
6, And the LORD your God will circumcise your heart, and the heart of your seed, to love the LORD your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, that you may live.
7, And the LORD your God will put all these curses on your enemies, and on them that hate you, which persecuted you.
8, And you shall return and obey the voice of the LORD, and do all his commandments which I command you this day

Now a key point here. ALL of Deuteronomy 28-30 are presented as a whole in relation to the blessings and curses for OBEDIENCE or DISOBEDINECE of God's LAW.

NOTE:
At that particular point in time when the covenant of blessings and curses were given to God's people EVERYTHING outlined in it was indeed future as it was only just given to God's people. They had not been disobedient or fully obedient to God's LAW as a people at that particular point in time.

From that day forward however everything in this covenant was to apply to God's professed people. Deut 30:9-20 closes off the covenant of blessings and curses outlined in Deuteronomy Cahapters 28-30. Deuteronomy 30:1-8 should not be read separately to Chapters 28-30 as they are part of the same topic.
Deuteronomy 30:1-8 does not even mention the
restoration of priestly/Levitical/and animal sacrifices

Blessings of OBEDIENCE continued... for returning to the Lord from the lands of captivity....

9, And the LORD your God will make you plenteous in every work of your hand, in the fruit of your body, and in the fruit of your cattle, and in the fruit of your land, for good: for the LORD will again rejoice over you for good, as he rejoiced over your fathers:
10, If you shall listen to the voice of the LORD your God, to keep his commandments and his statutes which are written in this book of the law, and if you turn to the LORD your God with all your heart, and with all your soul.
11, For this commandment which I command you this day, it is not hidden from you, neither is it far off.
12, It is not in heaven, that you should say, Who shall go up for us to heaven, and bring it to us, that we may hear it, and do it?
13, Neither is it beyond the sea, that you should say, Who shall go over the sea for us, and bring it to us, that we may hear it, and do it?
14, But the word is very near to you, in your mouth, and in your heart, that you may do it.
15, See, I have set before you this day life and good, and death and evil;
16, In that I command you this day to love the LORD your God, to walk in his ways, and to keep his commandments and his statutes and his judgments, that you may live and multiply: and the LORD your God shall bless you in the land where you go to possess it.
17, But if your heart turn away, so that you will not hear, but shall be drawn away, and worship other gods, and serve them;
18, I denounce to you this day, that you shall surely perish, and that you shall not prolong your days on the land, where you pass over Jordan to go to possess it.
19, I call heaven and earth to record this day against you, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing: therefore choose life, that both you and your seed may live:

20, That you may love the LORD your God, and that you may obey his voice, and that you may hold to him: for he is your life, and the length of your days: that you may dwell in the land which the LORD swore to your fathers, to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, to give the

Now you are arguing that this is all future and not yet fulfilled correct? Well my friend scripture and history both disagree with you here. As Israel was conqoured and sent to other lands for their DISOBEDIENCE against God's LAW.

Scripture references on the captivity of Israel and Judah

Assyrian captivity; conqour Israel into captivity (2 Kings 17), The reson of their captivity was for SIN or DISOBEDIENCE against God's LAW rejecting his covenant (2 Kings 17:7-16)

Babylonian captivity;
conqour Israel into captivity (1 Chron 9:1; Dan 1:1-7; Jer 29:4-14; Ezra 5:12), v1 The reson of their captivity was for SIN or DISOBEDIENCE against God's LAW rejecting his covenant

Medes and Persians
; conqour Babylon and take over Israel into captivity then to be released (2 Chron 36:20-23; Ezra 1:1-4; 2:1-2; Esther)

Greece and Roman empires (Daniel 8:20-24) prophecy.


History of ancient Israel and Judah (Source; wiki linked)

The Kingdom of Israel emerged as an important local power by the 10th century BCE before falling to the Neo-Assyrian Empire in 722 BCE. Israel's southern neighbor, the Kingdom of Judah, emerged in the 8th or 9th century BCE[SUP][1][/SUP] and enjoyed a period of prosperity as a client state of first the Neo-Assyrian Empire and then the Neo-Babylonian Empire before a revolt against the latter led to its destruction in 586 BCE. Following the fall of Babylon to the Achaemenid Empire under Cyrus the Great in 539 BCE, some Judean exiles returned to Jerusalem, inaugurating the formative period in the development of a distinctive Judahite identity in the province of Yehud Medinata. Yehud was absorbed into the subsequent Hellenistic kingdoms that followed the conquests of Alexander the Great, but in the 2nd century BCE the Judaeans revolted against the Seleucid Empire and created the Hasmonean kingdom. This, the last nominally independent kingdom of Judea, came to an end in 63 BCE with its conquest by Pompey of Rome. With the installation of client kingdoms under the Herodian dynasty, the Province of Judea was wracked by civil disturbances which culminated in the First Jewish–Roman War, the destruction of the Temple, the emergence of Rabbinic Judaism and

Summary:
It seems that history and God's Word disagrees with your interpretation that Deuteronmy 30:1-8 referring to the blessing and curses are all future. Scripture and History both testify that these scriptures in Deuteronomy 30 have indeed been fulfilled.

All the blessings and curses are conditional on OBEDIENCE or DISOBEDIENCE. Disobedient Israel have been conqoured and sent to other lands and held captive by other nations accoding to the curse of disobedience in Deuteronomy 29:25-28.

Dueteronomy 30 does not even mention the restoration of
restoration of priestly/Levitical/sacrificial. Your first premise has fallen down and is not supported by scripture or history that animal sacrifices will be continued in the NEW Covenant.

......................


Hello, thanks for joining the chat!

You wrote: "Deuteronomy 30:1-8 does not even mention the restoration of priestly/Levitical/and animal sacrifices."

My response: I disagree. Dt. 30:8 refers to 100% obedience to all (Heb. "kol") Torah. This, of course, entails obedience to Torah laws pertaining to animal sacrifices.

You ask: "Now you are arguing that this is all future and not yet fulfilled correct? "

My response: I maintain that the return of all Israelites to the land (Dt. 30:5) and subsequent 100% obedience to all Torah (Dt. 30:8) has not yet occurred.

You wrote: "It seems that history and God's Word disagrees with your interpretation that Deuteronmy 30:1-8 referring to the blessing and curses are all future. Scripture and History both testify that these scriptures in Deuteronomy 30 have indeed been fulfilled."

My response: I'm not sure what you're talking about. I can't find anything in your response which shows (from history or Scripture) that ALL Israelites returned (after a diaspora) to the land of Israel to obey 100% of Torah (as prophesied by Moses in Dt. 30:1-8).

You wrote: "Disobedient Israel have been conqoured and sent to other lands and held captive by other nations accoding to the curse of disobedience in Deuteronomy 29:25-28."

My response: Sure, but this diaspora is not permanent! Rather, in the latter days the Israelites shall return (Dt. 4:26-30; Dt. 30:1-8). The Israelites have never all returned to obey all Torah. Thus, this is a FUTURE PROPHECY.

You gave us no historical or Biblical evidence that all Israelites have returned to the land to obey all Torah as prophesied in the prophets.

You wrote: "Dueteronomy 30 does not even mention the restoration of restoration of priestly/Levitical/sacrificial."

My response: Again, Dt. 30:8 refers to restoration of ALL (Heb. "kol") Torah. This, of course, entails obedience to Torah portions pertaining to animal sacrifices.

You wrote: "Your first premise has fallen down and is not supported by scripture or history that animal sacrifices will be continued in the NEW Covenant."

My response: You just contradicted Paul who CONDONED sacrifices (Ac. 21).

You just contradicted the four others with Paul who likewise CONDONED sacrifices (Ac. 21).

You contradicted the REASON for the sacrifice in Ac. 21 (which was to prove Paul walked orderly according to the Torah, which of course entails obedience to animal-sacrifice laws).

You opposed the practice of the many disciples who were sacrifice-performing priests (Ac. 6).

You opposed Heb. 8:13 which states that the Old Covenant was READY/NEAR to disappear as of the New-Covenant-era time of the writing of the book of Hebrews, thereby confirming that the Old Covenant and New Covenant function simultaneously.

You opposed the prophets which guarantee restoration of sacrifices in the future (Jer. 33; Is. 66; Eze. 20; Eze. 40-47; etc.).

Yikes!

I think we need to discuss this further, because the weight of evidence here seems to clearly disconfirm your viewpoint.

look forward to chatting with you further...

blessings...