Something that bugs me about what Christian media/people have done to Christianity is that it has twisted it in a direction that simply isn't true; people now think that if what they believe in the Bible conflicts with science, the science must be wrong. Now, sometimes this is the case, but it is usually your interpretation of key passages that is wrong. Don't feel bad; when you examine something that has been translated, and view it from the goggles of a different (Western) culture, you often end up getting the wrong idea.
For instance, you guys are talking about the Big Bang. What gives you the impression that God didn't create the universe in such a manner that a 'Big Bang' would've occurred? The people who say "the big bang came out of nowhere" are, of course, illogical and wrong, but there is a tremendous amount of evidence that the Big Bang occurred; yet Christians get the perception (and here is where hurtful stereotypes are created) that "because the Big Bang is scientific, and lots of Atheists believe it occurred, makes it wrong and unbiblical". WRONG. Do the Atheists not also believe the Earth was created at one point in time? So? Didn't God also create the Earth at a point in time? Indeed, he did.
Adding things to the word of God (namely that "God supposedly didn't create the universe starting with a Big Bang") is wrong, and the result of satanic influence. Here is a Biblical example of this:
[Genesis 2:16-17]: "" And the LORD God commanded the man, “You are free to eat from any tree in the garden; but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat from it you will certainly die.”"
Okay, so God gives a set of incredibly clear instructions. Let's see if Eve adds anything to his instructions:
[Genesis 3:2-3]: "The woman said to the serpent, “We may eat fruit from the trees in the garden, but God did say, ‘You must not eat fruit from the tree that is in the middle of the garden, and you must not touch it, or you will die.’”"
Unfortunately Eve has added "must not touch", thus falsifying God's word. Many "Anti-science" Christians do the same every day.
However, many Christians run in the opposite direction; taking things away from God's word. Yes, I'm looking at you "Theistic Evolutionists". In case you're not aware, many Christians believe that God created man through evolution. Simply examining the Bible will reveal that TE's are taking away from God's word. This, also, is the result of satanic influence. Let's examine those two Bible passages again:
[Genesis 2:16-17]: "" And the LORD God commanded the man, “You are free to eat from any tree in the garden; but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat from it you will certainly die.”"
Okay, so God gives a set of incredibly clear instructions. Let's see if Eve takes away from anything He said:
[Genesis 3:2-3]: "The woman said to the serpent, “We may eat fruit from the trees in the garden, but God did say, ‘You must not eat fruit from the tree that is in the middle of the garden, and you must not touch it, or you will die.’”"
God said that they were free to eat from any tree (except the tree of G&E); eve said they may eat fruit from the trees. God said "free + all"; Eve said "may", and didn't even mentioned 'all".
Furthermore, God says "you will certainly die"; Eve says "you will die". God, addressing Adam, says YOU will CERTAINLY die.... However, Eve removes "certainly" (a powerful word), and instead says "you will die" (to Satan) instead of "I will die".
So some of you may be going "Meh, so what? It's only a few words, here and there. What could possibly go wrong with that?". I'll answer that with another verse: "When the woman saw that the fruit of the tree was good... she took some and ate it."
Just a few words can be the difference between falling to sin, or Glorifying God.
So we see that taking away from the word of God is also a satanic influence.
Wow, this was way longer than it should've been. Oh well.
Only say exactly what the Bible says; and keep in mind that while it is never wrong, you're interpretation of it may be.