Repentance and baptism

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Roughsoul1991

Senior Member
Sep 17, 2016
8,855
4,507
113
#81
Huh?

I recommended that particular part of the video in order to document Barton's lies.

As far as "a good counter argument to America not being founded on a Judeo-Christian foundation" is concerned, I also provided you with a link to something I had written and posted on this forum a while back.

Anyhow, I'm not going to derail this thread.

I mentioned Barton because you recommended him as a trustworthy apologist, and he's anything but the same.

The guy is a bold-faced liar.

If you want to start a separate thread about him, then that's your prerogative to do so.

Out of respect for Monika, I'm not discussing Barton here anymore. She watched the video herself, and drew her own (right) conclusion. I'm content with that.
You say liar, I say historian. You posted stuff with no debate to prove if the lies are true or false. What link to your writings? If you wish to debate we can elsewhere.
 
B

Blackpowderduelist

Guest
#82
I never said to anyone not to get baptized.. If you can quote where i told anyone not to get baptized then do so.. But you will not be able to quote me saying such::

Therefore you are being a false accuser of the brethren and as such you should take the appropriate actions..

Also to declare a Christian satanic is an extremely serious charge..

Throwing about such an allegation flippantly should cause one to fear blasphemy of the Holy Spirit..
"Another Work that is not essential"
I'm not afraid that the Holy Spirit would ever say such at thing.
Jesus instituted baptism. To relegate it to just a nonessential work. Is indeed an evil thing to do.
Anyway we can debate it somewhere else so as not to derail this thread.
 
B

Blackpowderduelist

Guest
#83
You say liar, I say historian. You posted stuff with no debate to prove if the lies are true or false. What link to your writings? If you wish to debate we can elsewhere.
Y'all don't derail this thread. This lady needs encouragement not our arguement.
 

Adstar

Senior Member
Jul 24, 2016
7,582
3,616
113
#84
"Another Work that is not essential"
I'm not afraid that the Holy Spirit would ever say such at thing.
Jesus instituted baptism. To relegate it to just a nonessential work. Is indeed an evil thing to do.
Anyway we can debate it somewhere else so as not to derail this thread.
I agree these disputes about the validity of certain preachers and water baptism should not have entered into this discussion.. it was about the Original poster and her questions...
 

CS1

Well-known member
May 23, 2012
13,058
4,344
113
#85
Explain this in more detail.

this is not my thread and I am nothing to overtake it with debate on David barton. I think I was very clear as to why. I want to say it was some time ago David barton is not a new guy who saw him back in 2001-2004 and he made some comments about American history that were speculative and opinionated that could not be validated. He was given the benefit of the doubt yet he could prove his statement.


1.David Barton has been criticized in the past for refusing to submit his publications for peer review, choosing to instead self-publish.
2. On glen backs program he made statements there that were founded to be untrue.


Again has he said many good things? yes, but he was discredited and because of it lost integrity. Is everything he said false no but did he say things that only He said and could not be established with historical fact > yes.

Listen the World will not allow a man of god to say something untrue and not beat him over the head with it.
 

Roughsoul1991

Senior Member
Sep 17, 2016
8,855
4,507
113
#86
Y'all don't derail this thread. This lady needs encouragement not our arguement.
Was not trying to but my source was called out to be a liar. That is like calling your credibility out. Not good when you are trying to share good apologetical sources. Truth must be defended. That is within the scale of apologetics.
 

Roughsoul1991

Senior Member
Sep 17, 2016
8,855
4,507
113
#87
this is not my thread and I am nothing to overtake it with debate on David barton. I think I was very clear as to why. I want to say it was some time ago David barton is not a new guy who saw him back in 2001-2004 and he made some comments about American history that were speculative and opinionated that could not be validated. He was given the benefit of the doubt yet he could prove his statement.


1.David Barton has been criticized in the past for refusing to submit his publications for peer review, choosing to instead self-publish.
2. On glen backs program he made statements there that were founded to be untrue.


Again has he said many good things? yes, but he was discredited and because of it lost integrity. Is everything he said false no but did he say things that only He said and could not be established with historical fact > yes.

Listen the World will not allow a man of god to say something untrue and not beat him over the head with it.
What was untrue? You can move this to msg or another thread does not matter to me.
 
B

Blackpowderduelist

Guest
#88
Was not trying to but my source was called out to be a liar. That is like calling your credibility out. Not good when you are trying to share good apologetical sources. Truth must be defended. That is within the scale of apologetics.
Fair enough.
And I'm not trying to be a jerk.
We just need to be sensitive to the needs of new Christians and give them what they need. Especially ones that are struggling.
She seems to burdened by a heaven load that is not hers to bear. We need to just unpack it for her and set her free in Christ.
 
B

Blackpowderduelist

Guest
#89
What is important for her is that she know that the work is done by Jesus and that we rest and abide in him and he will work through us, and it won't be a burden to us because we will not even think of it as work or duty, because it will become our nature as we love the Lord, study his word and pray.
 

Roughsoul1991

Senior Member
Sep 17, 2016
8,855
4,507
113
#90
Fair enough.
And I'm not trying to be a jerk.
We just need to be sensitive to the needs of new Christians and give them what they need. Especially ones that are struggling.
She seems to burdened by a heaven load that is not hers to bear. We need to just unpack it for her and set her free in Christ.
I know as to why I listed sources of apologists. Barton was mentioned not for the philosophical arguments, or science, or math, but to refute the anti Christian American heritage that is being taught to our children. Back in the 1800s American textbooks even included scriptures to promote good morality. We know how important education is to our children and government.
 
L

Live4Him

Guest
#91
I agree these disputes about the validity of certain preachers and water baptism should not have entered into this discussion.. it was about the Original poster and her questions...
The title of this thread is "repentance and baptism", as in water baptism, so why shouldn't that have entered into this discussion?

Furthermore, the OP is the one who asked for apologists or "certain preachers" to listen to, so it has been about the original poster and her questions all along.

Just saying.
 

oyster67

Senior Member
May 24, 2014
11,887
8,705
113
#92
How often do we need to confess our sins?
Dailey.
Ephesians 4:26 Be ye angry, and sin not: let not the sun go down upon your wrath:


What if you die with unconfessed sins? For example if someone that was born again didn’t repent for one month and died?
God looks upon the state of the heart. We do not lose our salvation every time we stumble. It is continually living in a state of rebellion and a willful refusal to confess that will result in forfeit of salvation and eternal damnation following. This is called Apostasy.

Also in regards to being born again. Is surrendering to God asking for forgiveness, accepting Him as your Lord and Saviour enough? Or must one be baptised in water to be saved.
Rituals have no part in the salvation of any man. Water baptism is simply a way of testifying to others about something already accomplished by the saving Blood of Jesus. Nothing but the Blood of Jesus.
 

Adstar

Senior Member
Jul 24, 2016
7,582
3,616
113
#93
The title of this thread is "repentance and baptism", as in water baptism, so why shouldn't that have entered into this discussion?

Furthermore, the OP is the one who asked for apologists or "certain preachers" to listen to, so it has been about the original poster and her questions all along.

Just saying.
I am saying that when people come and ask such questions each person should give their answer and not get caught up in debating over each others posts.. People should direct their thoughts to the one asking the question not open side arguments with other contributors.. That just ends up leaving a very negative impression to the Seeker asking the question..

Yes Christians are not in 100% agreement on all things doctrine.. But engaging in insults and a slanging match in front of a Seeker is a good way to destroy the desire of a Seeker to ask questions..

If people find another post seriously objectionable they should either PM the Seeker to give their warning or PM the moderator to gives ones concerns to the Moderator..
 
B

Blackpowderduelist

Guest
#94
The title of this thread is "repentance and baptism", as in water baptism, so why shouldn't that have entered into this discussion?

Furthermore, the OP is the one who asked for apologists or "certain preachers" to listen to, so it has been about the original poster and her questions all along.

Just saying.
She is not asking for a theological debate about the efficacy of baptism.
We as Christians need to simply advise the struggling. We can debate later and elsewhere.
 
B

Blackpowderduelist

Guest
#95
I am saying that when people come and ask such questions each person should give their answer and not get caught up in debating over each others posts.. People should direct their thoughts to the one asking the question not open side arguments with other contributors.. That just ends up leaving a very negative impression to the Seeker asking the question..

Yes Christians are not in 100% agreement on all things doctrine.. But engaging in insults and a slanging match in front of a Seeker is a good way to destroy the desire of a Seeker to ask questions..

If people find another post seriously objectionable they should either PM the Seeker to give their warning or PM the moderator to gives ones concerns to the Moderator..
I agree 💯 percent and I should not have engaged you in an arguement to start with. I should have kept my comments as good advise for the OP.
 
L

Live4Him

Guest
#96
She is not asking for a theological debate about the efficacy of baptism.
We as Christians need to simply advise the struggling. We can debate later and elsewhere.
How do you know what she's asking?

For the record, she and I have spoken privately, and, unless I'm greatly mistaken, she's not the least bit upset about anything that I've said or done here.

In fact, she seems thankful.

Maybe you and others here should retire from being other peoples' spokesmen?

Sounds like a good idea to me.
 
B

Blackpowderduelist

Guest
#97
How do you know what she's asking?

For the record, she and I have spoken privately, and, unless I'm greatly mistaken, she's not the least bit upset about anything that I've said or done here.

In fact, she seems thankful.

Maybe you and others here should retire from being other peoples' spokesmen?

Sounds like a good idea to me.
Context and reading comprehension. Generally when someone makes a statement and asked a question, they don't mean something other than what they actually said or asked.
 
B

Blackpowderduelist

Guest
#98
How do you know what she's asking?

For the record, she and I have spoken privately, and, unless I'm greatly mistaken, she's not the least bit upset about anything that I've said or done here.

In fact, she seems thankful.

Maybe you and others here should retire from being other peoples' spokesmen?

Sounds like a good idea to me.
No one said anyone is upset with anybody about anything that anyone said. You are assuming too much of what I said.
Is it ok if we consider what a person says, like if they are a new Christian and have some questions or struggles,
And we not turn it into one of the typical circuses that so many of these threads become.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
60,137
29,452
113
#99
I am saying that when people come and ask such questions each person should give their answer and not get caught up in debating over each others posts.. People should direct their thoughts to the one asking the question not open side arguments with other contributors.. That just ends up leaving a very negative impression to the Seeker asking the question..

Yes Christians are not in 100% agreement on all things doctrine.. But engaging in insults and a slanging match in front of a Seeker is a good way to destroy the desire of a Seeker to ask questions..

If people find another post seriously objectionable they should either PM the Seeker to give their warning or PM the moderator to gives ones concerns to the Moderator..
Being exposed to the arguments for and against lines of theological thought/doctrine is a good way to learn, as the person exposed can then weigh what is presented against Scripture as a good Berean should. The objection to insults and name calling is legitimate, however... although even there, is it really objectionable to call something a heresy that is widely accepted as heretical? Should not such heresies be pointed out? Mods need not be consulted on such matters. They are stretched thin as it is. Plus, not everyone can PM...