Shroon2,
You do not have to agree or identify with my assessment, but Strangelove typifies the OP and is the type of person the author is illustrating. It is incredible how Strangelove, and some others, mirror the entire content of the article, hook, line and sinker, and they do not care one iota for what this author had to say or any of the truth that was conveyed from a historical viewpoint. That is being fraudulent. They have their own premise, their own history, their on authors, their own interpretation, their own conclusions and their own understanding and believe it is all in the scriptures, every last jot and tittle. That is strange and that is 'Strangedoctrine', my new nic for this man that has deceived himself into believing a lie and won't come out of it unless God can really shake him up out of his stupor.