So do you believe then that the person who has truly been born again and has believed -- is then able to go back into unbelief, and even outrightly deny God, and (if he wants to) can curse and swear at God, and say that he does not want into God's heaven -- but that in the end God will still take him into heaven?
You've, so far, ignored answering my post #2417, but I will answer this current post for you from scripture.
When asking about another's belief, as if what they stated as their belief were opposed to scripture, when in fact it stands in contrast to Western dogmas that are actually creations of socially engineered theologies, I'd have to say that I stated in my own words what scripture says:
2 Timothy 2:13
If we believe not, yet he abideth faithful: he cannot deny himself.
We are His body. Who among us denies any part of his own body, and yet far too many picture Christ cutting off His own finger, or toe...
That one sentence from 2 Timothy packs an enormous amount of information one can glean from a systematic study on this topic, but you seem to have a problem with that system of study on the basis of something that you never did answer in relation to my inquiry in that other post.
So, yes, one can even go into outright denial for faith and belief in the Lord and still be saved. I hope that's clear enough.
So, if you disagree, in spite of what's written in scripture and quoted here in this post, what's your problem with the saved Christ-denier still being saved? Does it make you jealous, resentful...what? After all, loss of genuine salvation on the basis of failures on our part, that inevitably makes salvation works-based, which then leads to the conclusion that we're ALL lost this very moment.
We ALL still sin, and rejection is a sin to the one who was once saved. Is denial any worse than the sins you commit daily? If so, then how do you gauge that in order to form that graph in your mind that differentiates between saved and unsaved for those who were truly believed at some point in their lives?
Can you draw that graph for us that names the sins below the threshold of salvation between saved and unsaved? Please give a graphic representation that delineates between the various sins so that we can all see which ones you believe causes the loss of salvation and those don't nullify salvation.
Some like to point at Christ's denial of those who denied Him in this life. Well, given the loose, tawdry, weak and beggarly understanding of most professing believers because of all their failures to read scripture for themselves and to do systematic study, thus exercising proper responsibility for what they choose to believe, they go along with one or more of those whelps who stand behind the pulpits of their pathetic churchianity organizations. Most are generally taught that Christ's denial of any one is in reference to salvation rather than reward. We all may as well, then, expect to see Peter burning in the pits of Hell right beside us.
Oh, but then they point out how Peter wept in repentance for his denial, and even chose his method of execution as a demonstration for his dedication TO Christ. Where does scripture even portray that Peter lost his salvation even for those moments or hours? Do you now see the hypocrisy behind the belief of denial being the loss of genuine salvation?
My friend, going along with the crowd as a crowd-pleaser by parroting what they all want to hear, that does indeed make one part of the in-crowd. Daring to believe scripture, which is generally ignored by those who intentionally go along with what the bandwagoneers believe, that ends up getting him cast off the bandwagons of social religions, thus bruising the rump, only to get back up and preach to yet another bandwagon of theological marauders to see if at least some will jump off those bandwagons and join in ministry to others to get them back into the scriptures.
I'm not saved this very moment and beyond because of my efforts to retain what was bestowed upon me by unearned, unmerited favor because of my faith willingly placed upon Christ. If we can earn the continuance of our salvation on the basis of our merits, then we were saved by our own merits, which many of us understands is not at all true. Salvation is not bi-polar; meaning that it is unmerited favor looking backward, but then changes polar properties looking to the future whereby it's THEN on the basis of our own merits and efforts. Do you now see the dichotomy in the belief for loss of genuine salvation?
This should cause the Roman Catholic religion's cathedrals to empty out from supporters, but they will continue the narrative of works-based salvation in their beliefs because of their false belief in salvation lost dare they commit what they call a "mortal sin." It's a strangely natural inclination rooted in human pride to think that we MUST contribute at least SOMETHING for our salvation to be true and intact. How pathetic our flesh really is, but most choose to cater to it, caressing it with acquiescence, even though we are commanded to deny the flesh.
Generally speaking, believe whatever you want, engaging the belief that one must continue in efforts to earn and retain salvation if you want. That sets well with all those bandwagoneers out there. They will caudle and hug you with affection and genuine fleshly love for being a part of their club. Remember, however, that the appeal and warm fuzzies derived from such love is fleshly, not spiritual.
MM