False teaching by separating Scripture from Scripture

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
You’re right that believers still sin, and you’re right that 1 John 3:9 and Romans 8:13 don’t teach perfection — but none of that proves sin is inevitable; the NT teaches that sin remains, not that sin must occur, and the break with sin’s dominion means the regenerate can obey in a way the unregenerate cannot; your model turns “ongoing battle” into “guaranteed defeat,” but Scripture frames it as remaining sin vs defeated sin, not “remaining sin vs inevitable sin”; the saved still fall, but they do not have to fall, because the Spirit makes real obedience genuinely possible.
I'm sure you would agree with the fact that every single human being since Adam, has sinned every single day of their lives, and there's is no way they/we can stop sining every single day of our lives.

I'm not suggesting that this is a good thing, to the contrary. I consider it a terrible reality, but it is the truth. You can duck and weave and dance around it, but it remains an ugly stain on humanity and it will remain until the end of time.

So, yes we all will sin every day for the rest of our lives. But those of us who are saved (Gods elect) can rejoice in the knowledge that all of our past, present and future sins are fully paid for by Christ so we won't be punished for them. That truly is good news for Gods elect.
 
I'm sure you would agree with the fact that every single human being since Adam, has sinned every single day of their lives, and there's is no way they/we can stop sining every single day of our lives.

I'm not suggesting that this is a good thing, to the contrary. I consider it a terrible reality, but it is the truth. You can duck and weave and dance around it, but it remains an ugly stain on humanity and it will remain until the end of time.

So, yes we all will sin every day for the rest of our lives. But those of us who are saved (Gods elect) can rejoice in the knowledge that all of our past, present and future sins are fully paid for by Christ so we won't be punished for them. That truly is good news for Gods elect.
Brother, the claim “every human sins every day and cannot stop sinning” is not what Scripture teaches about the regenerate.
It’s what your theological system teaches.
The Bible teaches universal sinfulness before regeneration, ongoing warfare after regeneration, and real Spirit‑produced victory in regeneration.
You’re treating the unregenerate condition as the permanent Christian condition, and the apostles never do that.
 
You keep repeating “saved by grace vs saved by works” as if the only two possible categories are
(1) monergistic justification and
(2) synergistic justification, but I’ve never argued synergistic justification —
I’ve argued Spirit‑produced sanctification, which Scripture treats as the result of salvation, not the condition of salvation.
When you say I’m “adding conditions,” you’re confusing the ground of salvation (Christ’s finished work) with the fruit of salvation (Spirit‑empowered obedience).
Romans 6 says the regenerate are freed from sin’s mastery;
Romans 8 says the regenerate put sin to death;
Titus 2 says grace trains us;
1 John says the regenerate do not continue in rebellion.
None of that is “finishing the job Jesus failed to finish.”
It’s the Bible’s doctrine of sanctification.
You’re collapsing justification and sanctification into one instantaneous event, then calling anything that happens afterward “conditions.”
But Scripture itself distinguishes them — justification is by grace alone, sanctification is the inevitable work of the Spirit, and rejecting that distinction doesn’t protect grace; it erases the very transformation the New Testament says God produces in every believer.
I keep repeating the "saved by grace" v "saved by works" because they are the only two options. You're attempting to add works to grace, in order to produce a hybrid salvation. But the bible never ever teaches this. You are just like those who believed that Christians should still practice Judaism. They also wanted to add works to grace to produce salvation.

You haven't found a single verse in the bible that supports your theory that salvation is achieved via a joint effort between a dead sinner and God. But the Bible says that a dead sinner can't contribute anything to his salvation. So you are rejecting Gods Word, in order to implement your unbiblical way of salvation.
 
An observation that might resolve this issue, is being a sinner the result of making specific sinful actions or is it a statement about one's state of being. It would seem that if it is the result of making specific sinful acts then one can only be a forgiven sinner by being forgiven after making each specific act. But if being a sinner is the state of one's being, then a forgiven sinner remains a forgiven sinner even after continued sinful actions. Both states allow for contrition by the sinner for their sinful deeds, both allow the sinner to attempt to reduce their sinful acts, but one requires continual new forgiveness by God while the other recognizes that God's forgiveness is lasting.
 
An observation that might resolve this issue, is being a sinner the result of making specific sinful actions or is it a statement about one's state of being. It would seem that if it is the result of making specific sinful acts then one can only be a forgiven sinner by being forgiven after making each specific act. But if being a sinner is the state of one's being, then a forgiven sinner remains a forgiven sinner even after continued sinful actions. Both states allow for contrition by the sinner for their sinful deeds, both allow the sinner to attempt to reduce their sinful acts, but one requires continual new forgiveness by God while the other recognizes that God's forgiveness is lasting.
When God regenerates a born again believer, He gives us a new heart and a new spiritual nature through the Holy Spirit. But the old sinful nature, often called the "flesh" or the "old man," stays inside us. While sin is no longer our absolute master, the capacity and temptation to sin remain.

Christians experience a daily spiritual war between their new desires for God and our remaining sinful habits. Regeneration is the starting point that sets the process of growth—known as sanctification—in motion.
Even mature believers stumble daily in thoughts, words, and deeds. Believers must actively fight remaining sin every day, by "mortifying" or putting the flesh to death.

God never abandons a person He has regenerated; His good work will be brought to completion. When a regenerate believer sins, we experience conviction by the Holy Spirit and turn back to God in repentance. Committing sin does not mean we lose our salvation or our new identity in Christ.
 
I keep repeating the "saved by grace" v "saved by works" because they are the only two options. You're attempting to add works to grace, in order to produce a hybrid salvation. But the bible never ever teaches this. You are just like those who believed that Christians should still practice Judaism. They also wanted to add works to grace to produce salvation.

You haven't found a single verse in the bible that supports your theory that salvation is achieved via a joint effort between a dead sinner and God. But the Bible says that a dead sinner can't contribute anything to his salvation. So you are rejecting Gods Word, in order to implement your unbiblical way of salvation.
Your reply collapses the entire sanctification debate into a false binary (“grace vs works”) that Scripture itself does not use, because the New Testament distinguishes justification (grace alone, apart from works) from sanctification (Spirit‑produced obedience) without ever merging them into a hybrid salvation:
Romans 6 says the regenerate are freed from sin’s mastery, not contributing to salvation;
Romans 8 says they put sin to death by the Spirit, not to earn salvation;
Titus 2 says grace trains believers, not that believers co‑save themselves;
1 John says the regenerate do not continue in rebellion, not that obedience is a co‑payment.

You keep insisting that any post‑conversion transformation equals “adding works to grace,” but Scripture treats transformation as fruit, not ground; you’re collapsing justification and sanctification into one instantaneous event and then calling everything afterward “works‑salvation,” which erases the very change God promises to produce.
World‑system diagnosis: your argument reflects System 2 (hyper‑monergistic reductionism), where all categories collapse into justification and any biblical description of Spirit‑empowered obedience is reclassified as “works”;
the biblical passages themselves operate in System 1 (covenant‑juridical + Spirit‑transformative), where grace saves and the Spirit inevitably renovates.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DavidLamb
Brother, the claim “every human sins every day and cannot stop sinning” is not what Scripture teaches about the regenerate.
It’s what your theological system teaches.
The Bible teaches universal sinfulness before regeneration, ongoing warfare after regeneration, and real Spirit‑produced victory in regeneration.
You’re treating the unregenerate condition as the permanent Christian condition, and the apostles never do that.
No, the Bible doesn't teach any such thing. It teaches that those who claim to be sinless are liars. Because a regenerated born again believer doesn't get the victory over our old nature in this life.

The Bible reveals that true believers continue to fight against our old sin nature. Paul clearly says that he was overpowered by his old nature.

True believers will become Christlike and sinless in the life to come, not in this life.
 
No, the Bible doesn't teach any such thing. It teaches that those who claim to be sinless are liars. Because a regenerated born again believer doesn't get the victory over our old nature in this life.

The Bible reveals that true believers continue to fight against our old sin nature. Paul clearly says that he was overpowered by his old nature.

True believers will become Christlike and sinless in the life to come, not in this life.
Your claim that “true believers don’t get victory over the old nature in this life” contradicts the very texts you’re appealing to, because 1 John’s warning that “if we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves” (1 John 1:8) is not a denial of Spirit‑produced victory but a denial of sinless perfectionism, while Romans 6 explicitly says the regenerate are no longer slaves to sin (vv.6–7), Romans 8 says they actually put sin to death by the Spirit (v.13), Galatians 5 says they actually walk in the Spirit and do not fulfill the flesh (v.16), and Titus 2 says grace actually trains believers to renounce ungodliness (v.12); Paul’s Romans 7 struggle is not “overpowered forever” but the pre‑Spirit conflict he contrasts with Romans 8’s Spirit‑empowered life.
Scripture teaches ongoing warfare, not inevitable defeat; real obedience, not perfection; real transformation, not unchanged bondage. World‑system diagnosis:
Your argument reflects System 2 (hyper‑monergistic reductionism), where any biblical description of Spirit‑empowered obedience is reclassified as “works,” while the passages you cite operate in System 1 (covenant‑juridical + Spirit‑transformative), where grace saves and the Spirit actually produces victory.
 
Your reply collapses the entire sanctification debate into a false binary (“grace vs works”) that Scripture itself does not use, because the New Testament distinguishes justification (grace alone, apart from works) from sanctification (Spirit‑produced obedience) without ever merging them into a hybrid salvation:
Romans 6 says the regenerate are freed from sin’s mastery, not contributing to salvation;
Romans 8 says they put sin to death by the Spirit, not to earn salvation;
Titus 2 says grace trains believers, not that believers co‑save themselves;
1 John says the regenerate do not continue in rebellion, not that obedience is a co‑payment.

You keep insisting that any post‑conversion transformation equals “adding works to grace,” but Scripture treats transformation as fruit, not ground; you’re collapsing justification and sanctification into one instantaneous event and then calling everything afterward “works‑salvation,” which erases the very change God promises to produce.
World‑system diagnosis: your argument reflects System 2 (hyper‑monergistic reductionism), where all categories collapse into justification and any biblical description of Spirit‑empowered obedience is reclassified as “works”;
the biblical passages themselves operate in System 1 (covenant‑juridical + Spirit‑transformative), where grace saves and the Spirit inevitably renovates.
You keep trying to compartmentalize salvation into separate events, but that's not what the Bible teaches. The bible teaches that a believer is saved at the point of regeneration and not at the end of a life of obedience and good works, as you falsely claim.

Regeneration is when the Holy Spirit gives spiritual life to a person who was spiritually dead. The moment God regenerates a person, that person immediately responds with faith and trust in Christ.
At this exact time, God also declares the believer righteous, which means they are fully saved right there and then.

While regeneration causes faith, they happen at the exact same time in real life. There is no waiting period or gap between being born again and being saved. God never fails to finish the work He starts in a believer. The end of a person's life is not when salvation happens.

The fact that salvation is permanent and instantaneous does not mean that believers cannot fall into heinous sins. Simon Peter illustrates this truth well. Remember that he committed the worst sin of all, denying the Lord and Master who would redeem His soul (Matt. 26:69–75)

Your preacher failed to teach you the truth of the gospel.
 
You keep trying to compartmentalize salvation into separate events, but that's not what the Bible teaches. The bible teaches that a believer is saved at the point of regeneration and not at the end of a life of obedience and good works, as you falsely claim.

Regeneration is when the Holy Spirit gives spiritual life to a person who was spiritually dead. The moment God regenerates a person, that person immediately responds with faith and trust in Christ.
At this exact time, God also declares the believer righteous, which means they are fully saved right there and then.


While regeneration causes faith, they happen at the exact same time in real life. There is no waiting period or gap between being born again and being saved. God never fails to finish the work He starts in a believer. The end of a person's life is not when salvation happens.

The fact that salvation is permanent and instantaneous does not mean that believers cannot fall into heinous sins. Simon Peter illustrates this truth well. Remember that he committed the worst sin of all, denying the Lord and Master who would redeem His soul (Matt. 26:69–75)

Your preacher failed to teach you the truth of the gospel.
You’re still mixing categories the Bible itself refuses to mix — you keep saying I “compartmentalize salvation,” but I’m literally quoting the passages that do the compartmentalizing:
regeneration (new birth),
justification (legal declaration), and
sanctification (Spirit‑driven transformation).
Regeneration and justification absolutely happen at the same moment — no argument there — but Scripture never says sanctification is regeneration or justification; it says sanctification flows from them (Romans 6:18, 22; Romans 8:13; Titus 2:11–12; 1 John 3:9).
Your argument tries to collapse everything into one instantaneous event so that any mention of Spirit‑produced obedience sounds like “works‑salvation,” but the texts don’t let you do that.
Peter’s denial doesn’t prove sanctification is nonexistent; it proves believers can fall hard and still be restored — and restoration itself is sanctification (Luke 22:32).
You keep saying I teach “salvation at the end of life,” but I’ve never said that — justification is immediate, final, and irreversible; sanctification is the Spirit changing a justified person over time.
You’re defending the permanence of salvation — I agree with you.
What you’re denying is the transformation Scripture says God actually produces in the saved.
My preacher didn’t fail me as my teacher is the scripture itself and the verses you’re quoting aren’t contradicting mine; they’re describing justification, while the verses I’m quoting are describing sanctification.
 
Your claim that “true believers don’t get victory over the old nature in this life” contradicts the very texts you’re appealing to, because 1 John’s warning that “if we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves” (1 John 1:8) is not a denial of Spirit‑produced victory but a denial of sinless perfectionism, while Romans 6 explicitly says the regenerate are no longer slaves to sin (vv.6–7), Romans 8 says they actually put sin to death by the Spirit (v.13), Galatians 5 says they actually walk in the Spirit and do not fulfill the flesh (v.16), and Titus 2 says grace actually trains believers to renounce ungodliness (v.12); Paul’s Romans 7 struggle is not “overpowered forever” but the pre‑Spirit conflict he contrasts with Romans 8’s Spirit‑empowered life.
Scripture teaches ongoing warfare, not inevitable defeat; real obedience, not perfection; real transformation, not unchanged bondage. World‑system diagnosis:
Your argument reflects System 2 (hyper‑monergistic reductionism), where any biblical description of Spirit‑empowered obedience is reclassified as “works,” while the passages you cite operate in System 1 (covenant‑juridical + Spirit‑transformative), where grace saves and the Spirit actually produces victory.
It's not my claim, it's what Gods Word reveals. I accept Gods Word as it is spoken, you obviously don't when it doesn't line up with the teaching of your denomination.

Paul's struggle with sin in Romans 7:14–25 describes his post-conversion (regenerate) experience as a believer, not his life before coming to Christ as your denomination teaches.
Paul says in verse 22, "For in my inner being I delight in God’s law"—a spiritual desire that belongs only to a renewed heart.

The lament "O wretched man that I am!" (v. 24) reveals a sensitivity to remaining sin that only a person indwelt by the Holy Spirit possesses. Unbelievers are at peace with their sin rather than agonizing over its presence.

Paul elsewhere describes his pre-conversion Pharisaic life as thinking he was "blameless" regarding legalistic righteousness (Philippians 3:6). The deep, internal anguish of Romans 7 reflects a mature spiritual sight that recognizes the profound depth of remaining corruption.

Regeneration does not completely erase the old sinful nature from a person's earthly body. Sanctification is an ongoing war between the flesh and the Spirit. God gives believers the grace and strength to slowly overcome more sin over time. God will finish the good work He started, but total freedom from the presence of sin only happens after death or Christ's return.

The Bible teaches that salvation is by grace alone, and human obedience is the fruit of salvation, never the cause or basis for it. A person is declared righteous before God entirely through the unmerited favor of God. Human works or obedience—past, present, or future—contribute nothing to earning or meriting justification. Salvation relies completely on the active and passive obedience of Jesus Christ on behalf of believers, not on the believer's own compliance with the law.
 
It's not my claim, it's what Gods Word reveals. I accept Gods Word as it is spoken, you obviously don't when it doesn't line up with the teaching of your denomination.

Paul's struggle with sin in Romans 7:14–25 describes his post-conversion (regenerate) experience as a believer, not his life before coming to Christ as your denomination teaches.
Paul says in verse 22, "For in my inner being I delight in God’s law"—a spiritual desire that belongs only to a renewed heart.

The lament "O wretched man that I am!" (v. 24) reveals a sensitivity to remaining sin that only a person indwelt by the Holy Spirit possesses. Unbelievers are at peace with their sin rather than agonizing over its presence.

Paul elsewhere describes his pre-conversion Pharisaic life as thinking he was "blameless" regarding legalistic righteousness (Philippians 3:6). The deep, internal anguish of Romans 7 reflects a mature spiritual sight that recognizes the profound depth of remaining corruption.

Regeneration does not completely erase the old sinful nature from a person's earthly body. Sanctification is an ongoing war between the flesh and the Spirit. God gives believers the grace and strength to slowly overcome more sin over time. God will finish the good work He started, but total freedom from the presence of sin only happens after death or Christ's return.

The Bible teaches that salvation is by grace alone, and human obedience is the fruit of salvation, never the cause or basis for it. A person is declared righteous before God entirely through the unmerited favor of God. Human works or obedience—past, present, or future—contribute nothing to earning or meriting justification. Salvation relies completely on the active and passive obedience of Jesus Christ on behalf of believers, not on the believer's own compliance with the law.
Your reply keeps saying “I’m just accepting God’s Word,” but the actual texts you’re quoting don’t support the theological jump you’re making.
Romans 7 does describe a regenerate person — agreed — but Paul’s point isn’t “the flesh always wins until death”; it’s that the flesh still exists and creates conflict, while Romans 8 describes the Spirit‑empowered victory that actually happens in the regenerate.

You’re treating Romans 7 as the final description of Christian experience, but Paul treats it as the incomplete description that only makes sense when followed by Romans 8: “the law of the Spirit of life has set you free” (8:2), “you are not in the flesh but in the Spirit” (8:9), and “if by the Spirit you put to death the deeds of the body, you will live” (8:13). That’s not perfectionism — it’s transformation.

And yes, justification is by grace alone, apart from works — nobody’s arguing otherwise — but you’re collapsing justification and sanctification into one instantaneous event so that any mention of Spirit‑produced obedience sounds like “works‑salvation.”
Paul doesn’t do that. He says justification is once‑for‑all (Rom 5:1), but sanctification is ongoing warfare with real victories (Rom 6:14; Gal 5:16; Titus 2:12).
 
You’re still mixing categories the Bible itself refuses to mix — you keep saying I “compartmentalize salvation,” but I’m literally quoting the passages that do the compartmentalizing:
regeneration (new birth),
justification (legal declaration), and
sanctification (Spirit‑driven transformation).
Regeneration and justification absolutely happen at the same moment — no argument there — but Scripture never says sanctification is regeneration or justification; it says sanctification flows from them (Romans 6:18, 22; Romans 8:13; Titus 2:11–12; 1 John 3:9).
Your argument tries to collapse everything into one instantaneous event so that any mention of Spirit‑produced obedience sounds like “works‑salvation,” but the texts don’t let you do that.
Peter’s denial doesn’t prove sanctification is nonexistent; it proves believers can fall hard and still be restored — and restoration itself is sanctification (Luke 22:32).
You keep saying I teach “salvation at the end of life,” but I’ve never said that — justification is immediate, final, and irreversible; sanctification is the Spirit changing a justified person over time.
You’re defending the permanence of salvation — I agree with you.
What you’re denying is the transformation Scripture says God actually produces in the saved.
My preacher didn’t fail me as my teacher is the scripture itself and the verses you’re quoting aren’t contradicting mine; they’re describing justification, while the verses I’m quoting are describing sanctification.
All of the above describe salvation by grace. A person is not saved by increments or instalments of grace. Salvation is finalised at the point of regeneration, everything that follows is not adding anything to Gods completed work of salvation.

All of those things that come after a person is saved, are done by God through the saved person. So you still have nothing to boast about. God gives His people everything we have, we don't contribute anything at all because we never had anything to begin with (apart from a rotten corpse).

All of that "you must abide in Christ", to be saved is nonsense. None of us can abide in Christ, we keep falling back into sin and backsliding for the rest of our lives and God must keep on bringing us back to Himself, or we would never come back if it was left up to us. We can do nothing without Him, He must to do it all for us.
 
All of the above describe salvation by grace. A person is not saved by increments or instalments of grace. Salvation is finalised at the point of regeneration, everything that follows is not adding anything to Gods completed work of salvation.

All of those things that come after a person is saved, are done by God through the saved person. So you still have nothing to boast about. God gives His people everything we have, we don't contribute anything at all because we never had anything to begin with (apart from a rotten corpse).

All of that "you must abide in Christ", to be saved is nonsense. None of us can abide in Christ, we keep falling back into sin and backsliding for the rest of our lives and God must keep on bringing us back to Himself, or we would never come back if it was left up to us. We can do nothing without Him, He must to do it all for us.
Look my friend, you’re defending justification; I’m describing sanctification — and Scripture refuses to merge them. This is the issue you and I need to work out. Please, just hear me out..
The Bible teaches
(1) regeneration — God gives life (John 3:5–8; 1 John 5:1),
(2) justification — God declares righteous once‑for‑all (Romans 5:1; Titus 3:5–7), and
(3) sanctification — the Spirit actually changes the justified person over time (Romans 6:18, 22; Romans 8:13; Galatians 5:16; Titus 2:11–12).
You’re right that salvation is finalized at regeneration — nobody is saved “by installments.”
But Scripture also says regeneration produces
new desires (1 John 3:9),
new power (Romans 6:6–7),
new direction (Galatians 5:16), and
new obedience (Titus 2:12).
None of that adds to justification — it’s the fruit of justification.
Your claim “none of us can abide in Christ” contradicts Jesus’ own teaching:
He commands abiding (John 15:4),
describes it as the normal experience of believers (John 15:5),
and warns that refusing to abide is apostasy (John 15:6).
Abiding isn’t sinless performance; it’s continuing trust (Hebrews 3:14).
And your line “we keep backsliding for the rest of our lives” contradicts Paul’s statement that sin shall not have dominion over the regenerate (Romans 6:14).
So scripture resolves the issue thus,
justification is God’s finished work for us,
sanctification is God’s ongoing work in us,
and collapsing them makes the New Testament’s entire sanctification vocabulary meaningless.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DavidLamb
Your reply keeps saying “I’m just accepting God’s Word,” but the actual texts you’re quoting don’t support the theological jump you’re making.
Romans 7 does describe a regenerate person — agreed — but Paul’s point isn’t “the flesh always wins until death”; it’s that the flesh still exists and creates conflict, while Romans 8 describes the Spirit‑empowered victory that actually happens in the regenerate.

You’re treating Romans 7 as the final description of Christian experience, but Paul treats it as the incomplete description that only makes sense when followed by Romans 8: “the law of the Spirit of life has set you free” (8:2), “you are not in the flesh but in the Spirit” (8:9), and “if by the Spirit you put to death the deeds of the body, you will live” (8:13). That’s not perfectionism — it’s transformation.

And yes, justification is by grace alone, apart from works — nobody’s arguing otherwise — but you’re collapsing justification and sanctification into one instantaneous event so that any mention of Spirit‑produced obedience sounds like “works‑salvation.”
Paul doesn’t do that. He says justification is once‑for‑all (Rom 5:1), but sanctification is ongoing warfare with real victories (Rom 6:14; Gal 5:16; Titus 2:12).
Romans 7 is not describing a passing phase in Pauls life, as you suggest. Instead it describes his Permanente life long state. The war against the flesh is life long and we don't have the final victory in this life.

Romans 8 does not teach a life free from the presence or inner conflict of sin. Chapter 8 flows directly out of the struggle of chapter 7. Romans 8:13 commands believers: "if by the Spirit you put to death the deeds of the body, you will live". This ongoing duty is called mortification. The need to actively "put to death" sin proves that indwelling corruption and inward cravings still remain throughout this life.

Believers in Romans 8 still "groan inwardly" as we wait for final redemption, living in a world affected by physical and spiritual brokenness (Romans 8:23).
Romans 8:29–30 outlines God's unbroken chain from predestination to final glorification. Complete, flawless victory over sin is reserved for glorification, while this life is characterized by progressive sanctification (growing in holiness). So we never have the real and final victory over sin in this life.
 
Romans 7 is not describing a passing phase in Pauls life, as you suggest. Instead it describes his Permanente life long state. The war against the flesh is life long and we don't have the final victory in this life.

Romans 8 does not teach a life free from the presence or inner conflict of sin. Chapter 8 flows directly out of the struggle of chapter 7. Romans 8:13 commands believers: "if by the Spirit you put to death the deeds of the body, you will live". This ongoing duty is called mortification. The need to actively "put to death" sin proves that indwelling corruption and inward cravings still remain throughout this life.

Believers in Romans 8 still "groan inwardly" as we wait for final redemption, living in a world affected by physical and spiritual brokenness (Romans 8:23).
Romans 8:29–30 outlines God's unbroken chain from predestination to final glorification. Complete, flawless victory over sin is reserved for glorification, while this life is characterized by progressive sanctification (growing in holiness). So we never have the real and final victory over sin in this life.
This has been an enjoyable conversation, thank you for that😊
You’re right that Romans 7 describes a real lifelong conflict — Paul never says the flesh disappears — but your conclusion that “we never have real victory in this life” contradicts the very passages you’re using.
Romans 7 shows indwelling sin remains;
Romans 8 shows indwelling sin does not reign.
Paul says the regenerate “are not in the flesh” (Rom 8:9),
“the law of the Spirit of life has set you free” (8:2), and
“sin shall not have dominion over you” (Rom 6:14).
That is not perfectionism; it is Spirit‑produced victory in the war, not the removal of the war.
Mortification (Rom 8:13) proves sin remains, but the command “put to death” proves the Spirit actually enables obedience.
Groaning (Rom 8:23) proves we await glorification, but groaning is not defeat — it is longing from people who already “walk in the Spirit” (Gal 5:16) and actually “renounce ungodliness” because grace trains them (Titus 2:12).
The golden chain (Rom 8:29–30) shows final victory is future, but it never says present victory is nonexistent; it says present sanctification is real, progressive, and Spirit‑empowered.
So the biblical tension is simple: the war is lifelong (Rom 7), but the Spirit gives real victories now (Rom 6; Rom 8; Gal 5; Titus 2).
The mistake is treating Romans 7 as the final word instead of the setup for Romans 8’s Spirit logic.
 
Look my friend, you’re defending justification; I’m describing sanctification — and Scripture refuses to merge them. This is the issue you and I need to work out. Please, just hear me out..
The Bible teaches
(1) regeneration — God gives life (John 3:5–8; 1 John 5:1),
(2) justification — God declares righteous once‑for‑all (Romans 5:1; Titus 3:5–7), and
(3) sanctification — the Spirit actually changes the justified person over time (Romans 6:18, 22; Romans 8:13; Galatians 5:16; Titus 2:11–12).
You’re right that salvation is finalized at regeneration — nobody is saved “by installments.”
But Scripture also says regeneration produces
new desires (1 John 3:9),
new power (Romans 6:6–7),
new direction (Galatians 5:16), and
new obedience (Titus 2:12).
None of that adds to justification — it’s the fruit of justification.
Your claim “none of us can abide in Christ” contradicts Jesus’ own teaching:
He commands abiding (John 15:4),
describes it as the normal experience of believers (John 15:5),
and warns that refusing to abide is apostasy (John 15:6).
Abiding isn’t sinless performance; it’s continuing trust (Hebrews 3:14).
And your line “we keep backsliding for the rest of our lives” contradicts Paul’s statement that sin shall not have dominion over the regenerate (Romans 6:14).
So scripture resolves the issue thus,
justification is God’s finished work for us,
sanctification is God’s ongoing work in us,
and collapsing them makes the New Testament’s entire sanctification vocabulary meaningless.
Sanctification is a work of the Holy Spirit, it has nothing to do with your efforts or ability to abide in Christ.

The command to abide in John 15:4 functions as the divinely appointed means through which God preserves His people. Believers actively abide by depending on the Holy Spirit, feeding on Christ's Word, and obeying His commands, recognizing that even this very ability to respond flows continuously from the life-giving sap of the vine.

Your claim that John 15:6 is a warning to believers who refuse to abide in Christ is nonsense. Because the Bible reveals that a regenerated believer cannot refuse to abide in Christ and fall away, because God preserves His elect and ensures they continue in the faith. Paul’s statement ("For sin will have no dominion over you, since you are not under law but under grace") is a promise, not merely a conditional command. Because the believer is united to Christ in His death and resurrection, sin's legal and tyrannical mastery (dominium) is broken once and for all.

Salvation is not a process that relies on anything we contribute, because God sovereignly chose and predestined specific individuals for salvation out of pure grace, entirely apart from any foreseen human merits, faith, or good works.
 
Your claim that John 15:6 is a warning to believers who refuse to abide in Christ is nonsense. Because the Bible reveals that a regenerated believer cannot refuse to abide in Christ and fall away, because God preserves His elect and ensures they continue in the faith. Paul’s statement ("For sin will have no dominion over you, since you are not under law but under grace") is a promise, not merely a conditional command. Because the believer is united to Christ in His death and resurrection, sin's legal and tyrannical mastery (dominium) is broken once and for all.
Your claim breaks the text because John 15:6 is not addressed to “fake believers who only look like branches,” but to the same people Jesus just called “clean” in 15:3 — meaning genuinely regenerated disciples — and the warning functions exactly like every other perseverance warning in Scripture: not to suggest the elect will finally fall, but to describe the real danger God uses to keep them from falling.
Your slogan “a regenerated believer cannot refuse to abide” is true at the level of God’s decree (John 6:39; Jude 24), but false at the level of human responsibility, because Jesus commands abiding precisely because the elect must abide and God preserves them through that abiding.
Paul’s statement in Romans 6:14 is indeed a promise — sin’s dominion is broken — but Paul immediately follows it with commands (6:12–13) because the broken dominion does not eliminate the battle; it guarantees the outcome.
The NT never says, “You cannot fail to abide,” it says, “If you do not abide, you are burned” (John 15:6), and then shows that the elect do abide because the Spirit keeps them (1 John 2:27). The world‑system behind your objection is fatalistic‑determinism — turning God’s preserving grace into a denial of the very means He uses to preserve.