Not the end of the world; the end of the age...the end of the old covenant.
What, in a couple of sentences is the book of Revelation about?
Revelation is the revealing of Christ Jesus. I said end of the world sorta meaning bringing to the climax.
Not the end of the world; the end of the age...the end of the old covenant.
What, in a couple of sentences is the book of Revelation about?
Outline for the book of Revelation:Since you don't know, I'll help you out. In the book of Deuteronomy, God establishes a covenant with Israel. The outline for the book is as follows:
1. Preamble 1:1-5
2. Historical Prologue 1:6-4:49
3. Ethical Stipulations 5:1-26:19
4. Sanctions 27:1-30:20
5. Succession Arrangements 31:1-34:12
The preamble identifies the Lordship of the Great King, stressing His transcendence and imminence. The prologue surveys the previous relationship with His subjects. The stipulations expound the subjects obligations under the covenant. The sanctions outline the blessings for obedience and curses for disobedience. And finally, the arrangements are made for continuity of covenantal relationship for future generations.
Let that soak in awhile, and consider that Israel failed to live up to the terms of the covenant. How do you suppose God would respond? Wouldn't He be forced to bring the sanctions upon Israel for failing to keep the covenant? Hence, this is what we find in the book of Revelation. I'll show you in the next post how the book of Revelation has the exact same outline except God is not initiating a covenant, but ending a covenant.
Jesus has already been revealed before this in history, as well as in the gospels and epistles. See posts 3,819 and 3,822.Revelation is the revealing of Christ Jesus. I said end of the world sorta meaning bringing to the climax.
Amen he sure is !Beautiful
God is amazing![]()
![]()
Yes I understood .Israel = the covenant people; the nations (Gentiles) = those not in the covenant.
I was agreeing with you.
Gentile" (goy) was a term used to describe a person from one of the nations outside of Israel."Gentile" (goy) was a term used to describe a person from one of the nations outside of Israel.
As seen in Zechariah 8:23, which is describing what will take place during the Millennium.
This is what the LORD Almighty says: “In those days ten people from all languages and nations will take firm hold of one Jew by the hem of his robe and say, ‘Let us go with you, because we have heard that God is with you.’” Zechariah 8:23
........
“At the cross Satan was bound.”At the cross Satan was bound. Jesus sets down at the right hand of the Father, and all authority is given to Him. Later He shows up with a couple of new keys on His key chain...to death and hell. Death now has lost its sting and the church is growing unabated by the forces of hell. Not only so, but the forces of evil are unwittingly aiding in God's plan to fill the earth with the knowledge of His glory.
Satan 0................Jesus infinity
You are locked into poor eschatological dogma. You have so much invested in it at this point that you will probably never see the truth.
God's words stands.... clear and precise.
Acts 3:24 NKJV — “Yes, and all the prophets, from Samuel and those who follow, as many as have spoken, have also foretold these days.
Curious....
Where does it actually say the words that the 144,000 are firstfruits?
Another preterist 5 alarm dumpster fire.Outline for the book of Revelation:
1. Preamble 1
2. Historical Prologue 2-3
3. Ethical Stipulations 4-7
4. Sanctions 8-14
5. Succession Arrangements 15-22
The difference being that Deuteronomy is dealing with the establishment of a covenant, while Revelation deals with the sanctions coming to fruition for failure to keep the terms of the covenant.
Incidentally, the books written by the prophets often have the same outline.
Revealed you say? Hardly.Jesus has already been revealed before this in history, as well as in the gospels and epistles. See posts 3,819 and 3,822.
Would you care to chime in and properly identify this entity? And define his demise how and when? You failed to answer in the last post, so now is your big chance to convince us of the impeccability of your eschatology.
Are we to believe it when the historicists, amils and CT's postulate that this is the usual cast of straw men like Antiochus Epiphanies or Nero?
@Aaron56 @HeIsHere @Beekeeper ?
We really would like to know.
[2Th 2:8-10 KJV]
8 And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:
9 [Even him], whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders,
10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.
By the way, when the Macabbean War took place, Israel was not being ruled over by someone from the line of David.
Here is a more detailed description of that using A.I.:
No, there was no ruler from the line of David ruling over Israel during the Maccabean War. The Maccabean Revolt (167–160 BCE) was fought against the Seleucid Empire, a Hellenistic Greek dynasty that controlled Judea.
Really good stuff in there !I am not as persuaded as you are that the text requires Jesus to born before the wars of Ezekiel 38 and 39.
I am aware that in Ezekiel 37:26-28 the new everlasting covenant is predicted.
The "sanctuary" and the "tabernacle" that will be in the midst of God's people forevermore, is of course Jesus.
Going back again to 37:24 "David my servant shall be king over them" we have a similar promise that Jesus will come, and it is future from when Ezekiel speaks.
If we go back just a bit further to 37:21, we will be reading about the two kingdoms (Israel and Judah) becoming one.
That is a matter that very much belongs to the time of the second temple restoration.
So now I begin reading of the judgement on Gog, as it starts in Ezekiel 38, "And the word of the Lord came unto me, saying...."
and it is obvious that I am reading a separate prophesy, given to Ezekiel at a different time from the one in ch. 37.
It does not flow on directly form the new covenant prediction in 37, so in no way does it force us to conclude that this judgement on Gog must be placed in the future of the new covenant.
I am not as persuaded as you are that the text requires Jesus to born before the wars of Ezekiel 38 and 39.
I am aware that in Ezekiel 37:26-28 the new everlasting covenant is predicted.
The "sanctuary" and the "tabernacle" that will be in the midst of God's people forevermore, is of course Jesus.
Going back again to 37:24 "David my servant shall be king over them" we have a similar promise that Jesus will come, and it is future from when Ezekiel speaks.
If we go back just a bit further to 37:21, we will be reading about the two kingdoms (Israel and Judah) becoming one.
That is a matter that very much belongs to the time of the second temple restoration.
So now I begin reading of the judgement on Gog, as it starts in Ezekiel 38, "And the word of the Lord came unto me, saying...."
and it is obvious that I am reading a separate prophesy, given to Ezekiel at a different time from the one in ch. 37.
It does not flow on directly form the new covenant prediction in 37, so in no way does it force us to conclude that this judgement on Gog must be placed in the future of the new covenant.
So the millennium is not without sin?
Satan is still able to inflict damage even while "bound"?
It is sounding more and more like the times we live in.
All part of the tribulation 1st century.
Since you don't know, I'll help you out. In the book of Deuteronomy, God establishes a covenant with Israel. The outline for the book is as follows:
1. Preamble 1:1-5
2. Historical Prologue 1:6-4:49
3. Ethical Stipulations 5:1-26:19
4. Sanctions 27:1-30:20
5. Succession Arrangements 31:1-34:12
The preamble identifies the Lordship of the Great King, stressing His transcendence and imminence. The prologue surveys the previous relationship with His subjects. The stipulations expound the subjects obligations under the covenant. The sanctions outline the blessings for obedience and curses for disobedience. And finally, the arrangements are made for continuity of covenantal relationship for future generations.
Let that soak in awhile, and consider that Israel failed to live up to the terms of the covenant. How do you suppose God would respond? Wouldn't He be forced to bring the sanctions upon Israel for failing to keep the covenant? Hence, this is what we find in the book of Revelation. I'll show you in the next post how the book of Revelation has the exact same outline except God is not initiating a covenant, but ending a covenant.
The sin is found in man not satan....Satan has no influence no one can say the devil made me do it.
what is your point?Another preterist 5 alarm dumpster fire.
Utter fantasy and preposterous on every level. Truly, a tale told by an absolute zealot, full of sound, fury, and approximately zero connection to the text. The following critique is by no means thorough. But my time is far to valuable to be squandered on hosing down smouldering heaps of refuse.
* Ignored Covenant Restoration (Deuteronomy 30): The preterist argues Revelation acts out the curses of Deuteronomy 28 to terminate Israel, but completely ignores Deuteronomy 30, where God explicitly promises that after the curses fall, He will miraculously gather, redeem, and restore Israel permanently.
* Wrong Timeline for Covenant Termination: The Mosaic Covenant was legally ended and fulfilled at the Cross (Colossians 2:14, Hebrews 8:13), not by the Roman destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD. Revelation cannot "terminate" a covenant already abolished decades prior.
* Fabricated "Ethical Stipulations" (Rev 4–7): For a Suzerain-Vassal treaty outline to work, chapters 4–7 must list the laws Israel violated. Instead, they contain heavenly worship, Seal judgments, and the sealing of Jewish witnesses—zero legal stipulations or charges against Israel.
* The "Historical Prologue" Anomaly (Rev 2–3): A covenant prologue reviews the King’s past faithfulness to the vassal. Revelation 2–3 consists of letters to seven predominantly Gentile/mixed churches in Asia Minor addressing their present spiritual states, not national Israel’s history.
* Twisting "Succession Arrangements": Deuteronomy 31–34 (Moses passing the baton to Joshua) was designed to lead the exact same nation into the Promised Land. Preterism twists "succession" into "replacement" (God abandoning Israel), violating the very pattern it claims to use.
* The Rescue Mission (Revelation 19): If Revelation is God’s execution decree against Israel, Christ’s return in chapter 19 makes no sense. He returns to destroy the Gentile armies of the Antichrist gathered at Armageddon to annihilate the Jewish remnant—a rescue, not an execution.
* The Unfulfilled Davidic Kingdom (Rev 20): Preterism must spiritualize Revelation 20 because a literal 1,000-year earthly reign of Christ requires a physically restored, national Israel fulfilling the unconditional covenants.
* Eternal Tribal Names (Rev 21:12): If Revelation 15–22 represents God legally divorcing and replacing Israel, He would not permanently carve the names of the twelve tribes of the sons of Israel into the gates of the New Jerusalem.
* Global Scope vs. Local Curses: Deuteronomy's sanctions were geographically restricted to Israel and its land. Revelation's judgments devastate the entire global ecosystem and explicitly target "every nation, tribe, people, and language" (Rev 7:9).
* The Primary Theme Omitted: The preterist outline completely ignores the central climax of end-time prophecy: the national salvation, deliverance, and reconciliation of Israel (Romans 11:26, Zechariah 12:10).
what is your point?
Commit all the sins right now? No worries, there is a final Reconciliation.
Yet Jesus says, "sin no move "!
One don't know if will live after today.
When one still have breath, repent and return to God.
Enough already encouraging people to sin!!!! Which side are you on?