Israel or Palestine?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
waiting for an apology?

You bear false witness against me and you want me to apologize?

seems like your the one who needs to apologize.. for bearing false witness against my belief..
what belief?
is Daniel 9 fulfilled?
is satan or some other demonic figure the one who makes the covenant with Israel?
or was it Jesus?
did God fulfill His Promises to Israel?
is there a future 1,000 years?
is chosen Israel just blinded until all the gentiles get saved?

what false witness?
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
what belief?
is Daniel 9 fulfilled?
is satan or some other demonic figure the one who makes the covenant with Israel?
or was it Jesus?
did God fulfill His Promises to Israel?
is there a future 1,000 years?
is chosen Israel just blinded until all the gentiles get saved?

what false witness?
I am NOT dual covenant. I do not believe Any one is or has ever been saved by the law..yet I have said this many times,, you still do not believe me.

none of the rest matters because it is not salvic.

You make it salvic by demanding I am dual covenant, You are wrong.

so are you going to apologize. or claim I still believe jews are saved by a different covenant? Your the only person I know in this chat room that think I am..
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
I am NOT dual covenant. I do not believe Any one is or has ever been saved by the law..yet I have said this many times,, you still do not believe me.

none of the rest matters because it is not salvic.

You make it salvic by demanding I am dual covenant, You are wrong.

so are you going to apologize. or claim I still believe jews are saved by a different covenant? Your the only person I know in this chat room that think I am..
is Daniel 9 fulfilled?
is satan or some other demonic figure the one who makes the covenant with Israel?
or was it Jesus?
did God fulfill His Promises to Israel?
is there a future 1,000 years?
is chosen Israel just blinded until all the gentiles get saved?

what false witness?
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,729
3,661
113
Many Popes spoke quite eloquently, for many in this forum, through punitive supersessionism.

Pope Clement VIII: “The Bible itself says that the Jews are an accursed people.”

Pope Innocent III: “The Jews, by their own guilt, are consigned to perpetual servitude because they crucified the Lord.” (To the Archbishops of Sens and Paris)

Pope Saint Pius V: “In order to make an end of all doubt concerning the colour of the cap and the sign of the women, we declare that the colour must be yellow.” (Romanus Pontifex)

Pope Benedict XIV: “It is fitting for Jews to serve Christians, but not for Christians to serve Jews. On the contrary, the Jews, as slaves rejected by that Saviour Whose death they wickedly contrived, should recognize themselves in fact and in creed the slaves of those whom the death of Christ has set free, even as it has rendered them bondmen.” (Quoting Pope Innocent III, “Etsi Judaeos”)

Pope Innocent III: “When Jews are admitted out of pity into familiar intercourse with Christians, they repay their hosts, according to the popular proverb, after the fashion of the rat hidden in the sack, or the snake in the bosom, or of the burning brand in one’s lap.”

Pope Gregory IX: “Ungrateful for favours and forgetful of benefits, the Jews return insult for kindness and impious contempt for goodness.” (Epistle to the Hierarchy of Germany)

Pope Stephen III: “With great sorrow and mortal anxiety, We have heard that the Jews have in a Christian land the same rights as Christians, that Christian men and women live under the same roof with these traitors and defile their souls day and night with blasphemies.” (Epistle to the Bishop of Norbonne)

Pope Innocent IV: “The wicked perfidy of the Jews - from whose hearts Our Saviour did not remove the veil because of their enormous crimes but caused them justly to continue in their blindness, commit acts of shame which engender astonishment in those who hear, and terror in those who discover it.” (The Wicked Perfidy of the Jews)

Pope Gregory IX: “We order all our brother bishops absolutely to suppress the blasphemy of Jews in your dioceses, churches, and communities, so that they do not dare raise their necks, bent under eternal slavery, to revile the Redeemer.”

Pope Saint Pius V: “Besides usury, through which Jews everywhere have sucked dry the property of impoverished Christians, they are accomplices of thieves and robbers.” (Hebraeorum Gens)

Pope Benedict XIV: “Furthermore, by means of their particular practice of commerce, they amass a great store of money and then by an exorbitant rate of interest utterly destroy the wealth and inheritance of Christians.” (A Quo Primum)

Pope Clement VIII: “All the world suffers from the usury of the Jews, their monopolies and deceit. They have brought many unfortunate people into a state of poverty, especially the farmers, working class people and the very poor. […] Their ethical and moral doctrines as well as their deeds rightly deserve to be exposed to criticism in whatever country they happen to live.”

Pope Innocent III: “The Lord made Cain a wanderer and a fugitive over the earth, but set a mark upon him, making his head to shake, lest anyone finding him should slay him. Thus the Jews, against whom the blood of Christ calls out, although they ought not to be wiped out, nevertheless, as wanderers they must remain upon the earth until their faces are filled with shame and they seek the name of the Lord Jesus Christ.” (Epistle to the Count of Nevers)

Pope Saint Sylvester I at the First Ecumenical Council of Nicea: “Concerning the prohibition of usury and base gain by the clergy; and concerning the prohibition against conversing or eating with the Jews. No priest shall set money out at interest or take unfair profit or be friendly or sociable with Jews; nor should anyone take food or drink with the Jews; for if this was decreed by the holy apostles, it is incumbent upon the faithful to obey their command; and the synod shall excommunicate any one who does not comply with this order.”

Pope Eugene IV: “We decree and order that from now on, and for all time, Christians shall not eat or drink with the Jews, nor admit them to feasts, nor cohabit with them, nor bathe with them. […] They cannot live among Christians, but in a certain street, separated and segregated from Christians, and outside which they cannot under any pretext have houses.”

Pope Alexander III: “Our ways of life and those of the Jews are utterly different, and Jews will easily pervert the souls of simple folk to their superstition and unbelief if such folk are living in continual and intimate intercourse with them.” (Ad Haec)

Pope Martin V: “However, we received a short time ago through credible reports knowledge to our great alarm, that various Jews of both sexes in Cafas and other cities, lands and places overseas, which fall under the jurisdiction of Christians, are of obstinate mind and, in order to conceal swindling and wickedness, wear no special sign on their clothing, so that they are not recognisable as Jews. They are not ashamed to give themselves out as Christians before many Christians of both sexes of these cities, districts and places mentioned, who could not in fact identify them, and consequently commit shameful things and crimes.” (Sedes Apostolica)

Pope Eugene IV: “We decree and order that from now on, and for all time […] All and every single Jew, of whatever sex and age, must everywhere wear the distinctive dress and known marks by which they can be evidently distinguished from Christians.”

Pope Saint Pius V: “With full understanding and in exercising of the apostolic powers, we withdraw from the Jews and their rule (and recognize no right or claim) all properties, which the Jews have in their possession in this city Rome or other places of our domain of rule.” (*** Nos Super)

Pope Paul IV: “It is too absurd and pointless that the Jews, whom their own guilt condemns to slavery, under the pretence that Christian piety suffers and tolerates their coexistence, pay back [with wickedness] the mercy received from Christians.” (*** Nimis Absurdum)

Pope Leo VII: “Let the Gospel be preached unto them and, if they remain obstinate, let them be expelled.”

Pope Adrian I at the Second Ecumenical Council of Nicea: “Since certain, erring in the superstitions of the Hebrews, have thought to mock at Christ our God, and feigning to be converted to the religion of Christ do deny him, and in private and secretly keep the Sabbath and observe other Jewish customs, we decree that such persons be not received to communion, nor to prayers, nor into the Church; but let them be openly Hebrew according to their religion, and let them not bring their children to baptism, nor purchase or possess a slave.”

Pope Innocent IV: “We who long with all our hearts for the salvation of souls, grant you full authority by these present letters to banish the Jews, either in your own person or through the agency of others, especially since, as we have been informed, they do not abide by the regulations drawn up for them by this Holy See.” (To the King of France)

Pope Saint Martin I: “If anyone shall teach a slave, under pretext of piety, to despise his master and to run away from his service, and not to serve his own master with good-will and all honour, let him be anathema.”

Pope Benedict XIV: “It is fitting for Jews to serve Christians, but not for Christians to serve Jews. On the contrary, the Jews, as slaves rejected by that Saviour Whose death they wickedly contrived, should recognize themselves in fact and in creed the slaves of those whom the death of Christ has set free, even as it has rendered them bondmen.” (Quoting Pope Innocent III, “Etsi Judaeos”)

Pope Gregory IX: “They ought to know the yoke of perpetual enslavement because of their guilt. See to it that the perfidious Jews never in the future become insolent, but that they always suffer publicly the shame of their sin in servile fear.” (Epistle to the Hierarchy of Germany)

Pope Alexander III at the Third Lateran Ecumenical Council: “We declare that the evidence of Christians is to be accepted against Jews in every case, since Jews employ their own witnesses against Christians - and that those who prefer Jews to Christians in this matter are to lie under anathema, since Jews ought to be slaves to Christians.” (Canon 26)
The Popes Against The Jews

Pope Innocent III: “The Jews, by their own guilt, are consigned to perpetual servitude because they crucified the Lord.” (To the Archbishops of Sens and Paris)

Pope Innocent IV: “And that you [King Saint Louis IX] order both the aforesaid abusive books [The Talmud] condemned by the same doctors and generally all the books with their glosses which were examined and condemned by them to be burned by fire wherever they can be found throughout your entire kingdom, strictly forbidding that Jews henceforth have Christian nurses or servants, that the sons of a free woman may not serve the sons of a bondwoman, but as slaves condemned by the Lord, whose death they wickedly plotted, they at least outwardly recognize themselves as slaves of those whom the death of Christ made free and themselves slaves. So we may commend the zeal of your sincerity in the Lord with due praises.” (The Wicked Perfidy of the Jews)

Pope Saint Martin I: “If anyone shall teach a slave, under pretext of piety, to despise his master and to run away from his service, and not to serve his own master with good-will and all honour, let him be anathema.”

Pope Gregory IX: “They ought to know the yoke of perpetual enslavement because of their guilt. See to it that the perfidious Jews never in the future become insolent, but that they always suffer publicly the shame of their sin in servile fear.” (Epistle to the Hierarchy of Germany)

Pope Alexander III at the Third Lateran Ecumenical Council: “We declare that the evidence of Christians is to be accepted against Jews in every case, since Jews employ their own witnesses against Christians - and that those who prefer Jews to Christians in this matter are to lie under anathema, since Jews ought to be slaves to Christians.” (Canon 26)
I find this quite interesting (but not new) since Rome claims their positions have not changed over the centuries.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
I find this quite interesting (but not new) since Rome claims their positions have not changed over the centuries.
but:

Commission of the Holy See for Religious Relations with the Jews
The Holy See - The Roman Curia - Pontifical Councils - Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity < click

and :

The most recent document published by the Pontifical Biblical Commission on The Jewish People and Their Sacred Scriptures in the Christian Bible (2001), after recognizing the "surprising strength of the spiritual bonds that united the Church of Christ to the Jewish people" (n. 85), concludes by noting that "in the past, the break between the Jewish people and the Church of Christ Jesus might at times have seemed complete in certain periods and in certain places. In the light of the Scriptures, this should never have happened, because a complete break between the Church and the Synagogue is in contradiction to Sacred Scripture" (ibid.).

Thus, in the contemporary context, which cannot ignore the appalling slaughter of the Shoah in the 20th century, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, introducing this document, asks the question: "Did not the presentation of the Jews and of the Jewish people, in the New Testament itself, contribute to creating a hostility to this people which the ideology of those who wanted to suppress it has encouraged?". The document honestly admits that many passages in the New Testament that are critical of the Jews "served as a pretext for anti-Jewish sentiment and, effectively, have been used for this purpose" (n. 87). A few years earlier, Pope John Paul II himself had said that "in the Christian world - I do not say on the part of the Church as such - erroneous and unjust interpretations of the New Testament regarding the Jewish people and their alleged culpability have circulated for too long, engendering feelings of hostility towards this people" (Address to Participants in a Symposium on "The Roots of Anti-Judaism in the Christian Milieu", n. 1, 31 October 1997; ORE, 5 November 1997, p. 1).

"there is need for acknowledgment of the common roots linking Christianity and the Jewish people, who are called by God to a covenant which remains irrevocable (cf. Rom 11: 29) and has attained definitive fullness in Christ. Consequently, it is necessary to encourage dialogue with Judaism, knowing that it is fundamentally important for the self-knowledge of Christians and for the transcending of divisions between the Churches" (ibid.). Dialogue and collaboration between Christians and Jews "also implies that "acknowledgment be given to any part which the children of the Church have had in the growth and spread of anti-Semitism in history; forgiveness must be sought for this from God, and every effort must be made to favour encounters of reconciliation and of friendship with the sons of Israel'" (ibid.).

In this spirit of rediscovered brotherhood a new springtime for the Church and for the world can bloom once more, with the heart turned from Rome to Jerusalem and to the land of the Fathers, so that there too a just and lasting peace may quickly germinate for all and mature like a banner flying in the midst of the peoples.

Anti-semitism: A wound to be healed < click
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
in any case this absurd and bigoted pseudoscience has since been tossed into the garbage bin of history where it belongs...
will you please draft a letter informing the khazarian jews of your findings please.

you are an authority based on a few early (debunked themselves) attempts to attribute these people and their real history to antisemitic nazis.

please be sure to inform them their history needs to go into the trash where it belongs.



"The history of Khazaria presents us with a fascinating example of how Jewish life flourished in the Middle Ages. In a time when Jews were persecuted thruout Christian Europe, the kingdom of Khazaria was a beacon of hope. Jews were able to flourish in Khazaria because of the tolerance of the Khazar rulers, who invited Byzantine and Persian Jewish refugees to settle in their country. Due to the influence of these refugees, the Khazars found the Jewish religion to be appealing and adopted Judaism in large numbers.

Most of the available information about the Khazars comes from Arabic, Hebrew, Armenian, Byzantine, and Slavic sources, most of which are reliable. There is also a large quantity of archaeological evidence concerning the Khazars that illuminates multiple aspects of the Khazarian economy (arts and crafts, trade, agriculture, fishing, etc.) as well as burial practices.

Origins. The Khazars were a Turkic1 people who originated in Central Asia. The early Turkic tribes were quite diverse, although it is believed that reddish hair was predominant among them prior to the Mongol conquests. In the beginning, the Khazars believed in Tengri shamanism, spoke a Turkic language, and were nomadic. Later, the Khazars adopted Judaism, Islam, and Christianity, learned Hebrew and Slavic, and became settled in cities and towns thruout the north Caucasus and Ukraine. The Khazars had a great history of ethnic independence extending approximately 800 years from the 5th to the 13th century.

The earliest history of the Khazars in southern Russia, prior to the middle of the 6th century, is hidden in obscurity. From about 550 to 630, the Khazars were part of the Western Turkish Empire, ruled by the Celestial Blue Turks (Kök Turks). When the Western Turkish Empire was broken up as a result of civil wars in the middle of the 7th century, the Khazars successfully asserted their independence. Yet, the Kök kaganate under which they had lived provided the Khazars with their system of government. For example, the Khazars followed the same guidelines as the Kök Turks regarding the succession of kings.

An Introduction to the History of Khazaria < click


"Most of the available information about the Khazars comes from Arabic, Hebrew, Armenian, Byzantine, and Slavic sources, most of which are reliable."

while you are informing everyone of your findings (racist nazi ideological trash), please contact the custodians and scholars responsible for the above sources.

please, as well, revise the history books which record scores of travelers and regional contemporaries who testified and record their own histories and observations that the Khazars were - first - pagan shamanistic gentiles, who under the influence of immigrant Rabbinic families (who married into the Khazarian Royalty and found favor in the courts) - virtually the entire nation converted to Talmudic Judaism, and over a few short generations (after destroying most remnants of their pagan past, phallic idols etc, due to their new beliefs)...ALL BEGAN TO BELIEVE THEY WERE ANCIENT ISRAELITES.

did you see where they migrated to after their final conquest and the dissolution of their Kingdom?

so, do the KHAZARS themselves CLAIM to be ancient israelites or don't they? no they DON'T.

they had some intermarriage (see site), and they migrated to various places (see site).
so, though DNA is a bogus way to determine anything to any definitive degree and there really ought to be no reason for it (unless racists need to prove racial purity or heritage for some 'important' reason), of course you are going to find SOME connection - they considered themsleves jews and married jews!

that doesn't ake them israelites and they never claimed to be.

they converted to Judaism 700 years AFTER CHRIST.

you'll find these artifacts at Khazaria.com - they are not ashamed of their heritage, but perhaps they'll believe you that their history belongs in the garbage can.





Ukrainian Prince Sviatoslav's defeat of the Khazar army c. 968 A.D.
Hexagram on Khazar shield.


.........................


The Star of David, known in Hebrew as the Shield of David or Magen David (Hebrew מָגֵן דָּוִד; Biblical Hebrew Māḡēn Dāwīḏ [maːˈɣeːn daːˈwiːð], Tiberian [mɔˈɣen dɔˈvið], Modern Hebrew [maˈɡen daˈvid], Ashkenazi Hebrew and Yiddish Mogein Dovid [ˈmɔɡeɪn ˈdɔvid] or Mogen Dovid) is a generally recognized symbol of Jewish identity and Judaism.[1] Its shape is that of a hexagram, the compound of two equilateral triangles. The hexagram has been in use as a symbol of Judaism since the 17th century, with precedents in the 14th to 16th centuries in Central Europe, where the Shield of David was partly used in conjunction with the Seal of Solomon (the hexagram) on Jewish flags. Its use probably derives from medieval (11th to 13th century) Jewish protective amulets (segulot).

Star of David - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia < click
 
Last edited:

Drett

Senior Member
Feb 16, 2013
1,663
38
48
drett....all you have to do is claim the name of Israel, and presto.
everything you want you get.
you have to have laid down 2000 years worth of lies first, but it works out in the end.
Then I better get going. Do you if there are any vacancies in the media or banking sector ?
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,729
3,661
113
but:

Commission of the Holy See for Religious Relations with the Jews
The Holy See - The Roman Curia - Pontifical Councils - Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity < click

and :

The most recent document published by the Pontifical Biblical Commission on The Jewish People and Their Sacred Scriptures in the Christian Bible (2001), after recognizing the "surprising strength of the spiritual bonds that united the Church of Christ to the Jewish people" (n. 85), concludes by noting that "in the past, the break between the Jewish people and the Church of Christ Jesus might at times have seemed complete in certain periods and in certain places. In the light of the Scriptures, this should never have happened, because a complete break between the Church and the Synagogue is in contradiction to Sacred Scripture" (ibid.).

Thus, in the contemporary context, which cannot ignore the appalling slaughter of the Shoah in the 20th century, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, introducing this document, asks the question: "Did not the presentation of the Jews and of the Jewish people, in the New Testament itself, contribute to creating a hostility to this people which the ideology of those who wanted to suppress it has encouraged?". The document honestly admits that many passages in the New Testament that are critical of the Jews "served as a pretext for anti-Jewish sentiment and, effectively, have been used for this purpose" (n. 87). A few years earlier, Pope John Paul II himself had said that "in the Christian world - I do not say on the part of the Church as such - erroneous and unjust interpretations of the New Testament regarding the Jewish people and their alleged culpability have circulated for too long, engendering feelings of hostility towards this people" (Address to Participants in a Symposium on "The Roots of Anti-Judaism in the Christian Milieu", n. 1, 31 October 1997; ORE, 5 November 1997, p. 1).

"there is need for acknowledgment of the common roots linking Christianity and the Jewish people, who are called by God to a covenant which remains irrevocable (cf. Rom 11: 29) and has attained definitive fullness in Christ. Consequently, it is necessary to encourage dialogue with Judaism, knowing that it is fundamentally important for the self-knowledge of Christians and for the transcending of divisions between the Churches" (ibid.). Dialogue and collaboration between Christians and Jews "also implies that "acknowledgment be given to any part which the children of the Church have had in the growth and spread of anti-Semitism in history; forgiveness must be sought for this from God, and every effort must be made to favour encounters of reconciliation and of friendship with the sons of Israel'" (ibid.).

In this spirit of rediscovered brotherhood a new springtime for the Church and for the world can bloom once more, with the heart turned from Rome to Jerusalem and to the land of the Fathers, so that there too a just and lasting peace may quickly germinate for all and mature like a banner flying in the midst of the peoples.

Anti-semitism: A wound to be healed < click
The chameleon lives on. chameleon.jpg
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,729
3,661
113
Yes the Jews were scattered into all the earth as the Scriptures foretold ...even Europe with the promise that He would bring them back. Besides they have been returning from all over the earth...not just Europe.
Drett,
Did I get an amen? Besides the reason for the preponderance of European Jews in Israel is due to the fact that they were the ones with a strong motive to leave Europe after the Holocaust.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,729
3,661
113
Great! So then we agree that antichrist is about "the spirit of antichrist", and not at all about an individual boogieman.
2 Timothy 4:3-4 For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; 4 And they shall turn away [their] ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.
My only question here is if the antichrist is not an individual...

and the devil who had deceived them was thrown into the lake of fire and sulfur where the beast and the false prophet were, and they will be tormented day and night forever and ever.
(Rev 20:10)


how do you throw the "the spirit of antichrist" into the lake of fire?
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
eyup

In this spirit of rediscovered brotherhood a new springtime for the Church and for the world can bloom once more, with the heart turned from Rome to Jerusalem and to the land of the Fathers, so that there too a just and lasting peace may quickly germinate for all and mature like a banner flying in the midst of the peoples.

there ya have it.
 
Feb 17, 2013
1,034
9
0
eyup

In this spirit of rediscovered brotherhood a new springtime for the Church and for the world can bloom once more, with the heart turned from Rome to Jerusalem and to the land of the Fathers, so that there too a just and lasting peace may quickly germinate for all and mature like a banner flying in the midst of the peoples.

there ya have it.
all I can say is wow, you came up with that, wow I greatly differ. but that is poetic. wow
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
all I can say is wow, you came up with that, wow I greatly differ. but that is poetic. wow
pardon?

that came from here:

but:

Commission of the Holy See for Religious Relations with the Jews
The Holy See - The Roman Curia - Pontifical Councils - Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity < click

and :

The most recent document published by the Pontifical Biblical Commission on The Jewish People and Their Sacred Scriptures in the Christian Bible (2001), after recognizing the "surprising strength of the spiritual bonds that united the Church of Christ to the Jewish people" (n. 85), concludes by noting that "in the past, the break between the Jewish people and the Church of Christ Jesus might at times have seemed complete in certain periods and in certain places. In the light of the Scriptures, this should never have happened, because a complete break between the Church and the Synagogue is in contradiction to Sacred Scripture" (ibid.).

Thus, in the contemporary context, which cannot ignore the appalling slaughter of the Shoah in the 20th century, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, introducing this document, asks the question: "Did not the presentation of the Jews and of the Jewish people, in the New Testament itself, contribute to creating a hostility to this people which the ideology of those who wanted to suppress it has encouraged?". The document honestly admits that many passages in the New Testament that are critical of the Jews "served as a pretext for anti-Jewish sentiment and, effectively, have been used for this purpose" (n. 87). A few years earlier, Pope John Paul II himself had said that "in the Christian world - I do not say on the part of the Church as such - erroneous and unjust interpretations of the New Testament regarding the Jewish people and their alleged culpability have circulated for too long, engendering feelings of hostility towards this people" (Address to Participants in a Symposium on "The Roots of Anti-Judaism in the Christian Milieu", n. 1, 31 October 1997; ORE, 5 November 1997, p. 1).

"there is need for acknowledgment of the common roots linking Christianity and the Jewish people, who are called by God to a covenant which remains irrevocable (cf. Rom 11: 29) and has attained definitive fullness in Christ. Consequently, it is necessary to encourage dialogue with Judaism, knowing that it is fundamentally important for the self-knowledge of Christians and for the transcending of divisions between the Churches" (ibid.). Dialogue and collaboration between Christians and Jews "also implies that "acknowledgment be given to any part which the children of the Church have had in the growth and spread of anti-Semitism in history; forgiveness must be sought for this from God, and every effort must be made to favour encounters of reconciliation and of friendship with the sons of Israel'" (ibid.).

In this spirit of rediscovered brotherhood a new springtime for the Church and for the world can bloom once more, with the heart turned from Rome to Jerusalem and to the land of the Fathers, so that there too a just and lasting peace may quickly germinate for all and mature like a banner flying in the midst of the peoples.

Anti-semitism: A wound to be healed < click
that was always the plan.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,729
3,661
113
eyup

In this spirit of rediscovered brotherhood a new springtime for the Church and for the world can bloom once more, with the heart turned from Rome to Jerusalem and to the land of the Fathers, so that there too a just and lasting peace may quickly germinate for all and mature like a banner flying in the midst of the peoples.

there ya have it.
See my sig...:cool:
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
is Daniel 9 fulfilled?
is satan or some other demonic figure the one who makes the covenant with Israel?
or was it Jesus?
did God fulfill His Promises to Israel?
is there a future 1,000 years?
is chosen Israel just blinded until all the gentiles get saved?

what false witness?
So the truth comes out. You are unwilling to admit anything.

As I told Abiding and bookends.. Our views only differ because you see daniel 9 as salvic I do not. Since this is the case. we can not agree on things of prophey concerning Israel. You see them all (salvic) fulfilled in Christ on the cross. I see them all (non salvic) only to be fulfilled when Israel repents and turns from their sin and recieves Christ.

since you see Dan 9 as salvic YOU MUST proclaim (falsely I might add) that I am Dual covenant (jews saved under mosaic covenant gentiles saved under new covenant) or some assemblance of it which is false. Since I do not believe it is salvic. It does not matter what answer I give,, We will not agree. and you will condemn me, which you have.

finally I might add.. Do I believe jews are blinded until all gentiles are saved? If you would ever read what I post. you would have seen I FOUGHT THIS LIE TOOTH AND NAIL.. with a few people in the last two weeks in other threads which you were very active in, and you would not have asked such a question, because you would have known it is not true.
 
A

Abiding

Guest
So the truth comes out. You are unwilling to admit anything.

As I told Abiding and bookends.. Our views only differ because you see daniel 9 as salvic I do not. Since this is the case. we can not agree on things of prophey concerning Israel. You see them all (salvic) fulfilled in Christ on the cross. I see them all (non salvic) only to be fulfilled when Israel repents and turns from their sin and recieves Christ.

since you see Dan 9 as salvic YOU MUST proclaim (falsely I might add) that I am Dual covenant (jews saved under mosaic covenant gentiles saved under new covenant) or some assemblance of it which is false. Since I do not believe it is salvic. It does not matter what answer I give,, We will not agree. and you will condemn me, which you have.

finally I might add.. Do I believe jews are blinded until all gentiles are saved? If you would ever read what I post. you would have seen I FOUGHT THIS LIE TOOTH AND NAIL.. with a few people in the last two weeks in other threads which you were very active in, and you would not have asked such a question, because you would have known it is not true.
Dan 9 = non salvic
No wonder i like poking you with a long stick:p
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
lol crossnote...you are funny.

Zech 14:4 And his feet shall stand in that day upon the mount of Olives, which [is] before Jerusalem on the east, and the mount of Olives shall cleave in the midst thereof toward the east and toward the west, [and there shall be] a very great valley; and half of the mountain shall remove toward the north, and half of it toward the south.

fulfilled bud;)
 
A

Abiding

Guest
Ive heard Dan 9 referred to as the Holy of Holies of Gods redemptive plan.
So certainly it not salvic:p duh! drool! ok!